UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

¤ÉÉä±ÉxÉä xɽþÒÆ nùäÆMÉä* 

... (´ªÉ´ÉvÉÉxÉ)

+Éb÷´ÉÉhÉÒ VÉÒ ¤ÉÉä±ÉäÆMÉä iÉÉä ½þ¨É ¦ÉÒ =xÉEòÉä ¤ÉÉä±ÉxÉä xɽþÒÆ nùäÆMÉä*

... (´ªÉ´ÉvÉÉxÉ)

_______________________________________________________________________

* Expunged as ordered by the chair.

¸ÉÒ ¨ÉÉä½þxÉ ÊºÉÆ½þ (nùä´ÉÊ®úªÉÉ): ºÉ¦ÉÉ{ÉÊiÉ ¨É½þÉänùªÉ, <iÉxÉÒ MÉÆ¦ÉÒ®ú ¤ÉÉiÉ ½þÉä MɪÉÒ* <ºÉ {É®ú ¨ÉÉ¡òÒ ¨ÉÉÆMÉxÉä EòÒ ¤ÉÉiÉ ½þè*

... (´ªÉ´ÉvÉÉxÉ)

+É{É =ºÉEòÉä EòɪÉÇ´ÉɽþÒ ºÉä ÊxÉEò±É´ÉÉ nùÒÊVÉB* ... (´ªÉ´ÉvÉÉxÉ) +É{É =xɺÉä ¨ÉÉ¡òÒ ¨ÉÆMÉ´ÉÉ<ªÉä*

... (´ªÉ´ÉvÉÉxÉ)

b÷É. ¶É¡òÒEòÖ®úǽþ¨ÉÉxÉ ¤ÉEòÇ : ªÉ½þ ºÉƺÉnù EòÉ +{ɨÉÉxÉ ½þè*

... (´ªÉ´ÉvÉÉxÉ)

MR. CHAIRMAN: I do not want anybody to express any derogatory remarks against any Member particularly with regard to our security. Any such remarks expressed here would be expunged. Please continue.

¸ÉÒ ¨ÉÉä½þxÉ ÊºÉÆ½þ : <iÉxÉÉ ½þÒ EòÉ¡òÒ xɽþÒÆ ½þè*

... (´ªÉ´ÉvÉÉxÉ)

ªÉ½þ ¤É½þÖiÉ MÉÆ¦ÉÒ®ú ¤ÉÉiÉ ½þè*

... (´ªÉ´ÉvÉÉxÉ)

ºÉiiÉÉ {ÉIÉ Eòä BEò ÊVɨ¨ÉänùÉ®ú ºÉnùºªÉ xÉä BäºÉÒ ¤ÉÉiÉ Eò½þÒ ½þè* ... (´ªÉ´ÉvÉÉxÉ)

THE MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS (SHRI L.K. ADVANI): If anyone from the Government Benches has described an hon. Member of this House as ........I apologise for it apart from the fact that you may expunge it.

¸ÉÒ ¨ÉÖ±ÉÉªÉ¨É ÊºÉÆ½þ ªÉÉnù´É : ºÉ¦ÉÉ{ÉÊiÉ ¨É½þÉänùªÉ, ¨ÉèÆ <ºÉʱÉB Eò½þ ®ú½þÉ lÉÉ EªÉÉäÆÊEò VÉÉVÉÇ ºÉɽþ¤É xÉä Eò½þÉ ÊEò ¨ÉèÆxÉä ʴɺ¡òÉä]õ <ºÉʱÉB ÊEòªÉÉ ÊEò +¦ÉÒ EòÖUô xɽþÒÆ ½þÖ+É ½þè* <ºÉʱÉB ½þ¨ÉxÉä EòÖUô ¤ÉÉiÉäÆ Eò½þÒÆ ÊEò ªÉÉ iÉÉä =xÉEòÉä ¥ÉÒ¡ò MɱÉiÉ ÊEòªÉÉ MɪÉÉ ½þè ªÉÉ =x½þÉäÆxÉä {ÉjÉÉ´ÉʱɪÉÉÆ xɽþÒÆ {ÉgøÒ ½þèÆ, <ºÉʱÉB ¨ÉèÆ MÉÉä{ÉxÉÒªÉiÉÉ EòÉä ¦ÉÆMÉ xɽþÒÆ Eò®úxÉÉ SÉɽþiÉÉ* ½þ¨ÉxÉä VÉÉä EòÖUô ÊEòªÉÉ ½þè, =xÉEòÉä VÉÉVÉÇ ºÉɽþ¤É ºÉä Eò½þäÆMÉä* =xÉEòÉä ¤ÉiɱÉɪÉäÆMÉä +Éè®ú +MÉ®ú =xÉEòÉä MɱÉiÉ ¥ÉÒ¡ò ÊEòªÉÉ ½þè iÉÉä =xÉEòÉä º´ÉÒEòÉ®ú Eò®úÉBÆMÉä ÊEò ½þ¨ÉxÉä EòÖUô xɽþÒÆ ÊEòªÉÉ ½þè* <ºÉÒʱÉB ½þ¨ÉxÉä <xÉ ¤ÉÉiÉÉäÆ EòÉä Eò½þxÉÉ SÉɽþÉ* <ºÉEòä +±ÉÉ´ÉÉ ¨Éä®úÒ +Éè®ú EòÉä<Ç ¨ÉƶÉÉ xɽþÒÆ lÉÒ*

