UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

The White House Briefing Room


November 2, 1998

PRESS BRIEFING BY JOE LOCKHART

2:45 P.M. EST

                                  THE WHITE HOUSE
                           Office of the Press Secretary
______________________________________________________________
For Immediate Release                                         November 2, 1998     
                                PRESS BRIEFING BY 
                                   JOE LOCKHART 
		
                                The Briefing Room     		    
2:45 P.M. EST
		
		MR. LOCKHART:  Good afternoon.  What can I do for you? 
		Q     Nothing.
		MR. LOCKHART:  Okay.  Thank you very much.  We're not going to 
pursue that, Mark.  (Laughter.)
............
	     
	     Q	  How do you assess the status of the presidency in 
the wake of the events of this year?  Is it held in as high esteem 
around the world or has it been diminished?
	     MR. LOCKHART:  If you're asking for my opinion, I think 
if you look at the goings on and what's happened in the last month 
alone, the President has been strong and forceful for getting a 
budget deal that has unprecedented investments in education as far as 
100,000 teachers and Pell Grants, Head Start, things like that -- to 
the agreement that they reached on the Eastern Shore of Maryland 
between Israel and the Palestinians.  So I think if you look at the 
results and try to peal away some of the partisan rhetoric that seems 
to pervade the dialogue recently, you'll see a President that is 
leading and that is strong.
	     Q	  Is the President going to be talking to any foreign 
leaders on Iraq, or has he done so already today?
	     MR. LOCKHART:  I don't believe he's had conversations 
today.  I think you can assume that conversations are going on 
throughout our government with our allies.  Let me tell you a little 
bit.  The President met with his foreign policy team for about an 
hour, starting about noontime.  The meeting was -- participating in 
the meeting were Sandy Berger, the President's National Security 
Advisor; Secretaries Albright and Cohen; CIA Direct Tenet; Joint 
Chief Chairman Shelton; John Podesta; Jim Steinberg; and some others.
	     They reviewed the situation on the ground, discussed the 
new Iraqi position as articulated over the weekend, and discussed the 
strong and unanimous reaction from the international community.  The 
President and his team reviewed and discussed potential options for 
next steps.  No decisions were made beyond the President asking the 
Secretary of Defense to travel to Europe and to the region to consult 
with our allies.  The details of that trip you can get from the 
Pentagon. 
	     Q	  Are military strikes among the options?
	     MR. LOCKHART:  I think we have said repeatedly that all 
options are on the table, and that means all options are on the 
table.
	     Q	  Do you feel that the allies in the region, the 
Saudis and the others, will support the use of force, if necessary? 
	     MR. LOCKHART:  I'm not going to speculate on a 
hypothetical.
	     Q	  We've heard the President say that all options are 
on the table many times before.  Isn't there a danger that Saddam 
Hussein could just view this as more empty threats from the United 
States? 
	     MR. LOCKHART:  I think that we're going to review the 
situation.  The steps he's taken are unacceptable.  The threat and 
the inhibiting and restriction of long-term monitoring is a very 
serious situation.  But I'm not going to get into what the options 
are that are being considered. 
	     Q	  Does the U.S. think it has, currently, the 
authorization to engage in a military strike against Iraq should it 
so decide that that's the proper course of action?
	     MR. LOCKHART:  Yes. 
	     Q	  Joe, with President Clinton facing impeachment 
proceedings in perhaps two weeks, is there any concern that Saddam 
Hussein might be emboldened to engage in adventurism because of his 
perceived weakness?
	     MR. LOCKHART:  You know, I think Saddam Hussein has a 
history of miscalculations on a very grand scale.  I think if you 
look at it from his situation, what he's been trying to do this year 
is get out from under the punitive sanctions that the international 
community has placed upon him.  And he's trying to do that by 
dividing the international community.  	     And every step he takes, 
he gets the opposite result.  We know that the U.N. articulated a 
very strong statement in August when they withdrew the six-month 
