UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

USIS Washington File

13 February 1998

SADDAM RESPONSIBLE IF FORCE IS USED ON IRAQ, CLINTON REPEATS

(President says it will be his decision, "not mine")  (820)
By Wendy S. Ross
USIA White House Correspondent
Washington -- For the third straight day in a row, President Clinton
said February 13 that Iraq's Saddam Hussein will be responsible if
force is used against suspected weapons sites in Iraq.
Speaking to reporters after a White House ceremony in the Oval Office
to swear in a new U.S. Surgeon General, Clinton said that "if there is
military action over this matter in Iraq, it will be Saddam Hussein's
decision, not mine. And it's up to him to make" the decision to
"permit qualified, honest, nonpolitical, technically competent
inspectors to have access to those sites" which he has not permitted
them to visit.
"Just look at the volume, look at the sheer volume of stocks and
weapons in the chemical and biological area. Look at the nuclear work
that's been done since the end of the Gulf War," Clinton said, in
explaining why the United Nations Special Commission in Iraq (UNSCOM)
which monitors weapons of mass destruction must have unfettered access
to the sites it wants to inspect.
Clinton said he hopes and prays that the Iraqi leader will make the
right decision.
"The inspection system works. It has made the world safer," Clinton
explained. "If he would let that inspection system be completed and
accept the offer of the international community, that the United
States strongly supports, to sell more oil and have more funds for
food and medicine and for reconstituting the basic fundamental
necessities of human life in his country, we would be well on the way
to resolving this.
"This is not a complicated thing," Clinton said. "A country like Iraq
can be a great country and succeed without having a chemical and
biological weapons program and the means to visit those weapons on
their neighbors. And this is a decision for him to make. I think it is
a no-brainer in terms of what's right for the people, the children and
the future of Iraq. But the rest of us have to worry about the
children and the people and the future of all the people that are
around Iraq or might someday find their way in harm's way if those
weapons of chemical and biological destruction are more widely
disseminated."
Asked about the latest Russian statements opposing use of force to
resolve the Iraqi stalemate made February 12 in Moscow by Russia's
Defense Minister Igor Sergeyev in talks there with Secretary of
Defense Cohen, Clinton said Russia's opposition to military action
would not stop U.S. forces going ahead, if that becomes necessary, but
this should not harm overall relations with Moscow.
The Russians agree with the United States, he said, that Iraq is not
in compliance with the United Nations resolutions. "They agree with us
that they must let the inspectors go back to work, do their job, open
the sites. They want a diplomatic solution. I want a diplomatic
solution. I have bent over backwards for months now to try to achieve
a diplomatic solution. I am still working with the Russians, the
French, the United Nations, anybody, to try to find a diplomatic
solution," Clinton said.
"The difference here is that I simply do not believe it is acceptable
to permit Iraq to walk away from its obligations. Because what we want
to do is to significantly diminish the capacity of the Iraqis to
reconstitute, to develop, to deploy their weapons of mass destruction
and to threaten their neighbors. That is the difference.
"We don't believe it is acceptable, if diplomacy fails, to walk away.
And our relationship with Russia is very important to us, my
relationship with President Yeltsin has been very productive and I
believe we have advanced the cause of world peace in substantial ways
and advanced our future partnership.
"But I don't think you can have a United Nations set of resolutions
about something this important to the future of the world and simply
walk away if diplomacy fails. And so, that's the rub. But we're going
to keep working with the Russians and with everybody else. We're
trying to find a diplomatic solution. And I hope that whatever
happens, that our relationships with Russia will continue to be
productive and strong, because that's very important to the future of
our people," Clinton said.
Asked by a reporter if push comes to shove, are you going to be able
to go forward, if Russia says 'Nyet', Clinton said "'Nyet' is not 'No'
for the United States under these circumstances."
Asked how close the United States is to having its troops in harm's
way in Iraq, Clinton said "we are simply doing what we always do under
circumstances like this. We're taking the necessary steps that you
would expect the United States to take."




NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list