UNITED24 - Make a charitable donation in support of Ukraine!

Military

Why the Government is Increasingly Depending on the Coast Guard as an Important Player

in National Security

 

CSC 1997

 

Subject Area - National Security

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

Title:     Why the Government is Increasingly Depending on the Coast Guard as an Important Player

               in National Security

 

Author: Lieutenant Commander David A. Cinalli, United States Coast Guard

 

Thesis: The Coast Guard has become an increasingly important, if unsung, player in ensuring the national security of the United States. As Military Operations Other Than War (MOOTW) starts to play a greater role in United States national security, the Coast Guard alone has the unique ability to integrate its humanitarian mission of search and rescue, and its national security mission of law enforcement, with its multi-mission platforms to meet these emerging demands.  

 

Discussion: With the global threat of the Cold War diminished, increased involvement in Military Operations Other Than War (MOOTW) in the 21st Century will continue to increase as chaos spreads and world resources become scarce. This is occurring as the federal government is downsizing, and funding continues to be scarce throughout an austere budget environment. The federal government, therefore, needs a service capable of meeting these multi-mission demands in a cost effective manner. A case study of the Haitian Mass Exodus which occurred from 1991 to 1994, exemplifies why the federal government is increasingly dependant upon the Coast Guard's expertise and capabilities as the service of choice in similar maritime operations in the littorals.

 

          The Coast Guard was the primary maritime federal law enforcement agency and took the lead throughout the Haitian Mass Exodus, bearing the burden of enforcing United States immigration laws. The Coast Guard provided an invaluable service and a most noteworthy contribution to humanity, saving thousands of Haitian lives that would surely have perished at sea. The Coast Guard's ability to expertly handle the vital functions of Search and Rescue (SAR) and law enforcement integrating them with their mulit-mission platforms, while still responding to routine emergencies, proved once again that the Coast Guard is the premier maritime service and the service of choice for this type of operation. Being prepared to stop the influx of illegal migrants is a key part of the Coast Guard's law enforcement mission and an important national security concern.

 

Conclusions: Given the likelihood that the next naval conflict will be in the littoral versus open ocean, the Coast Guard's multi-mission capabilities will make it the service of choice. Operation Able Manner was a classic example of how the Coast Guard was able to use its multi-mission force to provide a non-redundant capability to complement the Navy in support of U.S. goals and interests in a littoral area. Its complex, yet efficient, organization of people, ships, boats, aircraft, and operation centers consistently ensured that the proper tools were always at hand.  The Coast Guard's greatest strength was its versatility and its ability to tie together its many missions, effectively meeting challenges whenever and wherever they arose. An aggressive high seas boarding program is essential for both deterring and interdicting drug and alien smuggling at sea. The demand for Coast Guard assets and expertise will continue to grow. There is simply no one else available with the training, experience, or multi-mission platforms to assure these national maritime priorities in the absence of the Coast Guard.


 

 

 

CONTENTS

 

 

CHAPTER     PAGE

 

1. THE COAST GUARD AS THE LEAD AGENCY IN

                 THE HAITIAN MASS EXODUS.................................................................. 1

 

2. HAITI - THE CASE STUDY......................................................................... 5

 

  Haiti: An Agenda For Democracy................................................. 5

  Haitians Know When to Go and When to Stay.............................. 6

  Alien Migrant Interdiction Operation............................................. 9

  Legal Framework for Coast Guard Operations in

  Support of Immigration Law Enforcement..................................... 12

  Executive Order 12807.................................................................. 13

  Another Mass Exodus................................................................... 17

  Operation Able Manner................................................................. 19

 

3. Search and Rescue.............................................................................. 22

 

4.  LAW ENFORCEMENT................................................................................. 27

 

  Legal Authorization....................................................................... 30

 

5. tRAINING.................................................................................................... 33

 

6.   MULTI-MISSION PLATFORMS AND APPROACH................................... 37

 

7.    CONCLUSION............................................................................................. 42

 

 

 

APPENDIX A: CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY OF US/HAITI INTERACTION...... 45

 

 

NOTES..........................................................................................................................    49

 

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY.................................................................................................... .....    54

 

 

 

 

Why the government is increasingly depending on the The United States Coast Guard as an important player in National Security

 

 

CHAPTER ONE

 

 

THE COAST GUARD AS THE LEAD AGENCY IN

THE HAITIAN MASS EXODUS

 

SEMPER PARATUS!!! Always ready. The Coast Guard has a long sea-going tradition and a high spirit which is summed up in its motto. The United States Coast Guard, known as the "Smokies of the Sea" and the "Lifesavers," has approached its mission and served its country and humanity with professionalism, enthusiasm, and a high sense of vigor since August 4, 1790. The Coast Guard was originally entrusted with the enforcement of the young republic's anti-smuggling laws using its fleet of ten cutters. As such, the Coast Guard is the oldest continuous sea-going armed service of the United States. In 1967, the Coast Guard was transferred from the Treasury Department to the Department of Transportation where it performs a peace time mission. In war time, the Coast Guard reports under the Department of Navy and serves alongside other Navy surface combatants.

 

With the global threat of the Cold War diminished, increased involvement in Military Operations Other Than War (MOOTW) in the 21st Century will continue to increase as chaos spreads and world resources become scarce. This is occurring at the same time that the federal government is downsizing, and funding continues to be scarce throughout an austere budget environment. The federal government, therefore, needs a service capable of meeting these multi-mission demands in a cost effective manner.

 

The Coast Guard has become an increasingly important, if unsung, player in ensuring the national security of the United States. As MOOTW starts to play a greater role in United States national security, the Coast Guard alone has the unique ability to integrate its humanitarian mission of search and rescue, and its national security mission of law enforcement, with its multi-mission platforms to meet these emerging demands. A case study of the Haitian Mass Exodus exemplifies why the federal government is increasingly depending on the Coast Guard's expertise and capabilities, as the service of choice in similar maritime operations in the littorals.

 

Although the Immigration and Naturalization Services (INS) is the primary agency for enforcing United States immigration law and administering the relevant federal programs, most Americans remember the United States Coast Guard as the first military force and government agency involved in the Haitian Migration Mass Exodus. The Coast Guard was the primary maritime federal law enforcement agency and took the lead throughout this crisis, bearing the burden of enforcing United States immigration laws and related international agreements at sea.   The Coast Guard may have been the smallest United States military service and government agency involved, but it was also the most visible. Providing an invaluable service and a most noteworthy contribution to humanity, the Coast Guard saved thousands of Haitian lives that would surely have perished at sea.

 

Two Joint Chiefs of Staff, have recognized the Coast Guard as a valuable asset. In 1992, General Colin Powell stated, "I'm more certain than ever that the Coast Guard belongs in the toolbox of military capabilities. The Coast Guard's national security functions will evolve with the emerging requirements of the post Cold War era." [1] The Coast Guard was further recognized receiving numerous other accolades by General Powell's successor General Shalikashvili, the present Commander of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, during a visit to Haiti. He stated to Admiral Kramek, Commandant of the Coast Guard , "Your people performed superbly in Haiti. You were right there when we needed you the most. We can always rely on the Coast Guard ! You are truly Semper Paratus." [2]

 

The Haitian Mass Exodus, which occurred from 1991 to 1994, was sparked by the overthrow of President Jean-Bertrand Aristide, a Roman Catholic priest, was elected to office on 16 December 1990. Jean-Bertrand Aristide was Haiti's first popularly elected president receiving 67% of the vote. On September 30, 1991, LT Gen Raoul Cedras, named by Aristide to run the army, led a coup and seized control of the country. The leaders of the coup massacred many Haitians after assuming power.[3] Aristide fled to Caracas, Venezuela, and then eventually to Washington, D.C.

 

In an effort to restore him to power, the United Nations, led by the United States, imposed an embargo on the island. This worsened the already desperate economic situation. The exodus of the Haitians was also prompted in part by the Clinton administration's decision to grant political asylum hearings to Haitians picked up at sea, rather than summarily returning them to Haiti. A mass exodus form Haiti ensued. During this mass exodus, thousands of Haitians departed Haiti in an attempt to reach the United States in search of freedom and a better life. Unfortunately, they used a variety of extremely dangerous, overloaded, and unseaworthy craft. Nearly all of the vessels lacked basic safety equipment and had inadequately trained crews. This ultimately challenged the Coast Guard, which was tasked with both enforcing immigration laws and working around the clock performing numerous search and rescue (SAR) missions to assure the preservation of life.


CHAPTER TWO

HAITI - THE CASE STUDY

 

Haiti, located in the Caribbean, occupies the western one-third of the island of Hispaniola between the Caribbean Sea and the North Atlantic Ocean. It is west of the Dominican Republic and just to the east of Cuba. (See figure 1) Its population is approximately six and one-half million, with a population density of 2000 people per square mile. Haiti lacks a stable economy and unemployment is as high as 60 %. The capital is located in Port-au-Prince, where one fifth of the population resides.

 

hAITI: AN AGENDA FOR DEMOCRACY

According to sources from the World Bank, Haiti is by far the western hemisphere's poorest country, despite receiving a large volume of international aid. The United Nation's Human Development Index, a device designed to measure standards of living rather than just income, also ranks Haiti at the bottom of the hemisphere, resting firmly in the misery levels of the world's poorest countries, with a per capita income of only $218 per year.[4]

 

Numerous attempts by the United States and other nations to resurrect Haiti have failed. Josh Dewind, the Director of Latin American and Caribbean Studies at Hunter College in Pennsylvania, and David Kinley III of the World Bank stated, " in the past, as much as 80% of money earmarked for aid was misused for corruption." [5] Likewise, sources from the Government Accounting Office (GAO) stated, "corruption has a grave impact on Haiti's dire poverty and severe social problems." [6] With a long history of corruption in a country where a coup is capable of ousting the president and massacring hundreds of people, it is no wonder Haitians sought refuge in the United States.

