Two US Paths on Iraq
Iraq News MAY 1, 1998
By Laurie MylroieThe central focus of Iraq News is the tension between the considerable, proscribed WMD capabilities that Iraq is holding on to and its increasing stridency that it has complied with UNSCR 687 and it is time to lift sanctions. If you wish to receive Iraq News by email, a service which includes full-text of news reports not archived here, send your request to Laurie Mylroie .
I. CLINTON PRESS CONFERENCE, APR 30 II. HOUSE PASSES CONFERENCE REPORT FUNDING DEMOCRATIC OPPOSITION, APR 30 NB: The latest [much-criticized] IAEA report on Iraq's nuclear program can be found at http://www.fas.org/news/un/iraq/iaea/s1998312.htm Also, there is a U.N. website, largely on UNSCR 986, but also including some reports on Iraq's weapons programs. It can be found at http://www.un.org/Depts/oip In his press conference yesterday, Clinton was asked about Iraq. He replied, "We are encouraged by the level of compliance so far with the UN inspections and by the evidence that has been adduced on the nuclear side that more progress has been made. And I believe we've already issued a statement that we believe that if Baghdad will continue to work with us, that by October the UN may well be able to certify that they are actually in compliance on the nuclear side, and they can go from the inspection to the monitoring phase." "A little carrot," one reader remarked. Also, a sop to the Russians. Yet as today's NYT reported, "The president's remarks will doubtless raise concern among arms control experts who have accused the Atomic Energy Agency of complacency and have said Iraq's record of deception and its wealth of talented scientists suggest that it could quickly recreate an atomic program once rigorous inspections end." Also, despite the ominous statements emanating from Baghdad [see "Iraq News," Apr 16, 17, 24, 30] the administration is leaning toward reducing the US military presence in the Gulf. As Clinton explained, "I would wait for a recommendation from the Pentagon with involvement from the State Department and the NSC on that. That is, we have a certain number of carrier groups and a certain number of assets to deploy at sea. They have to be trained; they also need to be deployed in different places for different reasons. So, inevitably, unless we believe there is some reasons for it to be there at some point in the future, I would anticipate some reallocation of our resources." It seems Jim Hoagland, Apr 23, "No Time to Tone Down," ["Iraq News," Apr 30] was right. The administration is preparing another retreat. But the tactic is unlikely to work. Saddam needs no encouragement for his next challenge. Clinton's newest display of irresolution will only suggest to Saddam that he is correct in his calculations, while underscoring to America's regional allies that the US is not to be counted on. Notably, this is a different view than that offered today by the editors of the Wash Post, in "Isolated Iraq." They suggested that since Iraq had failed to get sanctions lifted, or even a positive report from the alternative weapons teams it requested, Iraq was still in the dog-house. But "Iraq News" believes the Iraqi demands are not to be taken simply at face value. There is a large element of tactical maneuver and the real action is the crises Saddam creates that weaken the anti-Iraq coalition. The relevant question is whether Saddam is better off now that he was in Oct, when the confrontation began. "Iraq News" believes the answer is yes. One need only consider Clinton's statement yesterday. Six months hence, the US will be prepared to declare Iraq nuclear free. Not only would that be highly controversial in itself, it would represent the first time that the US had agreed to "close" a file. But there is no provision in UNSCR 687 for treating Iraq's proscribed weapons programs individually, "closing" the "files" one by one. That is an Iraqi invention and the US president, yesterday, accepted it. Yet there is another path. It is being laid by Congress. The House and Senate had earlier approved versions of a bill to provide funding to support a democratic Iraqi opposition to Saddam. The funding is attached to an emergency authorization, in significant part to cover the cost of the US military presence in the Gulf. Yesterday, the House passed the conference report [the commonly agreed upon version of the bill] and the Senate is expected to do so shortly. It provides for $5 million to support the democratic Iraqi opposition and $5 million for a "Radio Free Iraq." The State Department is required to report to Congress within 30 days on its plans to establish such a program, while Congress said that it expects "that a significant portion of the support for the democratic opposition should go to the Iraqi National Congress, a group that has demonstrated the capacity to effectively challenge the Saddam Hussein regime with representation from Sunni, Shia, and Kurdish elements of Iraq." I. CLINTON PRESS CONFERENCE Q: Thank you. Mr. President, the Pentagon said this week you're expected to decide whether to reduce U.S. forces in the Gulf soon. Has Baghdad made sufficient progress on allowing weapons inspections to permit a reduction in force? And if so, will we see an ending of the sanctions against Iraq? THE PRESIDENT: Well, those are two very different questions. Let me say, first of all, we are encouraged by the level of compliance so far with the U.N. inspections and by the evidence