UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

Washington File

27 May 2003

Rumsfeld Warns Iran Not to Interfere in Iraq

(Defense secretary addresses Council on Foreign Relations) (2370)
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld May 27 warned Iran that efforts to
try to remake Iraq in its image "will be aggressively put down."
"Assistance from Iraq's neighbors will be welcomed," the secretary
said in a speech on the challenges of helping Iraq become a free
society. "Conversely interference in Iraq by its neighbors or their
proxies will not be permitted."
Addressing the Council on Foreign Relations in New York, Rumsfeld
compared the problems Iraq is facing with the conditions the United
States faced in 1783 just after the war for independence. "No nation
in memory that has made the transition from tyranny to a free society
has been immune to the difficulties and challenges of taking that path
-- not even our own," he said.
"Those early years of our young republic were characterized by chaos
and confusion," he said. "There was crime and looting and a lack of an
organized police force. The issue of competing paper currencies by the
various states led to uncontrolled inflation and popular discontent.
There were uprisings ... regional tensions ... Crown loyalists to deal
with, many of whom had fought against the Continental Army."
Outlining the guidelines that the coalition is following in helping
Iraq to build a free nation, Rumsfeld said that the coalition:
-- will assert temporary authority over the country and will not
tolerate self-appointed "leaders;"
-- will provide security and is prepared to use force to impose order
and to maintain security forces in the country for as long as
necessary;
-- will work to improve the circumstances of the Iraqi people and
welcomes the United Nations, other countries and agencies to assist in
Iraq;
-- will involve Iraqis as early as possible in staffing ministries;
and
-- will actively oppose the old regime's enforcers, such as the Ba'ath
party leaders and Fedayeen Saddam, eliminate the remnants of Saddam's
regime, and bring to justice those who committed wars crimes.
"In assisting the Iraqi people, the United States will play its role
but should not be considered the first and only donor of funds,"
Rumsfeld said.
"The American people have already made a significant investment to
liberate Iraq and stand ready to contribute to the rebuilding
efforts," he said. "But when funds are needed, the coalition will turn
first to Iraqi regime funds in Iraq; Iraqi funds in the Oil-for-Food
program; seized frozen Iraqi regime assets in the U.S. and other
countries; and international donors, many of whom are already
assisting."
Following is the prepared text of the secretary's remarks:
(begin text)
U.S. Department of Defense
Council on Foreign Relations Speech
As Prepared for Delivery
Remarks by Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld,
New York, NY,
Tuesday, May 27, 2003
Thank you Pete [Peterson] and Les [Gelb].   Ladies and Gentlemen.
I appreciate the opportunity to discuss the challenges in a transition
from tyranny to a free and civil society.
The problems are real, to be sure:
-- looting, crime and mobs storming government buildings;
-- the breakdown of government structures and institutions that
maintained civil order;
-- rampant inflation caused by the lack of a stable currency;
-- supporters of the former regime roaming the streets and countryside
whose fate has to be determined;
-- regional tensions between north and south;
-- delays, bickering and false starts in the effort to establish a new
government.
If these problems sound familiar, they should: they are historians'
descriptions of the conditions here in America in 1783 -- in the
period after our nation's war for independence.
Those early years of our young republic were characterized by chaos
and confusion. There was crime and looting and a lack of an organized
police force. The issue of competing paper currencies by the various
states led to uncontrolled inflation and popular discontent.
There were uprisings such as Shays Rebellion, with mobs attacking
courthouses and government buildings. There were regional tensions
between mercantile New England and the agrarian south. There were
Crown loyalists to deal with, many of whom had fought against the
Continental Army. Our first effort at a governing charter -- the
Articles of Confederation -- failed miserably, and it took eight years
of contentious debate before we finally adopted our Constitution and
inaugurated our first President.
And, unlike the people of Iraq, we did not face the added challenge of
recovering from the trauma of decades of denial and brutal rule by a
dictator like Saddam Hussein.
