UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

USIS Washington File

03 February 1998

TRANSCRIPT: SECSTATE ALBRIGHT REMARKS ON 2/3 MEETING WITH MUBARAK

(Leaders discuss Iraq crisis, Middle East peace process) (2650)
Cairo -- The only standard for a real diplomatic solution to the Iraq
crisis is full compliance with the Security Council and unconditional,
unfettered access for UN weapons inspectors, Secretary of State
Madeleine Albright said February 3 after meeting with Egyptian
President Hosni Mubarak.
"The United States, Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and
the Palestinian Authority are of one mind: This crisis was created by
Saddam Hussein's defiance of the Security Council. We prefer to
resolve it diplomatically. But if diplomacy fails, sole responsibility
for the grave consequences that would follow will lie at the feet of
the government of Iraq," the Secretary told journalists at a press
availability with Egyptian Foreign Minister Moussa.
Albright reassured the people of Iraq that the United States
understands that they are suffering under this regime. ... "That's why
we wrote the UN resolution permitting Iraq to sell oil for food and
medicine. That's why we want to expand it so more food and medicine
can be provided more effectively to the Iraqi people," she said.
Responding to a question, the Secretary said "if we do take military
action, it will be significant and it will be very clear that Saddam
Hussein will have been thwarted in the way that President Clinton has
described (in his State of the Union speech).
On the Middle East peace process, Albright asserted: "it is decision
making time. ... For Israelis and Palestinians, for Prime Minister
Netanyahu and Chairman Arafat. We have no more time for hand-wringing
or finger-pointing. We must move the peace process forward now. Both
sides must settle these interim issues and move on to permanent status
negotiations...."
"Prime Minister Netanyahu and Chairman Arafat must both work harder to
restore the kind of partnership that made the Oslo process work. Peace
can only be achieved through a partnership that promotes common
interest -- not just self-interest," she said.
"Finally, every person, every nation, and every community in this
region that is committed to long-term peace must support the process
of peacemaking during good times and bad. Instead of sitting on the
sidelines and complaining, encourage the parties to make the right
decisions and help create an environment that makes it easier for them
to do so. Arab-Israeli peace is a regional challenge and a regional
responsibility. Working together, we can make it real," the Secretary
stated.
Following is the transcript of the press availability:
(Begin transcript)
SECRETARY OF STATE MADELEINE K. ALBRIGHT PRESS AVAILABILITY WITH
EGYPTIAN FOREIGN MINISTER MOUSSA FOLLOWING MEETING WITH PRESIDENT
HOSNI MUBARAK
ITIHADIYA PALACE
CAIRO, EGYPT
FEBRUARY 3, 1998
FOREIGN MINISTER MOUSSA: Well, ladies and gentlemen, we have just
concluded a very important meeting. We are very glad to have Secretary
Albright here in Egypt, especially at this juncture. The major issues
of importance of concern for all of us here in the region and in the
United States have been discussed and we are sure that the United
States and Egypt will continue to consolidate their relationship and
work together in order to establish peace, a just peace, and stability
in the region.
SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: Thank you. It is a pleasure to be here in Egypt,
and it is certainly always good to have a chance to consult with
President Mubarak and Foreign Minister Moussa. We had excellent
discussions about the situation in Iraq, and about the Middle East
Peace Process.
As you know, my meetings in Egypt cap a series of meetings with our
friends and allies in the Arab world. Today, I can report to you that
the United States, Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and
the Palestinian Authority are of one mind: This crisis was created by
Saddam Hussein's defiance of the Security Council. We prefer to
resolve it diplomatically. But if diplomacy fails, sole responsibility
for the grave consequences that would follow will lie at the feet of
the government of Iraq.
This evening, I briefed President Mubarak on all the options we are
pursuing -- diplomatic and otherwise -- to compel Saddam to cease his
aggressive defiance. We hope that diplomacy will convince Saddam to
turn away from this collision course with the world. But we are in
absolute accord that the only standard for a real diplomatic solution
is full compliance with the Security Council and unconditional,
unfettered access for UN weapons inspectors.
Unfortunately, there continues to be no evidence that Saddam's version
of diplomacy is anything more than feints, parries, and blocks. I have
yet to see any new behavior by Iraq that would reduce the skepticism I
have gained from watching past behavior by Iraq.
Before I leave the Middle East I want to say again to the people of
Iraq: the United States understands that you are suffering under this
regime; we have no quarrel with you at all. We do not wish to see
women and children used as human shields. We do not wish to see people
