UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

DATE=6/16/2000
TYPE=U-S OPINION ROUNDUP
TITLE=REFLECTIONS ON THE KOREAN SUMMIT
NUMBER=6-11879
BYLINE=ANDREW GUTHRIE
DATELINE=WASHINGTON
EDITOR=ASSIGNMENTS
TELEPHONE=619-3335
INTERNET=YES
CONTENT=
[EDITORS:  DUE TO THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE KOREAN 
SUMMIT, THIS   E X T R A   OPINION ROUNDUP WITH FRESH, 
F R I D A Y   EDITORIALS ASSESSING WHAT WAS 
ACCOMPLISHED, IS BEING TRANSMITTED IN ADDITION TO U-S 
OPINION ROUNDUP 6-11878 ON PUTIN AND THE PRESS]
INTRO:  The historic Korean peninsula summit is over, 
but the memory of this watershed event lingers on in 
the U-S press.  The nation's daily papers are assuming 
a cautious stance toward the possibility of a peaceful 
thaw between two of the world's most hostile and 
militarized nations. 
The event is being seen by some however, as nothing 
less than the beginning of the end to the Cold War's 
final chapter.  We get a sample of American media 
commentary from ____________ in today's U-S Editorial 
Digest. 
TEXT:  With the summit now over, newspapers around the 
country are trying to place what went on in some kind 
of perspective against the more than 50 years of 
extreme hostility between the two Koreas.
Many are enthusiastic at the prospect of improved 
relations between Pyongyang and Seoul, but more than a 
few remind readers that: "the proof of the pudding is 
in the eating," that is, the actions of the two 
nations in the weeks and months ahead will bear out 
the real fruit, if there is any, of the conference.
In Baltimore, The Sun is pleased, but also cautious.
      VOICE:  The summit ... exceeded expectations in 
      atmospherics if not specifics.  Peace is not at 
      hand but is suddenly imaginable.  No problem has 
      been solved but all may become soluble.  ... 
      This is a time for testing Kim Jong Il's 
      intentions, not taking goodness for granted.  No 
      lowering of our guard can precede the building 
      of confidence.  After the half-century of North 
      Korea's extreme hostility to the outer world, 
      much remains to be proven.  At least the process 
      has begun. 
TEXT:  The nation's number one business daily, The 
Wall Street Journal has an interesting look back at 
the change in Pyongyang's policy.
      VOICE:  /// OPT /// A rare and elusive beast was 
      briefly sighted on the Korean Peninsula this 
      week: peace.  The world watched as two men named 
      Kim pledged to work for reunification of the two 
      Koreas, an achievement that has eluded countless 
      other Kims for half a century. /// END OPT /// 
      How to proceed from here?  ... Much remains to 
      be seen.  Business ties, likely to be small at 
      first, will have only a limited impact unless 
      they spark a wider change that allows North 
      Koreans to start their own enterprises.  Such a 
      change would be the true litmus test of whether 
      North Korea is becoming a more responsible 
      regime, rather than simply hitting up the 
      outside world for benefits. .... Recall that 
      just a few years ago, when the U-S was seeking 
      to engage North Korea and the South was 
      maintaining a relatively hard line, Pyongyang 
      was all for dealing with the U-S rather than its 
      "puppets" in Seoul.  Now the roles of the two 
      allies are reversed, but the game is the same.  
      North Korea seeks to gain advantage from whoever 
      is prepared to engage it, and it seeks to play 
      the two off against each other. ... actions 
      still speak louder than words. ... There is 
      ample reason for skepticism.
TEXT:  The Washington Post sees a potential dilemma as 
relations begin to improve.
      VOICE:  Any effort to "engage" a militarily 
      aggressive totalitarian regime faces a dilemma.  
      Summitry and trade may moderate such a regime, 
      but they also may legitimize and sustain it.  
      South Korean President Kim Dae-jung's "sunshine 
      policy" toward North Korea and the Clinton 
      administration's effort to coax North Korea to 
      give up its weapons of mass destruction pose 
      such a dilemma.   ... The good mood generated by 
      the summit is real, and welcome.  At some point, 
      however, Kim Jong Il must deliver more than just 
      smiles. 
TEXT:  Specifics is what interests the Los Angeles 
Times, among others, as it waits to see how the 
summit's communique will be implemented.
      VOICE:  ... There may be a chance for a 
      continuing dialogue that could ease tensions and 
      the threat of conflict.  How real that 
      opportunity is will become clear soon.  One of 
      the few specifics in the vaguely worded 
      declaration signed in Pyongyang ... says the two 
      sides "will exchange groups of dispersed family 
      members" around August 15th.  Once or twice in 
      the past the North permitted brief meetings 
      among a handful of war-separated relatives.  
      Seoul estimates there are one-point eight 
      million such families, and for South Koreans the 
      prospect of family reunions is the greatest gift 
      their president could have brought home.  The 
      test will come in how extensively North Korea 
      allows the pledge of reunion to be carried out.   
TEXT: In a less skeptical assessment, The Atlanta 
Constitution focuses on the tenor of the meeting, 
which it describes as:
      VOICE:  Astonishing is the word for the warm and 
      tumultuous welcome South Korean President Kim 
      Dae-jung received this week from thousands of 
      cheering North Koreans and their communist 
      overlord Kim Jong Il.  It was as if everyone 
      involved decided not to let harsh realities  - - 
      such as the explosive border the Koreas share 
      and half a century of near-war  - - get in the 
      way of a joyous family get-together. ... What 
      the two Kims agreed upon is vague but promising.
TEXT:  Minnesota's St. Paul Pioneer Press says even 
though the "talk of reunification [is] vague," it 
calls the comments hopeful, and reminds readers: " in 
the diplomatic business, symbol sometimes  i s 
substance."  Out in the Pacific, Honolulu's Star-
Bulletin says the "Korean agreement offers hope for 
... peace and reunification," then adds this caveat.  
      VOICE: There is always a possibility that the 
      unpredictable regime in Pyongyang will revert to 
      provocative behavior, as it has many times.  But 
      for the moment at least there is reason for 
      optimism.
TEXT:  The Hartford [Connecticut] Courant calls the 
summit "remarkable," while in the computer industry 
heartland of California, The San Jose Mercury News 
says it was a: "Korean triumph," adding emphatically: 
"Without reserve, the world this week is cheering the 
historic Korean summit and its astonishing progress. 
New Jersey papers are also pleased.  The [Trenton] 
Times writes: "The two met this week as if they were 
long-lost friends and not the leaders of countries 
that had been vilifying each other for decades.  ... 
Their mutual enthusiasm was as encouraging as it was 
unexpected."  And in the state's northeastern, New 
York City suburbs, The [Bergen County] Record calls 
the "breakthrough" summit "truly encouraging, adding:
      VOICE:  Similar efforts at a thaw between the 
      two governments have failed twice before, but 
      this time the obvious enthusiasm of both leaders 
      should pave the way for real progress.  The 
      world community, including the United States, 
      should be strongly supportive.
TEXT:  With that we conclude this sampling of U-S 
newspaper editorial comment after the conclusion of 
[the] [this week's] historic two Koreas summit. 
NEB/ANG/PW
16-Jun-2000 15:40 PM EDT (16-Jun-2000 1940 UTC)
NNNN
Source: Voice of America
.





NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list