UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

USIS Washington File

08 May 2000

Excerpts: Three Lawmakers Urge Support for China PNTR May 4

(House speeches urge permanent NTR status for China)  (1570)
Three supporters of granting permanent Normal Trade Relations (NTR)
status to China urged their colleagues May 4 to join them when the
vote comes up later this month.
Representatives Joseph Knollenberg (Republican of Michigan), John
Linder (Republican of Georgia), and Adam Smith (Democrat of
Washington) said granting permanent NTR status to China was in the
best interest of the United States.
Following are excerpts of their speeches from the Congressional
Record:
(begin excerpts)
PERMANENT NORMAL TRADE RELATIONS TO CHINA
(House of Representatives - May 04, 2000)
Mr. KNOLLENBERG. Mr. Speaker, later this month, Members of the House
will be casting their votes on one of the most important trade issues
that we have faced in recent years. I am referring, of course, to
extend permanent normal trade relations to China.
The United States and the international community have been working
together with China for decades to bring China into the WTO. For the
first time in history, the doors of China's economy will be opened up
to international commerce and competition.
Congress will be faced with a simple choice then. If Congress passes
PNTR, we will allow U.S. companies to freely participate in the nearly
$4 billion Chinese economy. However, if we do not pass PNTR, American
products and American workers will be denied this opportunity.
Faced with these options, I think the choice is clear. I urge my
colleagues to avoid the temptation to give in to the protectionist
forces inside our country and instead support free trade and progress
in China.
Mr. LINDER. Mr. Speaker, the growth of high tech and the openness of
the Internet are spreading democratic ideals throughout China,
enlightening their people with ideas of freedom and opportunity.
In Nanjing, young Chinese men and women are being exposed to a quiet
revolution led by the growth of the Internet. A Times of London
article, entitled `China Embraces Its Last Revolution,' underscores
high tech's role in opening up Chinese society. The article says
China's older generation now recognizes that the economic development
on which China's future depends requires a new openness to the world,
the encouragement of the Internet, entry into the World Trade
Organization, and concentration on education and globalization. They
know this will change the political and social balance of China.
We can encourage this change. PNTR for China will maintain America's
technological leadership in the world and provide high-tech jobs for
Americans. It will also provide the Chinese people with access to
Western influence and ideas. The open technology of the Internet will
force China to open their society to bring about positive economic and
social changes.
Mr. Speaker, China PNTR is in the best interest of both the American
and the Chinese people.
Mr. SMITH of Washington. Mr. Speaker, trade has become an issue that
is very divisive in this country, and I rise today as a Democrat and a
member of the New Democratic Coalition to urge this body to remember
the importance of expanding access to overseas market, the importance
of trade to the growth of this Nation.
I do that mindful of some of the protests that have been out there
about our global trade policy and even somewhat in support of some of
the complaints that people have said about trade policy.
I think it is absolutely correct to look around the world and say what
can we do to help improve human rights, to help improve labor
standards, to help make sure that the entire globe protects the
environment. And I think these issues need to be brought up more often
in international discussions, not just involving trade, but in all
discussions with other countries.
Mr. Speaker, what can we do to help improve those things? I rise today
just to remind people that even though those issues are important, we
cannot forget the importance of open markets. It starts with the
simple fact that 96 percent of the people in the world live someplace
other than the United States of America, while at the same time, here
in the U.S., we manage to account for 20 percent of the world's
consumption.
If we are going to grow economically, if we are going to create more
jobs, those statistics make it abundantly clear that we are going to
have to get access to some of those other 96 percent of the people in
the world.
We need to get access to their markets. We need to reduce barriers,
open access to trade to help grow the economy. And I do not think
people understand completely the benefits that trade have brought and
the role they have played in the strong economy that we now enjoy.
I just think that while we are working to improve labor conditions,
working to improve human rights and environment, we can also open up
other markets to our trade. And the best example of this, and I
support the comments of the gentleman from California (Mr. Dooley), my
colleague who came before me, is the China PNTR trade agreement.
All of the concerns we have heard about trade in previous agreements,
a lot of them focus on the fact that it is a one-sided trade
agreement. We open our markets, but other countries do not open
theirs. This is actually the first trade agreement that goes the other
way. China opens their markets by reducing their barriers across the
board in a wide variety of goods and services that will increase our
access to the single largest market in the world, 1.3 billion people.
This is a great trade agreement that actually will help us here in the
U.S., and we need to recognize it for that. We also need to recognize
how engagement helps move us forward.
Mr. Speaker, turning down PNTR for China will not do one thing to
improve human rights, labor conditions or environmental standards in
China. In fact, if you listen to the human rights activists over
there, and if you listened to people over in that corner of the world,
isolating China will send them in exactly the opposite direction.
Taiwan, in particular, we have heard a lot about how we cannot support
this agreement, because of how bad China has treated Taiwan; and I
agree that there have been many bad actions by China towards Taiwan.
The Taiwanese, the recently elected president, an outspoken advocate
for independence for Taiwan, someone who has run against China many,
many times strongly supports the U.S. favoring PNTR for China, because
he understands that engagement is the policy that will best protect
him from Chinese aggression if they choose to go that route.
He wants China to be connected to the rest of the world so that they
cannot afford to act in a way that forces the rest of the world to
back away from them. So you can have a good trade agreement and also
improve human rights, labor conditions, and the environment; but this
argument goes beyond the specifics of the China Trade Agreement, even
though I think it will be a watershed moment in this country to see
whether or not we are going to go forward and embrace engagement and
embrace overseas markets or drift back into a dangerous isolation that
could push us into a bipolar world.
It is a basic philosophy of whether or not opening markets is open and
beneficial. I think there is a lot of statistics out there that show
that access to trade helps improve the economy across the board. This
is not an isolated few who benefit from it. When we have an economy
with 4 percent unemployment, 2 percent inflation, and growth as high
as 6 or 7 percent, that benefits everybody in this country.
Mr. Speaker, we cannot lose sight of the importance of opening
overseas markets to our goods. And it goes beyond economics. It is
also a matter of national security. We should be concerned about the
rest of the world, whether or not countries like Vietnam, Sub-Saharan
Africa, other countries in the Third World grow and prosper. If they
do not have access to our markets, their people will never be able to
rise out of poverty. They will never be able to generate the type of
economy that they need in order to have any level of prosperity
whatsoever.
This is important for two reasons. One, if we can grow a vibrant
middle class in places like Sub-Saharan Africa and beyond, they are in
a position to buy our stuff and help our economy grow as well. If they
are in poverty, we cannot get access to those markets because there is
no one to buy.
Beyond economics, it is also important to keep the peace. If countries
are impoverished, that is what leads to revolution and war. We have to
help them grow up so that we can keep peace and stability in the
world. Trade is important. Labor, human rights, environment,
absolutely important. But let us not forget the importance of opening
our markets for global stability and for a strong economy in the U.S.
(end excerpts)
(Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, U.S.
Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list