UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

USIS Washington File

05 May 2000

Excerpts: House Members Speak For and Against China PNTR May 3

(House Majority Leader Armey urges PNTR status for China) (1680)
The debate over granting China permanent Normal Trade Relations (NTR)
status continues to draw out lawmakers to take a stand one way or the
other before the vote scheduled for late May on the issue. In speeches
in the House May 3, four lawmakers split on the issue, with two
Republicans saying permanent NTR status for China was a good idea, and
one Republican and one Democrat arguing the opposite.
Representative Dick Armey (Republican from Texas) urged his colleagues
to support granting permanent NTR status to China.
The House Majority Leader, in seeking support for legislation that
would end the annual review process for granting China full access to
U.S. markets, stressed the importance to the Chinese people of being
able to engage freely with America and bringing about change in their
government.
"If we want to see the Chinese people free from an oppressive
government, if we want to see a Chinese Government reform, put freedom
in the hands of the Chinese people," the number two person in the
House of Representatives said.
Representative Randy Cunningham (Republican from California) said
trade is a way of modifying a communist regime. He noted that Taiwan
supports China's accession to the World Trade Organization and
permanent NTR status for China.
"They want China in 20 to 30 years to move in a direction of pro
democracy, not back to a totalitarian Communist state," Cunningham
said.
On the other side of the issue, Representative Dana Rohrabacher, a
fellow Republican from California, spoke out against granting China
permanent NTR status, as did Representative Sherrod Brown (Democrat
from Ohio).
Following are excerpts of remarks from the Congressional Record:
(begin excerpts)
GRANTING PERMANENT NORMAL TRADE RELATIONS TO CHINA
(House of Representatives - May 03, 2000)
Mr. ARMEY. Mr. Speaker, in 3 1/2 weeks, we will take what will be, I
believe, the most important vote in this Congress, the vote to extend
permanent normal trade relations to China.
Mr. Speaker, this vote is important. It is not only important to our
own domestic industries, our driving high-tech industry or to
America's workers in other industry or to America's farmers, but it is
very, very important, perhaps even more important, to the sense of
freedom and dignity to the Chinese people.
Mr. Speaker, this vote is not about allowing Chinese product access to
American markets, it is about allowing American product access to
Chinese markets. It is about having the Chinese Government accept the
discipline of conforming to a worldwide trade regime of rules and
proper conduct and behavior. That can be infectious, Mr. Speaker. If
they can accept those disciplines with respect to commerce, they are
most likely going to accept them with respect to other aspects of
their life.
It is about allowing the Chinese people, the normal everyday working
Chinese man or woman, the opportunity to enjoy the information, the
freedom, the cultural experience, the sharing of America's freedom
and, by doing so, getting a case to freedom in their own life.
History has proven, Mr. Speaker, that once people acquire the
experience of freedom through commerce, they then require freedom in a
greater share of their life.
If we want to see the Chinese people free from an oppressive
government, if we want to see a Chinese Government reform, put freedom
in the hands of the Chinese people. They, Mr. Speaker, will reform the
Chinese Government, improve their human rights; and while doing that,
we will be able to maintain, not only an American economic boom, but a
world economic boom to the greater good of all the world's people.
Mr. CUNNINGHAM. Mr. Speaker, last year I went to Vietnam with Hal
Rogers, chairman, at the behest of Pete Peterson, who is the
ambassador, and was asked to raise the American flag over Ho Chi Minh
City for the first time for over 25 years.
On that trip, I met with the prime minister, Communist prime minister
in Hanoi, and I asked the prime minister, `Why do you not get involved
in trade?' In perfect English, the Communist prime minister said,
`Congressman, we are Communist. If we get involved in trade, we will
be out of power as Communists.' At that moment, I said trade is good.
If we take a look at whether there are problems with the trade with
China, whether it is humanitarian or whether it is with national
security issues, it is in our best interest. That is why Taiwan
supports trade with China. They want China in 20 to 30 years to move
in a direction of pro democracy, not back to a totalitarian Communist
State.
Regardless of how one feels on the trade issue, both human rights and
national security, it is in the United States' best interest to
support the trade with China.
Mr. ROHRABACHER. What I wanted to mention today is that we have heard