 

Throughout the last decade, the number of Haitians who attempted to enter the United States illegally rose and fell according to the degree of political and economic problems facing the Haitians. In 1981, the United States Government established an agreement with the government of Haiti that permitted the Coast Guard to board Haitian-flagged vessels on the high seas in an attempt to aid Haitian vessels in distress, remove Haitians from unseaworthy vessels, and prevent them from entering the United States illegally. Haiti's poverty, high population density, and political instability are endemic. Therefore, Haitians have sought, and are likely to continue to seek, better conditions elsewhere. As Paul Kennedy comments in his book, Preparing for the 21st Century, the United States continues to be the destination for thousands of Haitian immigrants who consider it very desirable. Unfortunately, Haitian migrants come to the United States with low educational and skill levels, and they tend to congregate in Southern Florida, which places severe demands upon social, educational, and medical services.

 

HAITIANS KNOW WHEN TO GO AND WHEN TO STAY

Surrounded by horrendous conditions in Haiti, boat people will voyage to the United States no matter how daunting and risky, spending their entire life savings, rather than remain in their own country. In their desperate bid for freedom, many dared the perilous 650 mile voyage to the United States in leaky, overcrowded and terribly unsafe vessels, considered to be the world's most pathetic ocean-going boats. One Coast Guardsman who took part in a rescue effort described the fleeing Haitian Boats as, "no better than floating coffins. Passengers were so seasick, hungry, and dehydrated that they can not even answer questions put to them by immigration officers stationed on the cutters."[7] Despite the high risk, thousands of migrants from Haiti, as well as other countries such as Cuba and the Dominican Republic, are anxiously awaiting the opportunity to leave their country in search of the American dream. If Haitian migrants perceive a lack of Coast Guard presence in the Windward Passage, they will immediately exploit our weakness and set sail for the Florida coast. One Haitian captain interviewed by an INS agent stated,

 

The Coast Guard can cause trouble, but how long can they stay? My people

have weeks and months and the Coast Guard does not. Here, all you do is wake up and sit down with nothing to do. But if you get to Miami you can get a job and a good car. So, people are willing to kill themselves trying to leave. What else can they do?" [8]

 

There is a positive correlation between failed economies and migrant traffic. Although some Haitians, when interviewed, argued that their lives were endangered, this was not always the case. The majority of Haitian migrants came to America because they were hungry and wanted a better life.[9]

 

There was an initial surge of migrants after the military coup overthrew Aristide on September 30, 1991. Throughout the period from October 1991 through February 1992, there was a series of changes in policy which influenced the departure of migrants. Several times during the period, the repatriation policy was suspended and resumed. When the repatriation policy was suspended during November and January, the Coast Guard interdicted in excess of six thousand migrants. The next large interdiction occurred in March when INS changed their policy due to the court hearing held in Brooklyn, the Eastern District of New York, on the court case Sales vs Haitian Center Counsel (HCC) which required INS to provide each Haitian with a hearing. In anticipation of these new procedures, many Haitian's hopes were raised as they sought this ideal time to set sail. Haitians were keenly aware of the U.S. decision making process. Friends and family members in the U.S. kept the Haitians well appraised of any changes in policy, frequently reporting back to their relatives on the same day that any changes were implemented. The number of interdictions in April totaled 6,158, and in May the number of interdictions reached an all time high of 13,103. In response to this, President Bush signed Executive Order 12807 on May 23, 1992, which suspended the screening process and allowed the direct repatriation for all Haitians. The news reached Haiti that the Coast Guard was no longer taking interdicted migrants to Guantanamo Bay. This resulted in a dramatic decrease of Haitians departing Haiti until the November 1992, elections when 1,016 were interdicted. Their new hope came from the victory of President-elect Clinton and his campaign statement that favored Haitian immigration. The second wave of Haitians came in January, again in anticipation of President Clinton's inauguration and anticipated relaxation of the immigration policy. Instead, President Clinton announced no change in the direct repatriation policy. On January 15, 1993, Operation Able Manner commenced. This operation was designed to form a white picket fence of Coast Guard ships around Haiti and stop all migration to the U.S. The next surge came in June and July 1994, when the Migrant processing center opened reviving new hope for many Haitians. Eventually a Safehaven policy was announced and 16,086 migrants fled Haiti.

 

The Alien migrant interdiction mission operation has become a major Coast Guard mission. During the 1990s, the Coast Guard dedicated more resources to the migrant interdiction mission than to any other if its missions.

 

ALIEN MIGRANT INTERDICTION OPERATION

In early 1981, thirty Haitians drowned and washed ashore at Hillsboro Beach , Florida.[10] This drowning, in combination with several other tragic incidents, convinced the United States public, as well as policymakers, that the U.S. needed to control the number of Haitians attempting to enter the country. In September 1981, Executive Order 12324 was signed and issued by President Reagan. Executive Order 12324 established the Alien Migrant Interdiction Operation (AMIO), which authorized the Coast Guard to interdict vessels suspected of transporting illegal immigrants to the U.S. In addition, the U.S. signed a treaty with Haiti detailing the joint cooperation between the U.S. and Haiti in implementing these interdictions. The AMIO program also allows the Coast Guard to interdict stateless vessels as well as vessels of countries with which the U.S. has an interdiction agreement. This means that any boats which are suspected of having illegal aliens embarked can be intercepted by Coast Guard cutters, with the Coast Guard empowered to assess the situation and screen all potential refugees. Since the conception of AMIO, the Coast Guard has stationed at least one large or medium cutter in the Windward Passage, the body of water which separates Haiti and Cuba, with an INS agent and an interpreter on board. Additionally, a Coast Guard Liaison Officer (billeted for a CDR/O-5) is stationed in Port-au-Prince and oversees issues which involve coordination between the Coast Guard and Haiti.

 

Not only does the agreement between the U.S. and Haiti allow the Coast Guard to board all Haitian vessels, it also provides some protection to Haitians who are repatriated. The Haitian Government agreed that they will not prosecute Haitians who are returned for illegal departure.[11] Despite the AMIO program, Haitian emigration grew steadily until 1988, when it experienced a slight drop. However, from 1991 to 1993, an enormous increase occurred. Figure One below details the number of Haitians interdicted each month from 1981 through September 1995. Since 1981, the Coast Guard interdicted 92, 660 Haitians attempting to enter the United States illegally.[12]


 

 

 

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

JAN

 

129

0

25

104

258

192

503

438

54

309

6663

1354

63

36

FEB

 

0

5

318

34

453

9

0

141

90

0

1223

9

347

0

MAR

 

21

17

84

37

158

252

741

1535

0

0

1141

11

274

0

APR

 

0

145

75

750

550

101

329

687

113

758

6158

0

613

252

MAY

 

13

41

134

197

200

206

540

0

1

70

13103

1

1459

1

JUN

 

0

158

191

25

92

159

400

135

99

127

366

109

5603

41

JUL

 

8

90

43

0

133

604

402

150

206

196

150

91

16086

8

AUG

 

0

8

58

288

1248

506

173

70

0

43

246

77

345

423

SEP

 

0

25

380

652

6

547

209

429

156

157

141

371

131

0

OCT

169

0

140

141

44

8

368

452

115

191

68

737

95

22

 

NOV

18

0

55

953

32

24

429

431

0

0

6023

1016

60

110

 

DEC

0

22

78

540

248

258

168

434

37

214

2336

494

226

16

 

TOT

187

193

762

2942

2411

3388

3541

4614

3737

1124

10087

31438

2404

25069

761

Figure 1: Haitian Migrants Interdicted by Sea by USCG from 1981 to 1995

 

Source: Material provided by Aaron Danis, National Maritime Intelligence Center, Suitland, Maryland, on December 6, 1996, during an interview in person and by LT Eric Giesie, Coast Guard Headquarters, Office of Law Enforcement (G-OLE), on December 13, 1996, during an interview in person.


 

legal FRAMEWORK FOR COAST GUARD OPERATIONS IN SUPPORT OF IMMIGRATION LAW ENFORCEMENT

 

The statutory basis for all Coast Guard law enforcement missions is contained in 14 United States Code, (USC) 2 which states, "The Coast Guard shall enforce or assist in the enforcement of all applicable federal laws on, under, and over the high seas and waters subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S." [13] 14 USC 89 is the primary statutory basis for Coast Guard law enforcement jurisdiction in the maritime arena. The Coast Guard may at any time go on board any vessel subject to U.S. jurisdiction for the purpose of ensuring compliance with all applicable federal laws, including the violation of the Immigration and Naturalization Act. This enforcement authority extends to all waters over which the United States has jurisdiction, as well as all international waters.   14 USC 89 provides active duty Coast Guard petty officers, warrant officers, and commissioned officers authority to board, search, detain, arrest, and/or seize in appropriate circumstances. A second relevant statute is 14 USC 141(a) which provides broad authority for the Coast Guard to assist any federal agency in performing any activity for which Coast Guard personnel are especially qualified. In most cases, Coast Guard authority to assist a foreign government in cooperative enforcement cases is derivative in the sense that the Coast Guard acts at the request of the State Department following appropriate bilateral communications through diplomatic channels. Additionally, Executive Order 12807 of May 24, 1992, mandated Coast Guard migrant interdiction operations. [14]

 

 

 

 

EXECUTIVE ORDER 12807

In May 1992, the Coast Guard interdicted 13,103 Haitians. This represented the largest number of Haitian refugees interdicted in a month. This significant increase of migrants called for an expeditious response. The President was called on to alleviate the flood of refugees. On May 23, 1992, President Bush issued Executive Order 12807 which superseded Executive Order 12324 of September 29, 1981. This new executive order suspended the political asylum screening requirements for Haitian migrants on the high seas. [15] Additionally, it directed the Coast Guard to enforce the suspension through interdiction at sea, and to return interdicted vessels to the country of origin, but it removed the requirement to take steps to protect those genuinely fleeing prosecution in their homeland. In effect, this meant the Coast Guard was tasked with directly repatriating all migrants interdicted on the high seas, as well as all migrants at Guantanamo Bay, without conducting an INS interview.

