UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

DATE=09/19/98
TYPE=ON THE LINE
NUMBER=1-00671  
TITLE=DEALING WITH NORTH KOREA
EDITOR=OFFICE OF POLICY - 619-0037
CONTENT=
THEME:           UP, HOLD UNDER AND FADE
ANNCR:           ON THE LINE -- A DISCUSSION OF UNITED STATES 
                 POLICIES AND CONTEMPORARY ISSUES.  THIS WEEK, 
                 "DEALING WITH NORTH KOREA."  HERE IS YOUR HOST, 
                 ROBERT REILLY.
HOST:            HELLO AND WELCOME TO ON THE LINE.  NORTH KOREA, 
                 ONE OF THE LAST TOTALITARIAN COMMUNIST REGIMES 
                 IN THE WORLD, RECENTLY CELEBRATED ITS FIFTIETH 
                 ANNIVERSARY BY LAUNCHING A THREE-STAGE MISSILE 
                 OVER JAPAN AND INTO THE PACIFIC.  THE PURPORTED 
                 PURPOSE OF THE LAUNCH WAS TO PUT INTO ORBIT A 
                 SATELLITE TO BROADCAST "IMMORTAL REVOLUTIONARY 
                 HYMNS" IN HONOR OF ITS PARAMOUNT RULER, KIM JONG
                 IL, AND HIS FATHER KIM IL SUNG, WHO DIED IN 
                 1994.  IN 1994, THE U.S NEGOTIATED AN ACCORD 
                 WITH NORTH KOREA TO HALT ITS NUCLEAR WEAPONS 
                 PROGRAM.  RECENT ACTIVITIES AT A SUSPECTED NEW 
                 NUCLEAR WEAPONS PLANT HAVE RAISED QUESTIONS 
                 ABOUT THE NORTH KOREA'S ADHERENCE TO THAT 
                 ACCORD.  
                 JOINING ME TODAY TO DISCUSS THE RECENT ACTIONS 
                 OF NORTH KOREA ARE TWO EXPERTS.  JAMES LILLEY IS
                 DIRECTOR OF ASIAN STUDIES AT THE AMERICAN 
                 ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE, AND A FORMER U.S. 
                 AMBASSADOR TO CHINA AND THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH 
                 KOREA.  AND DAVID BROWN, A FORMER U.S. STATE 
                 DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL, IS SENIOR ASSOCIATE WITH 
                 THE ASIA PACIFIC POLICY CENTER. GENTLEMEN, 
                 WELCOME TO THE PROGRAM.
                 AMBASSADOR LILLEY, LET ME BEGIN WITH YOUR 
                 INTERPRETATION OF RECENT EVENTS IN NORTH KOREA, 
                 PARTICULARLY THE PROVOCATIVE LAUNCH OF THIS 
                 MISSILE, WHICH THEY DIDN'T EVEN BOTHER TO GIVE 
                 AN EXPLANATION FOR TILL FIVE DAYS AFTER IT 
                 HAPPENED.
LILLEY:          NORTH KOREA IS A VERY CUNNING COUNTRY WITH A 
                 VERY POOR HAND, IN TERMS OF ITS ECONOMIC 
                 SITUATION, BUT A VERY POWERFUL MILITARY CARD TO 
                 PLAY.  UNFORTUNATELY, THEY HAVE DEVELOPED THE 
                 HABIT OF USING MILITARY THREATS AND INTIMIDATION
                 IN ORDER TO GET CONCESSIONS FROM US.  THIS 
                 PARTICULAR SHOT WAS TO DEMONSTRATE TO VARIOUS 
                 COUNTRIES THAT ARE CONTESTING THEM THAT THEY 
                 HAVE THE CAPABILITY TO HIT A NUMBER OF ISLANDS 
                 IF THEY SHOULD CHOOSE AND ALSO, OF COURSE, TO 
                 CELEBRATE KIM JONG IL'S ASCENSION TO POWER AS 
                 HEAD OF THE NATIONAL DEFENSE COMMISSION.  SO I 
                 THINK THERE ARE A MULTIPLE OF OBJECTIVES.  AND 
                 RIGHT NOW, I THINK THEY'RE BARGAINING WITH US 
                 VERY HARD ON WHAT WE WILL DO TO CURB THEIR 
                 MISSILE PROLIFERATION AND THEIR MISSILE 
                 DEVELOPMENTS, AND ALSO TO GAIN ACCESS TO THEIR 
                 ALLEGED SECRET UNDERGROUND NUCLEAR WEAPONS 
                 FACILITY.
