Military

A NEO Is More Than A Maneuver

 

CSC 1992

 

SUBJECT AREA National Military Strategy

 

 

 

                            EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

Title:  A NEO is More Than A Maneuver

 

Author:  Major S. L. Bumgardner, USMC

 

Thesis:  The Department of Defense needs to create joint doctrine for the conduct of

noncombatant evacuation operations (NEO) which recognizes the significant political

consequences of the operation.

 

Background:  The United States has been concerned with rescuing and evacuating its

citizens from foreign countries since Lieutenant Prestley O'Bannon attacked in

Tripoli. With instability spreading in the world, it is likely that more NEO operations

will be occurring. Because a NEO is requested by the Department of State and

supported by the Department of Defense, joint military doctrine should recognize the

foreseeable consequences that occur when NEOs are conducted. During Operation

Sharp Edge, the noncombatant evacuation operation conducted in Liberia in June,

1990-January 1991, dramatic and expensive political changes occurred in conjunction

with the execution of this mission.

 

Recommendation:  Develop joint military NEO doctrine that shares terms and goals

with the Department of State.

 

 

                         A NEO IS MORE THAN A MANEUVER

 

                                    OUTLINE

 

Thesis Statement:  To better conduct future noncombatant evacuation operations

(NEOs) the Department of Defense needs to create joint doctrine that emphasizes the

significant political consequences of these operations.

 

 

I. NEO defined.

       A. Historical legal basis

       B. Modern legal basis

 

II. Relationship of State Department and Department of Defense in NEOs

       A. State Department Role

             1. Responsibilities

             2. Emergency Handbook

       B. Department of Defense Role

             1. Responsibilities

             2. Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan

 

III. Operation Sharp Edge

       A. Situation

       B. Political considerations

       C. Consequences

 

 

                            A NEO IS MORE THAN A MANEUVER

 

     In 1805 United States Marines first planted an American flag on a foreign

 

shore as part of a rescue mission. Led by Lieutenant Presley Neville O'Bannon, a

 

combined force of seven enlisted Marines and more than 500 Greek, Arab, and

 

expatriate European mercenaries supported by Bedouin cavalry captured the city of

 

Derma to force the Barbary pirates to free 307 American sailors held captive in

 

Tripoli. Despite manifest bravery, O'Bannon's campaign against the beys, deys and

 

bashaws of the Tripolitian Arabs failed to achieve its stated goal. In large part this

 

failure occurred because of contrary diplomatic negotiations undertaken by the U.S.

 

Consul General to Algeria Tobias Lear, the former personal secretary for President

 

Washington.1

 

     This inauspicious beginning marked the start of the U.S. challenge to

 

effectively coordinate diplomatic initiatives, combined forces, and military action

 

when conducting rescue missions. With regional instability rising in the aftermath of

 

the Cold War, the need to execute military rescue missions -specifically

 

noncombatant evacuation operations (NEOs)- will increase.2  To better conduct future

 

NEOs the Department of Defense needs to create joint doctrine that emphasizes the

 

significant Political consequences of these operations.

 

     The U.S. military conducts noncombatant emergency evacuations at the

 

request of the State Department to rapidly remove U.S. citizens and a few specified

 

others from the threat of harm in a foreign country. The need for a NEO occurs

 

when, as a consequence of natural disaster, internal unrest, or armed conflict with

 

another country, a host country can or will not provide protection to U.S. citizens

 

within its borders. Current Marine Corps doctrine describes NEOs as similar to

 

amphibious raids because both involve "swift incursion into or temporary occupancy

 

of an objective followed by a planned withdrawal."3 This description distinguishes a

 

NEO from an amphibious raid because different rule of engagement are followed. In

 

a NEO, force may be used only for self-defense or defense of others, such as the

 

evacuees.

 

     The international law basis for NEOs has become better settled in the years

 

since the end of World War II. Before 26 June 1945, when the United Nations

 

Charter had not yet superseded customary international law, two humanitarian

 

purposes permitted intrusion by one State into the sovereign territory of another.4

 

The rare justification for foreign incursion occurred when a country committed

 

atrocities upon its own people on a scale that fell below the standards of civilized

 

societies ---an extremely flexible standard. The more frequent basis for foreign

 

intervention occurred when a State's citizens living abroad faced imminent danger to

 

lives and property.5

 

    With the passage of the U.N. Charter, world governments reexamined the

 

legal theories of intervention. Initially many believed the U.N. Charter barred any

 

threat or use of force between States regardless of the intentions or goals of the

 

intervening State. The U.N. Charter grants only two exceptions to this absolute

 

prohibition:  self-defense or participation in U.N. enforcement actions to restore

 

international peace. However, in the years following World War II, idealism and the

 

U.N. could not establish an effective international peace force to conduct evacuation

 

missions world-wide.

