|
Fire support for offensive operations can be described in terms of an offensive framework presented in FM 100-15. This framework shows corps and divisions using five complementary elements in fighting their offensive battles:
- A main attack with supporting attacks as required.
- Reserve operations in support of the attack.
- Reconnaissance and security operations forward and to the flanks and rear of main and supporting attacks.
- A continuous deep operation in vital parts of the zone of attack.
- Rear area operations necessary to maintain offensive momentum.
The commander must provide
responsive fire support (from available air, ground, and sea resources)
that protects and ensures freedom of maneuver to forces in contact
with the enemy in deep, close, and rear operations. Each of the
five complementary elements of the offensive framework must be
considered when determining fire support requirements.
Corps and division commanders
normally ensure adequate fire support for offensive operations
through a process of allocation and retention of specific fire
support assets. The four basic tasks of fire support are as follows:
-
Support forces in contact.
-
Support all aspects of the
battle plan.
-
Synchronize fire support.
-
Support and sustain fire support.
This task includes the allocation
of weapon systems and sorties to subordinate elements, such as
division and brigade, which actually engage the enemy. Supporting
forces in contact usually means providing support for the close
operation.
Supporting the battle plan
means retaining fire support for any possible contingency. Fire
support assets for rear operations and deep fires must be identified
and marshaled for execution at the right time and place.
The synchronization of fire
support at corps and division is essentially a command function.
The FSCOORD helps the commander integrate all fire support with
the appropriate battlefield operating systems (BOSS). These systems
include maneuver, command and control, fire support, air defense,
intelligence, mobility and survivability, and combat service support.
Fire support for offensive
operations must be sustained through all phases of an operation.
It must survive through all phases of an operation without a degradation
of availability.
Specific fire support attack
systems and acquisition systems are allocated through normal practices,
such as field artillery organization for combat. Adequate fires
are made available to meet the corps and division commanders'
close support, counterfire, and interdiction requirements. Other
fire support means, such as tactical air, naval gunfire (division
and below), and nonlethal (EW) systems, are allocated if available
and applicable to the needs of the force commander.
The allocation of nuclear
weapons to support offensive operations is discussed in detail
in FM 100-30. The table below summarizes the roles of nuclear
weapons in offensive operations.
To satisfy the close support
needs of the attacking corps and divisions, FSCOORDs consider
the fires discussed below.
Preparatory Fires. These
are fires that support penetrations of the main defensive belts.
They are not necessarily scheduled preparations in the classic
sense; rather they are intense, concentrated fires that support
an opening for a penetration.
Blocking Fires. Blocking
fires isolate the main effort and fix other forces in the main
defensive belt for the supporting attacks. Use FASCAM if necessary;
but be sure minefield locations have been coordinated with and
approved by the division engineer and disseminated to all units.
Continuous Suppression.
Continuous suppression
of direct-fire weapon systems allows maneuver forces to close
with the enemy and destroy him with organic direct fire.
Obscuration and Screening
Fires. Obscuration
and screening fires allow maneuver forces undetected movement.
SEAD Fires. SEAD
is critical for all operations. CAS, BAI, and attack helicopter
operations in support of combat operations require SEAD fires
against the many antiaircraft systems that accompany the Threat's
forward elements. Some of this SEAD is appropriate for nonlethal
(EW) attack assets that jam air defense radar systems. A critical
element in performing SEAD is locating enemy air defense weapons
and facilities. Electronic warfare support measures and other
target acquisition sources are used for this purpose. SEAD fires
may be developed into a program of fires to support friendly air
operations, to include CAS, BAI, JAAT operations, and support
to air corridors. Smoke also may be used to hide friendly aircraft
from ground observers. Airspace coordination areas and phase lines
may be used to coordinate a SEAD effort.
Counterfire at corps and division
must be aimed against specific enemy fire support functions. By
using the IPB and/or TVA process and the decide-detect-deliver
targeting methodology, we can determine, locate, and attack
specific high-value functional targets such as C3 nodes, target acquisition
systems, and key weapon systems. The destruction, neutralization
and suppression of these targets yield high payoffs in the following
areas:
-
Keep the enemy from disrupting
our attack formations with a counterpreparation, thus ensuring
our freedom of maneuver.
-
Prevent the enemy's ability
to provide counterfire which would result in degraded friendly
fire support.
-
Eliminate or reduce the enemy's
capability to counterattack by shifting and massing fires
-
Conduct a counterair program
directed against the enemy's use of attack helicopters.
The use of interdiction to
support the commander's concept of operation and scheme of maneuver
must take into account the following:
-
Targeting efforts must focus
on the enemy's capability to shift resources to defend or reinforce
his positions.
-
Interdiction will be conducted
primarily by the corps. However, the division may contribute interdiction
fires, depending on the scale of the attack.
-
Interdiction attack assets
may include field artillery rockets and missiles and Army aviation
and Air Force assets performing air interdiction and battlefield
air interdiction.
