• Military Menu                       

• Introduction
• Systems
• Facilities
• Agencies
• Industry
• Operations
• Countries
• Hot Documents
• News
• Reports
• Policy
• Budget
• Congress
• Links

• WMD
• Intelligence
• Homeland Security
• Space

Sweden - Corruption

In recent years, Sweden, like other European countries, has become increasingly concerned about potential foreign interference in its political system, particularly from Russia. There have been allegations of attempts to influence Swedish elections or political discourse through social media campaigns, although direct evidence of corruption related to foreign influence remains limited.

Swedbank's former CEO Birgitte Bonnesen was sentenced to one year and three months in prison for serious fraud following Uppdrag Granskning's and SVT Nyheter's revelations. The Svea Court of Appeal announced this on 10 Septembe 2024. "This is one of the biggest business scandals we've had in modern times", said Joacim Olsson, Aktiespararna's CEO. The court case was about a series of statements that Bonnesen made during the years 2018-2019, when she was CEO of Swedbank. The case has been about whether Birgitte Bonnesen covered up what she and the bank management knew about the suspected money laundering in Swedbank, which Uppdrag Granskning and SVT Nyheter revealed at the beginning of 2019. The district court had acquitted her of all suspicions in January 2023. They argued that the statements were not specific enough to be criminal.

Swedbank is one of the largest banking groups in the Nordic and Baltic regions. It primarily operates in Sweden, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, offering a broad range of financial services, including retail banking, corporate banking, asset management, and insurance. It was founded in 1820 and has since grown into a major banking group in Northern Europe.

Sweden has historically been considered one of the least corrupt countries in the world, consistently ranking high in global anti-corruption indexes, such as Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index. However, like any country, Sweden is not immune to corruption or scandals. There have been instances of corruption within both the public and private sectors, although these cases are often isolated and not systemic.

While Sweden generally maintains a transparent and accountable public administration, some cases of corruption have emerged, particularly at the local level. These cases often involve conflicts of interest, such as officials accepting bribes, favors, or personal benefits in exchange for influencing decisions in areas like construction permits, procurement contracts, or public housing allocation. There have been instances where public officials have been accused of misusing government funds or resources, often leading to investigations, resignations, or legal action.

Some Swedish companies operating abroad have been implicated in bribery and corruption cases. A well-known case involved the telecommunications giant Telia, which was involved in a major bribery scandal in Uzbekistan. The company was accused of paying large sums to secure business licenses in the country, leading to significant fines and reputational damage. Major Swedish banks like Swedbank and SEB have been involved in money laundering scandals. In 2019, Swedbank faced scrutiny for its involvement in a money laundering scheme linked to its Baltic operations. This led to multiple investigations by financial regulators and the bank’s reputation taking a hit.

Corruption in the private sector generally involves issues like insider trading, bribery in procurement processes, and conflicts of interest in major business deals. Regulatory bodies such as the Swedish Competition Authority and the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority monitor such practices.

Political corruption in Sweden is relatively rare compared to many other countries, largely due to the country's strong legal frameworks, transparent governance, and active civil society. Sweden consistently ranks as one of the least corrupt countries in the world. While not common at high levels, there have been instances where politicians have been accused of using their positions for personal gain, often involving conflicts of interest or preferential treatment in public procurement, contracts, or subsidies. Local-Level Corruption: Political corruption is more likely to occur at the local or regional government levels, where oversight might be less strict than at the national level. Local politicians or public officials may sometimes be involved in dubious land deals, zoning decisions, or contracts that benefit friends or family.

On occasion, high-ranking politicians in Sweden have been forced to resign due to ethical lapses, even if not technically illegal. These incidents often revolve around misuse of government resources, inappropriate expense claims, or failure to declare conflicts of interest. A notable case involved Mona Sahlin, a former leader of the Social Democrats, who resigned from her role in 1995 after it was revealed that she had used a government-issued credit card for personal expenses. Some political figures have been implicated in scandals involving misuse of housing benefits or other perks. For example, in 2017, Mehmet Kaplan, a former Minister for Housing and Urban Development, resigned after facing criticism for his involvement with controversial groups and statements. While not directly a corruption case, it highlighted ethical lapses and questionable associations in politics.

While Sweden has regulations around political lobbying, there have been criticisms about the lack of transparency in political lobbying practices. Political decisions can sometimes be influenced by well-connected individuals or groups with economic or political interests, though this influence is typically indirect and legal. Like in many other countries, some Swedish politicians move between public office and high-level corporate positions, which raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest. Critics argue that such practices blur the line between political service and private sector influence.

Sweden has relatively strict rules on political party funding, requiring transparency in donations and other financial support. However, loopholes or lack of clarity in regulations have led to concerns that political donations could lead to undue influence. Some critics argue that wealthier donors or interest groups may hold sway over political parties or campaigns, even if the influence is subtle. There have been occasional issues regarding campaign finance violations, although these are not widespread or systemic. Political parties are required to disclose their funding sources, and violations are typically addressed through legal or electoral commission oversight.