 

     Lacking an active international force, the U.S. has adopted an interpretation of

 

self-defense which rests upon customary international law. This interpretation accepts

 

the ideas of self-defense put forth by the U.N. Charter. However, it permits a nation

 

to help its own people when the U.N. is unable to effectively act. When harm to

 

citizens abroad is imminent, the U.S. government can take appropriate action to

 

prevent injury or harm. These actions can include intervention into another country

 

provided the intervention is limited to protecting the citizens being evacuated.6

 

     Current regulation, agreement, and plan place the responsibility for protecting

 

U.S. citizens abroad on the Secretary of State.7 Under the scheme of Executive Order

 

12656, the Secretary of State eyes the world to minimize the number of U.S. citizens

 

who are subject to the risk of death, injury, and capture as hostage. To carry out this

 

responsibility, the Secretary of State names offices within the Department of State that

 

are responsible for evacuation planning and implementation. The cognizant on-scene

 

official who oversees the preparation and implementation of these plans for each

 

country is the U.S. ambassador.

 

     As instability grows, the Ambassador is charged to review the Emergency

 

Action Plan (EAP)contained in the Embassy's 12 Foreign Affairs Handbook-1

 

Emergency Planning Handbook.8 This plan is composed of completed checklists from

 

the 16 chapters and seven annexes of the 12 FAH-1 Emergency Handbook. Started as

 

a Department-wide program after the report of the 1985 Inman Commission which

 

examined the bombing of the U.S. Embassy in Beirut and other disasters, these

 

checklists assist the Ambassador and the Embassy Country Team in anticipating

 

potential emergencies.

 

     In the EAP, chapters are devoted to natural disasters, bombings, civil strife,

 

massive refugee requests, reduction of personnel, and evacuation. The EAP plans

 

responses to these various emergencies which range from standing-fast, leaving the

 

country by commercial means, evacuation, and post closing. When complete and

 

updated, an Embassy EAP contains extensive maps, pictures of landing zones and

 

beach sites, a transportation plan, a logistics plan, and a communication plan. Copies

 

of the EAP, which become a classified document when filled out, are returned to the

 

Emergency Plans Office of the State Department in Washington, D.C., which then

 

sends 44 copies to the Pentagon for retention and use.9

 

      Along with reviewing crisis response plans, the Ambassador is also tasked

 

with coordinating with the Secretary of Defense to maximize timely use of military

 

transportation assets and to insure military evacuation plans can be integrated into the

 

Department of State plans.10 If military assistance may be required for an evacuation

 

operation, the Ambassador makes the request to the Secretary of State who then

 

informs the President. The Ambassador's message to the Secretary of State requesting

 

this action normally informs the area Commander in Chief of Unified and Specified

 

Commands (CinC) so that military planning of the evacuation may begin.11

 

     Each CinC is tasked with preparing and maintaining plans for assisting the

 

Department of State in the protection and evacuation of U.S. noncombatants

 

abroad.12 Matters considered when drawing up these plans include courses of action,

 

forces, assembly area operations, evacuation site operations, embassy security,

 

medical support and host nation support -the same matters also considered in Chapter

 

15 of 12 FAH-1 Emergency Handbook.13 As the CinCs and their staffs work on

 

concepts of operation for the evacuations in their region, the Assistant Secretary of

 

Defense for Force Management and Personnel, the Under Secretary of Defense for

 

Policy, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Washington Liaison

 

Group--a joint monitoring body established and chaired by the Department of State

 

with Department of Defense representation--all oversee, and provide coordination for

 

the implementation of the non-combatant emergency evacuation plan.14 In their final

 

form, these military evacuation plans are included as part of the Joint Strategic

 

Capabilities Plan (JSCP) which gives the CinCs guidance for the accomplishment of

 

their military tasks over a two year cycle.15

 

     Two opportunities presented themselves in 1990 and 1991 to test the multi-

 

layered planning now involved when conducting NEOs. Both occurred in littoral

 

countries of Africa as Desert Shield built into Desert Storm. The first, Operation

 

Sharp Edge in Monrovia, Liberia, started as a evacuation rescue mission and evolved

 

into a seven month embassy sustainment mission. The second, Operation Eastern Exit

 

in Mogadishu, Somalia, began as an emergency evacuation and lived up to its billing.

 

Of the two operations, Operation Sharp Edge differs most from the normal

 

"amphibious raid" model of a NEO and for that reason perhaps had more influence

 

on the political situation of the host country.

 

     The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) started Operation Sharp-Edge

 

on 25 May 1990 by ordering the United States Europe Command (EURCOM) to

 

deploy Mediterranean Amphibious Ready Group (MARG) 2-90 off the western coast

 

of Africa near Monrovia, Liberia. The 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit (Special

 

Operations Capable) (MEU[SOC]) embarked aboard four amphibious ships gave

 

MARG 2-90 its ground combat element. This MEU(SOC) consisted of a Marine

 

medium helicopter squadron, a rifle battalion, and a combat services support group.

