UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

DATE=6/3/98
TYPE=BACKGROUND REPORT
NUMBER=5-40579
TITLE=INDO PAK RELATIONS
BYLINE=RAVI KHANNA
DATELINE=ISLAMABAD
CONTENT=
VOICED AT: 
INTRO:  TENSION CONTINUES TO MOUNT BETWEEN INDIA AND PAKISTAN 
AFTER LAST MONTH'S NUCLEAR TESTS BY THE TWO SOUTH ASIAN  
NEIGHBORS.  RAVI KHANNA SPOKE WITH THE FORMER FOREIGN SECRETARIES
OF THE TWO COUNTRIES FOR A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ON RELATIONS 
WHICH HAVE BEEN STRAINED SINCE THE NATIONS GAINED INDEPENDENCE 
FROM THE BRITISH IN 1947.
TEXT:  INDIA'S FORMER FOREIGN SECRETARY, J-N DIXIT, BLAMES THE 
TENSION BETWEEN THE TWO ON WHAT HE CALLS PAKISTAN'S IDENTITY 
CRISIS.
                   /// DIXIT ACTUALITY-ONE ///
         THERE ARE TWO FACTORS.  FIRST; PAKISTAN, EVEN AFTER THE 
         PARTITION, HAS A SENSE OF CRISIS ABOUT ITS IDENTITY.  IT
         DID NOT GET ALL THE MUSLIMS FROM INDIA -- PRE-PARTITION 
         INDIA -- INTO PAKISTAN.  SO THE TWO-NATION THEORY THAT 
         ISLAM WILL CREATE THE BASIS FOR A NEW NATION HAS NOT 
         BEEN PROVED CORRECT.  IT WAS FURTHER ERODED BY THE 
         BREAKING AWAY OF BANGLADESH.  SO THERE IS THIS ABIDING 
         PROBLEM OF IDENTITY.  SO TO CONSOLIDATE THEIR IDENTITY, 
         THEY FEEL THAT THEY MUST CONSTANTLY HARP ON THE THEME OF
         THEIR ISLAMIC NATURE, AND THEIR SEPARATENESS FROM THE 
         REST OF INDIA, OR INDIAN PEOPLE WITH WHOM THEY SHARE 
         CULTURE, LANGUAGE, MUSIC, ALL SORTS OF THINGS.  SO THIS 
         IS A CASE WHERE THE GEO-POLITICAL REALITY IS SOUGHT TO 
         BE TRANSCENDED BY AN EMPHASIS ON A NARROWER IDENTITY.  
         THOUGH THERE IS A REALIZATION BOTH IN INDIA AND PAKISTAN
         THAT THEY SHOULD LIVE TOGETHER, THEY HAVE A SLIGHT 
         PARANOIA ABOUT IT.
                      /// END ACTUALITY ///
BUT PAKISTAN'S FORMER FOREIGN SECRETARY SHAHARYAR KHAN SAYS IT 
WAS INDIA THAT TRIGGERED THIS FEELING IN PAKISTAN BY NOT  
ACCEPTING IT AS A SOVEREIGN STATE IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE PARTITION
IN 1947.
                      /// KHAN ACT-ONE ///
         I THINK THERE WAS, AT THE TIME OF PARTITION, A FEELING 
         IN PAKISTAN THAT INDIA HAD NOT ACCEPTED PAKISTAN AS A 
         SOVEREIGN STATE, THAT IT WAS A BRIEF ABERRATION OF 
         QAID-E-AZAM MOHAMMAD ALI JINNAH (FOUNDING FATHER OF 
         PAKISTAN), AND THAT IN A SHORT PERIOD PAKISTAN SOMEHOW 
         WILL RETURN TO THE FOLD.  AT LEAST THIS WAS THE 
         PERCEPTION -- A PERCEPTION FUELED BY VARIOUS AGREEMENTS 
         NOT BEING FULFILLED (BY INDIA), SUCH AS THE AGREEMENT TO
         TRANSFER FINANCE, AND ALSO THE PROBLEMS THAT AROSE 
         IMMEDIATELY AT THE PARTITION -- THE LARGE NUMBER OF 
         DEATHS ON BOTH SIDES, AND OF COURSE THE ISSUE OF 
         KASHMIR, AND AT THAT TIME HYDERABAD AND JUNNAGARH ALSO. 
         SO THE FEELING IN PAKISTAN WAS THAT WE ARE A NEW BORN 
         STATE, WE HAVE COME INTO BEING, AND YET WE ARE NOT BEING
         ACCEPTED IN OUR NEW IDENTITY, IN OUR NEW SOVEREIGNTY AND
         THIS HAS LED TO A CERTAIN HOSTILITY IN PAKISTAN TOWARDS 
         INDIA AND I AM AFRAID THIS HOSTILITY HAS REMAINED OVER 
         THE LAST 50-YEARS.
                      /// END ACTUALITY ///
BUT MR. KHAN BELIEVES LAST MONTH'S NUCLEAR TESTS BY THE TWO 
COUNTRIES WILL MAKE IT EASIER FOR THEM TO SIT ACROSS THE TABLE AS
EQUALS AND TALK PEACE.  
                      /// KHAN ACT-TWO ///
         IN THESE 50-YEARS WE HAVE SEEN THREE WARS BETWEEN THE 
         TWO COUNTRIES, WHICH HAVE LED TO DESTRUCTION.  THERE HAS
         BEEN NO WINNER, BOTH SIDES HAVE BEEN LOSERS, AND TO 
         CONTEMPLATE SOMETHING AS HORRIBLE AS A NUCLEAR 
         CONFRONTATION IS SOMETHING WHICH BOTH COUNTRIES AND BOTH
         PEOPLE SHOULD TURN THEIR BACKS ON.  BUT AS YOU SAY THE 
         SILVER-LINING IN THIS WHOLE PROCESS IS THE FACT THAT 
         BOTH COUNTRIES ARE OUT OF THE CLOSET.  NOW I FEEL THE 
         CHANCES OF BOTH SIDES SITTING DOWN (FOR TALKS) HAVE 
         INCREASED -- SEEING THE HORRORS OF WHAT COULD HAPPEN IF 
         THINGS WENT WRONG.  BOTH SIDES -- PUSHED BY THEIR 
         PUBLIC, PUSHED BY THE PUBLIC OPINION, AND BY THE POOR 
         ELEMENTS WHO SUFFER SO MUCH FOR THE LACK OF EDUCATION, 
         OF HEALTH, OF POWER, OF SCHOOLS -- CAN NOW SIT DOWN 
         ACROSS THE TABLE VIRTUALLY ON A STATE OF EQUIVALENCE, 
         AND REALLY, MEANINGFULLY SETTLE DOWN TO TRYING AND 
         RESOLVING ISSUES.  IT WILL NOT BE EASY, IT WILL TAKE A 
         LONG TIME, IT WILL BE A STEEP UPHILL, BUT MEANINGFUL 
         NEGOTIATIONS, I THINK, ARE NECESSARY AND PROBABLY HAVE A
         BETTER CHANCE TODAY THAN THEY DID OVER THE LAST 
         50-YEARS.
                      /// END ACTUALITY ///
THAT WAS PAKISTAN'S FORMER FOREIGN SECRETARY SHAHRYAR KHAN ON 
INDIA/PAKISTAN RELATIONS.   (SIGNED)
NEB/RK/CB/RAE
03-Jun-98 7:20 AM EDT (1120 UTC)
NNNN
Source: Voice of America
.





NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list