In offensive operations, fire
support assets are allocated to weight the main attack. For field
artillery, this is done by assigning a preponderance of decentralized
tactical missions (direct support and reinforcing) to the main
attacking force. The corps commander also can add weight to his
main attacking division by attaching corps field artillery elements
to the division or by providing reinforcing units to division
artillery. Employment of field artillery brigades is discussed
in detail in FM 6-20-2. By decentralizing field artillery units,
corps and division commanders provide their subordinate maneuver
commanders the support they need to gain and retain the initiative
of the attack.
Tactical air support adds
weight to the main attack when CAS sortie allocation is increased.
A continuous flow of preplanned CAS sorties allows the main attack
force to respond to contingencies that develop during the course
of the division battle as well as retain the initiative.
Allocation of other fire support
assets and resources must follow the same decentralized methodology.
Based on the factors of METT-T and the commander's concept of
the operation, these allocations give subordinate maneuver commanders
flexibility and responsive fire support. Decentralized allocation
gives the attacker the flexibility to exploit opportunities as
they arise.
Positioning of field artillery
assets is determined by the mission assigned to the subordinate
field artillery battalions. Artillery retained under corps or
div arty control with a mission of general support or general
support reinforcing (GSR) is positioned by the commander of the
respective force artillery. By positioning artillery in particular
sectors and assigning zones of fire, the force artillery commander
can lend weight to the main attack, provide additional adequate
support, and facilitate future operations. In the offense, artillery
is positioned well forward to exploit weapon ranges and to preclude
untimely displacement when fires are needed the most.
Corps and division artillery
units are positioned well forward in the forward brigade sectors.
MLRS units in particular, with their inherent mobility, can be
positioned well forward, nearer the FLOT. There they can engage
targets that are beyond the range of cannon artillery. Good positions
will be at a premium with units actively competing for them. While
the field artillery commanders select positions, all positions
must be coordinated through the FS cells in whose sectors the
proposed positions are located. Ultimate approval rests with the
maneuver commander concerned. Units in direct support of brigades
and their reinforcing artillery normally have overall priority
in positioning.
In the offense, units must
conduct timely displacements. Fire support must be continuous
and must not be outpaced by maneuver. Units that are positioned
by corps artillery, and even by division artillery, are in real
danger of being left behind unless repositioning is frequent and
is synchronized to support the forward progress of maneuver elements.
Corps and division tactical
CP operations cells must aggressively seek out the current forward
line of troops. They must ensure rapid dissemination to brigade
CPs of this vital information lest GS and GSR units be left behind.
Survivability moves are less frequent in the offense. This is
because moves are focused more on supporting the maneuver force
and we have superiority in combat power in the offensive zone.
Fundamental to the success
of any operation are proper ordering of priorities and an orderly
and logical consideration of each factor affecting fire support.
Thus, it is essential to the success of offensive operations conducted
by corps and divisions to instruct commanders and staff planners
on each of the fire support considerations. The fire support considerations
of consequence at all echelons for the attack include the following:
-
General planning and coordination
parameters.
-
Fire support planning, coordination, and tasks.
-
Targeting procedures.
- Intelligence preparation of the battlefield.
-
Use of electronic warfare
assets.
-
Weapon status during the attack.
At the main CPs of corps and
division, most of the FS cell actions involve planning the deep
battle, coordinating the future and current battles, and allocating
resources for current and future battles to the subordinate units.
Although these FS cells rarely request fire support for immediate
engagement of targets, they must ensure that preplanned TACAIR
requests are submitted during the planning process. The brigade
and battalion FS cells are much more involved in the execution
of the current battle, and most immediate TACAIR requests will
be submitted at these levels. They fight within the parameters
established by the higher headquarters and with the resources
they have been allocated.
-
Division coordinated fire
lines (CFLs) should be used sparingly and only to open up the
division zone to fight the division deep battle. The division
FS cell is often too far removed to emplace, cancel, and move
CFLs for the close-in operation.
-
A corps artillery asset with
a GSR mission to a division artillery makes positioning extremely
difficult. A preferred method in the offense is to make that unit
reinforcing with the necessary restrictions to facilitate future
operations.
-
SEAD should be planned and
fired by the unit using the air support. It is almost impossible
to coordinate SEAD fired by divisional DS artillery for CAS flown
in support of a brigade or task force operation. It is much easier
to use the brigade fire support with division artillery augmenting
as necessary.
Fire support coordinators
develop a fire support plan that assists and complements the maneuver
plan. The fire support plan provides fires in direct support of
committed maneuver elements and in general support of the entire
force. It also provides for fire support to the reserve when it
is committed. When use of nuclear or chemical weapons has been
authorized, the fire support plan assigns such weapons and fires
to appropriate executing units.
In planning a preparation,
consider the following factors:
-
Will the loss of surprise
be significant?
