10 April 2000
Text: Senator Akaka Says Taiwan's Democracy Challenges Beijing
(Senator Daniel Akaka April 7 Senate speech on Taiwan) (1750) Taiwan's democratic election in March, and the upcoming peaceful transfer of power from one party to another, are historic events, says Senator Daniel Akaka (Democrat of Hawaii). Furthermore, Akaka suggested in an April 7 speech in the Senate, the election of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) leaders Chen Shui-bian as president and Annette Lu as vice president gives Taiwan a degree of legitimacy that China's leaders have been struggling to earn by coupling economic reform with the suppression of dissent. "A free and fair vote by 80 percent of the electorate occurred without violence with a military that remained in the barracks," Akaka told his Senate colleagues. Akaka, a supporter of permanent Normal Trade Relations (NTR) status for China, contrasted the open political atmosphere in Taiwan with the repression and threats from Beijing. "The breath of fresh air blowing through Taiwan has not been matched in Beijing," he observed. Up to election eve, Akaka said, "the only wind out of China was the fierce breath of threats. Central Military Commission Vice-Chairman General Zhang and Vice Premier Qian Qichen both declared that `Taiwan independence means war.'" Even in Washington, D.C., Akaka said, a Chinese military official at a conference threatened Taiwan's democratically elected leaders if they didn't come to heel. "The quandary China finds itself now in," Akaka said, "is typified by the Beijing waiter, quoted in a recent Washington Post article, who commented as he watched news of the Taiwan elections, `their lives are better than ours, economically and politically. They have more freedom. They can elect their leaders.'" "No longer can China's leaders look across the Straits and see a mirror of themselves in Taiwan's former exiled rulers," he said. Instead, Akaka said, "they see an example of a political system which evolved in a few short years from totalitarian rule to a democracy." Even if one were to accept the characterization of the Taiwan election given to it by Beijing, "a local election in an area of China," it demonstrates, Akaka said, "how far the rest of China has to go: in China, a germinating democracy has not progressed beyond the stage of local village elections. Municipal or national elections have yet to be held." Despite China's rhetoric over elections in Taiwan, Akaka urged support for permanent NTR status for China. "We should be taking steps to welcome China into a greater, more responsible role in the international system," he said. "This critical vote in the U.S. Congress promises to open up China's markets to greater competition and more goods from the West," Akaka said. While permanent NTR will not mean that China will transform itself into a democracy, Akaka said, "it is a step towards integrating China into the new world community." Following is the text of Senator Akaka from the Congressional Record: (begin text) DEMOCRACY IN TAIWAN (Senate -- April 07, 2000) Mr. AKAKA. Mr. President, on March 18th the people of Taiwan elected Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) leaders Chen Shui-bian, former mayor of Taipei, to be President, and Annette Lu to be Vice-President of Taiwan. This was an historic vote, representing the first recorded, peaceful transfer of power in any Chinese political system in 5,000 years. A free and fair vote by 80 percent of the electorate occurred without violence with a military that remained in the barracks. It was a vote with implications not only for the people on Taiwan but also for China and the United States. First, the vote represented a rejection by a majority of the voters of the traditional ruling Kuomintang Party (KMT) and a vote in favor of political reform and change in Taiwan. There was a clear desire by the people to cleanse the political system that they viewed as corrupt. That the DPP could win a national election after having only been formed in 1986 indicates the maturity of the political system, as well as the deep desire for change. The first steps by President-elect Chen Shui-bian indicate the political sophistication of Taiwan's future leaders. He made conciliatory statements towards China, stating that he would avoid declaring independence and emphasizing that `the people's top priority is peaceful cross-strait relations' while declaring his willingness to `negotiate cross-strait air travel, trade and investment, peace agreements, and military conference-building measures with the mainland.' He has offered to meet with China's leaders, even to travel to Beijing. His party is now considering dropping its pro-independence policy in its party platform. He has nominated the current Kuomintang Defense Minister, Tang Fei, to be his Premier. General Tang was born in China. And in another step towards reform both major parties have reached an agreement to reduce the powers of the National Assembly and to strengthen those of the Legislative Yuan, the nation's parliament. The breath of fresh air blowing through Taiwan has not been matched in Beijing. In the run-up to the election the only wind out of China was the fierce breath of threats. Central Military Commission Vice-Chairman General Zhang and Vice Premier Qian Qichen both declared that `Taiwan independence means war.' A People's Liberation Army