UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Military

ACCIDENT RISK ASSESSMENT OF PERSONNEL RATED BY COMMANDERS/LEADERS


RISK FACTORS
(FROM NEXT ACCIDENT ASSESSMENT)
POINTSPERCENT OF
PERSONNEL
1. Self Discipline (dependability)
a. Counseled for poor performance
818%
b. Had at fault accidents/citations
88
c. Abused alcohol/drugs
84
d. Had judicial/non-judical punishment
87
e. GT score of 90 or less
84
f. Males under age 25
853
2. Leadership (enforcement of standards)
a. Insufficient knowledge/experience
629
b. Tolerates below-standard performance
1221
3. Training (job skills and knowledge)
a. MOS SDT (SQT) score less than 70
95
b. Not proficient in assigned tasks outside
MOS
910
4. Standards (task-cond-std/procedure)
a. Do not exist
48
b. Not clear/practical
413
5. Support (insuff amount/type/condition)
a. equipment
213
b. Supplies
214
c. Services/facilities
218
d. Personnel
227

  • 91 Soldiers were assessed by 19 Commanders/Leaders

  • Assessment results were:

    RISK
    LEVEL
    PERCENT OF
    SOLDIERS
    Extremely
    High
    2%
    High11%
    Medium15%
    Low71%

  • Indicators/sources of accident risk as reported are shown above.


Back buttonRisk Management Procedures--Training



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list