 

upon receipt of the JCS order, MARG 2-90 began planning the potential tasks of a

 

NEO. These included reinforcement of the United States Embassy in Monrovia,

 

protection of communication sites in Liberia, and possible extraction of key United

 

States Embassy personnel.16

 

     The circumstances which started the NEO begin in December of 1989. On

 

Christmas eve, 1989, Charles Taylor, the U.S. educated former head of the Liberian

 

Government Services Agency (GSA) and a member of the Gio tribe, started a revolt

 

against the then president, Samuel K. Doe, a member of the Bakwe tribe. Doe had

 

accused Taylor of corruption in 1987 and forced him to flee the country.17 Upon his

 

return in 1989, Taylor starte his insurrection with a small organization, the National

 

Patriotic Front of Liberia (NPFL). Fueled by tribal rivalries, the NPFL spread civil

 

dissent while growing quickly during the early months of 1990. Working inland from

 

the coastal town of Buchanan, Taylor followed Maoist doctrine by advancing slowly

 

while he gained the support of the people.

 

     In May the NPFL threatened the only international airport in Liberia, Roberts

 

International Airport. Around this airport in the outskirts of Monrovia, the members

 

of the Armed Forces of Liberia (AFL), who remained loyal to President Doe, and the

 

NPFL, engaged in bloody battles with neither obtaining much success. Observing the

 

mayhem, the American Embassy in Monrovia issued situation reports which "painted

 

a picture similar to the 'Fall of the Roman Empire' for the rest of the world to read

 

in message traffic."18 By 25 May the severity of these reports caused the JCS to

 

send MARG 2-90 from Toulon, France, to Mamba Station, a navigational point off

 

the coast of Liberia.

 

     To plan for the missions assigned in Operation Sharp-Edge, MARG 2-90 sent

 

an advance party comprised of the executive officer of the 22nd MEU(SOC), the

 

executive officer of the Marine rifle battalion ahead of the MARG to Monrovia. The

 

platoon commander of the Navy Sea, Air, Land (SEAL) team, an air/naval gunfire

 

liaison team (ANGLICO), and two radio operators joined them en route in Barcelona,

 

Spain. Together these individuals formed the Forward Command Element (FCE) of

 

MARG 2-90.

 

     Prepared for immediate action, the FCE arrived in Monrovia on 29 May.

 

Their baggage included food, batteries, satellite communications gear, smoke

 

grenades, weapons, and ammunition. Because they believed either the 22nd

 

MEU(SOC) would soon land or the crisis would end shortly, the FCE brought

 

supplies for only ten days.19

 

     The tasks the FCE conducted when it reached Liberia expressly concerned the

 

technical Marine Corps aspects of a NEO:  finding and evaluating possible helicopter

 

landing zones, finding and evaluating potential beach landing sites and assembly sites

 

for the evacuees, and drafting a reenforcement plan for the American Embassy. As

 

planned, MARG 2-90 reached Liberia on 5 June. By diplomatic decision, it sat

 

offshore for sixty days.20

 

     The Embassy personnel had several good reasons to resist the NEO. First, as

 

diplomats, the State Department officials in Liberia wanted to pursue negotiations for

 

as long as possible. Problems in the revolt caused circumstances to not be as dire as

 

broadcast.

 

     In late May, Charles Taylor lost two of his top lieutenants. One, Elmer

 

Johnson, was killed. The other, Prince Johnson, a professional soldier who had

 

trained with the U.S. Army at Fort Jackson, South Carolina, broke away to form a

 

splinter group called the Independent National patriotic Front of Liberia (INPFL).21

 

Hampered by these command problems and logistics difficulties, Taylor's advance on

 

Monrovia slowed. This delay, and the entry of the INPFL into the melee, provided an

 

opportunity for a diplomatic solution to the crisis.

 

     Second, the U.S. had a great deal of prestige and money tied to the

 

government of Liberia. Because good relations existed between the two countries for

 

a long time a surprising number of valuable U.S. assets are within its borders. The

 

U.S. abolitionist societies in 1822 began to send free slaves to Monrovia for

 

settlement of the country. By 1892 more than 16,000 freed U.S. slaves had returned

 

to Africa. They became the ruling elite, formed a republic, and became the model of

 

independent rule in Africa. Samuel Doe brutally crushed these leaders and the

 

traditions of their government when he came to power by insurrection and

 

assassination 1980.22

 

     From 1980 until 1987 Liberia received the largest per capita share of U.S. aid

 

to the sub-Saharan Africa, a figure close to $500 million.23 North of the town of

 

Careysburg, a place too small for most maps, Voice of America maintains its largest

 

transmission center in the world. Broadcasting with six 250 kW and two 50 kW

 

transmitters, coverage is provided for the entire African continent, the Middle East,

 

and southwestern Russia.24 Looking towards the sea from Monrovia, the U.S. keeps

 

an Omega communications and navigation relay station to transmit and guide

 

submarines in the Atlantic.25 Firestone runs the largest rubber plantation in the world

 

outside of Monrovia, complete with a 200 bed medical facility.26 Recalling these

 

facts, it is understandable why, although President Doe seemed to be losing his grip

 

on the country during the summer of 1990, the U.S. did not wish to under take any

 

action which would hasten his overthrow.