¸ÉÒ ¨ÉÖ±ÉÉªÉ¨É ÊºÉÆ½þ ªÉÉnù´É - VÉÉ®úÒ ªÉ½þ EªÉÉ ºÉÉʤÉiÉ Eò®úiÉÉ ½þè* {É®ú¨ÉÉhÉÖ ]õèº]õ EòÒ +Éc÷ ¨ÉäÆ nùä¶É Eòä ºÉÉlÉ BEò +Éè®ú Uô±É ÊEòªÉÉ VÉÉ ®ú½þÉ ½þè* EªÉÉ EòÉ®úhÉ lÉä ÊEò +É{ÉxÉä {É®úÒIÉhÉ Eòä 3-4 ÊnùxÉ Eòä +Ænù®ú +¨É®úÒEòÉ B´ÉÆ VÉÉ{ÉÉxÉÒ Eò¨{ÉÊxɪÉÉäÆ EòÉä ʤÉVɱÉÒ ªÉÉäVÉxÉÉ+ÉäÆ Eòä ʱÉB ºÉ®úEòÉ®úÒ MÉÉÆ®ú]õÒ ¨ÉÆVÉÚ®ú EòÒ* ½þ¨É {ÉÚUôxÉÉ SÉɽþiÉä ½þèÆ ÊEò <ºÉEòä {ÉÒUôä EªÉÉ ¨ÉƶÉÉ ½þè* +É{ÉxÉä iÉä±É =i{ÉÉnùxÉ Eòä ʱÉB 18 ¤±ÉÉìEò Ê´Énùä¶ÉÒ Eò¨{ÉÊxɪÉÉäÆ EòÉä ¨ÉÆVÉÚ®ú ÊEòB* <ºÉÒ iÉ®ú½þ 28 Ê´Énùä¶ÉÒ Eò¨{ÉÊxɪÉÉäÆ EòÉä nùä¶É Eòä 50,000 ´ÉMÉÇ ÊEò±ÉÉä¨ÉÒ]õ®ú ¦ÉÉMÉ {É®ú JÉÉxÉ EòÉ ±ÉÉ<ǺÉèÆºÉ ÊnùªÉÉ* VÉ¤É Ê´Éº¡òÉä]õ Eò®úEòä VɨÉÒxÉ EòÉ ]õèº]õ ÊEòªÉÉ VÉÉBMÉÉ iÉÉä Ê´Énùä¶ÉÒ Eò¨{ÉÊxɪÉÉÆ ½þ¨ÉÉ®úä nùä¶É EòÒ ®úIÉÉ EòÒ {ÉÚ®úÒ MÉÉä{ÉxÉÒªÉiÉÉ ±ÉäÆMÉÒ* ªÉ½þ nùä¶É Eòä ʱÉB ¤É½þÖiÉ ¤Éc÷É JÉiÉ®úÉ {ÉènùÉ ÊEòªÉÉ MɪÉÉ ½þè* {ÉiÉÉ ±ÉMÉÉ ±ÉäÆ ÊEò EòÉèxÉ nùä¶É¦ÉEiÉ ½þè, EòÉèxÉ nùä¶ÉpùÉä½þÒ ½þè* Ê´Énùä¶ÉÒ Eò¨{ÉÊxɪÉÉÆ ʴɺ¡òÉä]õ Eòä ¤É½þÉxÉä EªÉÉ-EªÉÉ Eò®úäÆMÉÒ* <ºÉºÉä ½þ¨ÉÉ®úä nùä¶É EòÒ ®úIÉÉ EòÉä ºÉ¤ÉºÉä VªÉÉnùÉ JÉiÉ®úÉ {ÉènùÉ ½þÖ+É ½þè* ªÉ½þ EªÉÉäÆ ÊEòªÉÉ ½þè, EªÉÉ ªÉ½þÒ ½þè º´Énùä¶ÉÒ +ÉÆnùÉä±ÉxÉ* ... (´ªÉ´ÉvÉÉxÉ) 50,000 ´ÉMÉÇ ÊEò±ÉÉä¨ÉÒ]õ®ú ʽþxnùÖºiÉÉxÉ EòÒ VɨÉÒxÉ {É®úÒIÉhÉ Eòä SÉÉ®ú ÊnùxÉ Eòä +Ænù®ú nùÒ ½þè +Éè®ú xÉÉ®úÉ nùäiÉä ½þèÆ º´Énùä¶ÉÒ EòÉ, nùä¶É EòÉä ¤É½þEòÉiÉä ½þèÆ º´Énùä¶ÉÒ Eòä xÉÉ¨É ºÉä* <ºÉʱÉB ½þ¨É Eò½þxÉÉ SÉɽþiÉä ½þèÆ ÊEò ªÉ½þ º´Énùä¶ÉÒ EòÉ xÉÉ®úÉ xɽþÒÆ ½þè* ®úɹ]ŠʽþiÉ Eòä ºÉÉlÉ <iÉxÉÉ ¤Éc÷É ÊJɱɴÉÉc÷ Eò®úxÉÉ, <ºÉºÉä ½þ¨ÉÉ®úä nùä¶É EòÒ ®úIÉÉ ºÉÉ®úÒ MÉÉä{ÉxÉÒªÉiÉÉ ¦ÉÆMÉ ½þÉä VÉÉBMÉÒ* ªÉ½þ iÉÉä º´ÉÒEòÉ®ú Eò®úxÉÉ {Éc÷äMÉÉ ÊEò ´É½þÒ ¶ÉÊEiɶÉɱÉÒ ½þè VÉÉä +ÉÊlÉÇEò nÞùʹ]õ ºÉä ¨ÉVɤÉÚiÉ ½þè* ½þ¨É Ê¡ò®ú nùÉä½þ®úÉxÉÉ SÉɽþiÉä ½þèÆ ÊEò ®úIÉÉ Eòä ¨ÉɨɱÉä ¨ÉäÆ ½þ¨ÉäÆ +{ÉxÉÒ ¶ÉÊEiÉ EòÉä ¨ÉVɤÉÚiÉ Eò®úxÉÉ SÉÉʽþB ÊVɺɺÉä nùÖÊxɪÉÉ EòÉ EòÉä<Ç ¦ÉÒ nùä¶É ½þ¨ÉÉ®úä nùä¶É EòÒ iÉ®ú¡ò ¤ÉÖ®úÒ ÊxÉMÉɽþ ºÉä xÉ nùäJÉ ºÉEòä*