sick and hungry. That's why we wrote the UN resolution permitting Iraq
to sell oil for food and medicine. That's why we want to expand it so
more food and medicine can be provided more effectively to the Iraqi
people.
But this Iraqi regime has not hesitated to use its weapons against
fellow Iraqis, fellow Muslims, and fellow Arabs. We are determined to
help protect all the peoples of this region from the threat posed by
Saddam Hussein armed with weapons of mass destruction.
President Mubarak and I also discussed the Middle East Peace Process.
As you know, this past weekend, at the President's direction, I
followed up on ideas he presented to Prime Minister Netanyahu and
Chairman Arafat last month in Washington. Later this week, Prime
Minister Netanyahu and Chairman Arafat will send envoys to Washington
with responses to the elements the President and I laid out. Before I
leave the region, I want to leave you with several strong impressions
I have about these efforts.
First, let me say as clearly as I can: It is decision making time. For
Israelis and Palestinians, for Prime Minister Netanyahu and Chairman
Arafat. We have no more time for hand-wringing or finger-pointing. We
must move the peace process forward now. The issues involved in the
four-point agenda are difficult and complex, but they have dragged on
far, far too long. Both sides must settle these interim issues and
move on to permanent status negotiations. That is the only path to a
lasting peace based on Resolutions 242 and 338, and the principle of
land for peace.
Second, Prime Minister Netanyahu and Chairman Arafat must both work
harder to restore the kind of partnership that made the Oslo process
work. Peace can only be achieved through a partnership that promotes
common interest -- not just self-interest.
Finally, every person, every nation, and every community in this
region that is committed to long-term peace must support the process
of peacemaking during good times and bad. Instead of sitting on the
sidelines and complaining, encourage the parties to make the right
decisions and help create an environment that makes it easier for them
to do so. Arab-Israeli peace is a regional challenge and a regional
responsibility. Working together, we can make it real. Thank you very
much and now Foreign Minister Moussa will now make his statement.
FOREIGN MINISTER MOUSSA: Well, you have heard the Secretary speaking
about the issues that have been considered by President Mubarak and
the Secretary, the Middle East or the Peace Process, as well as the
Iraqi situation.
On the Iraqi situation, we wish to reaffirm the following: Number one
that it is very important that there would be full compliance with
Security Council resolutions and, of course, to guarantee full
cooperation between UNSCOM and Iraq. At the same time, diplomatic
efforts should continue as the Secretary has underlined that the
United States is fully behind the diplomatic efforts and diplomatic
option in order to avoid grave consequences.
The options, we all know that they are still on the table and the
compliance by Security Council resolutions and diplomatic efforts will
really have us avoid the grave consequences that all of us want to
avoid. You know that the Secretary General of the Arab League is going
to visit Baghdad tomorrow. This also falls within that option of
diplomatic efforts that militate in favor of putting an end to this
episode and put back into work the Security Council, the
implementation of Security Council resolutions as well as the
cooperation between the UNSCOM and the Government of Iraq. That's on
the first point.
On the second point, we heard attentively what the Secretary had to
say about the peace process. You all know that the leading role of the
United States is very important in moving the peace process towards
fruition. The terms of reference as mentioned by her, the resolutions,
the interpretation of Resolutions 242, 338, and land for peace, in
addition to tackling all of the issues and the four points agenda as
the Secretary has underlined several times, including redeployment,
the further redeployment and also the time out and other issues. It is
indeed a tall order but we need both parties to move and we need the
United States leadership in this endeavor. We hope the peace process
would move and not continue to stall, according to or in accordance
with the principles underlined by the Secretary, in particular land
for peace.
QUESTION: May I ask you about President Mubarak's efforts? He's called
or been in touch with some thirteen leaders of Arab countries. Is this
an attempt to avoid force or is it an assertion at the same time
possibly of a leadership role for Egypt in the area and how does Egypt
feel about military action, should it come to that, as a last resort?
Would you support the United States?
FOREIGN MINISTER MOUSSA: The President has been in touch with all the
leaders of the members of the Arab League in order to mandate the
Secretary General of the League to visit Baghdad and talk with
President Saddam Hussein and his government that compliance with the
Security Council resolutions and work to avoid the grave consequences
of military options is very important and what we need is to avoid
that and give the diplomatic efforts the chance to bring us back on