 

     From 29 May until 4 August, the FCE closely worked with the State

 

Department and bided its time while the MARG sat over the horizon. On 29 July

 

President Doe met privately with the American Ambassador Peter de Vos and refused

 

an offer to depart the country under U.S. protection. On this date over 7,000

 

Liberians had taken shelter on grounds adjoining the U.S. Embassy with 12,000 more

 

taking refuge at the Voice of America transmitters and another 18,000 crowded on the

 

grounds of the telecommunication facility near Brewerville.27 Then, on the evening

 

of 30 July, Armed Forces of Liberia soldiers massacred 200 hundred of civilians in

 

an Lutheran church in Monrovia and wounded many more. 28 Five days after the

 

slaughter, on 4 August, Prince Johnson demanded humanitarian intervention by the

 

U.S. to settle the bloody three-way civil war. To back up his demand, Johnson and

 

the INPFL, threatened to arrest U.S. citizens for the sole purpose of forcing foreign

 

involvement. This threat forced the Ambassador to finally initiate the NEO.

 

     Based upon the extensive time for in-country planning by the FCE and the

 

opportunity for face-to-face coordination with the Embassy staff, the execution phase

 

of the non-combatant evacuation proceeded superbly. At dawn on 5 August more than

 

200 Marines aboard 11 CH-46E and CH-53D transport helicopters escorted by four

 

AH-1T gunships flew into the U.S. compound in Monrovia. Ten AV-8B Harriers

 

assigned to the Saipan took turn flying air cover. During the next few weeks more

 

than 2,400 people, including 226 Americans, were evacuated and no weapons had to

 

be fired by Marines.29

 

     The primary evacuation effort continued until 20 August when MARG 3-90

 

arrived with the 26th MEU(SOC) aboard and conducted an in-place relief. Rifle

 

companies from 26th MEU(SOC) then took up the mission of remaining ashore in the

 

U.S. embassy compound to reinforce the Marine Security Guard Detachment and the

 

State Department security forces directed by the Embassy's Regional Security Officer.

 

This duty continued until 9 January 1991.30

 

     With the landing of the first helicopters on 5 August, the tempo of the

 

insurgency increased. Within 33 days, on 9 September, the President Samuel Doe's

 

rule ended when Prince Johnson trapped and then assassinated him, recording the

 

whole gruesome event with a video camera.31 During all of the time the Marines

 

were ashore in Liberia daily fighting between among the three factions of the

 

population continued.

 

     At Nigeria's urging, five of Liberia's adjoining Africa states formed a 6,000

 

solider multi-national force to help put a cease-fire into effect among the three

 

factions. Although these forces entered the country in late August, by November the

 

U.S. State Department recognized these regional troops would not soon establish

 

order.32 At the last count in November of 1990, 20,000 Liberians in a population of

 

2,639,809 had died either from fighting or starvation.33 In July of 1991, U.S. State

 

Department estimated that 750,000 Liberians had become refugees. To assist in this

 

increasingly chaotic situation the U.S. provided $130 million to the Liberian relief

 

effort, $2.8 million to ECOWAS and an additional $3.75 million grant in fiscal year

 

1991 directly to the five ECOWAS countries whose troops maintained the regional

 

peace keeping coalition in Liberia.34

 

     The principle conclusion which may be drawn from this brief overview of

 

NEO procedures and Operation Sharp Edge is that a NEO is more than a maneuver.

 

Joint doctrine which recognizes the dramatic political consequences of noncombatant

 

evacuation operations must be developed. The constant warfare, the large number of

 

casualties which occurred to Liberians during the operation, and the political

 

involvement at the highest levels in supervising these events suggests that permanently

 

including NEOs as part of Low Intensity Conflict is confusing.35

 

     President Samuel Doe lost his legitimacy on 5 August when the first helicopter

 

touched. Analogizing this seven month operation to an amphibious raid brushes away

 

too many complications. The turbulent manner in which his government ended caused

 

the U.S. to lose some ability to influence events in West Africa. To regain this

 

influence, to date, has cost $136 million.

 

 

                     ENDNOTES

 

1.A. B. C. Whipple, To the Shores of Tripoli (New York: William Morrow and

Company, Inc., 1991), p. 244. See also, Robert Debs Heinl, Jr., Soldiers of the Sea

(Annapolis, Maryland: 1962), p. 45, which calls the expedition, "a fool's errand."

  

2.U.S., President, National Security Strategy of the United States (Washington, D.C.:

Government Printing Office, 1991), George Bush, August 1991, p. 7. See also Fleet Marine

Force Manual 1-2, The Role of the Marine Corps in the National Defense, 21 June 1991,

chapter 3, "Marine Corps' Responsibilities and Relationships," para. 3006.h; U.S.,

Department of Defense, Annual Report of the Secretary of Defense to the President and the

Congress, February 1992, (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1992), p.