 

          On May 24, 1992, the Secretary of Transportation, Andrew Card, issued a memorandum to the Commandant of the Coast Guard which stated,

 

The President, by Proclamation of September 29, 1981, has found

that the entry of undocumented aliens arriving at the borders of the

United States from the high seas is detrimental to the interests of the

United States and has suspended such entry and ordered its prevention

by the interdiction of certain vessels. The Executive Order of

May 23, 1992 directs me to issue appropriate instructions for the

United States Coast Guard to enforce the suspension and carry out

the interdiction.[16]

 

 

This memorandum replaced a previous one signed on October 1, 1981.   In implementing this policy, the Coast Guard repatriated Haitian migrants directly to Haiti. Refugee processing was made available to the Haitians through the American embassy in Haiti rather than allowing them to proceed to United States shores. The one exception was if the Commanding Officer of the cutter believed that such repatriation would place an individual in immediate or exceptionally grave physical danger. In such a case, the Commanding Officer could provide temporary refuge and seek guidance from higher authorities. "Exceptionally grave danger " was defined as an observable danger, or a compelling statement made by an individual on his own initiative that the individual was a high ranking member of the Aristide government and was actively being pursued by the de facto government. [17]

 

Executive Order 12807 allowed the Coast Guard to continue acting under all of its previous legal jurisdictions, to regain control of Haitian migration, and to empty out the Guantanamo Bay tent city. This operation was a success and clearly demonstrated that the best methods to curtail Haitian migration was to repatriate them immediately. For the following four months after the Executive Order was passed, the Coast Guard continued to control the Haitian migration interdicting a total of 903 Haitians over the entire period.

 

Although very popular with the American people, various Haitian rights advocates and support groups were strongly opposed to Executive Order 12807. They had long argued that the repatriation of Haitian migrants was to be carried out under the 1981 unilateral treaty. However, the direct repatriation policy violated the terms of this agreement because the INS interview was no longer required or conducted. The Haitian Refugee Center filed a suit against the U.S. government, claiming that the new policy subjected the Haitians, who were applying for asylum, to a haphazard enforcement of foreign policy, as well as to severe political punishment. The lead case, Sales vs. Haitian Center's Council (HCC), was heard by the Supreme Court in March 1993, to determine the final status of the legality of the U.S.'s interdiction and repatriation policy. [18] The issue at stake was whether the Haitians should have access to U.S. courts and due process rights when picked up at sea by a U.S. vessel or anywhere on U.S. controlled property. The policy being challenged did not allow the Haitians access until they were physically on U.S. soil. This was the primary reason for not conducting the refugee screening within the U.S., since the applicants would accrue additional rights which would later make it very difficult to return them to Haiti. The case was decided in favor of the U.S. interdiction policy by an eight to one vote. The court upheld the U.S. interdiction policy, ruling that applicable domestic and international refugee laws pertain only to aliens who physically made it to U.S. shores. Guantanamo Bay or a Coast Guard vessel were not considered an extension of U.S. soil. The 1951 Convention relating to the Statutes of Refugees, Article 33, prohibits States from returning refugees from countries where they face persecution.[19] If this decision had been reversed, the U.S. would have been unable to repatriate the Haitians and would have been faced with accepting those migrants as well as others in future exoduses. [20]

 

Overall, Executive Order 12807 was a success in controlling Haitian mass migration, allowing the Coast Guard to catch its breath after a long arduous operation. Additionally, the tight quarters in the tent cities in Guantanamo Bay were relieved and emptied as the migrants were repatriated to Haiti. The camp was closed, with the exception of 267 migrants who INS determined to have valid asylum claims because of testing HIV positive. However, these migrants were barred from entry into the United States, as immigration laws forbid entry to all who have a communicable disease considered harmful to U.S. citizens. The U.S. Attorney General was ultimately responsible for making this decision on the fate of all immigrants.

 

Despite all of the opposition to the Bush policy by refugee advocates and some Democratic Congressmen who claimed it was shaped by racism against citizens of a black nation, the executive branch stood firm in dissuading Haitians to voyage towards the United States in hopes of gaining political asylum. Some legislators asked the president to allow some of the refugees into the United States on a temporary basis. They reasoned that such a quiet humanitarian gesture would ease the painful effects without encouraging others to flee. President Bush rejected this idea and warned that allowing the boat people to enter the United States would only lead more Haitians to risk their lives in this dangerous journey. However, the President did pursuade other countries such as Belize, Honduras, Venezuela, Trinidad, and Tobago to accept a total of 450 Haitians.

 

 

ANOTHER MASS EXODUS

In October and November 1992, a resurgence of migrants occurred initiated by a statement made by President-elect Clinton, who vowed to end the direct repatriation of Haitians once in office. In the first press conference after his victory, Clinton stated, "I think that sending them back to Haiti under the circumstances which have prevailed for the last year was an error. Haitians should have a formal process to make their case." [21] Because of this policy, President Clinton was revered and idealized in Haiti. His name was shouted in the streets in conjunction with freedom. Haiti had a new hero born almost overnight. However, the Commandant of the Coast Guard immediately advised Clinton's staff and the future Administration of the severe ramifications of this statement as migrants once again started another mass exodus.  

 

This put added pressure on the Coast Guard as migrants began planning their voyage. The intelligence community confirmed that another mass exodus of immigrants from Haiti was underway to coincide with Clinton's inauguration day scheduled in January to celebrate their new hero. In response, the Coast Guard dispatched HU-25A Falcon jets with 70mm telephoto lenses to photograph the Haitian coastline at an elevation of five hundred feet.[22] Photo reconnaissance revealed more than 600 boats under construction and thousands more ready to sail.

 

A Department of Justice intelligence analysis predicted that if President Clinton suspended Executive Order 12807 and the Coast Guard was directed to bring the Haitian migrants to the United States, a flood of over 125,000 migrants would depart Haiti enroute to the Florida coastline. However, they estimated that only 50,000 would depart if Guantanamo Bay was reopened for processing and INS screening. [23]

 

The Coast Guard rushed cutters to the Windward Passage while continually trying to convince the Clinton Administration to alter its earlier statement to avoid this rush and sea-going catastrophe. Even Congressman Bill Tauzin, Chairman of the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Navigation, wrote President Clinton a letter warning him that his statements were creating havoc that would lead to a national security problem. [24] This rapid deployment of cutters to patrol the Haitian coastline marked the beginning of Operation Able Manner.

 

Despite this impact, the Coast Guard's performance spoke for itself. While other agencies were shy and unsure of what policies and solutions to implement, the Coast Guard took the lead in confronting the mass migration head on and preserving the sanctity of life. The Coast Guard's versatility and capability of switching missions from a law enforcement to a humanitarian mission proved invaluable. Had the Coast Guard not arrived immediately on the scene, a tremendous loss of life would have occurred in addition to placing our National security in jeopardy.

 

 

 

 

OPERATION ABLE MANNER

Operation Able Manner was designed to form a white picket fence of Coast Guard cutters around Haiti to prevent massive numbers of migrants from departing. The main goal of the operation was to deter a Haitian mass exodus rather than to restore democracy in Haiti. However, the two objectives were politically linked. Operation Able Manner was the largest joint maritime operation in history conducted under a Coast Guard commander, Rear Admiral William P. Leahy. Leahy, Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District, was tasked with the responsibility of all units and personnel involved in Able Manner, which included 23 ships and 17 aircraft. All were sent to the Windward Passage.[25] Additionally, the Army deployed two aerostat radar blimps, while the Air Force dispatched various Haitian interpreters. Over one thousand Coast Guard personnel and two thousand Marine Corps personnel deployed to the theater. [26]

 

The Coast Guard clearly demonstrated its unique capabilities to mobilize and adapt quickly to this highly demanding situation. The Coast Guard rapidly recalled all of its major cutters and resources for Operation Able Manner despite the fact that many had just returned from long patrols and had spent only a few days in port. Cutters were prepared for immediate deployment, allowing the Coast Guard to cover the vast search and rescue missions as well as the mass exodus law enforcement missions. The Coast Guard found itself coordinating with numerous other Government agencies but, more frequently, shouldered alone most of the burden of the Haitian migration while other government agencies sought solutions. As a result, the Coast Guard declared a crisis at sea before receiving any assistance from the White House or any other governmental agency.

 

The Coast Guard interdicted all the Haitian migrants without a single safety mishap. This record was remarkable and ranks second to none, considering the vast dangers associated with the mission. Haitians were overloaded on board Coast Guard cutters, with hundreds of Haitians living outside on the weather decks of the ships for as long as two weeks at a time. The crews of the Cutters who took part in the AMIO operation during this period administered everything from basic medical care to assisting with child birth while aboard ship. The Coast Guard prevented an enormous loss of life by interdicting Haitian migrants who would have certainly perished at sea. By interdicting Haitian migrants, the Coast Guard also saved South Florida from a potential socio-economic disaster the migrants might have caused if they had reached Miami.