HOST:            MR. BROWN, WHAT'S YOUR READING OF THAT EVENT?
BROWN:           I THINK I'M MUCH IN AGREEMENT WITH JIM.  THIS 
                 HAD BOTH MESSAGES FOR THE OUTSIDE WORLD, WHICH 
                 ARE DISTURBING AND THREATENING, AND IT WAS PART 
                 OF THE CELEBRATION OF THE FIFTIETH ANNIVERSARY. 
                 AND IN A WAY IT WAS THE KOREAN PEOPLE'S ARMY'S 
                 PRESENT TO KIM JONG IL.  KIM FORMALLY ELEVATED 
                 THEM TO THE MOST IMPORTANT INSTITUTION IN 
                 SOCIETY BY SAYING THAT THE NATIONAL DEFENSE 
                 COMMISSION IS THE HIGHEST ORGAN OF STATE POWER. 
                 AND HE MADE HIMSELF THE CHAIRMAN OF THAT.  AND 
                 IN A WAY, THE MILITARY WAS SAYING, IN A SOCIETY 
                 WHICH IS COMPLETELY FAILING IN EVERY OTHER WAY, 
                 WE'RE THE ONE INSTITUTION THAT CAN PRODUCE 
                 SOMETHING FOR YOU.  AND THAT'S A VERY TROUBLING 
                 MIXTURE IN MY MIND.
HOST:            AMBASSADOR LILLEY, WHAT ABOUT THE LAUNCH ITSELF.
                 WAS THIS ANOTHER SHOCK TO THE U.S. AND WEST 
                 EUROPEAN INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY?  RECENTLY, 
                 THERE WAS UPSET OVER INDIAN NUCLEAR TESTS, 
                 PAKISTAN, AND NOW A MISSILE THAT WE WEREN'T SURE
                 NORTH KOREA EVEN HAD.
LILLEY:          WE KNEW THEY HAD THE NO DONG AND THE TAEPO DONG 
                 THIS WAS A TAEPO DONG.  I'M NOT SURE IF IT WAS A
                 ONE OR A TWO.  IT WAS A THREE-STAGE MISSILE 
                 WHICH WAS, I THINK, A LITTLE BEYOND OUR 
                 EXPECTATIONS.  I THINK WE KNEW SLIGHTLY IN 
                 ADVANCE THAT THEY WERE GOING TO MAKE THE SHOT.  
                 AND WE NOTIFIED THE JAPANESE.  BUT I THINK, 
                 AGAIN, IT CAUGHT US SOMEWHAT BY SURPRISE, THE 
                 SCOPE OF WHAT THEY COULD DO.  AND I GATHER RIGHT
                 NOW, BECAUSE THEY BEGAN TO RECOVER SOME OF THE 
                 DEBRIS, IT WENT LONGER THAN WE THOUGHT.  IT WAS 
                 INTO THE THREE-THOUSAND-MILE RANGE, WHICH IS 
                 PRETTY FORMIDABLE.  
HOST:            AND EVEN THOUGH THEY DIDN'T BOTHER TO SAY TILL 
                 FIVE DAYS AFTER THE LAUNCH THAT THERE WAS A 
                 SATELLITE ON IT, APPARENTLY THERE WAS A FAILED 
                 ATTEMPT.
LILLEY:          IT LOOKS LIKE A FAILED ATTEMPT, BECAUSE NOBODY 
                 PICKED UP THE SIGNALS.  I THINK IT WAS AT TWENTY
                 SEVEN MEGAHERTZ.  THEY HAD A SIGNAL ON IT.  AND 
                 NOBODY PICKED IT UP.  AND WE SHOULD HAVE PICKED 
                 IT UP.  AND WE HAD THE ABILITY TO SPOT A 
                 SATELLITE IN ORBIT.  THEY SAID A HUNDRED THIRTY 
                 SIX MILES ABOVE THE EARTH IN ORBIT.  WE LOOKED 
                 AROUND AND WE COULDN'T FIND ANYTHING, SO IT 
                 LOOKS AS THOUGH IT FAILED.