-
Are there enough significant
targets?
-
Are there enough fire support
assets (weapons and ammunition) to support the preparation?
-
Can the enemy recover before
the effects can be exploited?
-
Can you include flank or follow-on
forces?
-
Can the effects of nuclear
and chemical fires affect the scheme of maneuver?
For effective fire support
coordination in combined operations, there must exchange of liaison
personnel down escape be an to the lowest possible echelon along
the common boundary. Personnel not only must be tactically and
technically competent but, ideally, also should be proficient
in language to facilitate rapid coordination. The fire support
coordinators at all levels are responsible to ensure both fire
support coordination and mutual assistance of fire support assets.
Targeting for the attack follows
general procedures detailed in FM 6-20-10. The FS cell targeting
decision process is shown in the illustration below. This example
emphasizes the targeting methodology of decide-detect-
deliver. The planning associated with a successful targeting effort
requires close interaction between the commander, the intelligence
and operations staffs, the fire support officers, and several
combat support agencies.
Done properly, the decide
function provides a clear picture of the priorities applicable
to the tasking of target acquisition assets, the selection of
an attack means, and the requirement for postattack assessment.
Specifically, the decide function answers these questions:
-
What targets should be acquired
and attacked?
-
Where will the targets likely
be found?
-
What acquisition assets are
best suited to locate the targets?
-
Which attack option applies
- maneuver, fire support, electronic warfare, or a combination
of these?
- Is damage assessment required and/or possible?
Finally, the deliver portion
takes place when and where the guidance provided during the decide
function has determined.
One requirement for a successful
attack is a thorough IPB. Important for all tactical operations,
IPB is clearly critical if we are to avoid being surprised by
the enemy. IPB provides much of the information for the intelligence
estimate, which in turn impacts on the target development process.
IPB is a continuous, systematic effort to analyze the enemy, terrain,
and weather we will be facing during the attack. IPB seeks to
evaluate Threat capabilities and helps staff members predict enemy
courses of action as we press on with our attack. IPB also seeks
to provide the corps and division commander and staffs a window
into the minds of the enemy commander and his staff. From
this, we may anticipate the enemy's reaction to our attack as
well as predict what his courses of action would be if our present
operation fails.
The initial IPB effort produces
doctrinal, situation, decision support, and electronic templates.
Templates of terrain factors and weather conditions are initially
based on climatological weather records. Templates are later based
on current and forecast weather and terrain conditions as the
battle continues.
Target value analysis is used
to identify high-payoff targets that support the commander's concept.
TVA produces a high-payoff target matrix and an attack guidance
matrix. TVA is conducted by the plans cell and is closely tied
to the IPB.
The all-source production
section (ASPS) at corps and division CPs and the EWS perform the
initial electronic preparation of the battlefield (EPB) in support
of the G2's IPB effort for the attack. The initial EPB is passed
to the MI unit technical control and analysis element (TCAE).
This element expands the EPB and correlates it with technical
data, to include call signs and frequencies. EPB also examines
the association of specific emitters with identified enemy units.
It checks the radio line-of-sight from these emitters to potential
locations of friendly EW assets. The result of the EPB is the
identification of targets that are important to the enemy's defensive
operation and that can be degraded with available EW assets.
The need for responsive fires
is a driving force in the assignment of tactical missions to field
artillery units of the entire force. Yet, individual units must
displace from time to time. They must rearm, refuel, and maintain
the weapons if they are to provide the support expected. This
is particularly true of certain weapon systems, such as the MLRS
or the semiautonomous howitzer improvement program (HIP) howitzer.
MLRS. The
fire planner can ensure a reasonable response time upon which
to base his fire plan by prescribing response posture options
to the launchers. A detailed discussion of several options for
the MLRS is in TC 6-60. To facilitate our main attack and the
supporting attack operations, the fire planner should assign the
hot status for MLRS units to ensure immediate response
time for this system.
Sustainment for and continued
fire support from MLRS can be facilitated by assigning some elements
(launchers) a cold status when not needed for immediately
responsive support. These two options,
or statuses, may be described as follows:
-
All operational launchers
are placed in the hot (go) status during surge conditions,
such as a full attack scenario. Weapons so designated are expected
to respond to a fire mission immediately. Launchers are in a position
that eliminates or reduces the distance, if any, necessary to
displace before firing. Crews are on board and fully alert. Estimated
time of first round fired is 2 minutes.
-
A cold (no-go) status
extends the fire mission execution time by 30 minutes. Operations
officers must order an upgrade from cold to hot as
soon as a hot system is processing a mission. This is to
maintain continuity of hot systems.
Effective command and control,
as well as coordination, depends heavily upon commanders, staffs,
and subordinate commanders exchanging battlefield information
on a timely basis. Although wire-dependent communications assume
a smaller role, the mobile subscriber equipment system helps offset
this loss in capability. Radios provide the primary means of communication
for fire support coordination.
