
03 February 1998
TRANSCRIPT: IRAQ MUST COMPLY WITH UNSC RESOLUTIONS, SAYS ALBRIGHT
(Secstate notes Bahrain's support in Iraqi crisis) (2710) Manama, Bahrain -- "Saddam Hussein, armed with chemical and biological weapons, is a threat to the international community. But it is a profoundly dangerous threat to the nations of the Persian Gulf and the entire Middle East," Secretary of State Madeleine Albright asserted February 3. "Saddam does not discriminate in the use of his weapons. Saudis, Kuwaitis, Bahrainis, Iranians, Israelis and Iraqis have all been his targets. We must stop Saddam from threatening any people of this region with weapons of mass destruction again," she said at a press briefing with Bahraini Foreign Minister Shaikh Muhammad Bin Mubarak al Khalifa. Albright said "the Amir agrees with the United States that diplomatic options are quickly running out, and that soon we will be forced to make some hard decisions. Diplomacy remains our preferred option. But the standard for a real diplomatic solution must be full compliance with the Security Council and unconditional, unfettered access for UN weapons inspections." The Secretary said that throughout this trip, she has found "unanimous agreement on the fact that Saddam Hussein must fulfill his obligations imposed upon him by the Security Council, that it is essential to have unfettered, unconditional access to the sites by UNSCOM, that whatever comes of this if diplomacy fails and military action is necessary, that Saddam Hussein is responsible for the grave consequences. "I have had I think very positive support, whether it's from King Hussein or from the Amir here, or Kuwait or Saudi Arabia, for what we are seeking. And I think that we believe that we will have all the cooperation we need across the board," she said. She stressed that the United States has no quarrel with the Iraqi people. "We do not wish to see women and children used as human shields. We do not wish to see people sick and hungry. The U.S. wrote the UN resolution permitting Iraq to sell oil for food and medicine. Now we want to expand it so more food and medicine can be provided more effectively to the Iraqi people," she said, adding, "But nothing will change our determination to thwart Saddam from ever threatening this region with weapons of mass destruction again." Albright noted that this year marks 50 years of relations and friendship between the United States and Bahrain and she expressed the appreciation of the U.S. for Bahrain's support in this time of crisis. Following is the transcript of the press briefing: (Begin transcript) PRESS BRIEFING BY SECRETARY MADELEINE K. ALBRIGHT AND BAHRAINI FOREIGN MINISTER SHAIKH MUHAMMAD BIN MUBARAK AL KHALIFA Sheraton Hotel Manama, Bahrain February 3, 1998 FOREIGN MINISTER: I would like to welcome Secretary of State Madeleine Albright -- I would like to welcome her visit here today and express appreciation for her inclusion of Bahrain in this important tour of the Middle East and the Gulf region. Her Excellency the Secretary of State has held constructive and fruitful discussions with their Highnesses the Amir, the Prime Minister, and the Crown Prince regarding the situation in the Gulf region and also the Middle East Peace Process. Bahrain is in agreement with the United States and is very keen that the Peace Process must be pushed forward to overcome the difficulties presently encountered in implementing the peace accords. Regarding the situation in the Gulf, the two sides agree that Iraq should adhere to, comply with, and implement all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions, and give access to the inspectors of the United Nations Special Commission. Iraq should reconsider its position and cooperate with the United Nations Security Council to alleviate and avoid further suffering for the Iraqi nation. Bahrain also reiterated its firm stand towards the importance of the unity and territorial integrity of Iraq. It has been stressed by both sides that all diplomatic efforts to reach a peaceful solution to the present crisis must be fully explored and exhausted. The failure of such diplomatic efforts will result in grave consequences, the sole responsibility for which will rest with Iraq. Bahrain and the United States enjoy excellent relations. Bahrain expressed its satisfaction with the current state of cooperation at all levels and looks forward to the development and strengthening of the ties between the two countries. Of course Bahrain, being a non-permanent member of the Security Council, has a special role to play in the political arena and will exert all possible efforts to fulfill its role. SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: Thank you very much. I am very glad to be back in Bahrain, even under these grave circumstances. I want to thank the Amir and the People of Bahrain for hosting us. Your hospitality as always is truly gracious. And Mr. Minister it is a pleasure to see you and work with you again. The Amir and I had excellent discussions about the situation in Iraq. Bahrain stands with the United States, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the international community, in our assessment that the responsibility for this crisis falls squarely on the shoulders of Saddam Hussein. He must stop his lawless defiance of the Security Council and provide