The point is this: no nation in memory that has made the transition
from tyranny to a free society has been immune to the difficulties and
challenges of taking that path -- not even our own. As Thomas
Jefferson put it at the time: "we are not to expect to be translated
from despotism to liberty in a featherbed."
It is now just seven weeks since the liberation of Iraq -- and the
challenges are there. Just as it took time and patience, trial and
error, and years of hard work before our Founders got it right -- so
too will it take time and patience, trial and error, and hard work for
the Iraqi people to overcome the challenges they face today.
This much is clear: we have a stake in their success. For if Iraq --
with its size, capabilities, resources and its history -- is able to
move to the path of representative democracy, however bumpy the road,
then the impact in the region and the world could be dramatic. Iraq
could conceivably become a model -- proof that a moderate Muslim state
can succeed in the battle against extremism taking place in the Muslim
world today.
The Iraqi people have a foundation on which to build the peace.
Very likely at least in part because of the speed and skill in the
execution of the war plan:
-- The vast majority of Iraq's oil fields were not destroyed,
preserving the country's oil wealth for the Iraqi people. And, an
environmental disaster was prevented;
-- Key bridges, roads and rail lines were not destroyed;
-- Dams were not broken and villages were not flooded;
-- The infrastructure of the country is largely intact;
-- There were no large masses of refugees fleeing across borders into
neighboring countries;
-- The former regime did not attack Iraq's neighbors with SCUD
missiles;
-- And the coalition took great care to protect the lives of innocent
civilians, as well as the important holy sites.
So unlike Europe after WW II, for the most part the people of Iraq do
not have to rebuild from this recent war, as they work to rebuild
their country and society after decades of a dictatorship.
We are committed to helping the Iraqi people get on the path to a free
society. We do not have an American "template" we want to impose --
Iraqis will figure out how to build a free nation in a manner that
reflects their unique culture and traditions.
What the President has outlined are some broad principles that are
critical if Iraq's transition from tyranny is to succeed:
-- that Iraq be a single country, which does not support terrorists,
threaten its neighbors or the world with weapons of mass terror, or
threaten its diverse population with repression;
-- that it have a government that respects and protects minorities,
provides opportunities for its people through a market economy, and
justice through an independent judiciary and rule of law.
These are not solely American principles, nor are they exclusively
Western principles. They are principles common to all the world's free
societies. The coalition will seek out Iraqis who support these
principles, and who desire to have a role in their country's future.
And those who oppose these principles -- whose agenda is to replace
Saddam Hussein's tyranny with some other form of dictatorship -- will
be opposed.
As we move forward to help Iraqis build a free nation, there are some
of the guidelines that the coalition is following:
-- First, while our goal is to put functional and political authority
in the hands of Iraqis as soon as possible, the Coalition Provisional
Authority has the responsibility to fill the vacuum of power in a
country that has been under a dictatorship for decades, by asserting
temporary authority over the country. The Coalition will do so. It
will not tolerate self-appointed "leaders."
-- Second, the coalition will provide security. Among the immediate
objectives are restoration of law and order for the Iraqi people and
provision of essential services. The coalition is hiring and training
Iraqi police, and will be prepared to use force to impose order as
required -- because without order, little else will be possible.
-- Third, the coalition will maintain as many security forces in Iraq
as necessary, for as long as necessary, to accomplish the stated goals
-- and no longer. Already 39 nations have offered stabilization forces
or other needed assistance, and that number is growing. Together,
coalition countries will seek to provide a secure environment, so that
Iraqis will be able to take charge of their country as soon as
possible.
-- Next, the coalition will work to improve the circumstances of the
Iraqi people. Already, electric services in the north and south are
better than they have been in 12 years and the power situation in
Baghdad is improving, albeit slowly. The coalition is working to
achieve rapid improvements in other vital public services. The
coalition will work to engage the Iraqi people as rapidly as possible,
and give Iraqis leadership roles in the reconstruction effort -- for
it is their responsibility to build the future of their country.