review of sanctions, and they acted decisively and unanimously over 
the weekend in issuing a statement.  So what he's trying to do to get 
out from under the sanctions is just not working.
	     Q	  It doesn't enter into the mix then?
	     MR. LOCKHART:  Well, you're asking me to get inside his 
head, and I think that's a very precarious and not necessarily 
fruitful venture for me.
	     Q	  Joe, you say he hasn't been successful with each of 
these steps he's taken.  But at the same time, there's been no 
adverse action against him.  I mean, the sanctions haven't been 
lifted --
	     MR. LOCKHART:  I think there has been an adverse action.  
If you look at where we were earlier in the year, there was some 
belief -- there was some split in the international community, and 
his actions against UNSCOM brought the international community back 
together firmly committed to getting cooperation from him.  And as 
his end game -- his end game is to get from underneath these 
sanctions.  And the U.N. in August suspended the sanctions review, 
thus creating a serious problem for him.
	     Q	  What makes you think that's his end game?  Why 
couldn't his end game just be an end to the U.N. inspections that 
let's him reconstitute his weapons program?
	     MR. LOCKHART:  Well, I think we'll take him at his word 
on what his end game is because he's repeatedly and clearly 
articulated that he thinks the sanctions are unfair and need to be 
lifted.
	     Q	  His Deputy Prime Minister, Tariq Aziz, said that 
the reason they suspended this cooperation is because the U.S. has 
decided -- the Clinton administration, like the Bush administration 
before it -- that no matter he does, as long as Saddam Hussein is in 
power, the sanctions will never be removed.  Is that the Clinton 
administration's position?
	     MR. LOCKHART:  Our administration and I think the 
international community's position is that he ought to cooperate 
fully with UNSCOM, that we need to deter his ability to threaten his 
neighbors and to reconstitute his weapons of mass destruction.  And 
they can play all the word games they want, but none of it matters 
until they actually do what they agreed to do at the end of the Gulf 
War.
	     Q	  Can they be removed with Saddam Hussein still in 
power?
	     MR. LOCKHART:  We need to have cooperation and 
compliance before that discussion happens.  As you'll remember, what 
may have precipitated some of the things over the weekend is the U.N. 
Security Council said come into cooperation with UNSCOM, and we'll 
review the sanctions with or without any predetermined idea whether 
they could -- whether they were in compliance or not.  But that's a 
discussion for down the road.
	     Q	  Joe, is the administration now having to fix a 
problem that it handed off to Kofi Annan last February?
	     MR. LOCKHART:  No, I don't think so.  I think the 
international community is united from the Security Council, Kofi 
Annan, the U.S. government, that we need -- UNSCOM needs cooperation 
and Saddam Hussein needs to get that message.  And until he does, 
there will be no further discussion of lifting any sanctions or 
reviewing sanctions.
	     Q	  Do the allies, Joe, have adequate military forces 
in the region now in case the military option has to be exercised?
	     MR. LOCKHART:  Without speculating about what options 
might be used or might not be used, you'll remember from earlier this 
year we talked about reconfiguring the forces in the region so that 
they could act quickly and forcefully.
	     Q	  Joe, you've made a point of saying that no options 
are off the table.  As long as the inspectors remain inside Iraq, 
though, it would seem that at least one option is constrained while 
they're there.  Does the United States feel that it's time to remove 
those inspectors since they are not able to inspect at this point and 
are -- 
	     MR. LOCKHART:  I think the United States believes it's 
time to let those inspectors do the work they were sent there to do, 
and I'm not going to go beyond that. 
	     Q	  If Iraq moves against Israel again, would the 
President ask Bibi to sit it out?  And if he did, do they have that 
kind of relationship? 
	     MR. LOCKHART:  We're getting way too far down the road 
and I'm not going to speculate on hypotheticals like that. 
..........
	     Q	  Thank you. 
             END                          3:15 P.M. EST
#012-11/02   



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list