The establishment of a common
survey grid is a command responsibility within each unified command.
It is essential for the effective massing of indirect-fire systems.
Survey planning begins with
understanding the maneuver commander's intent and receiving the
FSCOORD's guidance. During planning, full consideration must be
given to the commander's concept, priorities, tactical situation,
survey control available, desired accuracy, number of installations,
and METT-T factors. This information can be translated into survey
requirements for the target acquisition sensors and the designated
attack systems, which must be on a common grid by the time required.
Aggressive survey planning that answers who, where, when, why,
and how is absolutely essential to ensure mission success.
Planning and coordination
originate at the corps survey planning and coordination element
(SPCE), which is directed by the corps survey planning and coordination
officer (SPCO). The corps SPCE ensures synchronization between
topographic engineers, division artilleries, and nondivisional
units and/or systems requiring common control. Coordination and
planning at the div arty SPCE are done by the division artillery
survey officer assigned to the div arty HHB. The div arty survey
plan is further coordinated at the battalion level with the battalion
reconnaissance and survey officer (RSO). Interface among all echelons
of command must be maintained to ensure that common survey control
can be provided to units in support of maneuver commanders. Coordination
and synchronization of the corps survey plan are essential to
mission success.
Separate field artillery brigades
also have SPCEs organic to their HHBs. They plan and coordinate
the interface of their organic survey requirements with those
of the corps or division SPCEs.
Current ballistic met data
must be applied for accurate artillery fires, battlefield forecasts,
radiological fallout predictions, and target acquisition. This
information is in the form of met messages provided by the artillery
met sections. Met sections are assigned to div arty, FA brigades,
and FA battalions of separate brigades. It is the responsibility
of the commanders (coordinating with the met officer and the S3
or G3) to position the met sections to best measure the atmosphere
for support of all firing units involved.
Planning and use of the met
section begins with the maneuver commander's intent, the FSCOORD's
guidance, and the battlefield weather conditions. During the planning,
full consideration must be given to the following:
-
Commander's concept.
-
Mission priorities (type of
met data required).
-
Tactical situation and security.
-
Prevailing winds (determine
met section location).
-
Location of units supported.
-
Location of other met sections.
-
Communications facilities.
A typical corps artillery
configuration may include two met sections positioned forward,
where they can best sound the atmosphere through which most weapon
trajectories will pass. They provide ballistic and target acquisition
met data. Also, one section may be at the rear to provide upper
air data for USAF weather teams. This information supports aviation
missions, determination chemical warning areas, prediction radiological
fallout areas, and preparation weather forecasts.
Contingencies for the use
of reserves normally are a part of the corps or division plan.
In the offense, a sizable reserve force exists. At the corps,
the reserve may be a division; while at the division, the fixed
figure for a reserve force should not be estimated, Reserves can--
-
Deal with enemy counterattacks.
-
Reinforce or maintain momentum.
-
Sustain the attack of committed
units.
-
Deal with a level III rear
area threat.
-
Provide security.
-
Complete the destruction of
enemy forces.
-
Secure deep objectives.
-
Open the next phase of a campaign
or major operation by seizing objectives beyond the defined area.
In organizing the artillery
for combat and in allocating other fire support assets, the following
must be considered:
-
A plan for the use of fire
support organic to or habitually supporting the reserve force
until it is committed.
-
Provision of adequate support
to the force at the time of commitment.
-
Factors of METT-T.
-
Scheme of maneuver.
Once the reserve is committed,
all on-order missions are executed. Depending on the mission of
the committed reserve, normally more than the organic or habitually
supporting fire support is provided. Augmenting fires are provided
by--
-
Reinforcing artillery from
corps assets or other div arty units now assuming a reserve mission.
-
TACAIR.
-
Naval gunfire, when available.
-
Other agencies when used as
fire support means.
Units assigned to counter
level III rear security operations to threats or units that have
follow-and-support missions are not considered in reserve. They
require their own organic fire support or habitually supporting
DS FA battalion. However, if only one brigade of a division has
the rear area security mission, only that brigade needs its supporting
DS FA battalion. Meanwhile, the other artillery battalions can
be used to augment the fires of other committed units.
If the likelihood of commitment
for the reserve force is immediate, the organic or habitually
supporting artillery must be in position to support the force.
Therefore, only limited support to committed elements may be provided
by these units to ensure timely transition to their on-order missions.
Plan fires to support the
commitment of the reserve during movement. Fires are planned--
-
On the destroy flanks to protect
the force.
-
On the way to the objective.
-
On the objective to suppress,
neutralize, or destroy targets.
-
Beyond the objective to prevent
counterattacks, to help consolidate the objective, and to prevent
reinforcement of the objective area.
-
On enemy elements that have
been bypassed.
