Use of battlefield deception
can enhance a division's ability to fight according to AirLand
Battle tenets. For example, battlefield deception operations may
allow the commander to mass forces without being noticed by the
enemy. This may permit the commander to take the initiative by
acting in a manner unexpected by the enemy. The key is to synchronize
operations with the overall combat mission.
Battlefield deception operations
are conducted by commanders to mislead or confuse enemy decision
makers. They seek to distort, conceal, or falsify indicators of
friendly intentions or capabilities. Successful deception operations
cause the enemy to take operational actions favorable to friendly
plans.
Successful deception operations
depend on denying true dispositions and intentions to the enemy
and having thorough knowledge of the enemy. The first depends
on effective OPSEC. In the planning stage, friendly profiles must
be identified and used to advantage. OPSEC is also essential during
the execution and evaluation phases. In addition, intelligence
is required on enemy collection capabilities, decision making,
and deception doctrine.
CSS elements must be integrated
into all battlefield deception plans. Planners must consider whether
the deception-specific and other resources required to execute
a deception story are available. They must also be aware of the
risks involved in committing limited resources to the deception
story. This is especially true in the brigade area. Commanders
must determine whether the potential gain of a deception is worth
the resources required.
A division Battlefield Deception
Cell under the staff supervision of the G3 plans the division's
role in a corps deception, or may plan independent division-level
deception operations. The G4 prepares logistics estimates by analyzing
logistics factors affecting deception operations. He advises the
deception cell on logistics feasibilities of various courses of
action. The G1 advises the cell on the availability of personnel
to support deception operations. The G4 coordinates with the
G3 and his deception element to ensure deception tasks are integrated
into the logistics annex to the OPLAN.
Once the deception plan is
formulated, FSB elements may be required to employ deception means.
Deception means are methods, resources, and techniques used to
convey or deny information to the enemy. There are four categories
of deception means-visual, olfactory, sonic, and electronic. FSB
units may use any combination of the four types to accomplish
the two deception objectives-to hide the real and display the
false.
Concealing logistics activities
ties in with overall OPSEC measures. In addition to these other
OPSEC measures, the following specific deception means may be
used:
-
Use civilian cars and trucks
or converted buses for logistics operations.
-
Store supplies and perform
maintenance and medical operations in train cars, houses, factories,
subway tunnels, caves, or bunkers.
-
Setup activities in partially
destroyed installations.
-
Disguise packages and containers
to look like ones used by local civilians.
-
Send FSB personnel forward
with deploying forces to find and camouflage suitable locations
before supplies are sent forward.
- Set up in unusual or unorthodox positions and use secondary supply routes.
-
Require vehicles to move randomly,
rather than in convoys, and during periods of reduced visibility.
-
Screen activity with smoke.
-
Change movement patterns and
relocate activities at irregular intervals.
FSB units may use deception
means to lead the enemy to believe activities are located where
none exist. These activities may include logistics installations;
supply points, including ammunition and fuel storage areas; motor
pools; and airfields. Though such activities are normally performed
by elements at echelons above the brigade, FSB units may be required
to play a role in such specific deception means as --
-
Spraying surplus oil or tar
on the ground to create false runways.
-
Arranging empty ammunition
containers and fuel drums to portray logistics bases.
-
Using smoke to simulate activity
or obscure a dummy base.
-
Setting up fake supply routes
to a dummy base.
-
Portraying all indicators
normally associated with base activity. These include latrines,
trash, concertina wire, buried cable, and foot and vehicle tracks.
- Using any available logistics base decoy packages. Several devices to portray logistics bases are under development.
The following are examples
of how deception measures may be used by FSB elements to support
various tactical situations. These are only examples; there are
numerous others. The best deception means to use depends on METT-T.
The main point is that synchronization of effort depends on the
FSB techniques being integrated into the overall deception and
operations plans.
If the deception story is
that 1st Brigade will conduct the main attack, when in reality
2d Brigade will, FSB units help simulate noise and light patterns
in 1st Brigade's notional assembly area. They also appear to close
logistics activities in the old area. At the same time, FSB units
in support of 2d Brigade postpone the forward movement of vehicles
until the last possible moment. Even at that point, the movement
is restricted to that which appears normal for a defensive or
supporting attack.
In the defense, deception
may be used to lead the enemy to believe the division is withdrawing.
FSB elements conduct rearward movement of convoys with dummy
loads. Units also simulate evacuation, abandonment, or destruction
of supplies and equipment.
The FSB may use several techniques
to have the enemy believe the brigade is defending in its present
position when a withdrawal will be conducted. Stockpiles of supplies-
ammunition, fuel, and barrier materiel-are portrayed in the present
position. Normal patterns of activity are continued in the current
location. Movement of FSB elements to the rear are concealed through
infiltration and night movement.
NEWSLETTER
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|