
27 May 1999
TEXT: MAY 26 LETTER FROM LAWMAKERS TO CLINTON ON CHINA/WTO
(Bipartisan call for "time-out" on China's WTO bid) (520) Washington -- The Clinton Administration found its engagement policy toward the People's Republic of China under bipartisan assault in a letter from lawmakers to President Clinton May 26 calling for a "time-out" in China's bid to gain accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO). Senator Jesse Helms (Republican of North Carolina), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and his House counterpart, Rep. Benjamin Gilman (Republican of New York), chairman of the House International Relations Committee sent the missive that expressed their deep concern about negotiations regarding China's accession to the WTO. The Republicans were joined by Senator Russell Feingold (Democrat of Wisconsin), a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and Rep. Tom Lantos (Democrat of California), House International Relations Committee member. The bipartisan open letter to Clinton urged that the United States "take a step back," and reconsider the administration's current approach to China. The lawmakers said the de-linking of trade issues from other concerns had not fostered "the deep, stable and meaningful relationship between the United States and China that had been promised." Following is the text of the letter: (begin text) Congress of the United States Washington, DC 20515 May 26, 1999 The President The White House Washington, D.C. 20500 Dear Mr. President: We are deeply concerned about the continuing negotiations regarding China's being admitted into the WTO. In light of current events, and, specifically, the recent incidents in and by China, we are fully convinced that the most responsible and appropriate step is to set aside negotiations. China's entrance into the WTO would have a permanent and significant effect on the American economy, not to mention the flexibility of future Administrations. Under present circumstances, the U.S. should take a step back, reconsider the current approach to China and resume negotiations only when they can be conducted without the overhang of ancillary events. Among the issues that must be addressed is the effectiveness of our current terms of engagement with China. Recent newspaper editorials across the political spectrum have suggested that the Chinese government's sanctioning of the attacks on our embassy in Beijing, the torching of the consulate, and the attacks on U.S. businesses demonstrate clearly that our engagement policy and delinking trade from other issues such as human rights have not fostered the deep, stable and meaningful relationship between the United States and China that had been promised. Moreover, the Chinese government's allowance (and even encouragement) of such unlawful activity against the United States emphasizes the concerns many members of Congress have expressed about China's willingness and ability to enforce the rule of law, including its WTO commitments. In short, we are persuaded that the United States will be well served by such a "time-out." We look forward to working with you on this issue in the future and to developing an appropriate policy toward working with China. Sincerely yours, (signed) Jesse Helms Russell Feingold Benjamin Gilman Tom Lantos (end text)
NEWSLETTER
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|