UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

USIS Washington File

03 June 1998

UNSCOM BRIEFING SHATTERS IRAQI CREDIBILITY, RICHARDSON SAYS

(UN arms experts set "roadmap" for Iraqi compliance) (700)
By Judy Aita
USIA United Nations Correspondent
United Nations -- A detailed technical briefing by the UN weapons
inspectors on what Iraq has to do before sanctions can be lifted
"dealt a devastating blow" to Iraq's credibility, US Ambassador Bill
Richardson said June 3.
Ambassador Richard Butler, chairman of the Special Commission
overseeing the destruction of Iraqi weapons (UNSCOM) and chemical,
biological and ballistic weapons experts on his team were scheduled to
brief the Security Council and later Iraqi officials outlining a
"roadmap" on what remains to be done in the weapons area in order for
Baghdad to fully comply with the disarmament requirements of the Gulf
war cease-fire resolution. After more than five hours of meetings, the
council scheduled a second session with UNSCOM for June 4.
Iraqi Foreign Minister Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf met with council
members on June 2 in an attempt to convince them that his government
had satisfied the requirements and destroyed all its chemical,
biological, nuclear, and ballistic weapons and their programs.
Emerging from the closed session, US Ambassador Bill Richardson said
that "UNSCOM has dealt a devastating blow to Iraq's credibility."
UNSCOM produced documents, charts, and catalogued the gaps and
inconsistencies in Iraqi claims that it had fulfilled its disarmament
obligations, as well as documented Iraq's "pattern of concealment ...
in the missile and the chemical and the biological area," Richardson
said.
"There are some very vivid photographs, documentation, charts of Iraqi
concealment and until these questions are answered and these issues
are settled ... sanctions are not near being lifted," he added.
"Iraq, if it wants sanctions lifted, has a lot of progress to make,"
the US ambassador said.
Richardson acknowledged that Iraq had made "some progress" in allowing
UN weapons inspectors access to all sites in Iraq, including so-called
presidential sites and in satisfying the International Atomic Energy
Agency (IAEA) on nuclear weapons programs.
Nevertheless, the ambassador said, Iraq has "a long ways to go to
comply with Security Council resolutions and mandates."
"UNSCOM has brought forth a series of very, very strong charges
against Iraq's credibility that Iraq must answer" regarding patterns
of concealment, gaps and inconsistencies in records dating from 1991
through 1995 and into the present, Richardson said.
He used as an example Iraq's concealment of the chemical warfare agent
VX production equipment and said there was "disturbing information"
about missile propellants as well.
"Iraq just has a lot of explaining to do ... I think Iraq had a bad
day here," Richardson said.
British Ambassador Sir John Weston also highlighted problems with
unanswered questions on Iraq's missile program and accounting for
warheads, propellants, and production capabilities.
The British ambassador said that UNSCOM's "workmanlike approach" and
visual materials helped to clarify in the minds of members of the
council the technical basis for UNSCOM's determination that Iraq had
not completed its disarmament obligations.
In his semi-annual report to the council released in April, Butler
said that Iraq is no closer to providing U.N. weapons experts with the
data they need to certify Iraq is free of the banned weapons than it
was six months ago.
Butler said that "Iraq has essentially failed" to provide the
information needed to fill the gaps in the chemical and biological
weapons programs, nor provided new information to help account for
propellants and other materials for the banned ballistic missiles.
The situation with Iraq's ballistic missiles is complicated by the
fact that Baghdad claims it unilaterally destroyed some two-thirds of
its operational missile force including missiles, launchers, warheads,
and propellants, Butler said. In the past six months there had been no
substantive progress on accounting for missile propellants and no
satisfactory balancing of the Iraqi-made missiles and components with
what Baghdad has claimed to have unilaterally destroyed.
While it is clear that Iraq did destroy some weapons, "Iraq's refusal
to provide adequate and verifiable details" of the destruction to the
U.N. experts has made it impossible for the experts to verify all of
Iraq's claims, Butler said in the semi-annual report.
(For more information on this subject, contact our special Iraq
website at:
http://www.usia.gov/iraq)




NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list