UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

USIS Washington 
File

08 July 1999

'ENGAGEMENT' WITH CHINA DOESN'T WORK. NOW WHAT?

(Reprinted from July 8, 1999 Wall Street Journal)  (980)
By Senator Jesse Helms
Thanks to the Cox report's revelations, Americans now know that
Communist China has moved almost overnight from a 1950s nuclear
capability to the most modern, advanced technology in the American
nuclear arsenal. It is the most devastating intelligence failure in
American history. But while the details of the report have been widely
discussed, one question remains unanswered: What are we going to do
about it?
China's apologists in Washington have quickly circled their wagons in
an attempt to limit the impact of the Cox report's damning disclosures
on the Clinton administration's "engagement" policy toward Beijing.
Incredibly, some in the administration have even had the gall to
attempt to use this scandal of their own making to press for
ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. If anyone believes
that flimsy arms-control agreement will restrain China's now-exposed
nuclear ambitions, there's a bridge in Hong Kong I want to sell him.
The administration can no longer spin its way out of a fundamental
reassessment of its China policy. The time has come for President
Clinton to confront some uncomfortable facts about how China views the
U.S., and about how the U.S. must respond to protect its vital
interests in Asia.
China is not interested in a "strategic partnership" with the U.S., as
demonstrated by the spate of anti-American, government-sponsored riots
all across China following NATO's accidental bombing in May of the
Chinese embassy in Belgrade. To the contrary, the Chinese regime views
America as an adversary, perhaps an outright enemy. No country truly
interested in a "strategic partnership" with America would mislead its
people into believing that the bombing was deliberate, or refuse to
broadcast American apologies--and then incite mobs to attack U.S.
diplomatic posts with rocks and Molotov cocktails.
Beijing's paramount goal is to displace U.S. influence in the
Asia-Pacific region. China's aim is to undermine U.S. relations with
its Asian allies (who they hope will increasingly turn to China as the
region's security guarantor), and prevent America from defending its
vital interests in Asia--particularly our ability, and willingness, to
defend Taiwan against forced reunification with the mainland.
China is determined to modernize its military forces, especially its
nuclear capabilities, speedily in order to challenge U.S. military
dominance in the Pacific. The Chinese know that today their military
is vastly inferior to ours, but as their military might increases, we
can be sure that the Chinese regime will act more assertively.
China's nuclear espionage has brought us significantly closer to the
day when Beijing will be in a position to use nuclear blackmail
against the U.S. China has already shown its willingness to issue such
threats. Just after China fired missiles off Taiwan's coast in 1995, a
Chinese general publicly boasted that the U.S. would never come to
Taiwan's defense because "Americans care more about Los Angeles than
Taipei."
Of course, China does not want open war with America. As the Chinese
philosopher Sun Tzu wrote some 2,500 years ago in "The Art of War":
"Supreme excellence in war consists in breaking the enemy's resistance
without fighting." China hopes to develop the military capacity to
prevent America from defending its interests in Asia, with what Sun
Tzu called a "sheathed sword"--in this case, a nuclear sword.
Those who argue for U.S. "engagement" with China delude themselves if
they daydream that America can engage China from a position of
weakness. Ronald Reagan's dictum of peace through strength applies as
much in the Far East as it did in the East Bloc. We can convince the
Chinese leadership to behave only if their avenues to adventurism and
confrontation are closed. To start, we must take the following steps:
First, shore up our own defenses, and those of our allies, in the
region. The most urgent priority is Taiwan. With Hong Kong back in the
fold and Macau soon to be reabsorbed into the mainland, Beijing's
leaders now view the reunification of Taiwan as their No. 1 priority.
That is why the U.S. Senate must approve the bipartisan Taiwan
Security Enhancement Act. The act will authorize more U.S. arms sales
to Taiwan and increase cooperation between the U.S. and Taiwanese
militaries. This will deter Chinese threats against the island. And
given China's recent seizures of islands that lie within Philippine
maritime boundaries, it is also imperative that we rebuild our defense
relationship with the Philippines, now that the Philippine Senate has
ratified the Visiting Forces Agreement.
Second, we must bring Taiwan under a regional missile-defense umbrella
that will protect the Taiwanese, and all U.S. allies in the region,
from ballistic missile attack by China (or for that matter by North
Korea). This is vital because during the past year China has begun
moving hundreds of medium-range ballistic missiles along the coast
near the Taiwan Strait, in a clear effort to intimidate Taipei.
Third and foremost, the U.S. must move quickly to build a national
missile defense to protect the American people from ballistic-missile
attack. China can't blackmail us with nuclear weapons if its missiles
can't hit the U.S. We must, once and for all, place that antiquated
Cold War relic known as the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty into the
dustbin of history, and then build and deploy a system to defend us
from the threat of Chinese ballistic missile attack.
Thanks to this administration's ineptitude, China now possesses the
most advanced American nuclear weapons technology. The leaders in
Beijing must be made to know, in no uncertain terms, that they will
never be able to use that technology to intimidate the U.S. Then, and
only then, can we have any sort of constructive "engagement" with
them.
(Jesse Helms, Republican of North Carolina, is Chairman of the Senate
Foreign Relations Committee.)



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list