½þ¨ÉxÉä ºÉÒ.]õÒ.¤ÉÒ.]õÒ. {É®ú nùºiÉJÉiÉ Eò®úxÉä ºÉä ºÉÉ¡ò ¨ÉxÉÉ Eò®ú ÊnùªÉÉ* °üºÉ xÉä ¦ÉÒ Eò½þÉ, |ÉvÉÉxɍɯjÉÒ VÉÒ xÉä Eò½þ ÊnùªÉÉ lÉÉ ÊEò ½þ¨É ½þºiÉÉIÉ®ú xɽþÒ Eò®úäMÉäÆ, iÉÉä <ºÉºÉä ªÉ½þ ºÉÉ¡ò lÉÉ ÊEò ½þ¨ÉÉ®úä {ÉÉºÉ Bä]õ¨É ¤É¨É ½þè* =ºÉEòä ºÉÉlÉ ½þ¨ÉxÉä Eò<Ç ¤ÉÉ®ú Eò½þÉ ÊEò ½þ¨É ÊEòºÉÒ {É®ú ½þ¨É±ÉÉ xɽþÒÆ Eò®úäÆMÉä* ªÉÊnù EòÉä<Ç ½þ¨É±ÉÉ Eò®úäMÉÉ iÉÉä nùÖ¶¨ÉxÉ EòÒ VɨÉÒxÉ {É®ú ±Éc÷É<Ç ½þÉäMÉÒ* ±ÉäÊEòxÉ ªÉ½þ EòèºÉÉ EòÉ¨É ÊEòªÉÉ ÊEò {ÉÉÊEòºiÉÉxÉ +Éè®ú SÉÒxÉ Eòä Ê´É¹ÉªÉ ¨ÉäÆ +¨ÉäÊ®úEòÉ EòÉä ÊSÉ_Ò Ê±ÉJÉEò®ú SÉÒxÉ ´É {ÉÉEò BEò ºÉÉlÉ JÉc÷É Eò®ú ÊnùªÉÉ* ½þ¨ÉÉ®úÒ xÉÒÊiÉ BäºÉÒ ½þÉäxÉÒ SÉÉʽþB ÊEò {Éc÷ÉäºÉÒ nùä¶ÉÉäÆ ºÉä +SUôä Ê®ú¶iÉä ½þÉäÆ* ±ÉäÊEòxÉ +É{ÉxÉä SÉÒxÉ +Éè®ú {ÉÉÊEòºiÉÉxÉ nùÉäxÉÉäÆ ºÉä +SUôä Ê®ú¶iÉÉä EòÉä JÉi¨É Eò®ú ÊnùªÉÉ* +ÉVÉ {ÉÚ®ú¤É ºÉä {ÉʶSÉ¨É iÉEò {ÉÚ®úÒ ºÉÒ¨ÉÉ {É®ú +¶ÉÉÆÊiÉ ½þè* SÉÒxÉ +Éè®ú {ÉÉÊEòºiÉÉxÉ EòÉä <E_É Eò®úEòä ½þ¨ÉÉ®úä nùä¶É EòÒ ºÉÖ®úIÉÉ Eòä ʱÉB ºÉ¤ÉºÉä ¤Éc÷Ò SÉÖxÉÉèiÉÒ {ÉènùÉ EòÒ ½þè* VÉ¤É SÉÒxÉ Eòä ¤ÉÉ®úä ¨ÉäÆ Eò½þiÉä ½þèÆ ÊEò ¤Éc÷ä |ɪÉɺÉÉäÆ Eòä ¤ÉÉnù SÉÒxÉ ºÉä ºÉÆ¤ÉÆvÉ +SUôä ½þÉä ®ú½þä lÉä, EòÉÆOÉäºÉ EòÒ ºÉ®úEòÉ®ú xÉä, ®úÉVÉÒ´É MÉÉÆvÉÒ ºÉä ±ÉäEò®ú ¸ÉÒ MÉÖVÉ®úÉ±É iÉEò ºÉ¤ÉxÉä =ºÉºÉä +SUôä ºÉÆ¤ÉÆvÉ ¤ÉxÉÉB ÊVɺÉEòÉ xÉiÉÒVÉÉ ªÉ½þ ÊxÉEò±ÉÉ ÊEò 1965 ´É 1971 EòÒ VÉ¤É {ÉÉÊEòºiÉÉxÉ ºÉä ±Éc÷É<Ç ½þÖ<Ç lÉÒ iÉÉä SÉÒxÉ JÉɨÉÉä¶É nùäJÉiÉÉ ®ú½þÉ, =ºÉxÉä ¦ÉÉ®úiÉ EòÉ Ê´É®úÉävÉ xɽþÒÆ ÊEòªÉÉ +Éè®ú xÉ ½þÒ BEò ¶É¤nù ¤ÉÉä±ÉÉ * +É{ÉxÉä {ÉÉÊEòºiÉÉxÉ, ¤ÉÆMɱÉÉnùä¶É Eòä ]õÖEòc÷ä-]õÖEòc÷ä Eò®ú´ÉÉ ÊnùB* ½þ¨ÉÉ®úä ¤É½þÉnùÖ®ú ±Éc÷ä, `öÒEò EòÉ¨É ÊEòªÉÉ, ½þ¨ÉÉ®úÒ ºÉäxÉÉ ±Éc÷Ò, <ÆÊnù®úÉ VÉÒ ±Éc÷ÒÆ * ±ÉäÊEòxÉ <ºÉ ¤ÉÉ®ú +É{ÉxÉä SÉÖxÉÉèiÉÒ nùäEò®ú SÉÒxÉ EòÉ Ê´É®úÉävÉ ÊEòªÉÉ*