12-13.

 

3. Joint Chiefs of Staff, JCS Pub 1-02, DOD Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms,

1 June 1987, s.v. "amphibious raid"; U.S. Marine Corps Manual FMFM 8-1, Special

Operations, Superintendent of Document, U.S. Government Printing Office, (Washington,

D.C. 1 June 1987), Chapter 7, "Special Operations," para. 7102.

 

4. Charter of the United Nations With the Statute of the International Court of Justice

Annexed Thereto Signed at San Francisco, 26 June 1945; entered into force 24 October 1945.

59 Stat. 1301, TS 993, 3 Bevans 1153.

 

5. Jean-Pierre L. Fonteyne, "Forcible Self-Help by States to Protect Human Rights:

Recent Views from the United Nations," Richard B. Lillich ed., Humanitarian Intervention

and the United Nations, (Charlottesville, Virginia: University Press of Virginia, 1973), p.

198.

 

6. Steven F. Day, "Legal Consideration in Noncombatant Evacuation Operations" (Naval

Justice School, 1991), p. 10. (Mimeographed); W. Hays Parks, "Evacuation by Military

Force," Marine Corps Gazette, Vol. 62, No. 9, (September 1978), p. 25.

 

7. Executive Order 12656, "Assignment of Emergency Preparedness Responsibilities," 18

November 1988, section 1301(2)(f), 3 Code of Federal Regulations 585-610, (1988

compilation). See also: "State-Defense Statement on Protection and Evacuation of US

Citizens and Certain Designated Aliens Abroad ("Joint Statement")," A-1395, 18 July 1980;

and Department of Defense Directive No. 3025.14, Protection and Evacuation of U. S.

Citizens and Designated Aliens in Danger Areas Abroad (Short Title: Noncombatant

Evacuation Operations) (5 November 1990).

 

8. U.S. Department of State, 12 Foreign Affairs Handbook-1 Emergency Planning

Handbook, 1 September 1988.

 

9. Stephen Burnett, Plans Officer, U.S. State Department. Personal interview about

emergency actions plans. Washington, D.C., 16 March 1992.

 

10. "Memorandum of Understanding Between Departments of State and Defense on the

Protection and Evacuation of U.S. Citizens and Designated Aliens Abroad," Office of the

Assistant Secretary of Defense For Force Management and Personnel. (Advance copy: 19

November 1990).

 

11. J. P. Terry, "Noncombatant Evacuation Operations:  Operational Issues, Legal Issues,

and Rules of Engagement," lecture given at Naval Justice School, Newport, Rhode Island,

1991.

 

12. DoD Dir. 3025.14, para. E.9.(a). See also 12-FAH-1 Emergency Planning Handbook,

para. 1531.

 

13. Joint Chiefs of Staff, Doctrine For Joint Operations in Low Intensity Conflict, Joint

Test Pub 3-07 (Washington, D.C. 1990), p. V-6.

 

14. Ibid.

 

15. Armed Forces Staff College, The Joint Staff Officer's Guide 1991, AFSC Pub 1,

Norfolk, Virginia: (National Defense University 1991), p. 5-15.

 

16. Glen R. Sachtleben, "Operation SHARP EDGE: The Corps' MEU(SOC) Program in

Action," Marine Corps Gazette, Vol. 75, No. 11 (November 1991), p.78.

 

17. Tunji Lardner, Jr., "An African Tragedy", Africa Report, Vol. 35, No. 7, (November-

December 1990), 13-16. See also, Mark Huband, "Liberia, The Scars of War," Africa

Report, Vol. 36, No. 2, (March-April 1991), p.48; Michael Chege, "Remembering Africa,"

Foreign Affairs, Vol. 71, No. 1, (1991/92), p. 159.

 

18. "Intelligence Gathering and Analysis Prior to and During MARG 2-90 Insertion,"

Marine Corps Lessons Learned System Long Report, 28 September 1990.

 

19. Interview with Lieutenant Colonel Stephen J. Labadie, USMC, Executive Officer, 22nd

Marine Expeditionary Unit by Marine Corps Oral History Program at Camp Lejuene, 25

October 1990.

 

20. Ibid.

 

21. Mark Huband, "Doe's Last Stand," Africa Report, Vol 35, No. 5, (July-August), p.47-

49.

 

22. "U.S. and Africa,--Two New Worlds," US Department of State Dispatch, Vol. 12, No.

8, (25 February 1991), pp. 136-137. See also, Baffour Agyeman-Duah, "Military Coups,

Regime Change and Interstate Conflicts in West Africa," Armed Forces & Society, Vol. 16,

No. 4 (Summer 1990) pp. 547-570.

 

23. Tunji Lardner, Jr., "An African Tragedy," Africa Report, Vol. 35, No. 7, (November-

December 1990), p. 15.

 

24. U.S. Department of Defense Electromagnetic Compatibility Analysis Center,

"Electromagnetic Compatibility Aspects of the Radio Spectrum in the Republic of Liberia,"

(Annapolis, Maryland: 1986), p. 1-11.