that has been adduced on the nuclear side that more progress has been made. And I believe we've already issued a statement that we believe that if Baghdad will continue to work with us, that by October the U.N. may well be able to certify that they are actually in compliance on the nuclear side, and they can go from the inspection to the monitoring phase. Keep in mind, even under the agreements, the U.N. resolutions, no matter what is found out in any of these areas, there will still be a monitoring regime there. Our position on lifting the sanctions is that the U.N. resolutions have to be complied with completely, and then we vote to lift the sanctions. So this is just a nuclear peace. But I am encouraged by that. Now, on the question of reducing our military presence in the Gulf, I would wait for a recommendation from the Pentagon with involvement from the State Department and the NSC on that. That is, we have a certain number of carrier groups and a certain number of assets to deploy at sea. They have to be trained; they also need to be deployed in different places for different reasons. So, inevitably, unless we believe there is some reasons for it to be there at some point in the future, I would anticipate some reallocation of our resources. But I have not received a recommendation on that yet by the Defense Department. II. HOUSE PASSES CONFERENCE REPORT FUNDING DEMOCRATIC OPPOSITION H.R. 3579 Sec. 2005: SUPPORT FOR DEMOCRATIC OPPOSITION IN IRAQ: Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, of the funds made available under the heading "Economic Support Fund," in Public Law 1050118, $5,000,000 shall be made available for assistance to the Iraqi democratic opposition for such activities as organization, training, communication and dissemination of information, developing and implementing agreements among opposition groups, compiling information to support the indictment of Iraqi officials for war crimes, and for related purposes. Provided, That within 30 days of enactment into law of this Act the Secretary of State shall submit a detailed report to the appropriate committees of Congress on plans to establish a program to support the democratic opposition in Iraq. (Statement of Managers) Sec.10008 SUPPORT FOR DEMOCRATIC OPPOSITION IN IRAQ The conference agreement includes a general provision providing that, notwithstanding any other provision of law, $5,000,000 of the funds previously appropriated for the "Economic Support Fund" in Public Law 105-118 Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 1998) be made available for support for the democratic opposition in Iraq. The funds are to be used for such activities as organization. training, communication, dissemination of information, developing and implementing agreements among opposition groups, compiling information to support the indictment of Iraqi officials for war crimes, and for related purposes. The provision also requires a report from the Secretary of State to the appropriate committees of Congress within 30 days of enactment into law of this Act on plans to establish a program to support the democratic apposition in Iraq. The Senate amendment contained similar language, but included a supplemental appropriation of $5,000,000 for these activities. It also designated these funds as an emergency requirement under the terms of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit control Act of 1985, as amended, and further provided that the entire amount would be made available only to the extent that an official budget request for a specific dollar amount, that included designation of the entire amount of the request as an emergency requirement, was transmitted by the President to Congress. The House bill did not address this matter. The managers expect that a significant portion of the support for the democratic opposition should go to the Iraqi National Congress, a group that has demonstrated the capacity to effectively challenge the Saddam Hussein regime with representation from Sunni, Shia, and Kurdish elements of Iraq. CHAPTER 2 UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY INTERNATIONAL BROADCASTING OPERATIONS The conference agreement includes an additional $5,000,000, as proposed in the Senate bill for the "International Broadcasting Operations" account of the United States Information Agency to remain available until September 30 1999, for the establishiment of surrogate radio broadcasting to the Iraqi people by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty which shall be designated "Radio Free Iraq." The House bill had no similar provision. The conferees agree that this finding shall provide for the total costs of such a broadcast service in fiscal years 1998 and 1999, including start-up costs RFE/RL operational costs, and engineering and transmission costs incurred by the International Broadcasting Bureau. The conference agreement also requires the Broadcasting Board of Governors to submit a detailed report to the Congress, within 30 days of enactment, containing plans for the establishment and operation of such a broadcast service within the amount provided. The conference agreement designates this amount as an emergency requirement and provides that the entire amount shall be available only to the extent that the President transmits to the Congress an official budget request designating the request as an emergency requirement.
NEWSLETTER
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|