Plan mass fires at the breakthrough
point or at the point of assault to create a hole in the enemy
defenses. Plan heavy suppressive fires throughout the breakthrough
area. Fires are continuous until maneuver closes.
Fire support coordinating
measures such as CFLs must be well forward to ensure the force
will not outrun them.
Plan to rearm, refit, and
refuel organic and supporting fire support before assumption of
the on-order missions.
Reconnaissance and security
operations are characterized by smaller forces spread over large
areas. Generally, these forces are needed during a movement to
contact which consists of a covering force, an advance guard,
and rear and flank security forces.
Reconnaissance operations
are used to gather information through either route, zone, or
area reconnaissance. Fire support contributes to the reconnaissance
efforts by using aerial and ground observers, sensors, and radars
to gather combat information and intelligence.
Fire support tasks are as
follows:
-
Orient on the location or
movement of the reconnaissance objective.
-
Report all information quickly
and accurately.
-
Help the force retain freedom
of maneuver.
-
Provide deceptive fires.
Consider attaching FA assets
to the reconnaissance force.
FA units must have mobility
equal the supported force.
Main body FA units should
be positioned to support reconnaissance elements if possible.
Fire plans should be executed
only if surprise is lost. It is not normally the intent of the
reconnaissance elements to become engaged with an enemy force.
Plan UAV and TAR missions
to help gather combat information and to avoid physical contact
with the enemy.
These are self-contained forces,
operating at extended distances from the main body. A covering
force is expected to penetrate the enemy's security zone, locate
forces in the main defensive belt, and limit the ability of the
enemy's security forces to collect intelligence by stripping away
his reconnaissance assets.
Fire Support Tasks. Covering
force fire support tasks are:
-
Provide responsive fires to
covering force elements. To penetrate the enemy's security elements
without becoming engaged in a direct-fire maneuver battle, fire
support must be immediately responsive.
-
Provide deceptive fires. Deception
in covering force operations allows some freedom of maneuver in
one area while the enemy's security elements react in another.
This freedom of maneuver allows a penetration of security forces.
Fire support allocations to
the covering force must make up for the combat power imbalance.
For field artillery, this means extreme decentralization of assets.
The corps should consider attaching FA brigade units to the covering
force to provide enough FA of one DS battalion for each maneuver
battalion-or squadron-size element. If possible, a mixture of
calibers in the covering force (155 mm and 203 mm) helps to deceive
the enemy as to the composition of the force. The mix of calibers,
which may be achieved through cross-attachment, also maximizes
the advantages of both weapon systems:
-
155-mm weapons provide rapid
response time and a mix of munitions.
-
203-mm weapons provide a heavy
punch and greater nuclear and chemical capabilities.
Fire Support Planning and
Coordination. Plan
for hasty attack and/or hasty defense. The covering force may
encounter a formidable force with which it must become engaged.
If possible, the covering force will attack. If a hasty attack
is not possible, the covering force must prepare a hasty defense
and plan a deliberate attack or allow the main body to pass through
and attack.
Plan for a passage of lines
by main body forces (see Chapter 6).
Plan nuclear and chemical
fires to block enemy avenues of approach and to deny essential
terrain to the enemy.
Plan UAV, AFSO, reconnaissance
to help before physical contact.
Fire support coordinating
and Air Force locate the enemy measures should be permissive
and on-order but well in front of the rapidly moving covering
force. (CFLs should be established in conjunction with phase lines
[PLs].)
Positions for FA units are
best planned and coordinated by FSCOORDs and their FSOs. Displacement
will be frequent, and positions must be coordinated well in advance.
Fire plans should be simple
yet as detailed as possible. Modification of fire plans must be
expected throughout the covering force operation. Most fires will
be fires against targets of opportunity.
These are normally furnished
and controlled by the main body forces, while rear security forces
normally operate under corps control. The advance guard must maintain
contact with the covering force; and usually, it furnishes a liaison
element to the covering force headquarters. The advance guard
performs reconnaissance, conducts attacks, and delays or defends
as necessary to give the main body time to react. Security forces
(flank and rear) normally perform a screening mission because
of the extensive distances covered by a moving corps.
Fire Support Tasks. Fire
support tasks for guard and screening forces include the following:
-
Responsive fire support for
the security forces. The limited numbers of maneuver units over
a large area (especially for a screening force) require very responsive
fire support.
-
Fires to prevent decisive
engagement of security forces or to support decisive engagements
when unavoidable.
-
Suppressive, screening (smoke),
and illumination fires to allow freedom of movement.
-
Nuclear and chemical fires
to block enemy approaches and deny terrain.
Main body FA elements should
be positioned to support security forces whenever possible. This
may require nonstandard tactical missions for the main body FA.
For example, a main body FA battalion may be given a nonstandard
tactical mission of DS with second priority for calls for fire
to the security force headquarters.
