Navy Shipbuilding Programs: Nuclear Attack Submarine Issues (Testimony, 05/16/95, GAO/T-NSIAD-95-162)
This testimony on production of the Navy's nuclear attack submarines
makes three main points. First, alternatives to the Navy's approach to
maintain the required SSN force structure could save billions of dollars
and meet the Navy's force structure and threat requirements. Second,
there is agreement within the intelligence community that Russia's
frontline submarines are for the first time as quiet as or quieter than
the SSN-688I and that Russia plans to continue reducing radiated noise
levels on its submarines. Third, although the Navy argues that
maintaining two nuclear shipbuilders preserves competition and hedges
against future uncertainties, GAO concludes that consolidating
production at a single shipyard would cut costs dramatically.
--------------------------- Indexing Terms -----------------------------
REPORTNUM: T-NSIAD-95-162
TITLE: Navy Shipbuilding Programs: Nuclear Attack Submarine Issues
DATE: 05/16/95
SUBJECT: Defense contingency planning
Nuclear powered submarines
Shipyards
Shipbuilding industry
Navy procurement
Military cost control
Antisubmarine warfare
Combat readiness
Cost analysis
Naval warfare
IDENTIFIER: SSN-23 Submarine
SSN-688 Submarine
SSN-688I Submarine
Seawolf Attack Submarine
Russia
DOD Bottom-Up Review
------------------------------------------------------------------------
See the GAO FAQ - Section 2.0 for printed copy ordering information.
The FAQ is automatically retrieved with all WAIS search results or
can be obtained by sending e-mail to: info@www.gao.gov
GAO Report in PDF Format
NEWSLETTER
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list
|
|