 

25. "UpDate:  Liberia After Doe: The Bloody Struggle For Power, " Africa Report, Vol. 35, No. 4, (September-October 1990), p. 6.

 

26. "Medical Intelligence Report," Armed Forces Medical Intelligence Center, Rockville,

Maryland, 26 March 1992, p. LI-2.

 

27. U.S. State Department, "Representative State Department Statements on the Civil War

in Liberia," Foreign Policy Bulletin, (September/October 1990), p. 29.

 

28. Ibid.

 

29. Glen R. Sachtleben, "Operation Sharp Edge: The Corps' MEU(SOC) Program in

Action, "Marine Corps Gazette, Vol. 75, No. 11 (November 1991), pp. 85-86. See also,

"Marines Continue Liberia Airlift," The New York Times, 18 August 1990, pp. A-18: 4-5;

Eric Schmitt, "Marines Evacuate 21 More in Liberia," The New York Times, 8 August 1990,

pp. A3: 1-3.

 

30. Glen R. Sachtleben, "Operation SHARP EDGE:  The Corps MEU(SOC) Program in

Action. " Marine Corps Gazette, Vol. 75, No. 11, (November 1991), p. 86. See also,

Captain James K. Shannon, USMC, Commanding Officer, 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit,

Interview by Marine Corps Oral History Program at Camp Lejuene on 15 April 1991.

 

31. Archives, Marine Corps Museum, Washington Navy Yard, Washington,D.C. See also

Tunji Lardner Jr., "Liberia, An African Tragedy," Africa Report, Vol. 35, No. 7,

(November-December 1990), p. 14.

 

32. U.S. Congress, Senate, "Statement before the Subcommittee on African Affairs of the

Senate Foreign Relations Committee," Herman J. Cohen, Assistant Secretary for African

Affairs, 27 November 1990.

 

33. "Settlement and Reconstruction Still Evade Liberia," Strategic Policy, (November

1990) p. 32.

 

34. "Liberia, Assistance to Regional Peace-keeping Efforts," U.S. Department of State

Dispatch, 30 September 1991 p. 731.

 

 

35. The place to begin this work is with the dictionaries. The term "NEO," and the words

"noncombatant," or "noncombatant evacuation." are not defined in JCS Pub. 1, , Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, 1986, JCS Pub. 3-02.1 (Test), OH 1-100 Joint Doctrine for Landing Force Operations, 1989, Joint Test Pub 3-07 Doctrine For Joint Operation In Low Intensity Conflict, 1990, and JCS Test Pub 3-0 Doctrine For Unified and Joint Operations, 1990. Lacking a shared definition of the terms quickly leads to differing courses of action. In Operation Sharp Edge these different understanding were most apparent when the Forward Command Element (FCE) reported to the Embassy in Monrovia expecting the NEO to be over in 10 days!

 

 

                                 BIBLIOGRAPHY

 

1.     Agyeman-Duah, Baffour. "Military Coups, Regime Change and Interstate

             Conflicts in West Africa." Armed Forces & Society, Vol. 16, No. 4

             (Summer 1990), 547-570.

 

2.     "Almanac" Defense Transportation Journal, Vol. 48, No. 1 (February 1992),

             24-44.

 

3.     AFSC Pub 1, The Joint Staff Officer's Guide 1991, National Defense

             University, Norfolk, Virginia, 1991.

 

4.     Best, Kenneth. "Liberia, The Continuing Quagmire," Africa Report, Vol. 36,

             No. 4, (July-August 1991), 39-41.

 

5.     Biles, Peter. "Somalia, Filling the Vacuum." Africa Report, Vol. 36, No. 6

             (November-December 1991), 35-37.

 

6.     Biles, Peter. "Somalia, Going It Alone." Africa Report, Vol. 37, No. 1

             (January-February 1992), 58-60.

 

7.     Boucher, Richard. "Liberia:  Assistance to Regional Peace-Keeping Efforts,"

             US Department of State Dispatch, Vol. 2, No. 39, (30 September

             1991), 731.

 

8.     Burnett, Stephen. Plans Officer, U.S. State Department, interview conducted

             on 16 March 1992 in Washington, D.C.

 

9.     Chege, Michael. "Remembering Africa." Foreign Affairs, Vol. 71, No. 1

             (March, 1992), 146-163.

 

10.    Collier, Ellen C., ed. "Instances of Use of United States Armed Forces

             Abroad, 1798-1989." Congressional Research Service Report for

             Congress, 4 December 1989. Reprinted in 137 Cong. Rec. S130-35

             (daily ed. 10 Jan 1991).

 

11.    da Costa, Peter. "Liberia, Good Neigbors." Africa Report, Vol. 36, No. 6

             (November-December 1991), 21-24.

 

12.    Day, Steven F. "Legal Considerations in Noncombatant Evacuation

             Operations." Naval Justice School, Newport, Rhode Island: 1991.