HOST:            SO IF A SATELLITE OR RATHER A MISSILE LAUNCH OF 
                 THAT SIGNIFICANCE HAD NO OVERT PURPOSE OTHER 
                 THAN TO PLAY SOME REVOLUTIONARY TUNES IN OUTER 
                 SPACE, WE HAVE TO SAY IT HAD A POLITICAL 
                 PURPOSE.  AND CERTAINLY THE POLITICAL IMPACT IT 
                 HAD, PERHAPS, MR. BROWN, WAS GREATEST ON JAPAN. 
                 IS THAT FAIR TO SAY?
BROWN:           I THINK THAT'S VERY CLEAR, IN PART BECAUSE THE 
                 JAPANESE ARE STILL SOMEWHAT NAIVE IN THEIR 
                 APPROACH TO DEALING WITH NORTH KOREA, BUT ALSO 
                 BECAUSE IT WAS A TEST RIGHT OVER THEIR 
                 TERRITORY.  AND WHAT IT CLEARLY CONVEYS IS THAT 
                 NOT JUST PERHAPS SOME FRINGE AREAS OF JAPAN ARE 
                 NOW SUBJECT TO THREAT BY A MISSILE CAPABILITY 
                 FROM NORTH KOREA, BUT THE WHOLE OF THE JAPANESE 
                 ISLANDS.  IT'S ALSO INTERESTING, OF COURSE, THAT
                 THE SAME CAPABILITY COVERS ALMOST ALL OF THE 
                 POPULATED AREAS OF CHINA.  AND CHINA'S REACTION 
                 HAS BEEN REMARKABLY RESTRAINED AND SUBDUED TO 
                 THIS POINT.
HOST:            AND ALSO PARTS OF THE UNITED STATES?
BROWN:           POTENTIALLY EVEN TO THE UNITED STATES.
LILLEY:          I'D LIKE TO ADD SOMETHING ON THAT.  ONE OF THE 
                 THINGS THAT CHINA HAS PUSHED VERY HARD ON IS TO 
                 BE AGAINST THEATER MISSILE DEFENSE.  WITH SOUTH 
                 KOREA, WITH JAPAN, WITH TAIWAN, THEY'VE TAKEN A 
                 VERY TOUGH POSITION ON THIS.  WITH THE LAUNCHING
                 OF THIS NORTH KOREAN MISSILE, THE WHOLE ARGUMENT
                 ON THEATER MISSILE DEFENSE HAS BUBBLED UP IN 
                 JAPAN AGAIN.  AND THE SOUTH KOREANS HAVE TO LOOK
                 AT IT AGAIN.  AND EVEN TAIWAN IS CONCERNED 
                 BECAUSE THE NORTH KOREANS HAVE THROWN A MONKEY 
                 WRENCH INTO CHINESE PLANS TO BLOCK T-M-D.  THIS 
                 ISN'T THE FIRST TIME THEY DID IT.  THE FIRST 
                 TIME WAS ON JUNE 25TH, 1950, WHEN THEY INVADED 
                 SOUTH KOREA AND KNOCKED OFF CHINESE PLANS TO 
                 TAKE TAIWAN.  AND AMERICANS INTERVENED.  BUT 
                 AGAIN, THE NORTH KOREANS DO THEIR OWN THING 
                 REGARDLESS OF WHAT THEIR NEIGHBORING POWERS CARE
                 ABOUT.
HOST:            WHAT IS THEIR OWN THING?  YOU'RE LOOKING AT A 
                 NATION IN WHICH HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE 
                 ARE STARVING A YEAR.  THEY'RE SUPPOSEDLY 
                 DEDICATING A FIFTEEN-THOUSAND-MAN FORCE TO THE 
                 CONSTRUCTION OF THIS UNDERGROUND SUSPECTED 
                 NUCLEAR PROCESSING SITE AND THEY'RE LAUNCHING 
                 MISSILES.
