UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

DATE=12/7/1999
TYPE=BACKGROUND REPORT
TITLE=YEARENDER: U-S/NORTH KOREA
NUMBER=5-44922
BYLINE=STEPHANIE MANN
DATELINE=WASHINGTON
INTERNET=YES
CONTENT=
VOICED AT:
INTRO:  The United States and North Korea, once 
battlefield enemies and still ideological adversaries, 
are working toward normalizing relations.  This is the 
result of a U-S policy review conducted during the 
past year.  Correspondent Stephanie Mann looks at how 
U-S policy toward Pyongyang has changed and what that 
may mean in the coming months. 
TEXT:  The United States and North Korea were on 
opposite sides of a bitter war in the 1950's.  Since a 
truce in 1953, an atmosphere of distrust has kept the 
two countries on the brink of hostility.
// OPT //  The United States has more than 35-thousand 
troops stationed in South Korea.  And most of North 
Korea's one-million-strong army is deployed near the 
border with the South.  // END OPT//
Washington and Pyongyang reached an agreement in 1994 
that halted North Korea's nuclear weapons program.  
But the United States and other governments recently 
suspected the North was secretly continuing its 
efforts to make nuclear weapons.  
In 1998, North Korea test fired a medium-range missile 
that flew over Japan, prompting new fears about North 
Korea's intentions.  There were also signs North Korea 
was developing long-range nuclear-capable missiles.  
Given this atmosphere, the Clinton administration 
launched a policy review, looking for a new way to 
deal with North Korea.  Former Defense Secretary 
William Perry led the study and presented his 
conclusions to the President. 
Mr. Perry says the level of U-S and South Korean 
deterrence is strong but could be undermined by North 
Korean nuclear weapons.  He says no weapons-grade 
nuclear material has been produced at Yongbyon in 
North Korea since the 1994 agreement, but that could 
easily change.  And he says the success of the 1994 
accord would be in jeopardy if North Korea develops 
long-range missiles.
Mr. Perry says his final conclusion is that the North 
Korean government is not on the brink of collapse.  
So, he says the United States and its allies must deal 
with Pyongyang the way it is, not the way they wish it 
would be.  Mr. Perry says Washington must try to 
engage Pyongyang. 
            // PERRY ACT ONE //
      The first alternative is that if North Korea 
      will forego long-range missiles, as well as 
      nuclear weapons, then we should be prepared, we 
      the allies, should be prepared to move step by 
      step in a reciprocal fashion to normalization - 
      normalization of political relations, 
      normalization of economic relations.
            // END ACT //
On the other hand, Mr. Perry says if Pyongyang is not 
willing to remove the threat of nuclear weapons and 
long-range missiles, the United States and its allies 
must act to contain those threats.
            // PERRY ACT TWO // 
      I am confident that pursuing talks with North 
      Korea seriously and creatively is a good idea, 
      but . I cannot be confident that this process 
      will actually lead to a peaceful peninsula.  
      Therefore, the United States should keep its 
      powder dry.  In particular, we should make no 
      reductions in military readiness during the 
      course of these talks.
            // END ACT //
At a Geneva meeting in October, the two sides agreed 
to work toward normalizing relations, and each made a 
concession.  Washington agreed to ease economic 
sanctions against North Korea, and Pyongyang promised 
to suspend missile testing. 
Korea specialist Scott Snyder says that created the 
right atmosphere for dialogue, because either party 
can reverse its concession if it is not happy with the 
talks.
Mr. Snyder, a research fellow at the United States 
Institute of Peace, expects negotiations will take a 
long time to make noticeable progress.  The next step 
is for a high level North Korean delegation to come to 
Washington, but the date has not been set.
A Korea specialist at the Institute for Defense 
Analysis, Katy Oh (Kongdan Oh), says the new approach 
continues the Clinton administration's engagement 
policy on a more comprehensive, less piecemeal basis.  
Ms. Oh says the policy revision was needed. 
            // OH ACT ONE // 
      It was necessary simply because after the 
      Taepodong missile test of August 1998, Japan was 
      very upset and (South) Korea was uncertain, and 
      the U-S also.  Not only the Congress, but 
      overall the U-S policymakers and a lot of think-
      tank experts, including myself, were wondering 
      what was going on between North Korea and the U-
      S.  There was a need to re-examine it.
            // END ACT // 
Ms. Oh says William Perry's new approach involves 
reciprocity - the idea that rapprochement should be 
based on each side meeting certain conditions.  But 
instead of handling each aspect of relations on a 
case-by-case basis, Ms. Oh says the United States has 
offered North Korea what she calls a package deal. 
            // OH ACT TWO // 
      We will try to normalize relations with you, and 
      we will try to help you with economic aid and 
      even food aid, and also agricultural long-term 
      structural aid, and technological aid.  We 
      include all that.  But at the same time, we 
      expect you to put in your own package that you 
      will not test, sell, and (be) involved in 
      missile development and weapons sales, as well 
      as continuing the nuclear agreement in full 
      force.  In that case, your package and our 
      package can be swapped.  And that is the new 
      element. 
            // END ACT //
Scott Snyder says the policy approach suggested by Mr. 
Perry has strengthened U-S strategy.  But he says it 
does not yet deal with the problem posed by the huge 
numbers of conventional weapons deployed on both sides 
of the demilitarized zone.  
            // SNYDER ACT // 
      In other words, are we over-emphasizing nuclear 
      and missile questions and giving North Korea 
      unnecessary leverage that would be better 
      directed at the conventional military balance 
      and attempts to address that question?
            // END ACT //
Mr. Snyder also says fundamental differences between 
the two countries' political ideologies and economic 
systems are bound to complicate the negotiating 
process.
            // REST OPT // 
Before relations can be normalized, Mr. Snyder says 
some changes may have to occur in the basic nature of 
the two countries and their attitudes toward each 
other.  For example, he says, if Pyongyang moved 
toward a less totalitarian system of government, the 
prospect for normalized relations would be further 
enhanced. 
Mr. Snyder says the state of North Korea's economy may 
also influence the progress of talks in the coming 
months.  He notes in recent years North Korea has been 
in economic decline and that may have prompted its 
willingness to cooperate.  Now, Mr. Snyder says there 
are signs its economy may be stabilizing, and he 
wonders if that will make Pyongyang more difficult to 
deal with in international negotiations.   (SIGNED)
NEB/SMN/RAE
07-Dec-1999 13:12 PM EDT (07-Dec-1999 1812 UTC)
NNNN
Source: Voice of America
.





NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list