 

Operation Able Manner was a huge success, virtually stopping all illegal immigration from Haiti. Five interdictions were completed in just the first hundred hours. Upon conclusion of the operation, there was no further activity. During Operation Able Manner, the Coast Guard intercepted over 23,000 Haitians without significant loss of life. However, the toll on the Coast Guard was considerable. The increased tempo of operations put the Coast Guard over its planned budgetary expenditures and extended many of its sea and air assets beyond the scheduled operational hours. Not only has equipment life and the personal lives of the crew suffered, but training and maintenance were sacrificed to maintain the high vigilance at sea. Another consequence was that other missions, such as counternarcotics enforcement, experienced a severe drop, causing an immeasurable impact to the national security of the United States.


CHAPTER THREE

SEARCH AND RESCUE

 

The Coast Guard's ability to expertly handle the vital functions of Search and Rescue (SAR) cases during the Haitian Mass Exodus while still responding to routine emergencies proved once again that the Coast Guard is the premier maritime service and the service of choice for this type of operation. SAR is without a doubt the mission that the Coast Guard is best known for, both domestically and throughout the world. Saving lives and property at sea has been a mainstay of the Coast Guard and will remain a primary focus in the Coast Guard's maritime safety role in the foreseeable future.

 

SAR, as the most publicly known mission of the Coast Guard, traces its roots back to the early 1800s when the Fleet Revenue Cutter was tasked by the Secretary of Treasury to render aid to vessels in distress. Later, the U.S. Lifesaving Service was established to provide beach patrols, launching surf boats to rescue distressed people just offshore. In 1915, The Revenue Cutter Service and Lifesaving Service combined to form the Unites States Coast Guard. Today, despite the number of Coast Guard missions, SAR is the top priority. [27]

 

Coast Guard SAR response involves multi-mission stations, cutters, aircraft, and boats linked by a communications network. The National SAR Plan is divided into three regions: Inland, Maritime, and Overseas. The Coast Guard, as the maritime coordinator, is responsible for conducting SAR throughout the Maritime SAR area. The maritime SAR Area is a massive region which includes all waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, and high seas areas covering much of the North Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, as well as a substantial portion of the Arctic Ocean. To meet these vast responsibilities, the Coast Guard maintains SAR facilities on the East, West, and Gulf coasts, as well as in Alaska, Hawaii, Guam, and Puerto Rico, the Great Lakes, and on the internal waterways. The Coast Guard has continually been recognized as the leader by the international SAR community. In addition, maritime tradition and international law require Coast Guard assets to respond to distress requests for assistance in any area in which they are operating, regardless of location.

 

Over the years, the Coast Guard has developed a vast amount of knowledge and expertise in the SAR mission area, undertaking more than 65,700 SAR missions per year. In a typical day, the Coast Guard saves 14 lives and assists 328 people. The Coast Guard pulls them from the water, from cliffs, from rooftops, and sinking ships. To each of the 4,380 people whose lives are saved each year, to their families, friends, communities, and to America, the Coast Guard is the premier maritime service, a service that patrols America's coasts and abroad to rescue people in distress, provide cutters, aircraft, and expertise to state, local, and federal authorities in search and rescue missions, rescue victims of natural disasters, such as floods or hurricanes, and to deliver food, water and medicine to those in need. Additionally, the Coast Guard partners with local emergency response teams to provide assistance in the wake of maritime accidents or disasters such as the TWA Flight 800 crash where Coast Guard Cutter Adak (WPB-1333), (my previous command) was the first on scene, to improve recreational boating safety, and administer training, standards, and various safety programs such as the Partnership for Safety Program for commercial fishing vessels. Skipper Lawrence Bassett reaffirmed the Coast Guard's commitment and its importance when he was rescued by stating, "You never think it's going to be you. But today, it was my crew and they wouldn't be here now if the Coast Guard hadn't been there expeditiously. We owe them our lives." [28]    With the Coast Guard conducting an average of one SAR case every eight minutes and saving a life every two hours, it is no wonder that this training and expertise paid off during the Haitian Mass Exodus.

 

The lifesaving efforts of Coast Guard men and women captured worldwide attention throughout the Haitian Mass Exodus, but especially during the summer of 1994. The Coast Guard responded not only to the Haitian Mass Exodus but also to a Cuban Mass Exodus and more than 58,000 people were assisted during the two largest Coast Guard SAR operations since World War II. The cutters assigned to Operation Able Manner during the Haitian Mass Exodus rescued more than 23,000 people from overcrowded un-seaworthy sailboats off the coast of Haiti between May and July. During the two weeks beginning June 24, the cutters assigned to Able Manner worked an average of 31 SAR cases, rescuing more than 1,200 people each day. The daily SAR record reached a new plateau on July 4th, when 3,247 Haitians were rescued from 70 leaky sailboats. While these two operations drew international attention, the Coast Guard also kept pace with its normal busy routine comprised of 10,000 SAR cases per year in the 1.8 million square miles of water off South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, and the Caribbean. Kent Smiri, a Fish and Game warden from California, commented on the Coast Guard's covering the vast amount of area when he said, " The Coast Guard's success does not surprise me. We have a huge amount of territory to cover. Time and again the Coast Guard is there for us. They are a service that is well trained and have a wealth of expertise in maritime operations." [29]

 

Despite the large areas of operation, the Coast Guard has been successful by utilizing advances in technology to assist with SAR and search planning. The Coast Guard uses a system called Computer Assisted Search Planning System (CASP), which uses the Monte Carlo simulation technique to provide probability distribution for search target location. The system uses environmental input provided by Navy Oceanographic Center to predict drift of search target location. This is the only data base and tool available today that takes into account the many uncertainties associated with a search and results of prior searches. Additionally, the Coast Guard coordinates an Automated Mutual Assistance Vessel Rescue system (AMVER) in order to assist fellow mariners. Apart from Coast Guard assets, the Coast Guard also has always depended on other assets, such as commercial and salvage vessels, for assistance, utilizing the Good Samaritan rule when the Coast Guard requests. This has proven very effective, as only a small percentage of mariners refuse to participate.

 

The Coast Guard's SAR expertise, various platforms, thorough training, and past experience proved invaluable during the Haitian Mass Exodus. SAR is a vital function that the Coast Guard will surely continue to perform well into the future. Not only is SAR what the Coast Guard is best known for but it is one of the missions that no other service or agency can duplicate.  As the world's premier maritime agency, the Coast Guard remains prepared to handle future mass exoduses and is furthering its skills and expertise by dedicating research and development funding to advanced SAR systems.


CHAPTER FOUR

LAW ENFORCEMENT

 

Law enforcement has been a mission which the Coast Guard traces back to its inception. In the first decade following the Revolution, our young country found itself deep in a postwar economic depression. Facing heavy debts incurred during the war, the new Congress began raising money by passing a tariff law in 1789, taxing imported goods. Almost immediately, large scale smuggling sprang into existence and America's largest single source of desperately needed income was threatened. Enforcement of laws and treaties became the first mission of the Coast Guard when Alexander Hamilton, the first Secretary of the Treasury, requested in 1790, that Congress authorized the purchase of ten boats properly manned and armed with which to fight the smuggling. Congress responded by providing funds for the boats and, at Hamilton's insistence, authorizing that their officers and crews be given full military standing. The Coast Guard, then called the Revenue Marine Service, was well on its way to impacting history as a significant maritime interdiction service.

 

It was a bright crisp morning on July 26, 1991, and I had just assumed command of Coast Guard Cutter Adak (WPB-1333) ten days earlier. The seas and the winds were slightly building and an intelligence report stated that a mother ship (a large freighter) was due in the area within the next six hours, carrying a enormous load of cocaine. The transfer would occur within the next 24 hours to a fishing vessel and Adak was one of only three cutters in the AOR. As the search dragged on and the day got longer, there was no sign of any vessel traffic. Then, in a quick flash, the radio blared and a Coast Guard helicopter called to report a sighting 30 miles north from our position. I engaged the trootles and rang up 30 knots, headed due north and began prepping the boarding team. Upon completion of the evolution, Adak's law enforcement team boarded the vessel and seized over five and one-half tons of cocaine, setting a new record for the largest drug seizure ever on the East coast by land or sea.

As the proceeding example illustrates, the Coast Guard is uniquely positioned in terms of mandate, capabilities, and practical experience, among all federal agencies to protect borders from undocumented migrants as well as from illegal drugs and by being able to draw upon both military capabilities and law enforcement authorities. The Coast Guard enforces or assists in the enforcement of applicable laws and treaties and other international agreements, including enforcing all federal laws on the high seas and waters under U.S. jurisdiction. The principal functions of these missions are: to interdict smugglers moving drugs, to intercept illegal aliens and contraband being smuggled into the U.S., to enforce the Exclusive Economic Zone laws relating to fisheries and other resources out to 200 miles from U.S. coasts, to inspect domestic and foreign fishing vessels to ensure compliance with U.S. laws, assist other law enforcement agencies and enforce all other U.S. laws associated with marine matters and combat maritime terrorism.