The Sweden Democrats, a right-wing political party with nationalist and anti-immigration stances, has faced numerous scandals, some of which involve accusations of corruption, racist comments, or ties to extremist groups. While these issues are more about ethical concerns and political rhetoric than direct corruption, they have contributed to heated debates around political accountability in Sweden.

One of the hallmarks of Sweden’s political culture is the relatively quick action taken in cases where politicians are found to have acted unethically, even if their actions are not criminal. It is common for political figures to resign if they become embroiled in scandal, reflecting Sweden’s strong political accountability culture. Sweden has robust anti-corruption laws that apply to political figures, with agencies like the National Anti-Corruption Unit tasked with investigating allegations of corruption involving public officials, including politicians.

Despite the occasional scandal, Sweden enjoys high levels of public trust in its political institutions. The political system is seen as transparent, and Swedish politicians are generally regarded as accountable and responsive to public concerns. Sweden’s political culture places a high emphasis on ethical standards. As a result, politicians are often held to stringent moral and ethical expectations, which may lead to public outcry and media scrutiny even over relatively minor infractions.

Former Social Democratic leader Mona Sahlin was implicated in another scandal, this time involving falsification of income statements to help an employee secure a mortgage, leading to her 2016 resignation from a government-appointed role. Several high-profile Swedish politicians have been caught in scandals regarding improper use of public money for personal expenses. While these are often more about ethical lapses than large-scale corruption, they reflect the high level of scrutiny in Swedish politics.

While political corruption in Sweden is not systemic, the country still experiences occasional ethical lapses and corruption cases. Sweden’s strong institutions, high levels of transparency, and public accountability mechanisms help maintain integrity in politics and minimize corruption.

Sweden has comprehensive anti-corruption laws, and regulatory agencies like the National Anti-Corruption Unit (a part of the Swedish Prosecution Authority) handle investigations and prosecutions related to corruption. Whistleblower protection laws encourage individuals to report corruption without fear of retaliation.

The Swedish government promotes transparency in both public administration and the corporate world, and open data laws help make government decision-making accessible to the public. Some experts argue that while Sweden ranks high on international anti-corruption lists, there are gaps in how thoroughly corruption is investigated, particularly within international business activities. There are ongoing efforts to improve transparency and tighten regulations, especially in areas vulnerable to financial crime. While Sweden generally maintains a clean record on corruption, these isolated cases demonstrate that no country is entirely immune to such issues. The country's legal and regulatory framework is designed to detect and address corruption when it occurs.

In 2014, Transparency International ranked Sweden as one of the most corruption-free countries in the world; fourth out of 175. Sweden offers an extremely competitive, largely corruption-free economy with access to new products, technologies, skills, and innovations. These, combined with a well-educated labor force, outstanding telecommunications network, and a stable political environment, have made Sweden the destination of choice for American and foreign companies establishing a presence in the Nordic region.

Investors have an extremely low likelihood of encountering corruption in Sweden. While there have been cases of domestic corruption at the municipal level, most companies have high anti-corruption standards and an investor would not typically be put in the position of having to make a bribe to conduct business.

There are cases of Swedish companies operating overseas that have been charged with bribing foreign officials; however, these cases are relatively rare. Although Sweden has comprehensive laws against corruption, and ratified the 1997 OECD Anti-bribery Convention, in June of 2012, the OECD Anti-Bribery Working Group has given an unfavorable review of Swedish compliance to the dictates of that Convention. The group faulted Sweden for not having a single conviction of a Swedish company for bribery in the last eight years, for having unreasonably low fines, and for not re-framing their legal system so that a corporation could be charged with a crime.

Swedish officials object to the review, claiming that lack of convictions is not proof of prosecutorial indifference, but rather indicative of high standards of ethics in Swedish companies. Over the last two years, a high-profile case involving telecom giant TeliaSonera’s operations in Uzbekistan has received quite a lot of public attention and cost the CEO and other senior officials their jobs. Sweden's corruption prosecutor is currently investigating the case.

Sweden does not have an agency devoted exclusively to anti-corruption but a number of agencies cooperate together. Sweden has signed and ratified the UN Anticorruption Convention. Sweden is party to the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions. The National Corruption Group at the Swedish Police (Den Nationella Korruptionsgruppen) handles the investigation of corruption offences and is engaged in preventive efforts.

The responsibilities of the Swedish Prosecution Authority include prosecuting cases of corruption. A special unit in the prosecutor’s office worked on cases involving corruption and initiated 12 investigations in 2013, resulting in the prosecution of five persons. The authority is independent of the courts, the police, and all ministries. It had adequate resources and cooperated with civil society.