Iran hails new IAEA resolution a victory for Tehran
IRNA
Tehran, Nov 27, IRNA -- Iran has hailed what it has called a victory for Tehran and "obvious failure for America and Israel" an international nuclear watchdog`s refusal to refer the country`s atomic program case to the UN Security Council for possible sanctions. In a clear sign that Europe`s close contact with Iran had paid dividends, the 35-nation board of governors, working under the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), issued a compromise resolution Wednesday, welcoming Tehran`s "active openness". "This resolution is a clear sign that America and Israel have failed to implement their premeditated plan against the Islamic Republic," secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, Hassan Rowhani, told reporters Wednesday upon return from Vienna. The United States and its key ally Israel, wished that the board of governors would confront Iran through sanctions by reporting the country to the UN Security Council. Rowhani said "America sought that a new resolution was not signed in the board of governors` meeting so that the former resolution remained in force". "In the former resolution, Iran`s relations with the IAEA, had spun out of normal course and come under the conditions of Article 18 of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)," he said, adding "Iran has opened a new phase in its relations with the agency". According to Article 18, the board of governors can examine the nuclear activities of a country whenever it wants, paving the way for Article 19 which requires report to Security Council. "From now on, Iran`s relations with the Agency will be normal and the country will be excepted from the framework of safeguards Article 18," Rowhani said. According to the official, the new resolution "despite widespread pressures of America, Israel and certain countries, have not only met many of Iran`s demands, but have not brought about any positive achievement for America and the countries which are opposed to the development of Iran`s peaceful nuclear technology". France, Germany and Britain led Europe in opposing a tougher line on the Islamic Republic, arguing that the Islamic Republic should be awarded for its openness, including its pledge to allow snap inspections of its nuclear facilities. Rowhani said Europe "despite being faced with pressures and constraints, acted with goodwill". "We had many commonalties with Europe in this regard... Europe wanted that Iran did not seek nuclear weapons. We too believed in this," he said. Iran, however, has some reservations about certain articles of the resolution, Rowhani said. The agency censured Iran for allegedly concealing sensitive atomic research for 18 years, besides omitting a part of the IAEA director general, Mohamed ElBaradei`s report, which had declared Tehran`s nuclear activities as peaceful. "The Islamic Republic has reservations about certain articles of the resolution, including its tone which could have been better than this. Some issues which existed in (Mohamed) ElBaradei`s report, must also have been included," he said. According to the official, the articles were aimed at a compromise in order to save the United States` face after its proposal to include the "trigger" clause in the resolution received another blow. The clause warns that if further Iranian failures come to light, the IAEA board will take all necessary options at its disposal. "After Americans` failure to include (Iran`s activities) in serious breach (of the NPT), they tried to add a clause according to the trigger formula which would have led to the automatic referral of Iran`s case to the Security Council, but this did not realize either," Rowhani said. According to the official, the clause does not make "either direct or indirect reference to the case`s referral to the Security Council; rather Iran`s issues must be resolved in the board of governors on a routine basis". "This clause is a clarification of the self-evident facts and repetition of the agency`s responsibilities and those of the board of governors toward all countries and has no new point, nor has it any achievement for America," Rowhani said. The SNSC chief said "some parts were omitted from the resolution, while some others were added so that the Americans pull out of the battle ground a little bit more honorably after several weeks of serious squabble". BH/212 End
NEWSLETTER
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|