 

The Coast Guard's mission addresses areas that are of deep concern to Americans. The economic and social impact of the counter narcotics threat, for example, is becoming more complex and pervasive on an international scale while simultaneously reemerging as a primary concern to the American people. Illegal drugs continue to threaten the well being, safety, and security of all American citizens. The cost to society is staggering. It entails: lost worker productivity, soaring medical costs, and violent drug related crimes. A Washington Post nationwide poll indicated that Americans, in increasing numbers, are greatly concerned by the alarming rates of crime and drug use, and the extent to which their interrelated efforts are compounded by illegal immigrants.

 

In an effort to combat these problems, the Coast Guard, as the primary maritime federal law enforcement agency on the front line of America's National Drug Control Strategy, accounts for over 25 percent of the total U.S. seizures of cocaine and marijuana. Conducting numerous law enforcement boardings and the rigorous training in preparation for this tasking, enables the Coast Guard to perfect its skills and develop the expertise for operations such as the Haitian Mass Exodus.

 

Being prepared to stop the influx of illegal migrants is a key part of the Coast Guard's law enforcement mission and an important national security concern. The Coast Guard's interdiction policy is directed by the National Security goals. This policy is directed by the White House and Presidential Decision Directive 9, focusing U.S. interdiction efforts as far out at sea as possible. It also directs all law enforcement agencies to shift their efforts to meet the new alien smuggling threats.

 

The Haitian and Cuban mass migration in 1994, brought migrant interdiction efforts into the spotlight. However, lower-level illegal migrant threats are a daily part of our enforcement efforts, and the Coast Guard has interdicted migrants from more than 40 countries. The number of countries with potential migrants continues to rise. Reports indicate that on any given day, there are 125,00 migrants awaiting transportation from Caribbean region countries to the U.S. Over the past 5 years, the Coast Guard has interdicted over 135,000 illegal migrants, saving the American people 500 million dollars in annual support and social costs. In addition to these actual Coast Guard interdictions, the Coast Guard assisted other agencies in preventing nearly 100,000 illegal entries into the U.S. Public concern over illegal migrants costing the U.S. citizens jobs and increased taxes is high, and the Huddle Study, which was conducted in 1993, estimated that the illegal aliens that settled in the U.S. since 1992, required public assistance and displacement costs exceeding $11.9 billion annually.

 

LEGAL AUTHORIZATION

The Coast Guard has a distinct advantage and special uniqueness compared to other U.S. Armed Forces by its unique authorization to act under the Posse Comitatus Act. The Posse Comitatus Act (18 USC 1385) was enacted during the Reconstruction Era where criminal law proscribing use of Army, and later Air Force, to execute laws except where expressly prohibited by the Constitution or Congress. Its limits on the use of military for civilian law enforcement also applies to the Navy by regulation. In December 1981, additional laws were enacted (codified 10 USC 371-78) clarifying permissible military assistance to civilian law enforcement agencies including the Coast Guard, especially in combating drug smuggling within the U.S.

 

Posse Comitatus clarifications emphasize supportive and technical assistance, such as use of facilities, vessels, aircraft, intelligence, technical aid, and surveillance, while generally prohibiting the direct participation of Department fo Defense (DOD) personnel in law enforcement activities such as search, seizure, and arrest. For example, Coast Guard Law Enforcement Detachments (LEDETS) serve aboard Navy vessels and perform the actual boardings of interdicted suspected drug smuggling vessels and illegal immigration and, if needed, arrest their crews.

 

Positive results have been achieved especially from Navy ship and aircraft involvement. Presidential authorization in 1986, expended military (Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine) involvement, and DOD is now the lead department in detection and monitoring through the fiscal year (FY) 88 DOD Authorization Act for monitoring air, sea transit of illegal drugs into the U.S., integrating all command and control, communications, and intelligence assets dedicated to interdiction through communication networks. However, DOD is still not authorized to directly engage in the law enforcement aspects of leading a boarding, conducting arrests, or acting as a customs officer. However, DOD took on the important role of assisting the Coast Guard with interdiction operations of illegal immigrants as demonstrated in the Haitian Mass Exodus.

 

Over one third, (36%) of the Coast Guard's operating expense goes towards fulfilling the national security and maritime law enforcement duties. An aggressive high seas boarding program is essential for both deterring and interdicting drug and alien smuggling at sea. As we move into the 21st century, the demand for additional Coast Guard assets and expertise will continue to grow. The Coast Guard is working diligently to meet these additional requirements and operating hours and will continue to do so.


CHAPTER FIVE

TRAINING

 

The Coast Guard's superior and rigorous training program directly contributes to the high performance, success, and wealth of expertise that the Coast Guard enjoys today and which enabled it to perform as well throughout the Haitian Mass Exodus. As stated in the Commandant's Vision Statement,

 

The United States Coast Guard is committed to continuous improvement of it's performance as the world's leading maritime humanitarian and safety organization. We strive to be the armed force that offers the most challenging and rewarding career for the young men and women of our nation while preserving the and honoring those customs and traditions that have served the country so well in peace and war. We are committed to providing training to our people so that they can stand always ready, to serve, protect and enhance our nation's maritime interest. [30]

 

The Coast Guard has a total of four training centers where it conducts various types of training. They are: Reserve Training Center Yorktown (RTC) in Yorktown, Virginia, Recruit Training Center in Cape May, New Jersey, Training Center Petaluma in California, and the Coast Guard Academy. Reserve Training Center Yorktown offers specialized training which was utilized and proved invaluable during the Haitian Mass Exodus. Occupying the easternmost tip of Virginia's historical triangle formed by Jamestown, Williamsburg, and Yorktown, on a small peninsula just minutes from the Yorktown Battle Fields, Reserve Training Center Yorktown, hosts thousands of regulars, reservists, and auxiliarists who come each year to master the latest techniques and applications of modern Coast Guard operations. The center offers basic and advanced courses to personnel from other armed forces, state, local, and Federal agencies, and allied nations throughout the world. Some of the many courses offered are: Maritime Law Enforcement School, National SAR School, Port Safety and Security School, and Small Arms and Small Boat Maintenance School. These courses provide the opportunity to hone the skills which were repeatedly utilized during the Haitian Mass Exodus.

 

The Maritime Law Enforcement School graduates students who are able to enforce Federal laws and treaties upon American waters and the high seas. Students are required to practice the stressful and exacting responsibilities of a Coast Guard boarding officer while performing dangerous counternarcotics missions or equally dangerous AMIO missions. In addition, all students are required to master critical elements of Coast Guard authority, jurisdiction, basic enforcement procedures, and federal prosecution.[31] The practical aspects of this course are practiced over the six-week period under the tutelage of well-qualified and seasoned Coast Guard instructors. This course has proven to be very successful in preparing students to become solid and competent boarding officers able to handle the unexpected under stress.

 

The National SAR School is often referred to as the world's premier source of SAR training. The school's joint Coast Guard and Air Force staff provides training in oceanic, coastal, and inland search planning procedures to SAR professionals from all branches of the U.S. military, numerous federal, state and local government agencies, volunteer SAR organizations, and international SAR students. The facilities are state of the art and highly in demand from the various agencies mentioned above. The selection criteria for SAR instructors is vigorous. Those selected are distinguished in SAR and uphold the highest standards of performance, expertise, and leadership qualities.

 

Several other courses previously mentioned, as well as many others, are geared to day-to-day operations which are necessary in order to function efficiently. During the Haitian Mass Exodus, individuals trained at Reserve Training Center Yorktown served numerous valuable functions such as: small boat operations and repairs, handling of small arms, port security, navigation evolutions, radar intercepts, safety assurance, marine investigation, damage control, engineering repairs and maintenance.

 

As the world's premier maritime service, the Coast Guard's efforts are paying dividends as numerous countries continue to seek our assistance and expertise, especially when establishing their own Coast Guards or smaller navies. The Coast Guard is continually training and working hard to provide the best possible service at the lowest possible cost. Much of the success lies in the daily commitment to the core values of honor, respect, and devotion to duty. The Coast Guard is the most productive agency in the federal government today. In lives and property saved, the Coast Guard returns a value to America equal to four times its total budget.[32] No other Government investment can match the reward and unique value delivered by the Coast Guard. The diligent and dedicated training that the Coast Guard conducts not only pays great dividends in the international community, but also in circumstances of extremis such as the Haitian Mass Exodus. The Coast Guard's devoted commitment to training their personnel as well as other government and international

agencies will continue well into the future, assuring that the highest level of professionalism and maritime expertise provided is second to none.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CHAPTER SIX

MULTI-MISSION PLATFORMS AND APPROACH

 

Every day, every hour around the clock, Always Ready, always professional and compassionate, and always there!    "Although the public may be most familiar with the Coast Guard's SAR mission, the multi-mission approach permits our efficient organization to respond to a wide variety of law enforcement, marine safety, port security, and national defense missions." [33] Indeed, the Coast Guard's greatest strength lies in its versatility and its ability to tie together its many missions, to effectively meet challenges whenever and wherever they might arise. Since 1790, this multi-mission capability has been at its organizational core.

         

Coast Guard people and platforms are diverse, multi-mission oriented, standing always ready to guard America's interests on land, air, and sea. The active duty, reservist, auxiliary, and civilian members of Team Coast Guard work together to provide America with maritime law enforcement, SAR, environmental protection, and national security. As the twelfth largest navy and seventh largest maritime air force in the world, [34] the Coast Guard uses its diverse force of over 200 cutters, 1,400 small boats, and its 234 aircraft to provide a valuable resource in support of U.S. interests worldwide, but particularly in the littoral areas, where its flexibility and maneuverability can best complement the Navy's capabilities. Nowhere was this mulit-mission capability in a littoral area better demonstrated than in Operation Able Manner.