publication stated that `the PLA is determined to liberate Taiwan. If they meet hard resistance, then they can choose to use weapons of mass destruction, like neutron bombs.' Since the election, there has been some diminishment of the intensity of the attacks but Beijing remains consistent in its criticism and insistence on Taiwanese concessions. Last week, at a conference on Taiwan in Washington organized by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, PLA Senior Colonel Luo Yuan observed that `if you no longer acknowledge you are Chinese and sell off Chinese national interests, the Chinese government will definitely punish this national traitor. [. . .] Once the Taiwan independence provokes an impasse, then we have no choice but the use of blood to uphold the authority.' China's official Xinhua News Agency has commented that `Lee Teng-hui's ignominious fate proves that all those who engage in `Taiwan independence' and splittism and try resorting to trickery to hoodwink the world will come to no good end. The wages of sin is death.' Vice Premier Qian has insisted that there can be no negotiations with Chen or his envoys unless he accepts the principle that Taiwan is part of China and commits to negotiating only over the modalities of reunification. The quandary China finds itself now in is typified by the Beijing waiter, quoted in a recent Washington Post article, who commented as he watched news of the Taiwan elections, `their lives are better than ours, economically and politically. They have more freedom. They can elect their leaders.' One of the first actions by the Taiwanese political parties was to reform its political structure by reducing the role of the National Assembly sending another powerful signal to the Mainland where its hand-picked, 2,978 strong, National People's Congress delegate just met for stage-managed debates. China's leaders have been struggling to earn the degree of legitimacy through economic reform alone and through the continued use of force to suppress dissent that Taiwan's leaders have earned at the ballot box through the exercise of free speech and free trade. No longer can China's leaders look across the Straits and see a mirror of themselves in Taiwan's former exiled rulers. Instead they see an example of a political system which evolved in a few short years from totalitarian rule to a democracy. Martial law rule ended in Taiwan in 1987. A new legislature was elected in 1992. There were presidential elections in 1996, local elections in 1997 and 1998, and a second presidential election in 2000. China's Deputy Chief of Mission in Washington Liu Xiaoming described Taiwan's presidential election as `a local election in an area of China.' Yet, even if his description is accepted, it demonstrates how far the rest of China has to go: in China, a germinating democracy has not progressed beyond the stage of local village elections. Municipal or national elections have yet to be held. As President Clinton so succinctly observed, `the election provides a fresh opportunity for both sides to reach out and resolve their differences through dialogue.' Ironically, it is China, which had urged Taiwan to adopt direct trade, postal, and telecommunications links while Taiwan under President Lee rejected such direct ties, that now rejects President-elect Chen's offers to institute direct contacts. There apparently is the perception even inside China that their policy needs to be changed. One official was quoted over the weekend as saying, `we are painting ourselves into a corner. We are tough when we should be soft and passive when we should be taking the initiative.' Yet, even as Taiwan has grown apart from China, it has also grown closer. It has invested $24 billion in China and China now accounts for 23 percent of all Taiwanese exports. Taiwan's and China's economic progress have become mutually self-sustaining. As a result, we should not be painting China into a corner now. As it attempts to come to terms with the new realities in Taiwan, we should be taking steps to welcome China into a greater, more responsible role in the international system. A critical step in that regard is granting China Permanent Normal Trade Relations (PNTR). This critical vote in the U.S. Congress promises to open up China's markets to greater competition and more goods from the West. PNTR does not mean that China will be a democracy, nor does it mean instant benefits for the American economy, but it is a step towards integrating China into the new world community. Shortly after China joins the World Trade Organization, Taiwan will join. This is the third new reality with which American policymakers must contend. Taiwan has changed. It is not the single-party dictatorship which it was when the Taiwan Relations Act or the three communiques were promulgated. It is a vibrant democracy with a strong economy. It has long clamored to be allowed to play a more active role in the world community by providing assistance to international aid organizations or in UN Specialized Agencies. Can a new role be found for the Taiwan of today in tomorrow's world? Finding one may well be the key if China and Taiwan are to resolve their differences and achieve conciliation. (end text) (Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, U.S. Department of State - usinfo.state.gov)
|
NEWSLETTER
|
| Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|
|