UNSCOM with a free and unfettered access it needs to ensure that Saddam cannot develop, acquire or use weapons of mass destruction. Before I leave the Gulf I want to stress something that I have been saying for days. Saddam Hussein, armed with chemical and biological weapons, is a threat to the international community. But it is a profoundly dangerous threat to the nations of the Persian Gulf and the entire Middle East. Saddam does not discriminate in the use of his weapons. Saudis, Kuwaitis, Bahrainis, Iranians, Israelis and Iraqis have all been his targets. We must stop Saddam from threatening any people of this region with weapons of mass destruction again. I updated His Highness on all the options we possess, diplomatic and otherwise, to compel Saddam to turn from his defiant, aggressive path. The Amir agrees with the United States that diplomatic options are quickly running out, and that soon we will be forced to make some hard decisions. Diplomacy remains our preferred option. But the standard for a real diplomatic solution must be full compliance with the Security Council and unconditional, unfettered access for UN weapons inspections. The Amir and I agreed that if diplomatic measures fail, the government of Iraq alone will be responsible for the grave consequences. This year marks the 50th year that the United States Navy has been with you in the Gulf and Bahrain. Bahrain and the United States have been constant friends and partners. And let me say on behalf of the United States, we appreciate the support of Bahrain in this time of crisis. Finally I want to say again that the United States has no quarrel with the people of Iraq. We do not wish to see women and children used as human shields. We do not wish to see people sick and hungry. The U.S. wrote the UN resolution permitting Iraq to sell oil for food and medicine. Now we want to expand it so more food and medicine can be provided more effectively to the Iraqi people. But nothing will change our determination to thwart Saddam from ever threatening this region with weapons of mass destruction again. Thank you. QUESTION: Madam Secretary, you've had a few more hours maybe to look at this (inaudible) proposal that Iraq is floating through Russia. You still say that diplomatic time is running out, but is there any worthwhile diplomacy that the Russians are engaged in or can engage in based on that overture or any others you may know about. Is there anything live on the diplomatic front? SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: First of all let me repeat again that we would like to have diplomatic options explored. We believe that the best solution for this is still -- our preferred solution is the diplomatic one. But we have to stay with the standards we have set, which is that there has to be for UNSCOM unfettered, unconditional access to all the sites, and if diplomacy can achieve that, all the better. But if we are handed suggestions by anybody that result in diversionary tactics rather than diplomatic solutions, I think we need to keep reiterating that the goal here of diplomacy is to have UNSCOM have unfettered, unconditional access to all sites. QUESTION: This is for both the Foreign Minister and the Secretary of State. The US has repeatedly said that the conflict with Iraq is not a conflict between the U.S. and Iraq, but the U.N and Iraq. In this situation why is the UN not taking the lead in taking action against Iraq, and why is a US official, and not a UN official, making this current tour? SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: Well first of all, we are all of us the UN, and we are trying to fulfill the Security Council resolutions passed by members of the United Nations. I think that other UN officials are in fact speaking out. The Secretary General, Kofi Annan, has been making statements. Chairman Butler has been making statements. The United States is making this tour because we are one of the permanent members of the Security Council and because we believe that it is important for our friends on the Security Council and other countries to understand what our views are. The purpose of my trip has been to explain the U.S. position and to discuss the next steps. FOREIGN MINISTER: Well I would just like to add that Bahrain, as you know, is a non-permanent member of the United Nations Security Council and we have a role to play. We look to the issue as an international issue, and what we are asking, as I said in my statement, we are asking Iraq to implement the Security Council resolutions. And I think the Secretary of State here -- we would like to join her, with all other members of the Council, to ask Iraq to implement those resolutions. So really what we are doing is working within the framework of the United Nations Security Council. QUESTION: Madam Secretary, the bottom line on this trip is surely to have won the support of the Gulf States for any possible military action against Iraq should it be deemed to be necessary. With the exception of Kuwait that appears not to have happened. So doesn't the United States still risk alienating Arab public opinion if it does decide to use force? SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: Well I think you have a different take on this trip than I do. I feel that this has been an excellent trip, because wherever I have gone