ʤÉVɱÉÒ, {ÉÉxÉÒ EòÒ ºÉ¨ÉºªÉÉ ½þ¨ÉºÉä ½þ±É xɽþÒÆ ½þÉäiÉÒ* +ÆOÉäVÉÒ ½þÖEòÖ¨ÉiÉ ¨ÉäÆ ½þ¨ÉÉ®úÉ nùä¶É MÉÖ±ÉÉ¨É lÉÉ* ʽþxnùÖºiÉÉxÉ ¨ÉäÆ Eò<Ç ¤ÉÉ®ú +EòÉ±É {Éc÷É ±ÉäÊEòxÉ =ºÉEòä ¤ÉÉnù ¦ÉÒ Ê½þxnùÖºiÉÉxÉ Eòä ÊEòºÉÉxÉÉäÆ xÉä Eò¦ÉÒ +Éi¨É½þiªÉÉ xɽþÒÆ EòÒ* +ÉVÉ ½þ¨ÉÉ®úä ÊEòºÉÉxÉÉäÆ EòÒ ªÉ½þ nù¶ÉÉ ½þè* ÊEò =x½þäÆ +Éi¨É½þiªÉÉ Eò®úxÉÒÆ {Éc÷ ®ú½þÒ ½þè* +ÉVÉ Ê½þxnùÖºiÉÉxÉ EòÉä ÊEòºÉÒ ºÉä JÉiÉ®úÉ ½þè iÉÉä =xÉ +ÉÆiÉÊ®úEò ¶ÉÊEiɪÉÉÆ ºÉä VÉÉä ¨ÉÆÊnù®ú Eòä xÉÉ¨É {É®ú, ʽþxnùÚ-¨ÉֺɱɨÉÉxÉ Eòä xÉÉ¨É {É®ú ¤ÉÉiÉäÆ Eò®úiÉÒ ½þèÆ* ¨ÉÖ®úÉnùɤÉÉnù ¨ÉäÆ ¨ÉÖʺ±É¨É ¤ÉSSÉÉä EòÉä (8 ºÉä 10 ºÉÉ±É Eòä ) 302 EòÉ ¨ÉÖ±ÉÊWÉ¨É ¤ÉxÉÉEò®ú nùÆMÉÉ Eò®úÉEò®ú +É{ÉxÉä VÉÉä ÊEòªÉÉ ½þè, =.|É. ¨ÉäÆ ]õÉb÷É ¨ÉäÆ 14-14 ºÉÉ±É Eòä ʺÉJÉ ±Éc÷EòÉäÆ EòÉä VÉä±É ¨ÉäÆ ¤ÉÆnù ÊEòªÉÉ lÉÉ*

½þè, VÉÉä ʽþxnùÚ, ¨ÉÖʺ±É¨É, ʺÉJÉ, <ǺÉÉ<ªÉÉäÆ EòÒ BEòiÉÉ EòÉä JÉÆÊb÷iÉ Eò®úxÉä ´ÉɱÉä ½þèÆ, =ºÉºÉä nùä¶É EòÉä ºÉ¤ÉºÉä ¤Éc÷É JÉiÉ®úÉ ½þè*

¸ÉÒ ¨ÉÖ±ÉÉªÉ¨É ÊºÉÆ½þ ªÉÉnù´É VÉÉ®úÒ ½þ¨ÉÉ®úÒ ¤É½þÉnùÖ®ú ºÉäxÉÉ +Éè®ú ½þ¨ÉÉ®úÒ ¤É½þÉnùÖ®ú VÉxÉiÉÉ BEò ½þÉäEò®ú Ê´Énùä¶ÉÒ ¶ÉÊEiÉ ÊEòiÉxÉÒ ¦ÉÒ iÉÉEòiÉ´É®ú ½þÉäMÉÒ, ½þ¨ÉÉ®úÉ Ê½þxnùÖºiÉÉxÉ ¨ÉÖEòɤɱÉÉ Eò®úäMÉÉ +Éè®ú nùÉä ]õÚEò VÉ´ÉÉ¤É nùäMÉÉ +Éè®ú nùÖ¶¨ÉxÉ EòÒ vÉ®úiÉÒ {É®ú ½þÒ ±Éc÷É<Ç ½þÉäMÉÒ +Éè®ú ½þ¨É ʽþxnùÖºiÉÉxÉ EòÒ vÉ®úiÉÒ EòÉä ±Éc÷É<Ç EòÉ ¨ÉènùÉxÉ xɽþÒÆ ¤ÉxÉÉxÉÉ SÉɽþiÉä ½þèÆ, ªÉ½þ +¨ÉäÊ®úEòÉ EòÒ ºÉÉÊVÉ¶É ½þè* +É{ÉEòÒ xÉÒÊiɪÉÉäÆ Eòä EòÉ®úhÉ +MÉ®ú ±Éc÷É<Ç EòÉ ¨ÉènùÉxÉ Ê½þxnùÖºiÉÉxÉ ¤ÉxÉiÉÉ ½þè iÉÉä ½þ¨ÉEòÉä iÉEò±ÉÒ¡ò ½þÉäMÉÒ* +MÉ®ú ¨ÉVɤÉÚ®úÒ ¨ÉäÆ ±Éc÷É<Ç EòÉ ¨ÉènùÉxÉ ½þÉäiÉÉ ½þÒ ½þè iÉÉä ±Éc÷É<Ç EòÉ ¨ÉènùÉxÉ Ê½þxnùÖºiÉÉxÉ xÉ ¤ÉxÉä, nùÖÊxɪÉÉ EòÉ EòÉä<Ç +Éè®ú ¨ÉÖ±Eò ¤ÉxÉä, <ºÉ ¤ÉÉiÉ EòÉ ½þ¨ÉäÆ vªÉÉxÉ ®úJÉxÉä EòÒ Vɰü®úiÉ ½þè* ½þ¨É +{ÉxÉÒ {ÉÉ®ú¨{ÉÊ®úEò ¶ÉÊEiÉ EòÉä ¤ÉgøÉªÉäÆ +Éè®ú =ºÉ ¶ÉÊEiÉ EòÉä ¨ÉVɤÉÚiÉ Eò®úäÆ*

<x½þÒÆ ¶É¤nùÉäÆ Eòä ºÉÉlÉ ¨ÉèÆ +É{ÉEòÉä vÉxªÉ´ÉÉnù nùäiÉä ½þÖB +{ÉxÉÒ ¤ÉÉiÉ ºÉ¨ÉÉ{iÉ Eò®úiÉÉ ½þÚÆ*

... (´ªÉ´ÉvÉÉxÉ)

SHRI SOMNATH CHATTERJEE (BOLPUR): I have been conceding to everybody. If I am not called upon to speak, I will have to stage a walk-out.

¸ÉÒ ¨ÉnùxÉ ±ÉÉ±É JÉÖ®úÉxÉÉ : +É{É BäºÉÉ xɽþÒÆ Eò®úäÆ* =vÉ®ú ºÉä +É{ÉEòä ºÉÉiÉ ±ÉÉäMÉ ¤ÉÉä±Éä ½þèÆ +Éè®ú ªÉ½þÉÆ ºÉä SÉÉ®ú ±ÉÉäMÉ ¤ÉÉä±Éä ½þèÆ*

SHRI SOMNATH CHATTERJEE : I must concede to the Minister. The Speaker had said that after Shri Advani, I can speak.