 

As the experts in integrating numerous maritime roles and missions, the Coast Guard consistently operated ships in shallow water, which are not constrained by their draft. This ability often expedited the completion of mission tasking and made Coast Guard cutters the most valued asset in littoral waters.

         

During Operation Able Manner, the Navy deployed the USS Cyclone (PC-1) to the theater with a Coast Guard LEDET attached. The Cyclone, a 170 foot coastal patrol boat, is the Navy's version of the Coast Guard 110 foot patrol boat. This vessel is capable of running at high speeds; however, it lacks the shallow water operating capability needed in littoral waters. As stated in Naval Proceedings, "the draft is such that they must remain off shore far enough that they can't enter the strictly littoral waters of many of the world's coastal areas or risk grounding. Remember the image of the one of these craft grounded in the Haiti operation." [35] The illustration referred to was "the Monsoon (PC-4), that went aground off the coast of Haiti in 1994. Extensive assistance was required to get back in the game in these littoral waters." [36] This grounding not only incurred a severe financial expense but, additionally, the loss of an asset and the time of those who assisted in freeing it from the bottom.

 

During the Haitian Mass Exodus, Coast Guard cutters transited closer to shore, creating a presence in locations not accessible to other vessels. This proved crucial in intercepting Haitian refugee boats more expeditiously and much closer to shore. The alternative was to wait until these unsafe and unseaworthy boats transited into rougher open waters, where weather conditions and dangers significantly increased. The Coast Guard's ability to maneuver in tight spots and shallow water, significantly decreased the number of Haitian casualties by shorting their voyage and expediting their rescue in more protected and favorable conditions.

 

Coast Guard ships and aircraft proved invaluable, working around the clock with minimal breakdowns in addition to their normal duties. This is a tribute to the personnel of the Coast Guard who truly lived out their core values of respect, honor, and devotion to duty, but also to the vigorous training efforts and preparation provided by training centers like RTC Yorktown. Additionally, RTC provided well-trained personnel with the specialty knowledge and expertise in SAR and law enforcement which enabled the Coast Guard to locate many Haitians adrift within a large AOR and to conduct a myriad of boardings safely and effectively. This assured the Haitians safe provisions from the time they were rescued at sea, until they were safely ashore.

 

During this operation, the Coast Guard combined the unique skills of its people with their sea and air multi-mission platforms and their SAR and law enforcement expertise, to locate, interdict, and board numerous Haitian boats, resulting in saving over 23,000 lives. The combination of 23 cutters and 17 aircraft in the Windward Passage shut down all illegal immigration form Haiti within the first 100 hours, resulting in no immigrants getting through. This success was executed without any known mishaps or any loss of life. In the process, Coast Guard medical personnel provided badly needed medical attention to many Haitians and delivered five babies safely while at sea. TS1 Julie Duncan described an incident in which all of the crew's multi-mission skills, training and team work was tested. She wrote,

 

As the Coast Cutter Hamilton (WHEC-715) spotted an overloaded

boat which was very unstable. Cutter Hamilton raced to the scene to

handle the SAR case. On this 115 degree day, Hamilton quickly

pulled along side the 60 foot sailboat, overloaded with 300 Haitians.

They were stacked three high screaming, crying, and close to death.

As we took a deep breath, the air smelled foul and stagnant of salt,

feces, and death. As the crew started bringing the refugees aboard,

the boat dropped straight underwater as if it was dropped from a ten

story building. Now their were 300 weak and struggling Haitians in

the water starring up in horror at the crew. Immediately, life rings,

life lines, survival rafts, and rescue swimmers went over the side. The

crew became one and not a word was said. Everyone knew what they

had to do and knew that there was no time to waste as time was running

out quickly. After a long high tempo thirty minutes, all of the migrants

were safely on board. The 300 Haitians were safely placed on the flight

deck with 200 more Haitians that were previously picked up. The next

twelve hours were spent nursing, feeding. comforting, and praying

silently. The 75 days that followed, proved to be intense as the crew

suffered through the heat smell, and exhaustion, while only taking one

shower per week if water was available. [37]

 

 

In her final comments, TS1 Duncan stated, "Now, I understand clearly that the true reason I joined the Coast Guard was to save lives. If I had to do it all over again, I would." [38]

 

The Coast Guard also developed positive strategic relationships with Haiti through nation building. Despite the arduous duty and long hours during the Haitian Mass Exodus, Coast Guard personnel's work did not stop when they pulled into Haiti. After hours, Coast Guard members were involved in community relations renovating orphanages, tutoring school children, or painting churches and schools.

 

Given the likelihood that the next naval conflict will be in the littoral versus open ocean, the Coast Guard's multi-mission capabilities will make it the service of choice. Operation Able Manner was a classic example of how the Coast Guard was able to use its multi-mission force to provide a non-redundant capability to complement the Navy in support of U.S. goals and interests in a littoral area. Its complex, yet efficient, organization of people, ships, boats, aircraft, and operation centers consistently ensured that the proper tools were always at hand. This was also noted by David Rouse, Chief of Police in Cannon Beach, who commented on the Coast Guard's performance during Operation Able Manner. He stated, "The Coast Guard brings resources that we don't have to emergency situations all of the time. They are able to more safely affect rescues during difficult cases, and it avoids having to put our people at severe risk. I have always been impressed with their skill and courage." [39] The Coast Guard truly was the agency of choice.


CHAPTER SEVEN

CONCLUSION

 

"From Aztec shore to Arctic Zone, to Europe and Far East"... [40] For over two hundred years Coast Guard men and women have served with distinction around the globe. From its inception, the Coast Guard has been called to defend its country. The Coast Guard is the primary maritime operating agency and is a key element in maintaining the country's national security. As one of the nation's five Armed Services, the Coast Guard is characterized by a unique combination of disciplines which extend far beyond traditional military roles. The Coast Guard is not merely another small navy, duplicating the efforts of others, but a sensible complement to the other armed forces. Its peacetime mission and long tradition of humanitarian service enables the Coast Guard to provide expertise developed from its vast experience in this type of maritime MOOTW, a capability which is available nowhere else.

 

With the global threat of the Cold War diminished, increased involvement in MOOTW in the 21st Century will continue to increase as chaos spreads and world resources become scarce. As the federal government continues to downsize, funding continues to be scarce. The Coast Guard offers the Federal government and the American taxpayers a service capable of meeting these multi-mission demands proficiently, in a cost-effective manner. The Haitian Mass Exodus was a classic case study that demonstrated the Coast Guard's expertise, flexibility, and multi-mission capabilities as maritime experts. The Coast Guard accomplished what no other service or agency could, in this maritime operation, in the littoral waters of Haiti.

 

Throughout this crisis, the Coast Guard was the primary maritime federal law enforcement agency which took the lead, bearing the burden of enforcing United States immigration laws. The Coast Guard provided an invaluable service and a most noteworthy contribution to humanity, saving thousands of Haitian lives that would surely have perished at sea. The Coast Guard's ability to handle expertly the vital functions of search and rescue and law enforcement integrating them with their multi-mission platforms, while still responding to routine emergencies, proved the Coast Guard is the premier maritime service and the service of choice for this type of operation in the littorals.

 

Its complex, yet efficient, organization of people, ships, boats, aircraft, and operation centers consistently ensured that the proper tools were always at hand. The Coast Guard's greatest strength was its versatility and its ability to tie together its many missions, effectively meeting challenges whenever and wherever they arose. Given the likelihood that the next naval conflict will be in the littoral versus open ocean, the Coast Guard's multi-mission capabilities make it the ideal service of choice.

 

Since Haiti is a nearby island to Southern Florida, Haitians are likely to continue to seek out the United States, using the sea as their main avenue of approach. In order to resolve this ongoing dilemma, the United States will have to deal with a large number of refugees in the maritime environment for the foreseeable future. This challenge will require the Coast Guard's expertise and continued vigilance to protect America's shorelines from the waves of illegal immigrants which are sure to come. Being prepared to stop the influx of illegal migrants is a key part of the Coast Guard's law enforcement mission and an important national security concern. Continuing the Coast Guard's aggressive high seas boarding program is essential for both deterring and interdicting alien smuggling at sea. The demand for Coast Guard assets and expertise will thus continue to grow.

 

There is no avoiding the fact that the American people desire the Coast Guard to continue its long tradition of outstanding maritime service. However, more importantly, there is simply no one else available with the training, experience, law enforcement powers, or multi-mission platforms to assume these national maritime priorities in the absence of the Coast Guard.


APPENDIX A

 

CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY OF US/HAITI INTERACTION

1991

 

FEB 7 - Jean-Bertrand Aristide, a Roman Catholic priest was elected Dec 16, 1990 with 67 percent of the vote is sworn in as Haiti's first popularly elected president.

 

SEPT 30 - Lt Gen Raoul Cedras, named by Aritide to run the army, leads a coup and seizes control of the country. Aristide flees to Caracas, Venezuela, and then to Washington, D.C. As many as 500 Haitians are massacred in the day following Aristide's ouster.

 

OCT 3 - Organization form the American States (OAS) adopts resolution calling on members to suspend economic, financial and commercial ties with Haiti.

 

OCT 4 - President George Bush bans payment by U.S. companies to the regime and freezes the government's American assets, just days after suspending foreign aid.

 

OCT 8 - OAS votes to impose embargo and freezes overseas assets of the Haitian government.

 

1992

 

MAY 24 - President Bush orders repatriation of thousands of boat people fleeing Haiti.

 

JUNE 9 - Presidential candidate Bill Clinton declares he will not use military force in Haiti and will not return the refugees until some shred of democracy is restored.