track. So the efforts or the message that the Secretary General is
going to carry tomorrow is an important message by all the heads of
state of the Arab League that all of us work within the framework of
international legitimacy.
QUESTION:  (Inaudible)
SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: First of all, let me make clear that we have not
ever issued a time limit. We have wanted very much to make sure that
diplomacy is given every chance. As I have said, however, I believe
that the time for diplomacy is narrowing, that we have exhausted a lot
of efforts in order to try to follow the diplomatic track. We welcome
the fact that others are making an effort to get a diplomatic
solution. We believe, as I've said all along, that a diplomatic
solution is preferable. But I also have to say that I am skeptical
about it given the kinds of responses that Saddam Hussein has already
given to a number of envoys that have gone there. The United States
prefers a diplomatic solution, but all options are on the table, and
we believe that it essential for Saddam Hussein to abide by the
Security Council resolutions. We have all agreed on that. I have
traveled widely now and talked with Arab leaders from King Hussein,
now to President Mubarak, and we are all determined to make sure that
Saddam Hussein abides by the Security Council resolutions which would
allow unfettered, unconditional access for UNSCOM to all the sites
necessary.
QUESTION: Mr. Foreign Minister what are we to make of your handling of
this event here, bringing the Secretary of State in the back door, the
President not appearing with her at the news conference and making her
walk out to the press corps like this? Is that a reflection of your
country's posture towards the U.S. approach to the stand-off?
FOREIGN MINISTER MOUSSA: First, before the Secretary left the
building, President Afewerki came in, so the President has a very
heavy schedule this evening, and he is now meeting with President
Afewerki. That is why this press conference is being held that way.
The second thing is that there is no back door to the Presidency. This
is the door that the Prime Minister and all the ministers really
enter. We have full respect for Secretary Albright. We appreciate very
much her efforts and her work and her performance. So don't read too
much into such trivial things like coming from this or that door.
SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: Can I make a comment please? I have just spent, I
think, probably 55 minutes with President Mubarak in an excellent one
on one meeting in which we saw eye to eye on the issues that we were
discussing. I feel very welcomed and, in fact, if there is any
slighting, it is on my part for not staying in Egypt long enough, so I
am very much appreciative of the welcome that I've had here and I
always appreciate my relationship with my counterpart and colleague,
Foreign Minister Moussa.
QUESTION: Mrs. Albright, this is Egyptian television. In our part of
the world, we feel that, for instance, today, Israeli is occupying the
Golan Heights, southern Lebanon, Palestinian territories, yet as you
say if we don't see that swift act and adamant act that you have taken
immediately towards Iraq, why don't we see it with Israel as well?
SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: I think there is absolutely no comparison in these
two issues. The Middle East Peace Process is one of the most complex
that has existed for a considerable amount of time. It is one that is
worked on in a meticulous way. I have made very clear that I have been
involved, as has President Clinton, as has Foreign Minister Moussa. I
have made clear in my statement today that it is now decision-making
time. I have presented many of our ideas to President Mubarak and the
Foreign Minister and I do believe that it is time now for faster
action. There is absolutely no comparison in these two cases.
QUESTION:  (Inaudible)
SECRETARY ALBRIGHT: Let me say that as President Clinton explained in
the State of the Union message, our goal is to thwart Saddam Hussein's
ability to acquire and develop weapons of mass destruction or to
threaten his neighbors. As we have said, we would prefer a diplomatic
solution. But if there is, if we do take military action, it will be
significant and it will be very clear that Saddam Hussein will have
been thwarted in the way that President Clinton has described.
QUESTION: Foreign Minister Moussa, to what extent do you really feel
threatened by Iraq? To what extent do you believe it's been weakened
over the last seven years and do you really think it is necessary for
the United States to attack in order to contain these weapons and
lastly, if an attack occurs, what would be the effect on Islamic
fundamentalists in places like Egypt?
FOREIGN MINISTER MOUSSA: Well, first of all, we are not talking now
except about how to fulfill whatever all of us want, which is full
compliance with Security Council resolutions, cooperation between
UNSCOM and Iraq, the Iraqi government, as well as giving full support
to the current diplomatic efforts. So I'm not ready to go beyond that
for the time being. Thank you very much.
(End transcript)




NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list