UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

DATE=5/8/2000
TYPE=BACKGROUND REPORT
TITLE=POST-ELECTION IRAN
NUMBER=5-56275
BYLINE=ED WARNER
DATELINE=WASHINGTON
CONTENT=
VOICED AT:
INTRO:  Reformers have won two-thirds of sixty-six 
parliamentary seats in Iran's runoff elections. That 
gives them more than two hundred seats out of two 
hundred ninety, the first time conservative clerics 
have not dominated the parliament since the 1979 
revolution. At a recent Washington conference, 
participants discussed evolving Iran and the U-S 
response to it. V-O-A's Ed Warner reports.
TEXT:  Iran has been changing, says Graham Fuller of 
the research organization RAND, but U-S policy has not 
been changing along with it.
At a conference held by the Middle East Policy Council 
on Capitol Hill, Mr. Fuller said the United States has 
considered Iran a rogue state for too long. That is an 
arbitrary and arrogant label, he added, that simply 
stifles policy.
It is essential, he said, to start dealing with Iran:
            /// FULLER ACT ///
      Through our actions, we have suspended the 
      geopolitics of the Persian Gulf, and that makes 
      life very complicated for us and for everyone 
      else. Our boycott of Iran affects huge issues of 
      long term importance: pipelines which are not 
      here for four or five years but for 40 or 50 
      years and affect the region. Iran could assist 
      in overthrowing Saddam Hussein, if we had worked 
      with Iran in this area. But for a long time, we 
      were the threat to Iran much more than Saddam 
      Hussein was. 
            /// END ACT ///
Mr. Fuller noted that Iran has moved closer to Russia 
and China because it has been shunned by the United 
States. He believes Iran could offer some help in 
bringing stability to Afghanistan and the Caucasus. 
Above all, it has had years of experience as an 
Islamic republic under clerical rule. It can draw 
lessons useful for the rest of the Muslim world. 
Ted Carpenter, director of defense and foreign policy 
studies at the private Cato Institute, cited one 
possible lesson:
            /// CARPENTER ACT ///
      We may see the passing of a fairly pervasive 
      myth, and that is that the values of Islam and 
      democracy are antithetical. What is going on in 
      Iran today and at the other end of the Islamic 
      world in Indonesia thus becomes very, very 
      interesting. Are we going to see the emergence 
      of home-grown versions of democracy compatible 
      with the basic principles of Islam?
            /// END ACT ///
But is democracy assured in Iran? Assad Homayoun, an 
Iranian opposition leader in the United States, has 
his doubts. He notes the reaction of the hard-liners 
to the reformers' success in the first round of 
elections:
            /// HOMAYOUN ACT ///
      They shut down all pro-democracy papers - daily, 
      weekly and monthly. And they incarcerated a 
      number of students, journalists and even two 
      prominent pro-democracy women. Presently, Iran 
      is entering a crisis of confrontation between 
      the clerics and the people of Iran, maybe 
      resorting to violence. The situation in Iran is 
      very tense. 
            /// END ACT ///
Entrenched in the judiciary and the security forces, 
the conservative clerics limit the power of reformist 
President Mohammed Khatami. 
Mr. Homayoun says their intransigence could lead to a 
popular uprising. He believes there is even a faction 
of the Revolutionary Guards ready to break ranks with 
the hardliners. In his opinion, the Iranian people 
have had their fill of clerical rule.
Jerome Segal, President of the Jewish Peace Lobby, 
says a revitalized and more democratic Iran could play 
a major role as a Middle East peacemaker. 
Mr. Segal believes Jerusalem must be the shared 
capital of Israelis and Palestinians. To overcome 
Israeli resistance, Iran could make a dramatic offer 
to end all opposition to the Jewish state:
             /// SEGAL ACT ///
      To me, that actually means some kind of 
      reconciliation between Judaism and Islam with 
      respect to Jerusalem. The question is whether or 
      not Iran, which would be the uniquely positioned 
      country, could constructively be brought into 
      play in terms of bringing that long-term 
      reconciliation for a true deal on Jerusalem.
            /// END ACT /// 
But Mr. Segal notes that any such lofty action depends 
on continuing reform in Iran.   (Signed) 
NEB/ew/gm 
08-May-2000 18:05 PM EDT (08-May-2000 2205 UTC)
NNNN
Source: Voice of America
.





NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list