MÞɽþ ¨ÉÆjÉÒ (¸ÉÒ ±ÉÉ±É EÞò¹hÉ +Éb÷´ÉÉhÉÒ) : ºÉ¦ÉÉ{ÉÊiÉ VÉÒ, 1949 ¨ÉäÆ ¦ÉÉ®úiÉ º´ÉiÉxjÉ ½þÖ+É +Éè®ú iÉ¤É ºÉä ±ÉäEò®ú ¨ÉÖZÉä 4-5 BäºÉä +´ÉºÉ®úÉäÆ EòÉ º¨É®úhÉ ½þÉäiÉÉ ½þè, VÉ¤É nùä¶É ¨ÉäÆ ¤É½þÖiÉ |ɺÉxxÉiÉÉ ½þÖ<Ç* ±ÉäÊEòxÉ |ÉɪÉ& ºÉ¦ÉÒ +´ÉºÉ®úÉäÆ {É®ú VÉ¤É nùä¶É ¨ÉäÆ |ɺÉxxÉiÉÉ ½þÖ<Ç +Éè®ú ºÉ´ÉǺÉÉvÉÉ®úhÉ ¦ÉÉ®úiÉÒªÉ MÉ´ÉÇ EòÉ +xÉÖ¦É´É Eò®úxÉä ±ÉMÉÉ iÉÉä ʴɶ´É ¦É®ú ¨ÉäÆ ½þ¨ÉÉ®úÒ ¤Éc÷Ò iÉÒJÉÒ +ɱÉÉäSÉxÉÉ ½þÖ<Ç*

¨ÉÖZÉä º¨É®úhÉ +ÉiÉÉ ½þè ÊEò VÉ¤É 1948 ¨ÉäÆ ½þènù®úɤÉÉnù ¦ÉÉ®úiÉ Eòä ºÉÉlÉ Ê´É±ÉªÉ Eò®úxÉä EòÉä iÉèªÉÉ®ú xɽþÒÆ lÉÉ +Éè®ú =ºÉ ºÉ¨ÉªÉ ´É½þÉÆ {É®ú EòÉ®úÇ´ÉÉ<Ç Eò®úxÉÒ {Éc÷Ò +Éè®ú ÊVɺÉEòä {ÉÊ®úhÉɨɺ´É°ü{É ½þènù®úɤÉÉnù EòÉä ¦ÉÉ®úiÉ Eòä ºÉÉlÉ Ê´É±ÉªÉ Eò®úxÉä Eòä ʱÉB Ê´É´É¶É ½þÉäxÉÉ {Éc÷É iÉÉä VÉÉä ±ÉÉäMÉ Ê´É¶´É ¨ÉäÆ ½þ¨ÉÉ®úä ʨÉjÉ ¨ÉÉxÉä VÉÉiÉä lÉä, BäºÉä ´ªÉÊEiɪÉÉäÆ xÉä ¦ÉÒ ½þ¨ÉÉ®úÒ ¤Éc÷Ò +ɱÉÉäSÉxÉÉ EòÒ* VÉ¤É MÉÉä´ÉÉ EòÉ ¨ÉÖÊEiÉ ºÉÆOÉÉ¨É ½þÖ+É iÉÉä ´É½þÒ SÉÒVÉ ½þÖ<Ç* MÉÉä´ÉÉ ¨ÉÖEiÉ ½þÖ+É, iÉ¤É ¦ÉÒ ´ÉèºÉÉ ½þÒ ½þÖ+É* ªÉ½þÉÆ iÉEò ÊEò Bb÷±ÉÉ<WÉ º]õÒ´É䯶ÉxÉ VÉÉä ´ÉèºÉä ¦ÉÉ®úiÉ Eòä {É®ú¨É ʨÉjÉ lÉä, ´ªÉÊEiÉMÉiÉ °ü{É ºÉä =x½þÉäÆxÉä <iÉxÉÒ iÉÒJÉÒ +ɱÉÉäSÉxÉÉ ½þ¨ÉÉ®úÒ ®úɹ]Å ºÉÆPÉ ¨ÉäÆ EòÒ +Éè®ú ªÉÚxÉÉ<Ê]õb÷ xÉä¶ÉÆºÉ ÊºÉEªÉÉäÊ®ú]õÒ EòÉ=ÆÊºÉ±É ¨ÉäÆ ½þ¨ÉÉ®úä ÊJɱÉÉ¡ò ¤ÉÉEòɪÉnùÉ |ɺiÉÉ´É ®úJÉÉ MɪÉÉ* ´É½þ |ɺiÉÉ´É {ÉʶSɨÉÒ ®úɹ]ÅÉäÆ Eòä ºÉ¨ÉlÉÇxÉ ºÉä {ÉÉÊ®úiÉ ¦ÉÒ ½þÉä VÉÉiÉÉ, +MÉ®ú ºÉÉäʴɪÉiÉ °üºÉ =ºÉEòÉä ´ÉÒ]õÉä xÉ Eò®úiÉÉ* <ºÉÒʱÉB VÉ¤É <ºÉEòÒ ¤ÉÉiÉ ½þÉäiÉÒ ½þè xÉ ÊEò ʴɶ´É ¨ÉäÆ ½þ¨ÉÉ®úÒ +ɱÉÉäSÉxÉÉ ½þÉä ®ú½þÒ ½þè iÉÉä =ºÉEòÉä EòºÉÉè]õÒ xɽþÒÆ ¨ÉÉxÉxÉÉ SÉÉʽþB* =ºÉEòÉ =±±ÉäJÉ Eò¨É ºÉä Eò¨É ªÉ½þÉÆ {É®ú Eò®úxÉä EòÒ Vɰü®úiÉ xɽþÒÆ ½þè* ½þÉÆ, =ºÉEòÉ ÊVÉiÉxÉÉ EòÖUô vªÉÉxÉ ®úJÉxÉÉ ½þè, ´É½þ ®úJÉxÉÉ SÉÉʽþB*

