THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
(New York, New York)
________________________________________________________________________
For Immediate Release September 8, 2000
BACKGROUND BRIEFING BY
A SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL
ON PRESIDENT CLINTON'S BILATERAL WITH
PRESIDENT JIANG ZEMIN OF CHINA
Waldorf-Astoria
New York, New York
12:39 P.M. EDT
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: On the Clinton-Jiang meeting, they
met for about an hour and a half this morning, a very good meeting in
that these two have met with each other many times over eight years,
they know each other well, they are able to speak in a frank and
friendly fashion. Both terms are important. They say what's on their
minds.
The President may say to Jiang, I know I'm never going to convince
you of this; I've tried for years and I won't convince you, but I've got
to tell you, I really believe the following, and this is the way to go.
And Jiang will say, well, I listened the last time; I actually went back
and I read some materials on this and we made a decision, but then such
and such screwed it. You know, they'll have that kind of conversation
back and forth.
It's important to understand that because the real value of this
meeting is that it took up all the really key issues in our
relationship, and it wasn't designed to reach specific decisions, it was
designed to get these two men on the same wavelength a little more and
to get -- all the top officials who deal with foreign affairs were in
the room, and it's to get everyone listening to them and how they handle
the issue and the directions in which they want things to move. I think
on that level this meeting served exactly the purpose that we sought.
What are the key issues that they took up? This is not in order,
but it covers them all. Cross-strait relations between the mainland and
Taiwan; missile proliferation; PNTR and China's entry into the WTO;
Tibet, and separately, but related, obviously, the issue of religious
restrictions in China; Korea, North-South summit, the missiles for
launch proposal that President Putin reported from his trip to North
Korea; and a review of U.S.-China relations and what they've learned
about their relationship in eight years of dealing with each other.
So it was a substantial agenda, and on each of those I think it's
fair to say, quite substantive. Let me stop there and take whatever
questions.
Q Do you want to just go through some of these, like what did
they talk about on cross-strait relations? Did Jiang give any
assurances that China wouldn't move on Taiwan?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: I think our basic objective was to
encourage a cross-strait dialogue. It is clear that by now the
cross-strait relationship has kind of sought its own level. The Chinese
are in a wait-and-see attitude. On his side, Chen Shui-bian has made a
number of moves to take the edge off of the fact that he is from the
democratic progressive party, which has traditionally been a
pro-independence party. Our feeling is that we would like this
relationship, though, not to kind of remain where each side is warily
watching the other, but rather we'd like to see a dialogue begin to move
the relationship forward. And the discussion focused on that.
Q Forward to what end?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Forward to a peaceful resolution
of the cross-strait issue, which we have long advocated.
Q I take it Jiang was not prepared to go any further in the
dialogue with Taiwan.
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: I think this was, again, more an
explanation of how each side sees the issue at this point. We are not
now, and never seeking to negotiate a solution to this issue. So it is
more -- our role is more facilitate and encouraging, and that's very
much the spirit of this conversation today.
Q Was there anything that the President was particularly frank
on? You were describing in a kind of hypothetical way his being blunt.
Was he particularly blunt on any of these points when it comes to, say,
missile proliferation?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: I think he was frank, but not in
-- I know that's usually used when you describe a conversation to say
that they just went at it tooth and tong and disagreed, and that is not
the way I'm using it. I want to be very clear about that. But he was
very straightforward I think on each of these issues.
On PNTR, for example, that we should get this and he's working hard
on it, he thinks we will get it. But in the wake of PNTR, he's got to
be able to say to the Congress -- honestly, he's got to certify that the
deal that China has going into the WTO meets in every substantive
fashion the deal that we did bilaterally with the Chinese. And he
pointed out some issues that they have to really be mindful of, to make
sure that that occurs.
He looks him right in the eye and says, now, you've got to do that.
It's that kind of -- it was in that spirit on each of these issues. I
don't want to get into the details of what specific examples he used,
but there was -- again, they know each other well enough to kind of do
this back and forth, and stress that they're good friends and smile at
the end. So the tone was good, but this was not a lot of kind of fluff.
This was really quite substantive all the way through.
Q Was there anything that President Jiang refused to do? I mean
when he said, you've got to do that, is there anything he said, uh-uh?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: No, there's nothing he said no to.
He would give his perspective on issues, and then we have to -- the way
these things work is each of us gives a perspective and then at the next
level down or two levels down, you start working to, starting from
there, getting it together more concretely.
So I do not want to suggest that he sat there and simply said, gee,
you've just articulated my thoughts completely or persuaded me
completely -- no. But he would try to -- he picked up every issue the
President raised and said, this is the way I think about this, or this
is what we've been doing on this, or this is where we want to go on
this. And then, for many of them, the President came back at him. I
mean, it was a real -- this was not each man sitting there reading
talking points, this was a real back-and-forth.
Q Did missile defense come up?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Only briefly. The President
mentioned that it was -- explained very briefly the reasons for his
decision. Jiang followed the issue, not surprisingly. The President
stressed that the issue of a missile threat, and not only from
established nuclear powers, a threat like that in the future is real.
And he said he'll encourage his successor to engage in serious dialogue
with the Chinese and others so as to try to get a clearer, common
understanding of the threat and how we can all end up more secure by
what we do about it.
