DATE=4/25/2000
TYPE=CORRESPONDENT REPORT
TITLE=KOREA SUMMIT QUESTIONS (L-ONLY)
NUMBER=2-261679
BYLINE=HYUN-SUNG KHANG
DATELINE=SEOUL
CONTENT=
VOICED AT:
INTRO: Doubts are being raised in South Korea about
whether the reclusive leader of North Korea plans to
negotiate directly with the South Korean president at
their planned summit meeting in June. As Hyun Sung
Khang reports from Seoul, the South Korean government
says anything other than direct negotiations would be
unacceptable.
TEXT: The controversy centers on the wording of the
original announcement of the leaders' summit, which
was made simultaneously in Seoul and Pyongyang earlier
this month. The statement said there would a historic
meeting between the South Korean president, Kim Dae
Jung, and the North Korean leader, Kim Jong-Il. The
announcement continued: "and subsequently, the
highest-level talks will take place."
Analysts, writing in the South Korean media, suggest
the wording is ambiguous and may mean the leaders'
meeting and the negotiations are separate. There are
concerns that the North Korean leader plans to greet
the South Korean president and then leave the
negotiations to the country's ceremonial head of
state.
The analysts say this would be in keeping with the
style of North Korean leader, Kim Jong-Il. Little is
known about him and he rarely makes public
appearances. Kim Jong-Il inherited leadership of the
country after the death of his father, the founder of
North Korea, Kim Il-Sung.
Seoul, which has been trumpeting the meeting as a
breakthrough in diplomatic relations between the two
Koreas, has tried to dampen the concerns. But a
government spokesman, Chung Jun-Hui, acknowledged
there is room for different interpretations of the
statement. He added that if the two meetings were
separate, that would be unacceptable to the South
Korea government.
South Korean President Kim Dae Jung has invested much
of his personal prestige in his much-touted "Sunshine
Policy" of engagement with Pyongyang. A refusal by
the North Korean leader to negotiate directly with
President Kim would be viewed in the South as a direct
snub. (SIGNED)
NEB/HSK/FC/JP
25-Apr-2000 05:51 AM EDT (25-Apr-2000 0951 UTC)
NNNN
Source: Voice of America
.
NEWSLETTER
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list
|
|