¦ÉÉ®úiÉ Eò¦ÉÒ ¦ÉÒ +xiÉ®úÉǹ]ÅÒªÉ +ʦɨÉiÉ Eòä ¤ÉÉ®úä ¨ÉäÆ =nùɺÉÒxÉ xɽþÒÆ ½þÉä ºÉEòiÉÉ* Eò¦ÉÒ xɽþÒÆ ½þÉä ºÉEòiÉÉ* ±ÉäÊEòxÉ =ºÉEòÉ +lÉÇ xɽþÒÆ ½þè ÊEò ´É½þ ÊxÉhÉÉǪÉEò ¤ÉxÉä, ´É½þ ÊxÉhÉÉǪÉEò xɽþÒÆ ¤ÉxÉ ºÉEòiÉÉ* ¨ÉÖZÉä ªÉÉnù ½þè ÊEò {ÉÉäJÉ®úhÉ ¨ÉäÆ VÉ¤É {ɽþ±ÉÉ-{ɽþ±ÉÉ +hÉÖ Ê´Éº¡òÉä]õ ½þÖ+É lÉÉ, =ºÉ ºÉ¨ÉªÉ ¦ÉÒ EòÉ¡òÒ +ɱÉÉäSÉxÉÉ ½þÖ<Ç lÉÒ, ±ÉäÊEòxÉ nùä¶É Eòä ¦ÉÒiÉ®ú, ªÉ½þ 1974 EòÒ ¤ÉÉiÉ ½þè, ¨ÉèÆ =ºÉ ºÉ¨ÉªÉ ¦ÉÉ®úiÉÒªÉ VÉxÉºÉÆPÉ EòÉ +vªÉIÉ lÉÉ +Éè®ú +vªÉIÉ Eòä xÉÉiÉä BEò ±ÉäJÉ Eòä °ü{É ¨ÉäÆ, ´ÉEiÉ´ªÉ Eòä °ü{É ¨ÉäÆ ¨ÉèÆxÉä VÉÉä ¤ÉÉiÉ Eò½þÒ, =ºÉEòÉä ¨ÉèÆ lÉÉäc÷É ºÉÉ ½þÒ =rÞiÉ Eò°üÆMÉÉ* ¨ÉèÆxÉä Eò½þÉ ÊEò:

"The Government's announcement that India has successfully carried out an underground nuclear explosion has been hailed with hallelujah from all sides.

Only twice in recent years has one witnessed such a mood of national elation - first when the Indian Army entered Dacca to liberate Bangladesh and now when India has virtually entered the nuclear club."

¨ÉèÆ <ºÉ ¤ÉÉiÉ EòÉ º¨É®úhÉ <ºÉʱÉB Eò®ú ®ú½þÉ ½þÚÆ ÊEò ºÉSɨÉÖSÉ Eò±É ¤É½þºÉ ºÉÖxÉiÉä ½þÖB ¨ÉÖZÉä lÉÉäc÷É ºÉÉ +¡òºÉÉäºÉ ½þÖ+É lÉÉ* <ºÉ ¤ÉÉiÉ EòÉ +¡òºÉÉäºÉ ½þÖ+É lÉÉ ÊEò VÉ¤É EòÖUô nùä¶ÉÉäÆ xÉä ½þ¨ÉÉ®úÒ +ɱÉÉäSÉxÉÉ EòÒ, ºÉ¨ÉZÉ ¨ÉäÆ +ÉiÉÉ ½þè, ±ÉäÊEòxÉ MÉÖ]õ-ÊxÉ®ú{ÉäIÉ +ÉxnùÉä±ÉxÉ Eòä VÉÉä ®úɹ]Å ½þèÆ =xÉEòä ºÉ¨¨Éä±ÉxÉ ¨ÉäÆ VÉÉä |ɺiÉÉ´É {ÉÉÊ®úiÉ ½þÖ+É ´É½þ ´ÉºiÉÖiÉ& ¦ÉÉ®úiÉ Eòä <ºÉ +hÉÖ Ê´Éº¡òÉä]õ EòÉ ºÉ¨ÉlÉÇxÉ lÉÉ, SÉɽþä ¦ÉÉ®úiÉ EòÉ xÉÉ¨É xɽþÒÆ ʱɪÉÉ MɪÉÉ* BäºÉÒ ÊºlÉÊiÉ ¨ÉäÆ ½þ¨ÉÉ®úä ¤É½þÖiÉ |ɨÉÖJÉ ºÉ½þªÉÉäMÉÒ +Éè®ú VÉÉä ºÉÉvÉÉ®úhÉiÉ& ½þ®úäEò ¨ÉɨɱÉä EòÉ ºÉ½þÒ Ê´É¶±Éä¹ÉhÉ Eò®úiÉä ½þèÆ +Éè®ú ʴɶ±Éä¹ÉhÉ ºÉ½þÒ ¦ÉÒ xÉ Eò®úiÉä ½þÉäÆ, {ÉÚ®úÒ iÉ®ú½þ +É¡ò nù ]ÅèEò xÉ ½þÉäÆ, =xÉEòä {ɽþ±Éä-{ɽþ±Éä Ê®úBE¶ÉÆºÉ |ÉɪÉ& {ÉÉäVÉÒÊ]õ´É lÉä, BäºÉÉ ¨ÉÖZÉä xɽþÒÆ ÊnùJÉÉ* ±ÉäÊEòxÉ Eò±É VÉ¤É ¨ÉèÆ =xÉEòÉä ºÉÖxÉxÉä ±ÉMÉÉ iÉÉä ¤Éc÷É +ɶSɪÉÇ ½þÖ+É* <ºÉÒʱÉB ¨ÉèÆxÉä |ÉvÉÉxÉ ¨ÉÆjÉÒ VÉÒ ºÉä +xÉÖ¨ÉÊiÉ ¨ÉÉÆMÉÒ ÊEò ¨ÉèÆ ¦ÉÒ EòÖUô ¤ÉÉä±ÉÚÆ* ºÉÉvÉÉ®úhÉiÉ& ªÉ½þ Ê´É¹ÉªÉ BäºÉÉ ½þè ÊVɺÉEòÉä ¤É½þÖiÉ Ê´ÉºiÉÉ®ú ºÉä |ÉvÉÉxÉ ¨ÉÆjÉÒ VÉÒ xÉä +{ÉxÉä +É®úʨ¦ÉEò ´ÉEiÉ´ªÉ ¨ÉäÆ ®úJÉÉ ½þè* |ÉÊiÉ®úIÉÉ ¨ÉÆjÉÒ VÉÉä ºÉÒvÉä iÉÉè®ú ºÉä <ºÉ Ê´É¹ÉªÉ ºÉä VÉÖc÷ä ½þÖB ½þèÆ ´Éä ¦ÉÒ ¤ÉÉä±Éä* SÉÚÆÊEò |ÉvÉÉxÉ ¨ÉÆjÉÒ Ê´Énùä¶É ʴɦÉÉMÉ EòÉ ¦ÉÒ EòɪÉÇ ºÉ¨¦ÉɱÉiÉä ½þèÆ, Ê´Énùä¶É ʴɦÉÉMÉ EòÉ EòÉä<Ç +±ÉMÉ ºÉä ¨ÉÆjÉÒ xɽþÒÆ ½þè <ºÉʱÉB ʴɺiÉÉ®ú ºÉä ¤É½þºÉ EòÉ =iiÉ®ú nùäÆMÉä, BäºÉÉ ¨ÉÖZÉä ʴɶ´ÉÉºÉ ½þè* <ºÉºÉä ºÉ¦ÉÒ {ɽþ±ÉÖ+ÉäÆ {É®ú |ÉEòÉ¶É {Éc÷ VÉÉBMÉÉ*

