• Military

• WMD Menu                           

• Introduction
• Systems
• Facilities
• Agencies
• Operations
• Countries
• Hot Documents
• News
• Reports
• Policy
• Budget
• Congress
• Links

• Intelligence
• Homeland Security
• Space

U.S. Policy of Aggression towards DPRK Blasted

Korean Central News Agency of DPRK via Korea News Service (KNS)

   Pyongyang, August 18 (KCNA) -- The more desperate military methods the U.S. war-like forces employ to stifle the DPRK would only escalate the military confrontation between the DPRK and the U.S. and render the situation more complicated.
    Rodong Sinmun Monday observes this in a signed article.
    It continues:
    The madcap joint military exercises being staged by the U.S. and the south Korean puppets in the ground, air and sea assume extremely reckless and dangerous nature. Though the war maneuvers vary from each other in their theatres, scale and contents, all of them are aimed to ignite a new war on the Korean Peninsula and stifle the DPRK by force of arms.
    The U.S. trigger-happy forces are describing the provocative saber rattling for aggression as something for the "security" of their country and its allies but it is nothing but a deceptive artifice to cover up the aggressive nature and aim of their criminal war maneuvers in the eyes of the public at home and abroad.
    They are seeking to use south Korea as a forefront base for offensive and a forward operational base for implementing their policy of aggression toward the DPRK.
    The U.S. neo-conservative forces are now justifying their hostile policy toward the DPRK, claiming that "the U.S. security is threatened by north Korea." This is a far-fetched assertion intended to escalate the Cold War on the Korean Peninsula and ignite the second Korean War.
    The gangster-like intention to blackmail the DPRK militarily and destroy it by force of arms would only spark off confrontation and conflict.
    Only when the provocative war exercises are stopped and the tensions defused, is it possible to bring a peaceful phase to the Korean Peninsula and improve the DPRK-U.S. relations.
    The U.S. should make a bold decision to replace the outdated Korean Armistice Agreement by a peace agreement.
    Lasting peace can never settle on the peninsula nor can the danger of war be removed from it as long as there exists the AA which the U.S. reduced to a dead document.
    It is possible to build a peace-keeping mechanism on the peninsula only when the DPRK-U.S. ties are improved on the principle of respecting each other's sovereignty and ensuring peace.
    It is foolish of the U.S. war-thirsty forces to try to hurt the DPRK by force of arms, regarding strength as all-powerful.
    They would be well advised to stop the reckless anti-DPRK military racket, well aware that their policy of aggression toward the DPRK would only entail catastrophic consequences.