• Military

• WMD Menu                           

• Introduction
• Systems
• Facilities
• Agencies
• Operations
• Countries
• Hot Documents
• News
• Reports
• Policy
• Budget
• Congress
• Links

• Intelligence
• Homeland Security
• Space

U.S. Double-dealing Policy Accused

Korean Central News Agency of DPRK via Korea News Service (KNS)

   Pyongyang, May 30 (KCNA) -- The United States should roll back its unjustifiable double-dealing policy and hostile policy toward the DPRK if it is truly interested in the settlement of the nuclear and missile issues, urges Rodong Sinmun Wednesday in a signed commentary.
    Disclosing the U.S. recent moves to round off the preparations for a nuclear war and its intensified military tie-up with Japan, the news analyst goes on:
    What should not be overlooked is the U.S. double-dealing policy. The Japanese reactionaries are working hard to establish the Missile Defence System (MD) while pushing forward the moves to become a military giant with the backing of the U.S. and at its connivance. Accession to nuclear weapons by Israel and other countries is chiefly attributable to the U.S. connivance and cooperation.
    The nuclear issue of the DPRK, however, originated from the U.S. nuclear threat toward it. But for the U.S. escalated nuclear threat to the DPRK its nuclear issue would not have cropped up. The U.S., proceeding from its double-dealing stand, found fault with the DPRK only, while defending and supporting Israel and other countries in their nuclear weaponization and cooperating with them. This is a revelation of its extreme two-faced policy and one-sided hostile policy toward the DPRK.
    Such countries as the U.S. and Japan say this or that about the measure taken by the DPRK for increasing its defence capacity although they manufacture latest type nuclear weapons and missiles of the next generation as they please. This double-dealing policy should not be tolerated under any circumstances.
    It is self-evident that the nuclear and missile issues can hardly be settled fairly as long as countries like the U.S. cling to their double-dealing policy. The persistent application of double-dealing standards would reduce even international law and treaties to dead papers.