UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

USIS Washington File

07 October 1998

UNSCOM CONCERNED ABOUT MONITORING OF IRAQI WEAPONS SITES

(Reports on progress disarming Iraq) (1340)
By Judy Aita
USIA United Nations Correspondent
United Nations -- The Special Commission overseeing the destruction of
Iraqi weapons (UNSCOM) reported to the Security Council October 6 that
it is close to having a complete accounting of Iraq's ballistic
missile and chemical weapons programs, but warned that its monitoring
of Baghdad's weapons programs is being carried out "only at a less
than satisfactory level."
In a major six-month report to the council, UNSCOM Chairman Richard
Butler said that monitoring is vital to ensuring that Baghdad does not
reacquire the banned chemical, biological and nuclear weapons and
ballistic missiles in the future. The report comes at a tense time
between Iraq and the United Nations. In August Iraq announced that it
would no longer allow intrusive inspections or cooperate with UNSCOM
other than to allow the monitoring of certain sites to continue.
Another highly contentious issue is the report of tests conducted by a
U.S. Army laboratory that found traces of the deadly VX nerve gas on
warhead fragments. Iraq has claimed that it did not get to the stage
in its VX research to use the agent in weapons. UNSCOM is now waiting
for the results of tests on other fragments being conducted in France
and Switzerland.
A high-level Iraqi delegation, led by Deputy Prime Minister Tariq
Aziz, has been at the United Nations for ten days talking with
Secretary General Kofi Annan and some members of the Security Council.
The Iraqis say they have given all the information on the banned
weapons programs to UNSCOM and it is now time to lift sanctions.
The Security Council, however, has declared that it will not consider
lifting sanctions until Iraq resumes cooperation with the weapons
inspectors.
The council is scheduled to discuss the reports of UNSCOM and the
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on October 13.
IAEA reported to the council that the agency believes it has a
coherent picture of Iraq's clandestine nuclear program based on the
information available to date. At the same time, IAEA pointed out, it
cannot guarantee that all items have been found and the current
stalemate does nothing to help the situation.
Citing "a major accomplishment," Butler said UNSCOM was able to
account for the destruction of between 43 to 45 of the 45 operational
special warheads Iraq said it unilaterally destroyed in 1991.
But he reported that Iraq's declarations on the unilateral destruction
of special warheads does not match all the physical evidence collected
at the destruction sites. And the VX issue needs to be resolved in
order for UNSCOM to verify the number of warheads produced and
unilaterally destroyed.
The most important outstanding issues in the chemical weapons area
include the accounting for 550 artillery shells filled with mustard
chemical warfare agent, verification of the unilateral destruction of
R-400 chemical and biological aerial bombs, accounting for the
production of the chemical warfare agent VX, and verification of
Iraq's declaration on production equipment.
A chemical analysis of a dozen mustard-filled shells found at a former
chemical weapons storage facility in 1997 and 1998 revealed that the
mustard was still "of the highest quality," the report said.
Butler also reported that:
-- Iraq refused to discuss the issue of liquid ballistic missile
propellant and denied access to documents that would help in
verification;
-- Accounting of conventional warheads was "significantly advanced,"
but Iraq has failed to provide UNSCOM with information relating to
some 50 warheads that have not been recovered;
-- the issue of seven indigenously produced missiles remains
unresolved;
-- progress has been achieved in developing a rough material balance
between components and the number of missile engines Iraq claims to
have had; and
-- the remnants of some 30 indigenously produced conventional missile
warheads which Iraq said were unilaterally destroyed have not yet been
found.
In the biological weapons areas, the commission has not been able to
verify the number of anthrax and botulinum toxin missile warheads nor
get a consistent explanation for the number of weapons filled with
biological weapons, the report said.
"The development of the drop tank for dissemination of biological
weapon agents appears to have been pursued with the utmost vigor by
Iraq," the report said. "The team of international experts assessed
that the account in the FFCD (full, final, complete disclosure) of the
drop tank project could not be verified."
UNSCOM said it still does not have sufficient information on
biological weapons production levels, Iraq's acquisition of growth
media, and the disposition of biological weapons aerosol generators.
The six inspectors from five nations who monitor the missile programs
are currently responsible for 63 sites, 159 items of equipment and
over 2,000 operational missiles, the report said.
Ten inspectors, three chemists and one explosive specialist from 11
nations who make up the chemical weapons monitoring team periodically
inspect 120 sites, another 52 installations that range from
petrochemical facilities to water treatment plants, 518 dual-use
equipment items, and thousands of tons of dual-use chemicals, it said.
The chemical weapons monitoring group continues to discover dual-use
items and materials that Iraq had not declared, the report said.
As with the chemical monitoring, the biological monitoring team of 11
inspectors from nine nations "continues to find dual-use materials
which should have been declared by Iraq," it said.
In the lengthy report, Butler outlined the events and meetings leading
up to the current stalemate with Iraq.
A team of biological weapons experts went to Baghdad in July to review
any new information from Iraq and assess the thoroughness of Iraq's
final disclosure on its biological weapons programs. Iraq submitted no
information to the experts, he wrote.
"The team concluded that, as currently presented in Iraq's biological
(full, final and complete disclosure) FFCD, none of the components of
the material balance could be verified. These included biological
weapons munitions, bulk biological weapons agent production and
microbiological growth media," Butler said.
When he went to Baghdad at the beginning of August, Butler said he
told Iraqi officials that "some important progress had been made,
specifically in the area of missiles, but that progress in other areas
had proved to be much less than had been hoped for." He suggested that
Iraq and UNSCOM set out an intensive work program, proposed specific
expert meetings and inspections, and asked for several documents
including one taken from an UNSCOM chief inspector in July.
Iraq rejected the proposals; said that it "would not, indeed never"
give UNSCOM a chemical weapons document taken from the inspector; and
insisted that Butler report immediately to the council that there were
no more banned weapons and related materials and capability in Iraq,
the UNSCOM chairman said.
Saying that further discussions would be useless, Iraqi officials
ended the meeting. A few days later on August 5, Iraq issued the
declaration that it would no longer cooperate with the weapons
inspectors.
Butler also rejected Iraq's assertion that it is up to the weapons
inspectors, not Iraq, to prove that there are still banned weapons in
the country.
That argument, he said, "would reverse the onus of disclosure clearly
placed upon Iraq by the council and instead would require the
commission to make the full disclosure of proscribed items that only
Iraq can make."
"The commission has worked as constructively as it could, with Iraq,
to try to shed light on the biological weapons area, including by
suggesting a new approach," the report said. "But Iraq failed to take
that opportunity, failed to provide the disclosures which are
essential to the fulfillment of the disarmament mandate."
UNSCOM also told the council that at some point the members may have
to decide how to proceed if "the commission is obliged to conclude
that it is unable to provide 100 percent verification of the claimed
fate or disposition of prohibited weapons."
(For more information on this subject, contact our special Iraq
website at:
http://www.usia.gov/iraq)




NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list