             (Mimeographed.)

 

13.    Dubik, James M. "Military Force:  Preparing for the Future." Military Review,

             Vol. LXXII, No. 3 (March 1992), 77-82.

 

14.    Eggers, Thomas E. "Today's Air Commandos:  Air Force Special Operations

             Command." Military Reivew, Vol. LXXI, No. 6 (June 1991), 14-21.

 

15.    Ellsworth, Harry Allanson.  One Hundred Eighty Landings of United States

             Marines 1800-1934, Washington, D.C.:  History and Museums Division

             Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps, 1974.

 

16.    Fonteyne, Jean-Pierre L. "Forcible Self-Help by States to Protect Human

             Rights: Recent Views from the United Nations." In Humanitarian

             Intervention and the United Nations, edited by Richard B. Lillich.

             (Charlottesville, Virginia: University Press of Virginia, 1973), pp. 196-

             221.

 

17.    Gaddis, John Lewis. "Toward the Post Cold War World." Foreign Affairs,

             Vol. 70, No. 2 (Spring 1991), 102-122.

 

18.    Gellman, Barton. "Amid Winds of War, Daring U.S. Rescue Got Little

             Notice," Washington Post, 5 January 1992, Section A., p. 21.

 

19.    Gellman, Barton and Smith, R. Jeffrey. "Daring Marine Helicopter Mission

             Rescued Foreigners from Somalia," The Washington Post, 6 January

             1991, pp. A14:1-2, A16: 4-6.

 

20.    Gordon, Michael R. "U.S. Forces Evacuate 74 After Threats in Liberia," The

             New York Times, 6 August 1990, pp. A1:2, A2: 1-4.

 

21.    Greenfield, Richard. "Somalia, Siad's Sad Legacy." Africa Report, Vol. 36,

             No. 2 (March-April 1991), 13-18.

 

22.    U.S. Army Field Manual 100-20, Air Force Pamphlet 3-20, Military

             Operations in Low Intensity Conflict. Washington, D.C.: 5 December

             1990.

 

23.    Heinl, Robert Debs Jr. Soldiers of the Sea, Annapolis, Maryland: United

             States Naval Institute, 1962.

 

24.    Henry, Neil. "U.S., Italian Aircraft Evacuate Foreigners From Somali

             Capitol," The Washington Post, 6 January 1991, pp. A14:1-4, A16:4-

             6.

 

25.    Hoffman, F. G. "The New National Security Strategy." Marine Corps

             Gazette, Vol. 76, No. 2 (February 1992), 48-57.

 

26.    Huband, Mark. "Liberia, The Scars of War." Africa Report, Vol 36, No. 2,

             (March-April 1991), 47-50.

 

27.    Huband, Mark. "Doe's Last Stand," Africa Report, Vol. 35, No. 5, (July-

             August 1990), 47-49.

 

28.    Joint Pub 1-02, DOD Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms

 

29.    Joint Test Pub 3-07, Doctrine For Joint Operations in Low Intensity Conflict

 

30.    JCS Test Pub 3-0, Doctrine for Unified and Joint Operations

 

31.    Joint Pub 0-2, Unified Action Armed Forces (UNAAF)

 

32.    Kalshove, Frits. "Noncombatant Persons: A Comment to Chapter 11 of the

             Commander's Handbook on the Law of Naval Operations." In U.S.

             Naval War College International Law Studies, Vol. 64, pp. 300-330.

             Edited by Horance B. Robertson, Jr. Newport, Rhode Island: Naval

             War College Press, 1991.

 

33.    Labadie, Stephen J., Lieutenant Colonel, USMC, Executive Officer, 22nd

             Marine Expeditionary Unit, Interview by Marine Corps Oral History

             Program, 22nd MEU Headquarters, Camp Lejuene, North Carolina, 25

             October 1990.

 

34.    Lardner, Tunji Jr. "Liberia, An African Tragedy," Africa Report, Vol. 35,

             No. 7, (November-December 1990), 13-16.

 

35.    Lavalle, A.J.C., gen. ed. USAF Southeast Asia Monograph Series, 4 vols.

             Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984. Vol. 2:

             monograph 6: Last Flight From Saigon, by Thomas G. Tobin, Arthur

             E. Laehr, and John F. Hilgenberg, monograph edited by David R.

             Mets.

 

36.    Lymand, Princeton N. "Refugee Situation in Liberia," US Department of State

             Dispatch, Vol. 2, No. 29 (22 July 1991), 536.

 

37.    "Marines Continue Liberia Airlift," The New York Times, 18 August 1990,

             pp. A18: 4-5.

 

38.    Metcalf, Clyde H. A History of the United States Marine Corps, New York:

             G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1939.

 

39.    Millet, Allan R. Semper Fidelis, New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.,

             1980.

 

40.    Moskin, J. Robert. The U.S. Marine Corps Story, New York: McGraw-Hill

             Company, 2nd ed., 1987.