-- Fifth, in staffing ministries and positioning Iraqis in ways that
will increase their influence, the Coalition will work to have Iraqis
involved as early as possible -- so that Iraqis can develop and
explain the goals and direction to the Iraqi people. Only as Iraqis
are engaged in, responsible for, and explaining and leading their
fellow citizens will the broader public support develop that is
essential for security.
-- Sixth, the Coalition will work with forward-looking Iraqis and
actively oppose the old regime's enforcers -- the Ba'ath Party
leaders, Fedayeen Saddam, and other instruments of repression -- and
make clear that it will eliminate the remnants of Saddam's regime.
Those who committed war crimes or crimes against humanity will be
tracked down and brought to justice. De-Ba'athification may cause some
inefficiencies, but it is critical to removing pervasive fear from
Iraqi society.
-- Next, Iraq will need to find ways to heal the wounds the Ba'athists
inflicted on the society. The experiences of Eastern Europe and other
countries can inform this process.
-- Eighth, market systems will be favored -- not Stalinist command
systems -- and the Coalition will favor activities that will begin to
diversify the Iraqi economy beyond oil. The Coalition will encourage
moves to privatize state-owned enterprises. And, it will work to
provide enterprise driven economic development opportunities for the
Iraqi people.
-- Ninth, the Coalition Provisional Authority is developing a plan for
the Iraqi oil industry based on transparency. Iraq's oil wealth will
be used for the benefit of the Iraqi people.
-- Tenth, whenever possible, contracts for work in Iraq will go to
those who will use Iraqi workers, to countries that assisted the Iraqi
people's liberation, that provide assistance to Iraq's recovery and
also to neighboring countries so as to contribute to greater regional
economic activity and accelerate Iraq's economic recovery.
-- Eleventh, countries and international organizations, including the
United Nations and non-governmental organizations, are being welcomed
to assist in Iraq. They can and are playing an important role. The
Coalition Provisional Authority will work closely with them to
maintain a focus of effort.
-- Twelfth, assistance from Iraq's neighbors will be welcomed.
Conversely, interference in Iraq by its neighbors or their proxies
will not be permitted. Indeed, Iran should be on notice that efforts
to try to remake Iraq in their image will be aggressively put down.
-- Finally, in assisting the Iraqi people, the U.S. will play its role
but should not be considered the first and only donor of funds.
The American people have already made a significant investment to
liberate Iraq, and stand ready to contribute to the rebuilding
efforts. But when funds are needed, the coalition will turn first to
Iraqi regime funds in Iraq; Iraqi funds in the Oil-for-Food program;
seized frozen Iraqi regime assets in the U.S. and other countries; and
international donors, many of whom are already assisting.
The transition to democracy will take time, and it will not always be
a smooth road. In Central and Eastern Europe, the process has taken
time, but it is succeeding. Trial and error and experimentation will
be part of the process. The efforts will not be perfect. Course
corrections will be needed and should be expected. This effort will
require patience by all involved if it is to succeed. It has been
seven weeks -- in a nation that suffered a dictatorship for decades,
that saw tens of thousands of criminals released from their prisons,
and where many of the regime's enforcers are still at large.
The eventual political outcome will be decided by the Iraqi people,
within the broad principles of the rule of law, minority rights,
individual liberty, and representative democracy. One ought not expect
the Iraqi outcome to replicate ours or any other system.
Let me conclude by saying: the Iraqi people have an historic
opportunity to build a free and civil society. Doing so will be
difficult -- just as it was in the early years of our young republic.
But the benefits of success -- for Iraq, for the region, and the world
-- will be enormous. If Iraqis can take hold of their country, develop
the institutions of self-government, and claim their place as
responsible members of the international community, then the world
could have a new model for a successful transition from tyranny to
self-reliance -- and a new ally in the global war on terror and the
struggle for freedom and moderation in the Muslim world.
The world has a stake in their success -- and that is why so many of
the world's free nations are stepping forward to help.
With that hopeful thought, I thank you for listening -- and I'd be
happy to respond to questions.
(end text)
(Distributed by the Bureau of International Information Programs, U.S.
Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list