¨ÉèÆ ¨ÉÉxÉiÉÉ ½þÚÆ Eò±É ªÉ½þÉÆ {É®ú BEò ¤ÉÉiÉ EòÉä SÉÖxÉÉèiÉÒ nùÒ MÉ<Ç* ´É½þ ¦ÉÒ |ɨÉÖJÉ ±ÉÉäMÉÉäÆ Eòä uÉ®úÉ nùÒ MÉ<Ç ÊEò VÉ¤É ¦ÉÉ®úiÉ ºÉ®úEòÉ®ú Eò½þiÉÒ ½þè ÊEò ½þ¨ÉxÉä ªÉ½þ ÊxÉhÉÇªÉ nùä¶É EòÒ ºÉÖ®úIÉÉ EòÒ nÞùʹ]õ ºÉä ÊEòªÉÉ ½þè, iÉÉä =xÉ ±ÉÉäMÉÉäÆ xÉä Eò½þÉ ÊEò ºÉÖ®úIÉÉ ÊEòºÉºÉä? ºÉÖ®úIÉÉ EòÉ ºÉÆEò]õ ÊEòºÉºÉä ½þè? ½þ¨ÉäÆ EòÉä<Ç ºÉÆEò]õ ÊnùJÉÉ<Ç xɽþÒÆ nùäiÉÉ* EòÉä<Ç ºÉÆEò]õ ½þè ¦ÉÒ xɽþÒÆ, Ê¡ò®ú ¦ÉÒ ºÉÖ®úIÉÉ EòÒ ¤ÉÉiÉ Eò®úiÉä ½þèÆ, ±ÉäÊEòxÉ ºÉÖ®úIÉÉ Eò½þÉÆ ºÉä +É MÉ<Ç? +É{É Eò½þ nùäiÉä ÊEò ½þ¨ÉÉ®úä PÉÉä¹ÉhÉÉ {ÉjÉ ¨ÉäÆ Ê±ÉJÉÉ ½þÖ+É ½þè <ºÉÒʱÉB ½þ¨É Eò®ú ®ú½þä ½þèÆ, `öÒEò ½þè, SɱÉiÉÉ, ±ÉäÊEòxÉ VÉ¤É +É{É ºÉÆEò]õ +Éè®ú ºÉÖ®úIÉÉ EòÒ ¤ÉÉiÉ Eò®ú ®ú½þä ½þèÆ iÉÉä ½þ¨ÉäÆ ºÉ¨ÉZÉÉBÆ ÊEò ªÉ½þ ºÉÆEò]õ Eò½þÉÆ ºÉä ½þè +Éè®ú ªÉ½þ ºÉÆEò]õ Eò¤É {ÉènùÉ ½þÖ+É ½þè? EòèºÉä ªÉ½þ ºÉÖ®úIÉÉ EòÒ ¤ÉÉiÉ +É<Ç ½þè?

EòÉÆOÉäºÉ EòÒ +Éä®ú ºÉä xÉ]õ´É®ú ÊºÉÆ½þ VÉÒ ¤ÉÉä±Éä* ´Éä Ê´Énùä¶É ¨ÉÆjÉÉ±ÉªÉ Eòä ºÉÉlÉ ´É¹ÉÉäÇÆ iÉEò VÉÖc÷ä ®ú½þä ½þèÆ* +MÉ®ú =xÉEòÉä ¨ÉÉxÉÉ VÉÉB ÊEò ´Éä Ê´Énùä¶É IÉäjÉ Eòä ʴɶÉä¹ÉYÉ ½þèÆ iÉÉä ¦ÉÒ EòÉä<Ç MɱÉiÉ xɽþÒÆ ½þÉäMÉÉ* ªÉtÊ{É ´Éä |ÉÊiÉ®úIÉÉ IÉäjÉ Eòä ʴɶÉä¹ÉYÉ ½þèÆ ªÉÉ xɽþÒÆ, ¨ÉÖZÉä xɽþÒÆ {ÉiÉÉ lÉÉ* ±ÉäÊEòxÉ VÉ¤É =x½þÉäÆxÉä Eò±É ¨ÉÖZÉä ¤ÉiÉɪÉÉ ÊEò |ÉÉä-BÊE]õ´É EòÉ +lÉÇ EªÉÉ ½þÉäiÉÉ ½þè |ÉÊiÉ®úIÉÉ EòÒ ¦ÉɹÉÉ ¨ÉäÆ, iÉÉä ¨ÉÖZÉä +ɶSɪÉÇ ½þÖ+É* <ºÉÒʱÉB +ÉVÉ ¨ÉÖZÉä Êb÷¡òäÆºÉ BEºÉ{É]õÇºÉ Eòä {ÉÉºÉ VÉÉxÉÉ {Éc÷É* ¨ÉèÆxÉä =xÉEòÉä Eò½þÉ ÊEò ¨ÉèÆxÉä +MÉ®ú |ÉÉä-BÊE]õ´É ¶É¤nù Eò½þÉ iÉÉä EªÉÉ =ºÉEòÉ +lÉÇ ªÉ½þ ½þÉäiÉÉ ½þè VÉÉä xÉ]õ´É®ú ÊºÉÆ½þ VÉÒ ¨ÉÖZÉä ¤ÉiÉÉ ®ú½þä ½þèÆ, =x½þÉäÆxÉä Eò½þÉ Ê¤É±EòÖ±É xɽþÒÆ ½þÉäiÉÉ* =x½þÉäÆxÉä Eò½þÉ ÊEò ½þ¨É +É{ÉEòÉä ¤ÉiÉÉBÆMÉä EªÉÉ +lÉÇ ½þÉäiÉÉ ½þè* =x½þÉäÆxÉä +{ÉxÉä føÆMÉ ºÉä ¤ÉiÉɪÉÉ ÊEò EªÉÉ +lÉÇ ½þÉäiÉÉ ½þè, =ºÉ {É®ú ¨ÉèÆ ¤ÉÉnù ¨ÉäÆ +É>ðÆMÉÉ* ±ÉäÊEòxÉ Eò±É xÉ]õ´É®ú ÊºÉÆ½þ VÉÒ xÉä +É®ú¨¦É ¨ÉäÆ Eò½þÉ:-