Fire Support Planning and
Coordination. An FA
force attached to a security force must be as mobile as the supported
force. In a fast-moving corps movement to contact, over extended
distances, mobile FA units are necessary to keep up with the maneuver
force.
Positioning FA units is best
done through close coordination between maneuver and FA headquarters.
The FSCOORD (FSO) is in the best position at the maneuver CP to
locate, plan, and coordinate subsequent position areas. Displacements
are required often and must be coordinated well in advance.
Mixed calibers of FA weapons
usually are not possible in guard and screening missions. However,
main body FA can be made responsive to these security forces if
the FA is positioned forward and to the flanks of the main force.
Tactical air reconnaissance
and UAV missions may be used to help develop the situation. Other
aerial sensor information from corps may be linked directly or
indirectly to security elements.
If available, COLTS and/or
AFSOs designate targets for laser-guided munitions. Engagement
of command and control vehicles before the situation develops
allows the supported force to gain and retain the initiative.
Normally, corps offensive
operations focus on enemy units and support systems to the rear
of the main defensive belt. Division deep operations normally
focus on the main defensive belt second-echelon units and support.
Fire support for deep operations may include the fires of field
artillery, rockets, missiles, and air support; and lethal and
nonlethal command, control, and communications countermeasures
(C3CM).
Deep operations may include
the attack of the following general target types (not all-inclusive):
Follow-on echelons of the
enemy.
-
Independent tank regiments
anti/or battalions.
-
Attack helicopter units.
-
C2 and fire direction nodes
and facilities.
-
Air defense systems.
-
Nuclear delivery systems.
Adequate fire support attack
means and acquisition sensors must be identified and alerted for
a possible deep operations commitment. Field artillery ammunition
and fuel must be provided at the critical time and place. Army
aviation assets must be retained until the force commander decides
to employ his deep option. The factors that should be considered
when designating potential deep fire support assets are discussed
below.
Field artillery units may
require nonstandard tactical missions or modified command relationships.
This involves the establishment of ammunition expenditure restrictions
and positioning instructions for accompanying FA units aimed at
conserving fuel.
Fire support assets committed
to the close operation may be required to provide SEAD fires for
tactical air and Army aviation assets engaged in deep operations.
Specific fire support coordinating
measures must be implemented. Airspace coordination areas (ACAs)
must be established in conjunction with air corridors. Restrictive fire lines (RFLs)
may be used to delineate the fires of converging ground and air
forces.
AFSOs may be used to facilitate
fire support coordination and execution.
Usually, targeting for fires
and nonlethal attack means is focused on planned engagements.
A planned engagement entails some degree of prearrangement such
as general target location, weapon system designation and positioning,
and munition selection. Planned engagements may be scheduled for
a particular time or may be keyed to a friendly or enemy event.
Other planned engagements may be specified by target type and
may be on call based on the characteristics of the target; for
example, dwell time or high-payoff considerations. Unplanned engagements
may be conducted, but they must satisfy the same relevancy criteria
as those of the planned engagement.
The targeting effort is performed
by the plans cell. FM 6-20-10 details the members and duties of
this functional grouping (cell) for each echelon.
IPB, collection operations
and management, and intelligence production are the key functional
processes underlying IEW contributions to the deep fires decide-detect-
deliver methodology. The maneuver commander's most critical role
at every echelon in deep fires is in the decide phase.
The decisions made here guide those who plan and control subordinate
actions. They provide the frame of reference necessary for appropriate
focus and synchronization of the assets available to the commander.
Specific IEW contributions
to the decide phase include the following:
-
Situation development (ASPS
of the corps CP support element).
-
Target development (ASPS of
the corps CP support element).
-
Collection management (collection,
management, and dissemination [CM&D] section of the corps
CP support element).
Target Development. Target
development is based on the commander's target selection and attack
criteria. It includes the processing of all-source data to propose
targets for nomination and the reporting of target damage assessment
(TDA) (discussed in the deliver phase). Target development consists
of the following functional procedures:
-
Developing criteria.
-
Processing immediate targets.
-
Developing and nominating
targets.
-
Performing target damage assessment.
Collection Management.
On the the basis of
commander's intent, concept of operation, guidance on what targets
should be acquired and/or attacked, and target selection standards,
the G2 formulates his collection plan (where and when should targets
be found and who can find them?). The collection plan is a dynamic
tool used to coordinate and integrate the efforts of all collection
units and agencies. Collection management is cyclic. It begins
by processing information requirements (IR). These requirements
may take many forms and are generated by many sources; for example,
the commander's PIR and IR, targeting needs, tastings from higher
echelons, and requests for information from subordinate and adjacent
commands. In corps and division operations, most of these requirements
are based on information needs associated with named areas of
interest (NAIs) and target areas of interest (TAIs) developed
through IPB. Once requirements are analyzed, the element must
determine collection resource capability and availability. After
availability is determined, units and agencies are selected and
tasked to acquire and report information. During this process,
all units and agencies are considered for tasking against every
requirement. Capable assets are selected by a process of elimination.