BROWN:           CLEARLY, THE NORTH KOREAN LEADERSHIP THINKS IT 
                 CAN HAVE ITS CAKE AND EAT IT TOO, THAT THEY CAN 
                 THREATEN THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY WITH 
                 WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION AND DELIVERY SYSTEMS
                 AND, AT THE SAME TIME, HAVE THE INTERNATIONAL 
                 COMMUNITY CONTINUE TO PROVIDE THEM WITH FOOD AID
                 AND WITH FUEL.  THIS IS A MESSAGE WHICH, I 
                 THINK, THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY NEEDS TO GET 
                 VERY CLEARLY ACROSS TO THE NORTH KOREANS, THAT 
                 THAT'S NOT A GAME THAT'S GOING TO WORK.  YOU 
                 HAVE TO ALSO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE FACT THAT THE
                 NORTH KOREANS PROBABLY DON'T UNDERSTAND VERY 
                 WELL THE IMPACT OF THEIR OWN ACTIONS ON THE 
                 INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENT THAT THEY'RE LIVING 
                 IN, PARTICULARLY THIS POINT THAT JIM MENTIONED 
                 ABOUT HOW A REACTION IN JAPAN OF FEELING 
                 THREATENED IS GOING TO LEAD TO CLOSER DEFENSE 
                 COOPERATION WITH THE UNITED STATES, WHICH IS 
                 SOMETHING THE CHINESE HAVE BEEN TRYING TO 
                 PERSUADE JAPAN AND THE UNITED STATES NOT TO DO. 
                 THE CHINESE WERE NOT INFORMED IN ADVANCE OF THIS
                 SHOT AS THE NORTH KOREANS HAVE NOT BEEN 
                 INFORMING THE CHINESE OF MOST OF THE OTHER 
                 THINGS THEY HAVE DONE WHICH WERE REPREHENSIBLE, 
                 SUCH AS SUBMARINE OPERATIONS OFF THE SOUTH 
                 KOREAN COAST.  AND ONE CAN ONLY HOPE THAT IN DUE
                 COURSE THAT CHINESE CONCERN ABOUT THIS TYPE OF 
                 NORTH KOREAN BEHAVIOR WILL WORK TO THE ADVANTAGE
                 OF THE UNITED STATES.
HOST:            THE JAPANESE MOST IMMEDIATELY, AMBASSADOR 
                 LILLEY, HAVE SUSPENDED AID TO NORTH KOREA, HAVE 
                 THEY NOT?
LILLEY:          YES, THEY'VE TAKEN A MUCH TOUGHER APPROACH THAN 
                 WE DID.  THEY CANCELED THE CHARTERED FLIGHTS.  
                 THEY SAID THEY WOULD REEXAMINE CONTRIBUTING 
                 THEIR ONE BILLION DOLLARS TO THE LIGHT WATER 
                 REACTORS.  THEY CANCELED THEIR TALKS ON 
                 NORMALIZATION.  THEY HIT VERY HARD.  BUT I'D 
                 LIKE TO FOLLOW UP ON SOMETHING THAT DAVID SAID. 
                 THE LOGIC OF THE AMERICAN POSITION HAS TO BE 
                 LOOKED AT VERY CLOSELY.  IF YOU, IN FACT, GIVE, 
                 UNCONDITIONALLY, FOOD AID TO NORTH KOREA FOR 
                 STARVING CHILDREN -- AND NOBODY'S AGAINST 
                 FEEDING STARVING CHILDREN -- BUT THESE PEOPLE 
                 ARE TAKING THEIR MONEY AND HAVING THESE GREAT 
                 OCCASIONS, THESE OBSCENE MONUMENTS THEY BUILD.  
                 THEY PUT THIRTY PERCENT OF THEIR G-N-P INTO 
                 THEIR MILITARY.  THEY FIRE THESE SHOTS.  THEY 
                 SELL ADVANCED MISSILES TO ENEMIES IN THE MIDDLE 
                 EAST OF OURS.  IT'S APPALLING THAT WE PUT MONEY 
                 INTO THIS SYSTEM, SO THEY CAN TAKE THEIR MONEY 
                 AND PUT IT INTO THE MILITARY.
HOST:            BECAUSE FOOD IS FUNGIBLE?