we have had, first of all, terrific discussions. I have been offered the ability to explain our position and discuss the next steps. I have found unanimous agreement on the fact that Saddam Hussein must fulfill his obligations imposed upon him by the Security Council, that it is essential to have unfettered, unconditional access to the sites by UNSCOM, that whatever comes of this if diplomacy fails and military action is necessary, that Saddam Hussein is responsible for the grave consequences. I have had I think very positive support, whether it's from King Hussein or from the Amir here, or Kuwait or Saudi Arabia, for what we are seeking. And I think that we believe that we will have all the cooperation we need across the board. QUESTION: Madam Secretary, has Bahrain agreed to allow the United States to use it as a base for air strikes on Iraq? SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: Let me say again I'm not going to comment on specific countries or operational details, but we believe that we will have the cooperation we need to use our forces, if necessary, from all the countries I've talked to. QUESTION: Madam Secretary, you have repeatedly made a point about U.S. support for the oil for food program, and how the United States authored this resolution and has pushed incessantly for it. But there still remains a huge question out there, and that is even though you say you support expansion of the program, are you going to support the magnitude of the expansion that has been proposed by Kofi Annan, which is over five billion dollars, and how quickly can the Security Council act on that? SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: First of all I repeat always the fact that we were the authors of it, because I think people seem to forget that the United States has never had a fight with the Iraqi people, and I have said even at the time when I was at the UN that I think I probably felt more warmly and more compassionately about the Iraqi people than Saddam Hussein, who cries crocodile tears over them. We have just seen or heard about the Secretary General's report or suggestion. As is appropriate, we are going to be looking at what he has suggested, including the size of it. But we would like to figure out a way to make clear that our fight is not with the Iraqi people, and that we would like to make available as much as is possible and develop a mechanism so that the results of the sales, the food and medicines, can go and be distributed in a way that serves the Iraqi people. QUESTION: Mr. Foreign Minister, is Bahrain prepared to support a finding in the Security Council of material breach of Iraqi obligations? And Madam Secretary, you have said you're prepared to continue diplomatic pursuit for some time left, but your conditions are not negotiable. So what exactly is the purpose of diplomacy? FOREIGN MINISTER: To answer the first part of your question, I would like to say that this resolution is now in draft form, we haven't seen it yet, and certainly we will consider it. I think the British government is drafting that resolution and is submitting it next week, and when that comes certainly we will look at it and give it the support it needs. SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: The purpose of diplomacy, Political Science 101, is in order to be able to persuade other countries of your point of view and the necessity to move forward together, and what we have been doing here, all of us in these discussions, is talking about the importance of using diplomatic means to get Saddam Hussein to understand that he has to fulfill his obligations to the international community, and that those conditions are not negotiable; that they have to do with unfettered, unconditional access by the UNSCOM inspectors, who are the designated group to do the job, in order to have access to all the sites. QUESTION: I was wondering Madame Secretary that, at the end of your trip to the Gulf and the Middle East region, if you had heard from any of the officials you talked to any new ideas on the diplomatic front that might move Saddam Hussein. Obviously your message has reached him by now, obviously the message has not caused him to move in the direction you wished, and I'm just wondering if any officials here have proposed perhaps a new tact to use that might move him. SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: I think that what is happening is that there are an increasing number of messengers, but the message is consistent, and I will repeat it again. There should be unfettered, unconditional access by the UNSCOM inspectors to the necessary sites. And whatever ideas there are I think are primarily different groupings that are going to Baghdad. And as I said, we would like to exhaust all aspects of diplomacy, and therefore various groups going I think is useful. It is the message that counts and I think that you've heard, as you've traveled around with me and watched me with my fellow foreign ministers, that we are agreed on the message. QUESTION: The U.S. has been lobbying the allies in the Gulf. How about the allies in the Gulf war like Egypt and Syria? SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: I am on my way to Egypt. A/S RUBIN: Thank you very much. (End transcript)
NEWSLETTER
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|