Collector and ASPS reports are then monitored throughout the collection
process to ensure that intelligence and information are reported
to the right user in a timely manner.
Target development, aided
by the collection management process, is a cooperative effort
between the G2, G3, and FSCOORD. The G2 identifies specific target
sets associated with those critical Threat functions that could
interfere with the friendly course of action. The G2's analysis
of the ability of the corps or division to find relevant targets
must be coupled with the FSCOORD's analysis of his ability to
attack them. The FSCOORD determines availability of fire support
assets and ammunition status. The commander then makes the final
decision on relevant targets, attack means, and priorities for
both acquisition and attack.
NOTE: For
additional discussion, see FM 6-20-10. Additional coordination
is made with echelons above corps and the Army BCE, located at
the Air Force TACC. Thus, the necessary total AirLand Battle interface
is provided.
Sensors. IEW
sensors are cued to provide specific information on the high-payoff
targets selected for actual attack during the decide phase.
This usually is done while the sensors are conducting their routine
collection efforts. The sensors give the artillery system last-minute
target updates just before launch.
Tactical Missile System.
The tactical missile
system (TACMS) requires that valid information on target locations
be provided to the deep fires system no later than 30 minutes
before launch in a centralized mode and in near real time in a
decentralized mode. The information which must be provided by
the IEW sensors during this time consists of the four items discussed
below.
Target Description. Target
descriptions provide short summaries of what the target is; for
example, a battalion assembly area or a regimental CP.
Target Location. Target
locations are given in UTM grid coordinates of at least six digits.
Altitude is included if possible. Geographic coordinates to the
nearest minute may be required in some circumstances; for example,
for deep battle air support.
Target Location Error.
Each sensor type has
an associated target location error (TLE). Analysts must ensure
that the TLE associated with the target description meets the
guidelines established in the attack criteria.
Dwell Time. Dwell time,
or how long a target is expected to be at a designated location,
is required for critical targets. If a time cannot be determined,
the SOP established by the fire support system will be used to
execute a firing or jamming mission. Accurate dwell times preclude
reacting to old data that normally would cause wasted expenditure
of resources, including ammunition.
Confirmation. Because
execution time will be constrained, confirming detections can
be based upon single-source sensor data when at least three conditions
exist:
-
The single-source sensor must
be only confirming activity previously identified by all-source
detection.
-
The sensor must be capable
of reliable discrimination and locational accuracy.
-
The sensor must be capable
of quickly communicating processed data to the corps CP.
-
Guard Rail common sensor system.
-
Corps IEW UAV system.
-
Joint surveillance and target
attack radar system (J-STARS).
Fire Mission Processing.
Deep, operational fires
are delivered with different attack means, such as field artillery
tactical missiles. In terms of C3 these fire missions are executed
in either a centralized or decentralized manner or a combination
of the two. The postattack assessment is a critical aspect of
the deliver stage. It enables the fire support and IEW systems
to determine the effectiveness of friendly deep fires and nonlethal
attack means. This assessment determines the degree to which the
attack has succeeded, and it provides an input back into the targeting
system for future reference.
Quick Fire Channels. Most
deep targets are detected through the all-source analysis performed
in the ASPS. However, since execution time will be constrained,
confirmation of target trigger event detection can be based on
single-source sensor data if the enemy target behavior has been
previously derived from all-source analysis. Quick fire channels
may be established for this purpose and also to provide last-minute
target data directly to the firing unit.
Deception measures can contribute
to the success of deep operations and should be considered. These
measures can be used to deceive the location of enemy as to the
nature, time, or the deep operation, Fire support deception measures
may include the following:
-
Deception fires.
-
False transmission on fire
support nets.
-
Movement of artillery.
Rear operations are defined
as those actions, including area damage control, taken by all
units (combat, combat support [CS], CSS, and host nation), singly
or in a joint or combined effort, to secure the force, neutralize
or defeat enemy operations in the rear area, and ensure freedom
of action in deep and close operations.
For purposes of this discussion,
rear operations may be at all echelons down to division but not
including brigade rear areas, which actually are considered to
be part of the MBA. The rear area starts with the brigade rear
boundary and extends through the boundary to the corps rear line.
Corps rear operations are
the corps rear boundary those activities from forward to the rear
boundaries of committed maneuver units which are conducted to
ensure the corps freedom of maneuver and continuity of operations,
including continuity of sustainment and command and control. The
corps must synchronize the rear operations functions of terrain
management, security, sustainment, and movement with the corps
close and deep operations, in consonance with the corps commander's
concept and intent.
Soviet doctrine emphasizes
the integrated conduct of tactical operations in their enemy's
rear. The purpose of these operations is to seize and maintain
the initiative while degrading or eliminating their enemy's flexibility
and capability to sustain combat operations. To achieve these
aims, Threat activities in a corps rear area target key facilities
to include:
-
Nuclear weapon storage and
delivery systems.