LILLEY:          AND THE LOGIC OF THIS IS QUESTIONABLE.  BECAUSE 
                 WE ARE PROBABLY GOING TO GIVE THEM THESE THREE 
                 HUNDRED THOUSAND TONS [OF FOOD] AND THEY SAY 
                 THAT THEY MIGHT GIVE US ACCESS TO THE 
                 UNDERGROUND FACILITY.
HOST:            IN FACT, I THINK WE'VE JUST INCREASED OUR 
                 PROMISE OF SO MANY HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF 
                 METRIC TONS.  IS THAT THE RIGHT RESPONSE, MR. 
                 BROWN?
BROWN:           I THINK WE'RE DEALING WITH A DANGEROUS ADVERSARY
                 HERE.  THAT'S INCREASINGLY CLEAR, EVEN TO THOSE 
                 PEOPLE WHO WERE, I THINK, HOPEFUL THAT NORTH 
                 KOREA MIGHT BE CHANGING. BUT, IN DEALING WITH A 
                 DANGEROUS ADVERSARY, IT IS NOT WISE TO PAINT 
                 THEM INTO A CORNER COMPLETELY.  WE'VE GOT TO 
                 LEAVE THE NORTH KOREAN REGIME A WAY OUT OF 
                 CONFRONTATION WITH THE REST OF THE WORLD.  AND 
                 REASONABLE HUMANITARIAN CONCERN FOR THEIR 
                 PEOPLE, ADEQUATELY MONITORED, SEEMS TO ME TO BE 
                 A SENSIBLE THING FOR THE UNITED STATES TO 
                 CONTINUE TO DO EVEN WHEN WE HAVE VERY 
                 FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEMS WITH OTHER ASPECTS OF THEIR
                 BEHAVIOR.
HOST:            AMBASSADOR LILLEY, YOU MENTIONED ONE OF THE REAL
                 SORE POINTS WITH NORTH KOREA.  SUPPOSEDLY, THERE
                 ARE TALKS BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND NORTH 
                 KOREA ABOUT TO TAKE PLACE ON THIS ISSUE, AND 
                 THAT IS THEIR PROLIFERATION OF MISSILES TO 
                 PLACES LIKE PAKISTAN, IRAN AND SYRIA.  HOW 
                 SERIOUS A THREAT IS NORTH KOREA IN THIS 
                 PROLIFERATION PROBLEM, AND IS ANYTHING EFFECTIVE
                 BEING DONE ABOUT IT?
LILLEY:          OF COURSE, WHAT THEY'VE SAID -- AND THEY'VE 
                 GOTTEN INTO THIS VERY BAD HABIT OF ONE MILLION 
                 TONS OF FOOD FOR FOUR PARTY TALKS, THREE HUNDRED
                 THOUSAND TONS FOR ACCESS TO OUR SUPPOSED NUCLEAR
                 FACILITIES --  NOW THEY'RE SAYING FIVE HUNDRED 
                 MILLION DOLLARS TO BUY US OFF NOT TO EXPORT 
                 MISSILES TO COUNTRIES.  THE CLEAREST CASE WE 
                 HAVE OF THEIR INVOLVEMENT IS IN THE GHAURI  
                 MISSILE IN PAKISTAN, WHICH IS VERY CLOSE TO THE 
                 NO DONG MISSILE.  AND WE'VE BEEN TRYING TO STOP 
                 THAT FOR YEARS.  AND WE STOPPED IT FOR A WHILE 
                 -- ACTUALLY WHEN I WAS AT DEFENSE.  RECENTLY, 
                 THEY'VE GONE AHEAD AND DONE IT.  WE HAVE STRONG 
                 EVIDENCE THAT THEY'VE SHIPPED INTO SYRIA, IRAN, 
                 POSSIBLY LIBYA.
HOST:            THIS IS REALLY THEIR ONLY EXPORTABLE COMMODITY 
                 IN NORTH KOREA.