 

1993

 

JAN 14 - After Bush aides present the Clinton transition team with evidence of a large buildup of boats in preparation for a major exodus, Clinton announces that the Haitians will not be given asylum in America. U.S. Coast Guard vessels begin patrolling off of the Haitian coast to deter migration.

 

MARCH 16 - President Clinton meets with Aristide and steps up negotiations to restore him to power.

 

JUNE 4 - Clinton institutes sanctions against Haitian military leaders, including freezing their U.S. assets.

 

JUNE 8 - Bazin resigns and Malval takes over.

 

JUNE 21 - U.S. Supreme Court holds the President may order direct repatriation of aliens interdicted in the high seas.

 

JUNE 23 - United Nations (UN) oil embargo and OAS trade embargo commences. Assets freeze takes effect.

 

JULY 3 - cedras and aristide sign U.N. brokered Governors Island accord agreeing to Aristide's return on Oct 30 and establishing a ten step process to achieve a transition to democracy.

 

AUG 27 - U.N. sanctions, the OAS embargo and U.S. targeted economy sanction are suspended after parliament ratifies Prime Minister Robert Malval and his cabinet, as stipulated by the July 3 agreement.

 

OCT 11 - Warship USS Harlan County carrying military trainers as part of U.N. agreement is turned back from Port-au-Prince docks by gunmen as it attempts to land U.N./U.S. observers. White House subsequently initiates interagency task force study of military intervention.

 

OCT 13 - U.N. reimposes embargo and Clinton announces deployment of naval vessels to help enforce sanctions.

 

OCT 15 - Cedras refuses to step down in accordance with the Governors Island accords.

 

OCT 18 - U.N. an OAS sanctions imposed.

 

OCT 30 - Cedras officially reneges on agreement to let Aristide return to power.

 

DEC 15 - Malval returns to Haiti and resigns.

 

 

 

1994

 

AprIL 12 - TransAfrica executive director Randall Robinson begins hunger strike to protest U.S. policy calling for tighter economic sanctions and the end of repatriation of fleeing Haitians. During this period, the Congressional Black Caucus and human rights groups lobby Washington to change policy.

 

AprIL 26 - U.S. special envoy to Haiti Lawrence Pezzullo resigns after pressing a policy of compromise with Haiti's military rulers that drew heavy criticism from Haitian democracy activists and members of Congress.

 

MAY 1 - Seven Coast Guard cutters positioned off the coast of Haiti.

 

MAY 6 - U.N. imposes full trade embargo.

 

MAY 8 - White House replaces Pezzullo with William H. Gray III and announces the Migrant Processing Center (MPC). This plan consisted of a shipboard asylum policy whereby refugees picked up at sea were allowed to apply for asylum on board ship or in nearby countries.

MAY 15 - Twelve Coast Guard cutters positioned off the coast of Haiti.

 

MAY 22 - Increased U.N. sanctions imposed to include fuel.

 

MAY 25 - The National Intelligence Officer for Latin America testifies before congress stating that shipboard migrant processing will cause Haitians to flee in numbers that will quickly overwhelm shipboard processing capabilities.

 

JUNE 10 - Clinton bans air traffic and financial transactions with Haiti.

 

JUNE 22 - Clinton imposes expanded freeze on U.S. assets of Haitians.

 

JUNE 29 - State Department revokes non-immigrants visas issued to Haitians before May 11 and U.S. reopens reprocessing center at Guantanamo Bay naval base in Cuba.

 

JUNE 30 - Number of Coast Guard cutters positioned off the coast of Haiti increased to fifteen.

 

JULY 8 - First screened migrants repatriated to Port-au Prince.

JULY 9 - Week ends with the highest migrant outflow: 11,736 migrants interdicted.

JULY 11 - Cedras government expels human rights monitors.

 

JULY 12 - Number of Coast Guard cutters positioned off the coast of Haiti increased to seventeen plus one USN ship.

 

JULY 21 - Safe haven Policy announced. President Clinton announces this policy to encourage refugees to seek safe havens in third-party countries.

 

JULY 31 - U.N. Security Council votes to use all necessary means to restore democracy to Haiti. U.N. immediately adopts a resolution authorizing the use of all necessary means and the formation of a multinational coalition to restore democracy in Haiti. The number of Coast Guard cutters positioned off the coast of Haiti is decreased to twelve.

 

AUG 19 - Clinton approves timetable to invade Haiti and formally agrees on August 26 to the invasion.

 

AUG 30 - Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott meets in Jamaica with the leaders of four Caribbean nations, securing their promise to contribute troops.

 

SEP 17 - With the invasion set for Sep 19 at 1201 a.m., Clinton sends U.S. delegation to Haiti headed by former president Jimmy Carter, Sam Nunn and Colin Powell.

 

OCT - U.S. begins Operation Support Democracy, President Aristide returns.

 

NOV - Operation Able Manner ends after interdicting over 23,000 Haitians migrants over a twenty-three month period.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sources used in developing Appendix A:

 

Miami Herald, "Getting Tough; policy Changes on Haiti Since 1991," September 25, 1994, p. A-40.

 

Eric Giese, LT, USCG, Haiti analysis at U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, Office of Law Enforcement (G-OLE), interview by author, 13 December 1996. Additional information provided by Aaron Danis, Haiti Analysis at the National Maritime Interdiction Center, Suitland, Maryland interview by author on 06 December 1996.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

END NOTES



[1]     Colin Powell, GEN, RET, former Joint Chiefs of Staff. These comments were made on October 28, 1992, while visiting Haiti while Gen Powell was the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

 

[2]     Shalikashvilli, GEN, current Joint Chiefs of Staff. These comments were made in 1994 during a visit to Haiti while addressing Coast Guard personnel. Shalikashvilli was the Joint, Chiefs of Staff.

 

[3]     Douglas Farah, "To Haitians Manning Small Boats, Cutters still Mean a Ticket to the U.S.," The Washington Post, July 9, 1994, A14. This article was obtained via a Lexis/Nexis search assisted by Mr. Ralph Lowenthal, Reference Librarian at the Marine Corps Research Center.

 

[4]     Arthur R. McGee, Multinational Monitor: Article on Haiti, Downloaded from internet sight, http://www.stile.lut.ac.uk/~gyedb/STILE/Email0002091/ml6.html, December 10, 1996.

 

[5]     McGee, 2.

 

[6]     McGee, 2.

 

[7]     David Ellis, "Tragedy on the High Seas," Time, December 2, 1991, 24.

 

[8]     Douglas Farah, "Coast Guard Patrols, Clinton's Switch on Repatriation Delay Haitian Exodus," Washington Post, January 20, 1992, A14.

 

[9]      Eric Giese, LT, USCG, Haiti analysis at U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, Office of Law Enforcement (G-OLE), interview by author, 13 December 1996. Additional information provided by Aaron Danis, Haiti Analysis at the National Maritime Interdiction Center, Suitland, Maryland interview by author on 06 December 1996.

 

[10]    Eric Giese, LT, USCG, Haiti analysis at U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, Office of Law Enforcement (G-OLE), "USCG briefing for the Secretary of Transportation on Haitian Migration,"

11 January 1993.

 

[11]    Leahy, RADM, USCG, Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District, "Cuban and Haitian Immigration," 88-89, 1993.

 

[12]    Eric Giesie, LT, USCG, Haiti analysis at U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, Office of Law Enforcement (G-OLE), interview by author, 13 December 1996. Additional information provided by Aaron Danis, Haiti Analysis at the National Maritime Interdiction Center, Suitland, Maryland interview by author on 06 December 1996.

 

[13]     Rachel Canty, LT, USCG, Legal Officer at U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters (G-LMI), "Overview of Legal Framework for Coast Guard Operations in International Waters in Support of Immigration Law Enforcement", 13 May 1993, 5-6.

 

[14]    Rachel Canty, LT, USCG, Legal Officer at U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters (G-LMI), "Overview of Legal Framework for Coast Guard Operations in International Waters in Support of Immigration Law Enforcement", 13 May 1993, 6.

 

[15]    Secretary of State message to the Secretary of Transportation, "Amended Asylum Policy,"

24 May 1992.

 

[16]    Secretary of Transportation memorandum to Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, "High Seas Interdiction of Aliens," 24 May 1992.

 

[17]    Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard message to Commander, Coast Guard Atlantic Area, "Interdiction of Aliens," 24 May 1992.

 

[18]Rachel Canty, LT, USCG, Legal Officer at U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters (G-LMI), "Coast Guard Repatriation Authority Briefing," 12 December 1996, 6.

 

[19]    Stevens, The United States Supreme Court Judge, "Court Synopsis and Legal Case Study" 21 June 1993. Document provided by CDR Tom Cahill, senior legal counsel working on Haitian issues during the mass exodus.

 

[20]    Holly Idelson, "High Court to Hear Challenge to Refugee Policy," Washington Times,          

01 March 1993, A3. Also, Joan Biskupic, "Court 8-1 Upholds Return of Haitians," Washington Post, 22 June 1993, A1.

 

[21]    Christopher Marquis, "Clinton: Summary Repatriation to Haiti to End," Miami Herald,           

13 November 1992, A24.

 

[22]    Coast Guard Intelligence Center message to Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, "Photo Reconnaissance Mission Flown Along the Haitian Coast Line," March 1994.

 

[23]    Rachel Canty, LT, USCG, Legal Officer at U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters (G-LMI), "Summary from a Department of Justice Brief," 16 December 1992.

 

[24]    Congressman Bill Tauzin, Chairman of the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Navigation, Letter to President-Elect Clinton, "Campaign Promises," 22 December 1992.

