UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

USIS Washington File

04 June 1998

IRAQ STILL A THREAT TO REGION, RICHARDSON SAYS

(UNSCOM briefs UNSC on outstanding issues with Iraqi weapons) (1360)
By Judy Aita
USIA United Nations Correspondent
United Nations -- The United States believes that "Iraq still
represents a threat to its neighbors and this is why it should be
contained," US Ambassador Bill Richardson said June 4 after attending
a two-day briefing by the UN Special Commission overseeing the
destruction of Iraqi weapons (UNSCOM).
"The UNSCOM presentation made the following clear: One, biological
weapons may be in Iraq today. Two, VX nerve agents may be in Iraq
today. Three, Iraq continues to play hide and seek with UNSCOM with
the UN inspections. And four, Iraq is still hiding the documents that
would explain these weapons programs fully," Richardson told
journalists after the private meetings.
"Perhaps in the nuclear area, if there is adequate compliance between
now and the next sanctions review, there may be a move (from
inspections and disarmament) to (long-term) monitoring," Richardson
said. "But it is clear that in no way will there be a move to
monitoring in the chemical, biological, and missile area. That was
amply documented here today."
"Iraq is deceiving UNSCOM and it's deceiving the Security Council and
this must stop if Iraq expects to get sanctions lifted," the
ambassador said.
The ambassador singled out a problem with accounting for Iraqi
produced SCUD-type missiles known as Al-Hussein missiles.
UNSCOM was "told officially by Iraq that in 1991 all relevant
documentation in connection with an establishment called Al Farouk,
which was engaged in production of Iraq's own program of scud-type
missiles, had been handed over. It now turns around that we have a
document given to the Special Commission in March this year that shows
in 1993 the employees in that establishment were being ordered to
remove, destroy or conceal documents which could be of relevance to
the Security Council resolution," British Ambassador Sir John Weston
said.
Richardson pointed out that "while Soviet-supplied SCUD missiles have
been accounted for, UNSCOM has made clear that Iraq produced, flight
tested, and delivered to its army Al-Hussein SCUDs that have not been
accounted for."
"This is extremely serious," Richardson added. "Iraq will not show
UNSCOM even one remnant of these supposedly secretly destroyed
missiles."
The difference between UNSCOM's briefing and the meeting council
members had with Iraqi Foreign Minister Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf on
June 2, during which he attempted to convince them that his government
had satisfied the requirements and destroyed all its chemical,
biological, nuclear, and ballistic weapons and their programs, Sir
John said, was the difference "between chalk and cheese, the
difference between truth and falsehood."
Richardson said UNSCOM demonstrated by charts, by photographs, and
intelligence material that "there is still a number of disturbing
patterns of concealment, of obfuscation, of failing to provide
documents in the chemical, biological, and missile area. Very serious
lack of information."
"Every country needs to speak for itself, but what was presented here
was very sobering, was very disturbing," he said.
Basing his conclusions on the questions council members asked of the
UNSCOM experts during the meetings, Richardson said he believed that
"Iraq has lost a lot of support in the Security Council."
"Those countries that may have felt that Iraq was complying and being
responsive will not take a second look at that conclusion," the
ambassador said.
Richardson praised UNSCOM as a group of highly trained technical
experts and international civil servants who are "devoted to seeking
the truth and only the truth with facts, with documents."
"Today we were briefed by two Russians, a Frenchman, two Germans, two
Americans, an Argentine, and the Australian chairman of UNSCOM. The
presentation was thorough, factual, and totally credible," the US
ambassador said.
At a press conference after the council meeting, UNSCOM Chairman
Richard Butler said he will be presenting to Iraqi Deputy Prime
Minister Tariq Aziz in Baghdad June 13 and 14 a 14-point list that
some have called "a road map." He said he will discuss "driving
instruction on how long, what are the stops along the way, and what is
the best way" to complete the disarmament process.
He said the list is "tight, and clear and specific," on what UNSCOM
needs from Iraq in the areas of ballistic missiles, chemical weapons
and biological weapons.
Depending on the quality of the information Iraq gives UNSCOM, Butler
said, "if Iraq follows this, if we can work out good driving
instructions on this list ... I would expect, I could foresee a report
in October that was very different from any previous report."
Butler was emphatic that he did not expect to be able to verify to the
council that Iraq had completed the disarmament process by October,
but major progress could be made by the end of the year toward lifting
sanctions.
Nevertheless, "if Iraq gives us the truth we know it holds ... we know
that materials requested are in the possession of the government of
Iraq," he said, "then I'm sure we can move pretty fast."
"There are some items that could be done on a day if given the
document or piece of information we need. Some will take longer," he
said.
According to the list UNSCOM discussed with the council, the UN
weapons inspectors need to complete the warhead material balance, a
record of the unilateral destruction of propellants for long-range
missiles, monthly production status reports for the major components
of Iraq's production of Al-Hussein missiles, verifiable evidence of
the disposition of unaccounted munitions, especially 155 mm mustard
shells and chemical/biological aerial bombs, and information on the
use and status of equipment moved from chemical weapons facilities
prior to the Gulf War cease-fire resolution.
UNSCOM also wants information on the acquisition and production of
biological weapons materials, agents and munitions as well as on the
destruction of such material.
Butler said that in "a matter of weeks," he expects that UNSCOM will
be able to "understand and have a satisfactory account" of how many
special ballistic missile warheads for either chemical or biological
weapons agents Iraq had.
"That is a terrific development and I'm confident that it will occur,"
he said.
In addition to the big gaps in the biological weapons area, another
outstanding issue is the accounting for the fuel that can only be used
to drive SCUD-type missiles, Butler said. "We've never had correct
accounting of that propellant and need for us to have that accounting
to bring the missile area to closure."
Butler also pointed out that "the onus of proof is not" on UNSCOM.
"The system of disarmament that the council created has three parts --
declaration, verification, and destruction -- and they begin with
Iraq's declaration," he said.
"It is not our job to prove that Iraq does not any longer have
biological weapons capability. It's their job to tell us what they
have, truthfully, so that we can verify that and tell the council that
we are satisfied that we know the truth," Butler said.
"Basically we have a fair idea of what quantities are involved," he
said, but added that to say what numbers UNSCOM experts are looking
for would be the wrong way to verify arms programs.
For UNSCOM to reveal in full what it knows so Iraq could match the
numbers is wrong, he said. "The more truthful and correct way for
verification to work is for ... Iraq to step forward and reveal the
factual story," Butler said.
The UNSCOM chairman said that during the council meeting he saw "no
division in the council with respect to fundamental tasks" that needed
to be completed. "I see a very strong agreement on the basic
objectives."
"Of course there are nuances of view about how it's being done and how
it might be better done. But that is just within the normal range of
life," he said.
In some areas, 100 percent verification will not be possible, Butler
also said, and the council will have to "come to grips with this"
politically before deciding when to move to lift sanctions.
(For more information on this subject, contact our special Iraq
website at:
http://www.usia.gov/iraq)




NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list