LILLEY:          SCUDS, NO DONG MISSILES, THIS IS WHAT THEY 
                 EXPORT.  I THINK THE OUT THAT I WOULD SUGGEST, 
                 THAT DAVID MENTIONED, IS THE BEST OUT FOR THEM, 
                 NORTH-SOUTH DIALOGUE WITH THEIR BROTHERS IN THE 
                 SOUTH.  KIM DAE JUNG HAS OFFERED A SENSIBLE 
                 PROGRAM, REACHING OUT TO THEM.  AND THE ONE GOOD
                 NEWS IS, THIS MAN YON HYONG MUK IS NOW ON THE 
                 DEFENSE COMMISSION.  AND HE WAS THE PREMIER AT 
                 THE TIME OF THE NORTH-SOUTH TALKS IN 1991.  NOW,
                 IF IN FACT, KIM JONG IL PUTS A NAVY MAN AT THE 
                 HEAD OF THE DEFENSE ESTABLISHMENT, IF, IN FACT, 
                 THIS NEW PREMIER IS SOMEBODY THAT'S SOMEWHAT 
                 ASSOCIATED WITH A MORE FLEXIBLE POSITION, I 
                 THINK WE HAVE TO WATCH THAT VERY CLOSELY.  I 
                 DON'T THINK WE SHOULD READ ANY GREAT SIGNALS 
                 INTO IT, BUT, CERTAIN MOVES HAVE BEEN MADE.  THE
                 BAD NEWS IS, OF COURSE, THE MILITARY'S IN A MUCH
                 STRONGER POSITION AND THE MILITARY HAVE 
                 TRADITIONALLY BEEN THE HARD-CORE BOYS THAT HAVE 
                 BLOCKED ISSUES.  BUT, THERE ARE LITTLE GLIMMERS 
                 OF POSSIBLE HOPE IN THERE.
HOST:            WHAT ABOUT THE SOUTH KOREAN REACTION, MR. BROWN,
                 TO RECENT EVENTS?
BROWN:           THE GOVERNMENT HAS, I THINK, VERY MUCH TO THEIR 
                 CREDIT, DECIDED THAT THEY WILL MAINTAIN THIS 
                 POLICY THAT THEY CALL THE SUNSHINE POLICY, WHICH
                 ALLOWS FOR PRIVATE EXCHANGES AND BUSINESS 
                 DEALINGS WITH THE NORTH KOREANS TO EXPAND EVEN 
                 WHEN GOVERNMENT DIALOGUE, NORTH AND SOUTH, IS 
                 FROZEN.  THE UNFORTUNATE THING IS THAT PUBLIC 
                 SUPPORT FOR THAT KIND OF POLICY IS ERODING IN 
                 SOUTH KOREA PRECISELY BECAUSE OF THE KIND OF 
                 UNREASONABLE ACTIONS WHICH THE NORTH IS TAKING. 
                 AND THAT'S AN EXAMPLE OF HOW THE NORTH KOREANS 
                 DON'T FULLY UNDERSTAND THE IMPLICATIONS AND 
                 REACTIONS THAT THEIR OWN ACTIONS ARE TAKING.  
                 AND YOU HAVE A  MILITARY THERE WHOSE ONLY 
                 CONTACTS WITH THE OUTSIDE WORLD ARE WITH ROGUE 
                 REGIMES IN OTHER PLACES THAT THEY'RE COOPERATING
                 WITH AND IS OTHERWISE QUITE ISOLATED FROM 
                 INTERNATIONAL INFLUENCES.  THIS IS A VERY 
                 DANGEROUS MIXTURE.
LILLEY:          I WOULD AGREE THERE.  I THINK THE SOUTH KOREANS 
                 HAVE BEEN REMARKABLY MODERATE IN THIS ONE.  AND 
                 THEY'RE GOING AHEAD WITH THESE TOURIST GROUPS UP
                 TO KUM GANG SAN MOUNTAIN.  THEY HAD THE FIVE 
                 HUNDRED CATTLE THAT THE HEAD OF HYUNDAI  PUT 
                 ACROSS.  THEY ARE REALLY OPENING UP.  AND IT'S A
                 REAL OPPORTUNITY, BECAUSE THE BASIS OF ANY REAL 
                 PEACE ON THAT PENINSULA, I THINK, IS IN 
                 NORTH-SOUTH ACCORDS.  AND THEY REACHED THESE 
                 ACCORDS IN '91-'92, COMPREHENSIVE ACCORDS.  
HOST:            WHICH THE NORTH DID NOT THEN OBSERVE?