He said, I don't know whether we're going to end up convincing
people and reaching a common understanding, but I will sure encourage my
successor, whoever it is, to engage in that effort very seriously. And
he said, Jiang, I hope that you will engage in that effort equally
seriously, that you'll think about this and you'll be ready to engage on
it. Jiang said --
Q What did Jiang -- how did he respond?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Again, I, frankly, don't remember
his exact wording, but basically he said, yes, that's a good idea and we
take this as a very serious issue. Don't quote that because that's not
exactly what he said, but that's the spirit of it.
Q What did President Clinton raise in the human rights arena?
Did he talk about the Falun Gong at all?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: He focused on restrictions on
religion in China, on the human rights -- you know, we have a
wide-ranging human rights agenda with them, and you can't go through the
whole agenda at each meeting. Here he focused both on Tibet and
repression of religion in Tibet, among other things; and more broadly,
on restrictions on religion in China and his belief that religious
freedom is good for China.
And Jiang, it's fair to say, does not regard China as very much
repressing religion. That isn't his way of framing the issue. But he
went into an historical review of when different religions came to China
and noted that Christianity came really with foreign incursions into
China over the last couple hundred years, as versus Buddhism and Islam
that have very different histories.
They actually got into a back-and-forth -- Jiang wanted to know
whether America is primarily Protestant, and the President went into the
social bases, kind of historical bases of Catholicism in the U.S. Some
of this is really just kind of get to know the other country better type
discussion.
Q So he felt Christianity was a passing fancy? (Laughter.)
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: No, I wasn't suggesting that.
What I interpreted him as trying to convey, although he did not say it,
is that you've got to understand, Christianity among China's religions
has a certain baggage among the Chinese because it's very much
associated with Western humiliation of China over the last couple
hundred years. He didn't state that, but he put the pieces in place for
the President to understand that.
Q Did their conversation about human rights, was it tied to the
PNTR debate at all?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: No, not really, because they have
a very longstanding dialogue on human rights. I mean, they have
discussed this every time they have gotten together that I've been in
the room, and that's -- I've been every time for a few years now, and I
know it predates that. the President has said publicly that he has felt
the Chinese are on the wrong side of history on how they handle these
issues. So this is not a new topic or one where they pull a lot of
punches.
There was a substantial PNTR discussion, but we weren't saying, do
better on human rights to get PNTR. We were saying, do better on human
rights because it's in the interest of you and of the Chinese people
that you do better on human rights, and we really think this is what the
future requires.
So both were discussed, but, no, it wasn't, do this in order to get
PNTR. Hell, they're going to get PNTR we believe within a couple of
weeks. We want the human rights agenda to remain long afterwards. And
also, yes, the President did make the case -- he reminds me -- that part
of the discussion of PNTR -- there was actually a question during the
pool -- you were all there -- and the President said, look, it's in our
interest that China get PNTR. It's good for the U.S., it's good for the
Chinese. It works for both sides.
Q What about the Korean missile -- the offer by Kim Jong-Il?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Here, the issue, as you know, he
made this comment through President Putin -- President Putin
subsequently went to China and talked with Jiang Zemin, and among other
things they talked about that issue. President Putin told Jiang what he
has told others, which is to say that his view was this was a serious
subject. There was a subsequent report in the South Korean media that
Kim Jong-Il said that this was said in a joking fashion. That wasn't
Putin's impression. But Jiang recognizes the sensitivity of the issue
and so did not want to intrude into that -- he didn't respond to Putin,
let me get involved in this. They certainly want stability on the
Korean Peninsula, he made that very clear.
Let me make one final comment on that. It wasn't part of the
conversation this morning, but it's relevant. We've gone back and
looked at the Korean language version of what Kim Jong-Il actually said
and our -- I don't speak Korean -- our interpreters say that in that
context, clearly it didn't mean joking. It said it as, part of our
discussion -- it was a positive discussion, not that it was a joke. So
there is a sense of a real mistranslation in the English language media
out of South Korea.
Q Did Clinton take it directly up with Kim Jong-Il? I mean, why
go through three other countries to --
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Well, Clinton and Kim Jong-Il do
not regularly talk to each other.
Q But they could on this.
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Let me say, we are prepared to
take that subject up very seriously. If they are prepared to move
forward, we will look for a realistic basis to do that, and we'll follow
up. In broad terms, that is an idea worth pursuing. So that's the
serious answer to your question.
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: We have missile talks scheduled --
or not scheduled yet, but we hope to have those in the next few weeks.
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: I want to check to be exact, but
we will have missile talks again, yes.
Q Could you just say something about the status of U.S.-China
relations in the wake of this meeting?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Oh, I think -- actually, President
Clinton referred, somewhat jokingly, when they first sat down to
something that, in fact, is serious. No, actually, I guess this is
during the pre-brief. When asked kind of how he would sum up the
relationship after eight years, he said, I thought Jiang's interview on
60 Minutes -- he said, he described our relationship as like the
weather, generally good, but occasional storms. He said, that's about
right.
And I think that is his view of the relationship. It is a
relationship that is now a wide-ranging, complex, very much in the
interest of both countries to handle well, but we do bump into some
problems that can be very tough. We've gotten to the point we can
discuss those problems frankly without the whole relationship going off
a cliff. That's been one of the real accomplishments over recent years.
THE PRESS: Thank you.
END 12:53 P.M. EDT
|
NEWSLETTER
|
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list
|
|
|
