UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

13 January 2003

Transcript: Kelly Says Talks with North Korea, Energy Aid Possible

(Assistant Secretary's Jan. 13 remarks in Seoul, South Korea) (940)
James Kelly, in Seoul for talks with the newly elected South Korean
president, held out the possibility of talks with North Korea and even
aid to that country in the area of energy production.
"We are, of course, willing to talk to North Korea about their
response to the international community, particularly with respect to
elimination of nuclear weapons, and we're going to be talking here
with government people over how are some of the best ways to do that,"
the Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs
told reporters January 13.
The United States is well aware of the energy problems facing North
Korea, Kelly said, and offered that "it may well be that -- once we
can get beyond nuclear weapons -- there may be opportunities with the
U.S., with private investors, with other countries, to help North
Korea in the energy area."
Following is a transcript of Kelly's January 13 press availability in
Seoul, South Korea:
(begin transcript)
PRESS AVAILABILITY BY JAMES A. KELLY 
ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EAST ASIAN AND PACIFIC AFFAIRS
Monday, January 13, 2003, 11:30 a.m.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
SEOUL, KOREA
Assistant Secretary Kelly: Thanks very much. It was a special honor
and pleasure to meet with the President-elect, His Excellency
President-elect Roh, today, for the last hour. I was accompanied by
the Ambassador, by Mr. Moriarty of the White House, Senior Director
for Asian Affairs, and by Deputy Assistant Secretary Lawless from the
Pentagon.
We were primarily coming here to hear the President-elect's views. We
met his envoy, Mr. Chyung, a Representative in the National Assembly,
who will be coming to Washington before long. I wanted to hear
directly from the President-elect some of his views and how he sees
Korea developing under his Presidency, and he was very generous in
explaining his views. We see this as a great opportunity to improve,
to build our relationship and our alliance for the next 50 years, and
Mr. Roh commented on that.
I noted that this is January 13, a significant day. It was a hundred
years ago that a couple thousand Koreans arrived for the first time in
Hawaii, in the United States to take up residence. Now, we're talking
about way over 2,000,000 Korean-Americans. This began exactly 100
years ago, and it was a very auspicious day to meet with the
President-elect.
Why don't we take a couple of questions now -- maybe one from an
English speaker and one from a Korean speaker.
Question: (Barry Peterson of CBS) - As you know, there were meetings
over the weekend in Santa Fe with the former U.N. Ambassador, Bill
Richardson, who after the meetings, expressed optimism that talks
would begin soon. And then he said on one of the talk shows about the
North Koreans "They believe, in order to get something, they have to
lay out additional cards, step up the rhetoric and be more
belligerent." And we have certainly had a dose of that this weekend,
as I'm certain you've been aware -- all the things coming from the
North. Do you see this belligerence as perhaps a prelude to them
getting serious about talking, and if so, when or if might those talks
begin?
Assistant Secretary Kelly: I didn't hear Governor Richardson's views,
but when I left it was a little disappointing, because we really
hadn't heard anything from the North Koreans speaking to him that we
hadn't heard in their public pronouncements before that. So, it is as
you say a little mystifying, and I think we're just going to wait to
see. We are, of course, willing to talk to North Korea about their
response to the international community, particularly with respect to
elimination of nuclear weapons, and we're going to be talking here
with government people over how are some of the best ways to do that.
Question: (Kim Sang Hyup, Maeil Kyungje Shinmun (Daily Business News))
- Do you feel any need to revise or discard the so-called Agreed
Framework? Related to this question, there is a proposal, this is not
official yet, but using the pipeline gas projects of Exxon Mobil in
Sakhalin, might be useful too in solving the energy problems of North
Korea, as well as solving its (inaudible). Have you thought about
this?
Assistant Secretary Kelly: With respect to the Agreed Framework, when
I was in North Korea in October, I was told that it was considered
nullified. They said it was because of certain U.S. actions. This is a
position with which I don't agree. I believe we had been very careful
to observe the provisions of it over time. But as a result, the KEDO
board did stop the heavy fuel shipments, and we've had various other
breakdowns, and the expulsion of the IAEA inspectors since then. So,
where the Agreed Framework is going, I don't know. It's not in very
good health. However, we do know there are energy problems in North
Korea and it may well be that -- once we can get beyond nuclear
weapons -- there may be opportunities with the U.S., with private
investors, with other countries, to help North Korea in the energy
area.
I have a meeting now with some Transition Officers, then later on I'll
meet with members of the government. An excellent schedule has been
set up here. This is about talking to each other and exchanging views
and improving our understanding. Thank you very much.
(end transcript)
(Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, U.S.
Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)