LILLEY:          IT  DID NOT OBSERVE, BUT, STILL, BY '94, YOU 
                 WERE MOVING TOWARDS PREMIER TALKS.  AND YOU WERE
                 EVEN MOVING TOWARDS A SUMMIT BETWEEN KIM IL SUNG
                 AND KIM YOUNG SAM.  THEN KIM IL SUNG DIED.  AND 
                 THEN THERE WAS A LOT OF MISUNDERSTANDING AT THE 
                 TIME OF HIS DEATH.  AND EMOTIONS WERE HIGH AND 
                 ACCUSATIONS WERE MADE.  IT BROKE DOWN.  BUT I 
                 THINK, AGAIN, THAT IS THE KEY, NORTH-SOUTH.
HOST:            FOUR PARTY TALKS ARE SCHEDULED TO RESUME, ARE 
                 THEY NOT?
LILLEY:          OCTOBER FIRST IN GENEVA, RIGHT.
HOST:            AND WHAT DO YOU THINK MIGHT BE HOPED FROM THEM.
BROWN:           VERY LITTLE IN MY MIND.  I THINK THE NORTH 
                 KOREANS ARE NOT, AT THIS POINT, SERIOUS ABOUT 
                 REDUCING TENSIONS ON THE KOREAN PENINSULA, AND 
                 THAT'S WHAT THESE TALKS ARE ABOUT.
HOST:            AMBASSADOR, IT'S CLEARLY BEEN AN OBJECTIVE OF 
                 NORTH KOREA FROM THE BEGINNING TO EXCLUDE SOUTH 
                 KOREA FROM TALKS AND HAVE A ONE-ON-ONE 
                 RELATIONSHIP WITH THE UNITED STATES.  DO YOU 
                 THINK ANY OF THEIR RECENT BEHAVIOR CAN BE 
                 EXPLAINED IN TERMS OF MOVING TOWARD THAT 
                 OBJECTIVE AND IF SO, IS IT SUCCEEDING?
LILLEY:          IT CERTAINLY SUCCEEDED IN 1993.  THEY HAD MADE 
                 IT VERY CLEAR, EVEN WHEN I WAS TALKING WITH THEM
                 IN JANUARY 1992, THAT THEIR OBJECTIVE WAS TO GET
                 INTO DIRECT TALKS WITH THE UNITED STATES.  AND 
                 WE MADE IT CONDITIONAL ON TWO THINGS -- 
                 CHALLENGE INSPECTIONS AND A CONSTRUCTIVE 
                 NORTH-SOUTH DIALOGUE.  THEY WENT BACK ON BOTH OF
                 THOSE.  AND THEN, IT STARTED AGAIN WITH THE WAR 
                 SCARE IN '93, WHICH THEN PUT US INTO THESE 
                 NEGOTIATIONS ON THE LIGHT WATER REACTORS THAT 
                 BOB GALUCCI HEADED.  AND THEY GOT THAT.  THAT'S 
                 WHAT THEY WANTED.  THEY USED THE WAR SCARE TO 
                 MOVE US INTO DIRECT NEGOTIATIONS.  AND I THINK 
                 AGAIN, THEY WOULD LIKE TO GET MILITARY TO 
                 MILITARY TALKS, TALKS ON A PEACE TREATY, LIAISON
                 OFFICES ESTABLISHED, SANCTIONS LIFTED, ALL OF 
                 THOSE THINGS THEY WANT TO GET.  AND THEY THINK 
                 THAT WE ARE A MORE SUSCEPTIBLE TARGET THAN THE 
                 SOUTH.
BROWN:           AND I THINK THERE'S A DANGER RIGHT NOW, A DANGER
                 THAT THE SOUTH KOREANS CLEARLY PERCEIVE, THAT 
                 THE MISSILE TEST WAS DESIGNED TO ONCE AGAIN GET 
                 THEM IN SERIOUS NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE UNITED 
                 STATES, WHICH NEITHER THE SOUTH KOREANS OR THE 
                 JAPANESE, WHO ARE DIRECTLY THREATENED BY THIS, 
                 NOR THE CHINESE, ARE INVOLVED IN.  SO THE WHOLE 
                 THING IS FOCUSED ON THE U.S.  I'M NOT SURE THAT 
                 THIS WAS A MAJOR FACTOR IN WHAT THE NORTH 
                 KOREANS WERE DOING, BUT IT IS VERY DEFINITELY 
                 PART OF WHAT'S TAKING PLACE NOW.  AND I THINK 
                 IT'S VERY MUCH INCUMBENT UPON THE ADMINISTRATION
                 TO BRING THE SOUTH KOREANS, THE JAPANESE AND, I 
                 WOULD ALSO ARGUE, THE CHINESE VERY MUCH INTO ALL
                 OF OUR GAME PLANNING OF HOW WE'RE GOING TO GET 
                 ACCESS TO THIS NUCLEAR FACILITY.