a lot about trade with China this morning and we will hear more about
it. The trade that we have had with Communist China these last 10
years have not made this world a safer world. In fact, it has done
nothing but build up the powerful forces in Communist China that now
threaten the peace of the world.
Furthermore, it has not worked to the benefit of the people of the
United States. What we have in China is the building up of their
infrastructure. Our trade with them is building up their technological
capabilities; building them factories so that they can then export to
the United States and get enough money to buy weapons in order to put
us under a threat. I would oppose any of this WTO for China.
Mr. BROWN of Ohio. Mr. Speaker, in 3 weeks the Republican leadership
will ask this body to vote for permanent most favored nation status
trading privileges for the People's Republic of China. They tell us
engagement with China, that more trade with China, that giving trade
advantages to China, will make everything better. It all started back
about a dozen years ago with Ronald Reagan, then President George Bush
and President Bill Clinton, telling us that things would get better
with China.
Eleven years ago the United States had a $100 million trade deficit,
with an `M,' with Communist China, the People's Republic of China.
Today that trade deficit has grown to $70 billion, that is billion
with a `B,' from $100 million in 11 years to $70 billion trade deficit
with China.
We sell only $15 billion worth of goods to China every year. We buy
$85 billion worth of goods from China. We sell more to Singapore, we
sell more to Taiwan, we sell more to Belgium, than we do to China,
because China's markets are closed to American products by and large.
In fact, those products we sell to those countries, Belgium, Taiwan,
Singapore, those are countries with about 1/50 the population of the
People's Republic of China.
This process of engagement and giving them most favored nation status
and giving China trade privileges simply has not worked. Other
conditions have worsened. The trade deficit, as I said, went from $100
million to $70 billion in 11 years.
Other conditions, child labor has worsened, slave labor conditions in
China have worsened. We continue to give them trade advantages. They
answer by continuing their thumb in the eye of the values that we hold
dear.
The Chinese communist party persecutes Christians and Buddhists and
Muslims, not to mention their indigenous religious organizations such
as the Falun Gong. The Chinese government winks at, sometimes even
encourages, forced abortions, something that almost every country in
the world, probably every country in the world, finds absolutely
abhorrent.
Today, China continues its assault on Taiwan. A few years ago, I
believe 3 years ago when Taiwan held the first free elections in
Chinese history, the People's Republic of China sent missiles into the
Straits of Taiwan to warn them against democracy. Today, as Taiwan
begins a new era where their first native Taiwanese will be
inaugurated president later this month, the Chinese again are
threatening military maneuvers on the east coast of China.
If we let China in the World Trade Organization with full trading
privileges, as the Republican leadership and the President here wants
to do, what is to stop China from doing even more to Taiwan? They will
not have any check on their behavior.
Perhaps the most insidious part of this whole debate is how American
corporations have lined up on behalf of the Communist party
dictatorship. The CEOs of the largest businesses in America, the most
prominent corporations in America, are walking the halls of Congress
today and all the House and Senate office buildings imploring Members
of Congress to vote to support the People's Republic of China, to
support most favored nation status trading privileges for China.
Wei Jing Sheng, a Chinese dissident, said the vanguard of the Chinese
Communist Party revolution in the United States is America's most
prominent and prestigious CEOs.
There are more corporate jets at National Airport today, leading up to
the MFN vote, the most favored nation status, trading privileges for
China vote, than at any time during the year. Corporations understand.
They tell us that China has 1.2 billion potential consumers, that
America needs to sell to them. What they really mean to say is China
has 1.2 billion workers, investments made from American companies, in
China, people making 13 cents and 15 cents and 20 cents an hour,
working 60 and 70 and 75 hours a week, selling products back to the
United States, exploiting Chinese workers and costing American jobs.
Most favored nation status privilege is permanent. NTR for China is a
bad idea. I ask this Congress to defeat it.
(end excerpts)
(Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, U.S.
Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov)



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list