EELV - Boeing
Boeing initially submitted an EELV proposal based based on the Space Shuttle Main Engine built by Rockwell's Rocketdyne Division of Canoga Park, California. The proposal included recovering the engines after each launch for refurbishment and reuse.(1) Arianespace sought to participate in the EELV program in partnership with a US company, with arrangements anticipated to be concluded in late May or early April 1995. The initial proposal made at the US Space Foundation symposium in Colorado Springs, Colorado in early April 1995 was widely criticized by American industry and government officials.(2)
The concept appeared similar to plans for the New/National Launch System (NLS), which projected the development of a new family of launch vehicles.(3) Intended to meet a broad range of national security, civil and commercial launch needs anticipated for the next century, the initial launch of the first configuration of NLS was planned for 2002. NLS consisted of the following major elements:
- The space transportation main engine (STME), a highly reliable, low-cost engine that will provide 650,000 pounds of thrust
- A family of three new launch vehicles to capture the primary classes of payloads anticipated for the next century
- A high-energy upper stage to provide capability to geosynchronous orbits
- A cargo transfer vehicle for transporting payloads to the Space Station Freedom
- New launch processing facilities and launch pads at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, incorporating important operability features
- Some modified and new facilities at the Kennedy Space Center
The NLS-1 heavy-lift vehicle element of the system would consist of the core vehicle with four liquid-fueled engines and two Solid Rocket Boosters. It would be capable of delivering a 100,000-pound useful payload to rendezvous with Space Station Freedom 220 nautical miles above the Earth.
The NLS-2 vehicle, which would employ a common vehicle "core" with the NLS-1 would provide a payload capability of 50,000 pounds to low Earth orbit to meet the needs of the DOD's heaviest payloads.
The NLS-3 vehicle would be capable of lifting 20,000 pounds to low Earth orbit using a single STME to meet the needs of the DoD and NASA medium class payloads. The NLS 3 design also was intended to enhance the cost and operational competitiveness of the US commercial launch industry in the international marketplace.
The estimated cost of the New Launch System was in the $10.5 billion to $12 billion range, based on preliminary engineering definition, including over $2 billion for the STME engine development effort. Due to this high cost, the NLS program was terminated in 1991, and subsequent efforts to initiate development of the Spacelifter incarnation of the NLS 3 vehicle were greeted without enthusiasm.
It appeared, however, that Boeing was still seeking to develop a family of vehicles similar in capability, if not design, to the NLS-2 and NLS-3.
1. "Boeing Banks on SSME For Air Force Contract," Space News, 1 May 1995, page 2.
2. "Arianespace Considers EELV Bid," Space News, 8 May 1995, page 26.
3. Adapted from: Testimony by Lt. Gen. John E. Jaquish, principal deputy, assistant secretary of the Air Force (acquisition) and Maj. Gen. Donald G. Hard, director of space programs, assistant secretary of the Air Force (acquisition) to the House Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Defense, in Washington, DC, 6 May 1992.
- Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV)
- Boeing News Releases
- Boeing Wins Air Force Contract To Design New Launch System SEATTLE, Aug. 25, 1995
- Launch Vehicle Team Succeeds With First Series Of Drop Tests Of EELV Propulsion Module STENNIS SPACE CENTER, Miss., June 20, 1996
- Test Team Betting "Evolved" Launch-Vehicle Concept Can Save Taxpayers $10 Billion NASA STENNIS SPACE CENTER, Miss. (July 19, 1996)
- Boeing EELV Propulsion Module Successfully Dropped Into Gulf Of Mexico STENNIS SPACE CENTER, MS. (July 23, 1996)
- Test-Firing Of 'Recovered' Shuttle Main Engine Shows Boeing Design For EELV Can Save Billions STENNIS SPACE CENTER, Miss. (Aug. 27, 1996)
|Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list|