HOST:            WELL, OF COURSE, THE JAPANESE WENT ON MILITARY 
                 ALERT AFTER THE FIRING OF THE FIRST MISSILE AND 
                 EXPECTED THE FIRING OF A SECOND FOR A PERIOD OF 
                 TIME.  BUT THE EFFICACY OF ANY MILITARY ALERT 
                 WITHOUT A MISSILE DEFENSE AS YOU MENTIONED, 
                 AMBASSADOR LILLEY, IS QUESTIONABLE AT BEST.
LILLEY:          YES, WHAT THE NORTH KOREANS HAVE STIMULATED NOW 
                 IS THE JAPANESE RECONSIDERATION OF A UNILATERAL 
                 RECONNAISSANCE SATELLITE CAPABILITY.  AND 
                 GETTING THE JAPANESE INTO SPACE IN MILITARY WAYS
                 IS SOMETHING NOBODY REALLY WANTS.  AND I THINK 
                 THAT THAT'S ONE THING.  THE SECOND THING THAT IS
                 AN ANOMALY HERE IS THAT WE, IN 1996, HAVE AN 
                 AGREEMENT WITH SOUTH KOREA TO LIMIT THEIR 
                 MISSILES TO A HUNDRED AND EIGHTY KILOMETERS.  
                 AND THEREFORE EVERYBODY IS UTTERLY DEPENDENT 
                 UPON THE UNITED STATES.  NORTH KOREA FIRES A 
                 MISSILE THAT PROBABLY GOES FOUR THOUSAND 
                 KILOMETERS.  IT MAKES THE SOUTH KOREANS LOOK AS 
                 THOUGH THEY ARE SECOND COUSINS IN THIS DEAL.  
                 AND THE WHOLE THING IS DESIGNED TO HUMILIATE THE
                 SOUTH.  BECAUSE IF YOU SAW THE TRUMPETING THAT 
                 NORTH KOREA -- THE VICTORY OF THE SOCIALIST 
                 SYSTEM, ET CETERA, ET CETERA.
HOST:            SO THIS IS GOING TO HAVE SOME LONG RANGE IMPACT?
BROWN:           YES, AND IF WE'RE GOING TO DEAL WITH IT 
                 EFFECTIVELY, WE CAN'T DEAL WITH IT JUST AS THE 
                 UNITED STATES.  WE DIDN'T DEAL WITH THE NUCLEAR 
                 PROBLEM ALONE.  WE HAD TO USE JAPANESE, CHINESE,
                 SECURITY COUNCIL, I-A-E-A [INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC 
                 ENERGY AGENCY].  WE HAD A GRAND STRATEGY FOR 
                 DEALING WITH IT.  AND I THINK WE'RE GOING TO 
                 NEED AS A COUNTRY TO DO THE SAME KIND OF THING 
                 THIS TIME IN CONFRONTING THE NUCLEAR FACILITY 
                 AND THE TEST.
HOST:            I'M AFRAID THAT'S ALL THE TIME WE HAVE THIS 
                 WEEK.  I'D LIKE TO THANK OUR GUESTS -- JAMES 
                 LILLEY FROM THE AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE; 
                 AND DAVID BROWN FROM THE ASIA PACIFIC POLICY 
                 CENTER -- FOR JOINING ME TO DISCUSS THE PROBLEMS
                 OF DEALING WITH NORTH KOREA.  THIS IS ROBERT 
                 REILLY FOR ON THE LINE.
18-Sep-98 2:20 PM EDT (1820 UTC)
NNNN
Source: Voice of America
.





NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list