 

[25]    Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District letter to Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, "Assets participating in Operation Able," January 1993. This letter listed the following forces that were participating in Operation Able Manner; twenty three ships (1 WHEC, 11 WMECs, 5 WPBs, 1DD, 2FFGs, 2LSDs, and 1 SBA), 17 aircraft (2 C-130s, 2 HU-25s, 3 HH-3F, 6 HH-65s, 2 SH-3s and 2 CH-46s), which were all sent into the Windward Passage.

 

[26]    Leahy, 1.

 

[27]    Patrick Philibin, LCDR, USCG, Assistant Chief of Public Affairs, U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters (G-CP), interview by author on 13 December 1996.

 

[28]    Lawrence Bassett, Skipper of a vessel which was rescued by the Coast Guard. He was quoted in Operation Value, a recent Public Affairs document package provided for use throughout the Coast Guard.

 

[29]    Kent Smiri, Fish and Game Warden form California. This feedback was given and quoted in the Commandant's Bulletin.

 

[30]    William J. Kime, Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, Coast Guard Vision Statement, Washington, D.C. This document lays out the Commandant's Vision and is attached inside the front cover of the Coast Guard Reserve Training Center Handbook issued to all students who attend training in Yorktown.

 

[31]    Requirement listed in the Coast Guard Reserve Training Center Handbook, which is issued to all students who attend training in Yorktown, 3.

 

[32]    Wayne Paugh, Head of Media Relations at Coast Guard Headquarters, Office of Public Affairs, (G-CP), interview by author on 27 January 1997.

 

[33]    Robert Kramek, Commandant, United States Coast Guard, The 1997 Annual Review, Coast Guard Headquarters, Office of Public Affairs, (G-CP), January, 1997.

 

[34]    Arthur Pearcy, "U.S. Coast Guard Aircraft Since 1916," Naval Institute Press, 1991, preface.

 

[35]    Herbert W. O'Quin, QMC, USN, retired, "Designed for the Job," Naval Proceedings, Jan 1997, 18.

 

[36]    O'Quin, 18.

 

[37]    Julie Marie Duncan, TS1, USCG,    "What is Really Important", Naval Institute Proceedings, February, 1997,   p.34. TS1 Duncan served on USCGC Hamilton (WHEC 715) during the Haitian Mass Exodus and is currently assigned to USCG Group San Francisco. Her article was selected as a winner in the Enlisted Essay Writing Contest by Naval Proceedings and articulates the horrors and tragedies of her valuable experience under arduous conditions.

 

[38]    Duncan, 34.

 

[39]    David Rouse, Chief of Police in Cannon Beach, quotation about Operation Able Manner and the Coast Guard's capabilities not only in this operation but when operating together in Cannon Beach. The quotation was listed in the Operation Value Package which is a package of various materials provided by Public Affairs, Coast Guard Headquarters, (G-CP), for Coast Guard use throughout the field. This package was published in early 1997.

 

[40]    Francis Saltus Van Boskerck, CAPT, USCG, Semper Paratus, (Sam Fox Publishing Company, New York, N.Y., 1938) The verse is form "Semper Paratus," which is the official Coast Guard marching song. Semper Paratus was copyrighted in 1938 at the request of Capt Van Boskerck's widow. It was later renewed in 1966 and 1986 and will be sung proudly on mess night.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

 

 

Applebaum, Richard, RADM, USCG. " The U.S. Coast Guard in Review: Haitian Migration operation Were a Challenge." Naval Institute Proceedings, May 1995, 137-140.

 

Biskupic, Joan. "Court 8-1 Upholds Return of Haitians." Washington Post, 22 June 1993, A1.

 

Brannan, Liz, PA2, USCG. "Migrant-Smuggling Voyage Comes to an End." Commandant's Bulletin, June 1995, 2-4.

 

Browning, Robert, Coast Guard Historian. "AMIO Historical Background: Milestones." Official Records of the Coast Guard Historian, June 1993.

 

Cahill, Tom, CDR, USCG, Legal counsel on Haitian during the mass exodus. Interview by author, February 1997.

 

Canty, Rachel. LT, USCG, Legal Officer at U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters (G-LMI), "Coast Guard Repatriation Authority Briefing." 12 December 1996, 6.

 

Canty, Rachel. LT, USCG, Legal Officer at U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters (G-LMI), "Overview of Legal Framework for Coast Guard Operations in International Waters in Support of Immigration Law Enforcement." 13 May 1993, 6.

 

Canty, Rachel. LT, USCG, Legal Officer at U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters (G-LMI), "Summary from a Department of Justice Brief." 16 December 1992, 8-9.

 

Carlson, James D. LT, USCG, "As World Ambassador." Naval Institute Proceedings, December, 1996, p.54.

 

Coast Guard Intelligence Center. Message to Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, "Photo Reconnaissance Mission Flown Along the Haitian Coast Line." March 1994.

 

Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard. Message to Commander, Coast Guard Atlantic Area, Subject: "Interdiction of Aliens." 24 May 1992.

 

Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard. Memorandum to Secretary of Transportation, Subject: "SECDOT/SECDOD MOA on use of Coast Guard Capabilities and Resources in Support of National Military Strategy." 21 March 1995.

 

Commander, Coast Guard Atlantic Area, Subject: "Interdiction of Aliens." 24 May 1992.

 

 

Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District. Letter to Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, Subject: "Assets participating in Operation Able." January 1993.

 

Danis, Aaron. Haiti Analysis at the National Maritime Interdiction Center, Suitland, Maryland. Interview by author, 06 December 1996.

 

Duncan, Julie Marie. TS1, USCG, "What is Really Important." Naval Institute Proceedings, February, 1997, p.34.

 

Ellis, David. "Tragedy on the High Seas." Time, December 2, 1991, 24.

 

Farah, Douglas. "Coast Guard Patrols, Clinton's Switch on Repatriation Delay Haitian Exodus." Washington, Post, 20 January 1992, A14.

Giese, Eric. LT, USCG, U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, Office of Law Enforcement (G-OLE). "USCG briefing for the Secretary of Transportation on Haitian Migration." 11 January 1993.

 

Hayes, Margaret Daly, and Wheatley, Gary, RADM, USN (Ret.). Interagency and Political-Military Dimensions of Peace Operations: Haiti - A Case Study. National Defense University, Washington, D.C., 1996.

 

Hessman, James D. "Toady's Coast Guard: Straight, Steady, and True." Sea Power, August 1993, 14-16.

 

Idelson, Holly. "High Court to Hear Challenge to Refugee Policy." Washington Times,            01 March 1993, A3.

 

Johnson, Robert E. Guardian of the Sea. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1987.

 

Kime, William J., Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, "Coast Guard Vision Statement." Washington, D.C., 1994.

 

Kramek, Robert., Commandant, United States Coast Guard. "The 1997 Annual Review." Washington, D.C., January, 1997.

 

Kramer, Michael, "Putting People Second." Time, 01 November 1993, 29-30.

 

Larzelere, Alex, CAPT, USCG (Ret.). "Each Year the Coast Guard is Being Asked to Do More with No Increase in Assets." Naval Institute Proceedings, December 1994, 24-31.

 

Larzelere, Alex, CAPT, USCG (Ret.). "The 1980 Cuban Boatlift," National Defense University Press, 1988.

 

Leahy. RADM, USCG, Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District. "Cuban and Haitian Immigration," 88-89, March, 1993.

 

Marquis, Christopher. "Clinton: Summary Repatriation to Haiti to End." Miami Herald,            13 November 1992, A24.

 

Operation Value package. Coast Guard Public Affairs Presentation material provided for use throughout the Coast Guard, January, 1997.

 

O'Quin, Herbert W. QMC, USN, retired, "Designed for the Job." Naval Proceedings, Jan 1997, 18.

 

Paugh, Wayne. Chief of Media Relations at Coast Guard Headquarters, Office of Public Affairs, (G-CP). Interview by author, 27 January 1997.

 

Philibin, Patrick. LCDR, USCG, Assistant Chief of Public Affairs, U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters (G-CP). Interview by author, 13 December 1996.

 

Secretary of State. Message to the Secretary of Transportation, Subject: "Amended Asylum Policy." 24 May 1992.

 

Secretary of Transportation. Memorandum to Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, "High Seas Interdiction of Aliens." 24 May 1992.

 

Stevens, The United States Supreme Court Judge. "Court Synopsis and Legal Case Study." 21 June 1993.

 

Stubbs, Bruce B., CAPT, USCG. The U.S. Coast Guard's National Security Role in the Twenty -First Century. Center for Naval Warfare Studies, U.S. Naval War College, Newport, R.I., June 1992.

 

Tauzin, Bill, Congressman , Chairman of the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Navigation. Letter to President-Elect Clinton, Subject: "Campaign Promises." 22 December 1992.

 

"U.S. Coast Guard Overview." Commandant's Bulletin, January, 1995, 3-20.

 

U.S. Fact File 1996. Headquarters, Commandant, United States Coast Guard. Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1996.

 

Van Boskerck, Francis Saltus, CAPT, USCG, "Semper Paratus." (Sam Fox Publishing Company, New York, N.Y., 1938)

 

Vitullo, Thomas, LCDR, USCG, Coast Guard Headquarters, Office of Defense (G-ODO). Interview by author, January 1996.

 

Vitullo, Thomas, LCDR, USCG, Coast Guard Headquarters, Office of Defense (G-ODO). "Commandant's Brief Slides and Notes." January 1996.

 

   

 

 

 



NEWSLETTER
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list