Rumsfeld's Reckless Remarks against DPRK under Fire
Korean Central News Agency of DPRK
Pyongyang, June 23 (KCNA) -- U.S. Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld in a question and answer and interview with Asahi Shimbun in the wake of a speech made at the recent meeting of the Asian Security Forum held in Singapore malignantly slandered the DPRK over the delay of the six-party talks and its missile development.
Minju Joson Wednesday in a signed commentary says his remarks against the DPRK reflected the impatient mentality of the Bush administration now in the grip of the serious political crisis at home and abroad.
It goes on:
The U.S. is finding itself in a tighter corner as the days go by due to its foreign policy failure. It is now under fire at home and abroad. Its image fell to the ground and resignations are frequent inside its administration.
The "fiction of nuclear and missile threat from the DPRK" was invented by the U.S. to get rid of such miserable situation.
The U.S. charged the DPRK with "nuclear and missile proliferation" by absurdly linking its increase of nuclear deterrent force to terrorism in a bid to deliberately hype the urgency of the situation and induce the international community to support Washington's pressure upon the DPRK.
This campaign of the U.S. is aimed to justify its unreasonable assertion that the DPRK should scrap its nuclear program first though it is censured and protested worldwide and get rid of its miserable situation.
The U.S. is using the same method as it did in Iraq.
The DPRK will do what it should do when necessary no matter what others may say.
Such foolish trick of the U.S. to bring its difficult situation under control by pulling up others can never work on the DPRK. It will only cause the U.S. to suffer isolation, frustration and disgrace before the international community.
If the U.S. truly does not want political isolation and destruction, it should face up to the trend of times toward peace and justice and drop at once its high-handed and unilateral policy.
NEWSLETTER
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|