
Military Airlift: Comparison of C-5 and C-17 Airfield Availability (Letter Report, 07/11/94, GAO/NSIAD-94-225)
The Air Force has greatly overestimated the number of airfields worldwide that can accommodate the wide-bodied, C-17 cargo plane; when runway strength is considered, the C-17's wartime advantage over its C-5 predecessor shrinks from 6,400 to about 900 airfields. The C-17 advantage dwindles even further when only airfields that have been determined by the Air Force to be suitable for military operations are considered. So far, the Air Force has surveyed about 2,800 airfields as suitable for military operations. When wartime landing requirements, including minimum runway strength, are considered, the C-17's wartime airfield advantage is 145. When airfields in the United States, Canada, and Mexico are excluded, the C-17's wartime advantage falls to 95 airfields. Although the Air Face claims that the C-17's ability to land at small, austere airfields during wartime is a significant military advantage, the Defense Department has identified only three such airfields that the C-17 would use in major regional contingency scenarios; two are in Korea and one is in Saudi Arabia. --------------------------- Indexing Terms ----------------------------- REPORTNUM: NSIAD-94-225 TITLE: Military Airlift: Comparison of C-5 and C-17 Airfield Availability DATE: 07/11/94 SUBJECT: Defense contingency planning Military airlift operations Military aircraft Defense capabilities Strategic mobility forces Military bases Operations analysis Military systems analysis Airborne operations IDENTIFIER: C-17 Aircraft C-5 Aircraft Korea Saudi Arabia DOD Mobility Requirements Study ************************************************************************ See the GAO FAQ - Section 2.0 for printed copy ordering information. The FAQ is automatically retrieved with all WAIS search results or can be obtained by sending e-mail to: info@www.gao.gov
GAO Report in PDF Format [1.42 Mb]
NEWSLETTER
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|