UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

Iran says IAEA not to refer its nuclear case to Security Council

IRNA - Islamic Republic News Agency

Tehran, March 14, IRNA -- Iran on Sunday voiced confidence that the 
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) would not refer its nuclear 
dossier to the Security Council, citing its serious and transparent 
cooperation with the agency. 
Foreign Ministry spokesman Hamid-Reza Asefi said IAEA chief 
Mohamed ElBaradei as well as several delegates had confirmed at the 
last meeting of the agency to discuss Iran`s nuclear plans that the 
Islamic Republic is extending satisfactory cooperation on its nuclear 
plans. 
"Another reason is that we have concealed nothing and our nuclear 
activities are completely peaceful which we consider our natural and 
legitimate right," Asefi told reporters at a news conference. 
"Therefore, we are not worried and are sure that Iran`s nuclear 
case will not be forwarded to the Security Council." 
The IAEA on Saturday approved a resolution to defer progress in 
verifying Iran`s declarations about its nuclear activities until the 
watchdog`s next meeting in June. 
The 35-member Board of Governors decided to withhold response to 
the nature of the Islamic Republic`s nuclear activities until the 
receipt of a report which it asked ElBaradei to compile before the end
of May. 
Asefi said the some parts of the IAEA resolution were not based on
reality, stressing that the agency had acted unfairly by refusing to 
highlight Iran`s cooperation. 
He said the resolution had not condemned the Islamic Republic over
its nuclear plans, neither had it referred to any of Iran`s breach of 
its nuclear obligations. 
In issuing the resolution, the Board of Governors noted `with 
satisfaction that Iran signed the Additional Protocol on December 18, 
2003 and ... committed itself to acting in accordance with the 
provisions of the protocol`. 
By signing the Additional Protocol to the non-proliferation treaty
(NPT), Iran accepted snap inspections of its nuclear facilities, which
Tehran says are strictly intended for peaceful purposes. 
The board also took note of Iran`s decision on February 24 `to 
extend the scope of its suspension of enrichment-related and 
reprocessing activities`. 
The resolution, issued without a vote, came following intensive 
closed-door negotiations, amid the US-led lobby to send a 
`strong-worded message to Tehran`. 
This was opposed by some members, particularly the Non-Aligned 
Movement (NAM) countries, which issued a statement to commend Tehran`s
`increased cooperation` with the international nuclear watchdog. 
Asefi said efforts by the European states and NAM members to that 
effect were enough proof that US has been unsuccessful in achieving 
its goals against the Islamic Republic at the IAEA. 
He, however, stressed that Iran does not accept the wording of the
resolution and views it as inappropriate and even `rather insulting`. 
Asefi said the reason Iran had postponed the visit of IAEA 
inspectors was because of the wording of the resolution. 
"We ... never allow anyone to talk to us using such literature. 
That when they (the inspectors) would visit Iran should be arranged. 
Iran should check the date and the method of the visit by the IAEA," 
he said. 
Asefi said the IAEA should have considered the realities about 
Iran`s nuclear energy program in the resolution, warning that Iran may
otherwise revise its cooperation with the agency. 
"The IAEA has not considered the realities as it should. The 
realities should be considered. If the realities are not considered, 
the method of our cooperation (with the IAEA) may change," Iran`s 
Foreign Ministry spokesman said. 
"The issue of cooperation has not been questioned. We have been 
cooperating with the agency and are eager to continue that 
cooperation. This is because we are very transparent and clear in our 
intentions." 
Elsewhere in his remarks, Asefi said the European states had lived
up to their commitments over Iran-IAEA nuclear debates `as much as 
they could`. 
AA/AH/210 
End 



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list