 

41.    Neier, Aryeh, "Watching Rights." The Nation, 3 February 1992, p. 115.

 

42.    Parks, W. Hayes. "Evacuation by Military Force," Marine Corps Gazette,

             Vol. 62, No. 9, (September 1978), 24-33.

 

43.    Pilger, John. The Last Day, London: Mirror Group Books, 1975.

 

44.    Sachtleben, Glen R. "Operation SHARP EDGE: The Corps' MEU(SOC)

             Program in Action." Marine Corps Gazette, Vol. 75, No. 11

             (November 1991), 76-87.

 

45.    Sachtleben, Glen R., Major, USMC, Executive Officer of Battalion Landing

             Team 2/4, Interview by Marine Corps Oral History Program, 22 MEU

             Headquarters, Camp Lejuene, North Carolina, 24 October 1990.

 

46.    Schlesinger, James. "New Instabilities, New Priorities." Foreign Policy, No.

             85 (Winter 1991-92), 3-24.

 

47.    Schmitt, Eric. "Marines Evacuate 21 More in Liberia," The New York Times,

             8 August 1990, pp A3: 1-3.

 

48.    Shannon, James K., Captain, USMC, Commanding Officer, Company K, 24th

             Marine Expeditionary Unit, Interview by Marine Corps Oral History

             Program, Battalion Landing Team 3/8 Headquarters, Camp Lejuene,

             North Carolina, 15 April 1991.

 

49.    Siegel, Adam B. Eastern Exit: The Noncombatant Evacuation Operation

             (NEO) From Mogadishu, Somalia in January 1991. Alexandria,

             Virginia: Center for Naval Analyses Professional Paper 512.09,

             September 1991.

 

50.    Siegel, Adam B. The Use of Naval Forces in the Post- War Era: U.S. Navy

             and U.S. Marine Corps Crisis Response Activity 1946-1990.

             Alexandria, Virginia: Center for Naval Analyses Memorandum 90-246,

             February 1991.

 

51.    "State-Defense Statement on Protection and Evacuation of U.S. Citizens and

             Certain Designated Aliens Abroad ("Joint Statement")," A-1395, 18

             July 1980, Section II, C-1; Section II, E-1; and Section II, F-1 and F-

             2.

 

52.    Stiner, Carl W. "The Strategic Employment of Special Operations Forces."

             Military Review, Vol. LXXI, No. 6 (June 1991), 2-13.

 

53.    Summers, Harry G. Jr. "A Concept of War." In The U. S. Marine Corps The

             View From The Late 1980s, pp. 163-171. Edited by James L. George

             and Christopher Jehn. Alexandria, Virginia: Center for Naval Analyses,

             1988.

 

54.    U.S. Naval Warfare Publication (NWP) 9. Commander's Handbook on the

             Law of Naval Operations

 

55.    Terry, J. P. "Non-combatant Evacuation Operations: Operational Issues, Legal

             Issues, and Rules of Engagement," from lecture notes from a Naval

             Justice School, Newport, Rhode Island, 1992.

 

56.    U.N. Charter of the United Nations With the Statute of the International Court

             of Justice Annexed Thereto. San Fransico: 1945.

 

57.    "Update, Liberia After Doe: The Bloody Struggle for Power," Africa Report,

             Vol. 35, No. 4, (September-October 1990), 5-6.

 

58.    "U.S. and Africa--Two New Worlds," US Department of State Dispatch, Vol.

             12, No. 8, (25 February 1991), 136-137.

 

59.    U.S. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services. Remarks of

             Commandant Carl E. Monday Jr., February-March 1992.

 

60.    U.S. Department of the Navy. 1992 Posture Statement, February-March 1992

 

61.    U.S. Department of Defense Directive No. 3025.14, Protection and

             Evacuation of U.S. Citzens and Designated Aliens in Danger Areas

             Abroad (Short Title: Noncombatant Evacuation Operations) (5

             November 1990)

 

62.    U.S. Department of Defense Electromagnetic Compatiblity Analysis Center,

             "Electromagnetic Compatibility Aspects of the Radio Spectrum in the

             Republic of Liberia", Annapolis, Maryland, 1986.

 

63.    U.S. Department of Defense, Annual Report of the Secretary of Defense to the

             President and the Congress, February 1992. Washington, D.C.: U.S.

             Government Printing Office, 1992.

 

64.    U.S. Marine Corps Manual FMFM 1-2, The Role of the Marine Corps in the

             National Defense.

 

65.    U.S. Marine Corps Manual FMFM 8-1, Special Operations.

 

66.    U.S. President George Bush to Senator Robert Dole, 6 August 1990. A copy

             of this letter is located in the files of the Office of Legal and

             Legislative Counsel to the Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Washington,

             D.C.

 

67.    U.S. President, National Security Strategy of the United States, Washington,

             D.C.: August 1991.

 

68.    Whipple, A. B. C. To The Shores of Tripoli, New York: William Morrow and

             Company, Inc., 1991.