UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

Subject: Cox report conclusions questionable

Cato Institute News Memo: May 25, 1999
 From:	James N. Markels
 		Assistant Director of Public Affairs
	 	voice: (202) 789-5256
		fax:   (202) 842-3490

Today, the Cox Committee released its report detailing U.S. losses of technology through Chinese espionage and the launch of U.S. satellites. According to Cato Institute's director of defense policy studies Ivan Eland, disproportionate attention has focused on the technology that was lost and whether the Clinton administration was negligent in stopping the flow and investigating the alleged incidents. What is needed is a hard look at the specific ill-effects such technology transfers would have on U.S. security.

"Conservative Republicans-looking for a new enemy to fight after the Cold War ended-have hyped the questionable assertion that this is the most egregious case of espionage in U.S. history. Yet the effects on U.S. security may be overblown. The CIA was unable to determine how much of the information the Chinese obtained was stolen (versus what was gathered from open sources) and what effect the information had on Chinese advances in warhead design.

"The Cox Committee's worst-case conclusion that stolen secrets gave China design information on thermonuclear weapons equal to that possessed by the United States is also questionable. Even if true, many military experts cite China's poor history in serially producing technology they've obtained. If China successfully incorporates the technology, to pose a substantially increased threat to the United States, it would also need to dramatically expand its small nuclear arsenal and abandon its nuclear doctrine of minimum deterrence. China's modest defense budget of $35 billion per year-compared with the gargantuan U.S. defense budget of $290 billion-may not be able to support such a 'nuclear breakout.' Despite Chinese espionage, the United States will most likely retain nuclear and conventional military dominance well into the next century."

For additional information, contact Ivan Eland directly at 202-218-4630. All of these issues will be explored at a Cato policy forum to be held on June 7, 1999.
 WHAT: 	"People's Republic of China: Red Tiger or Pink Pussycat?"
 WHEN:  	11:00 a.m., Monday, June 7, 1999
 WHERE: 	F. A. Hayek Auditorium, Cato Institute, 
            1000 Massachusetts Ave, N.W.
 

The forum will also be broadcast live on from Cato's Web site: www.cato.org .




NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list