The Largest Security-Cleared Career Network for Defense and Intelligence Jobs - JOIN NOW

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

Kim Jong-un's Assassinated Brother May Have Received Money From US Intelligence

Sputnik News

17:08 12.06.2017(updated 17:09 12.06.2017)

Kim Jong-nam, the slain half-brother of North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, had $120,000 in cash in his possession on the day of his assassination, which he may have received from the US intelligence services, media reported Monday, citing Malaysian investigators.

TOKYO (Sputnik) – On February 13, Kim, traveling by the name of Kim Chol, was killed at the Kuala Lumpur International Airport before boarding a flight to Macau, where he resided with his family in exile.

During his stay in the country, Kim met with a US national believed by Malaysian authorities to have close links to a US intelligence agency, the Japanese Asahi Shimbun newspaper reported.

Malaysian investigators suspect that Kim passed some intelligence data to his US contact, according to the outlet.

"It may well have been in return for the information he provided," a Malaysian official said, as cited by the newspaper, referring to the cash found in Kim's possession on the day of the killing.

The meeting may have caused Pyongyang's decision to silence Kim, the outlet suggested.

Kim was likely to leave the country without declaring the received sum of money, as he traveled with a diplomatic passport allowing him to avoid a number of normal checking procedures when entering and leaving the country, the same reports noted.

Malaysian investigators suspect that Kim was killed with a doze of the VX nerve agent, a substance listed as a chemical weapon by the Chemical Weapons Convention and classified by the United Nations as a weapon of mass destruction.

Two women, Indonesian and a Vietnamese nationals, were arrested and charged with Kim's murder while Malaysian officials are reportedly looking for seven North Korean suspects in the murder probe.


Join the mailing list

One Billion Americans: The Case for Thinking Bigger - by Matthew Yglesias