"Now, we are entitled to know from the Prime Minister when did this threat begin. Did it begin on the 19th of March when he took over? Or, did it begin on the 8th of April when he gave the green signal to his scientists? ... Have the Pakistanis mounted an exercise which threatened the city of Amritsar?"

Mark the words. Every word is important - `Have the Pakistanis mounted an exercise which threatened the city of Amritsar?'

And, later on, he goes on to say:

"For 25 years, since 1971, there has been no security threat to India (meaning, from Pakistan). The Simla Agreement has ensured that there is no conflict with Pakistan."

Frankly, I cannot agree with this kind of an analysis of the situation. In fact, it is a total disagreement with this analysis that has made the Government of India take the decision that it had taken.

Subsequently, something similar was said by Shri P. Chidambaram also. Let me quote that also. It would be in place.

Questioning the same security concept Shri Chidambaram said, `The last war with Pakistan was fought 27 years ago'. And then he described how the hon. former Prime Minister, Shri Inder Kumar Gujral in his negotiations with Nawaz Sharif and President Clinton saw to it that so far as relations with Pakistan were concerned they moved towards normalcy.

I would not like to comment on the puerile tactic that he indulged in about the Vajpayee doctrine and the Advani doctrine because that is a very pet copy of many journalists trying to drive a wedge between the two. I would not expect Shri Chidambaram to do that.

Shri Natwar Singh in his speech had said that Shri Vajpayee has mentioned Nehruji and Indiraji, but perhaps he did not mention Rajivji and that it was understood. He said something like that. He quoted Rajivji who had made a very fervent appeal for nuclear disarmament and said that it did not succeed for different reasons. He said:-

"Rajiv Gandhi said that all nuclear weapons should be abolished by 2010 and Gorbachev came out with a proposal, if I remember correctly, that the nuclear weapons should be abolished by 2005. Then the Soviet Union disintegrated."

I do not know why Shri Natwar Singh or Shri Chidambaram conveniently disregarded the fact that in 1991 just before the elections, the Congress Party came forth with a manifesto and let us see what the manifesto says. It took cognizance of the threat that this Government has taken cognizance of. The 1991 election was fought by the Congress under the leadership of Rajivji. The 1991 Congress manifesto was prepared under the aegis of Rajivji. On Page 54 it says:-

"We are deeply concerned that Pakistan is developing the nuclear weapons. It is hoped that they will desist from this disastrous path. They have already inflicted four wars upon India. In case Pakistan persists with the development and deployment of nuclear weapons, India will be constrained to review her policy to meet the threat".

Generally, I am sure, in all documents of this kind Shri Chidambaram has a role. But I do not know whether he had any role in drafting the 1991 manifesto. But this is what I read. Have you read this? I was really surprised. This was the manifesto of the Congress Party.

SHRI RAJESH PILOT : We still say and had been saying that we keep the options open. We have all along been saying that weaponisation would damage our foreign policy. ... (Interruptions)

SHRI NATWAR SINGH (BHARATPUR): Shri Advani, I am very glad that you have read this. What is wrong in it?

SHRI L.K. ADVANI: I do not see anything wrong in this.

I only say that there is a threat perception which you tried to deny to this Government. ... (Interruptions)

SHRI NATWAR SINGH : We expect you to do better. It is feeble.

SHRI L.K. ADVANI: You have done as badly as you can. I will try to do better.

Sir, this is in so far as the security environment is concerned. I said that I would have ordinarily not intervened in this debate and left it to the intervention by the Defence Minister and then the final reply by the Prime Minister.

In so far as the relations with other countries are concerned and in so far as external security is concerned, they are the concerns either of the External Affairs Minister or of the Defence Minister. But I do believe that in so far as relations with Pakistan are concerned, they impinge not only on our external security but also on our internal security; and as a person who has been entrusted with the responsibility of looking after internal security, I feel that I can contribute something to this debate.

I believe that since 1947, Pakistan which declared itself a theocratic State has failed to reconcile with the fact that India has declared itself a non-denominational secular State, because commitment to theocracy and commitment to the two-nation theory logically lead to Kashmir becoming a part of Pakistan. But it did not happen. The leadership of Kashmir and the people of Kashmir decided to go along with India; and they have remained a part of this country since then.

Pakistan's failure to reconcile with this fact has been at the root of many problems that the country is facing in Jammu and Kashmir. That is how, there was a war in 1947, there was a war in 1965 and in a way, even the war in 1971 was related to that. But having failed in all the wars, they adopted a certain strategy which those concerned with India's security can never afford to discard and ignore. It cannot be done. Only those who discard it can think in terms of making statements of this kind: "Are they mounting an attack on Amritsar? Are they doing this? After all, they have very good talks with us. The Gujral doctrine was functioning very well; if you want to throw it overboard, you can do it. Why do you talk about threat perceptions when there are no threats at all? It is hunky-dory all along." It is only that kind of thinking that shows that we are totally oblivious of it or we shut our eyes ostrich-like to the fact that after the war in 1971, Pakistan decided upon a different strategy.


[NEXT PAGE]



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list