-
Critical corps command, control,
and communications facilities.
-
Air defense sites.
-
Reserve assembly areas.
-
Critical support and logistic
facilities.
-
Level I threats are those
which can be defeated by base or base cluster self-defense measures.
-
Level II threats are those
which are beyond base or base cluster self-defense capabilities
but which can be defeated by response forces, normally military
police (MP) with supporting fires.
-
Level III threats are those
which necessitate the command decision to commit a corps combined
arms tactical combat force to defeat them.
In addition to the Soviet
capabilities outlined above, their doctrine integrates into their
deep operations planning tactical air force and attack helicopter
strikes; the delivery of long-range artillery, missiles, and rockets;
and radio electronic combat. Thus, the complexity of Soviet deep
operations capabilities and doctrine pose; rear operations.
Units are responsible for
their own defense against level I threats. Each base or base cluster
commander is responsible to detect defeat and minimize the effects
of level I threats and to limit the effects of a level II threat.
The best defense involves aggressive preparation of fighting positions,
use of camouflage, sound and aggressive guard and security procedures,
well-rehearsed reaction forces and evacuation plans, artillery
fires planned in defense of positions, and so forth. In all cases
the planning and reaction time will be minimal. It is possible
that defeat of a strong level II force may require use of a reaction
force and/or indirect fire. The key to success will be locating,
tracking, and fixing the enemy.
Rarely will there be enough
fire support assets available to satisfy the needs of deep operations,
the MBA and the rear area at the same time. The availability and
timely use of fire support in rear operations are critical to
the commander's overall battle plan. Rear operations are important
to sustain the MBA forces and to ensure freedom of action throughout
the theater. A successful rear operation may not directly affect
the outcome of close or deep operations. However, its failure
may destroy a commander's ability to conduct sustained combat
operations and ultimately achieve campaign goals. Indirect-fire
assets normally are not available, nor necessarily desirable,
for employment against a level I threat. Operations against a
level II or III threat require the timely application of fire
support to ensure the defeat of the rear threat.
With few exceptions, indirect-fire
assets should not be employed against a level I threat or against
those level II threat forces that can be defeated by base or base
cluster units or by the reaction force. These are usually individual
or small-unit operations, of limited scope and duration and provide
too fleeting a target for successful engagement. Enemy forces,
battalion or larger, which could comprise a level III threat have
the size, combat power, and identifiability which would require
the use of indirect-fire assets.
Rear operations are also a
command responsibility. The operations cell of the rear CP is
the tactical center that controls rear operations at each echelon.
Operations in the rear of brigade, division or corps areas will
have a profound effect on the conduct of close and deep operations.
Therefore, such operations must be anticipated and plans must
be devised to defeat the rear enemy. All plans, to include fire
support for rear operations, are passed through the tactical chain
of command to the rear CP.
The forces already on station
are responsible for fighting the rear enemy initially. The immediate
problem for the commander responsible for rear operations is how
to manipulate his limited resources, including fire support, at
the right time and place. Considerations that affect the application
of fire support for rear operations are as follows:
-
The reduction of fire support
to the main battle effort.
-
The suitability as determined
by the overall tactical situation.
-
The responsiveness of the
available weapon systems.
-
The precision and collateral
damage effects of the weapon systems.
-
The existence of communications
nets to facilitate fire support activities.
-
The availability of observers
to identify targets and adjust fires.
The FS cell is responsible
for continuous evaluation of fire support assets available for
rear operations. A prioritized list should be developed and coordinated
with the operations cell of the rear CP. As close and deep operations
change the status of these fire support assets, this list must
be updated. Only in this way can effective fire support be quickly
provided to counter a level III threat or a level II threat which
cannot be defeated by base or base cluster forces or by the designated
reaction force.
Two options are available
for the deployment of artillery to support rear operations.
The first option is that artillery
can be organized for combat to support the close operations (the
covering force and the main battles) with on-order missions given
to selected units for rear contingency plans. Artillery so organized
must be capable of firing throughout 6,400 mils. It may be able
to cover brigade rear areas from its forward positions. However,
to engage targets for division and corps rear areas, it must be
ready to displace rapidly to the rear. If attacks occur at the
same time in the main and rear areas - a likely contingency -
there will be conflicting priorities for fire support. There is
also a time factor problem with this plan in that artillery may
have to displace up to 50 kilometers (km) to engage targets in
the corps rear area. The time for this deployment may render its
support ineffective. Furthermore, it takes artillery already committed
to close operations away from the main battle for an unspecified
period of time. There are variations to this option Corps artillery
may be used to cover division and brigade rear areas but be positioned
to fire at maximum range into the MBA.
The second option is the allocation
of some artillery to the tactical combat force assigned to counter
level II and level III threats. There is some merit to this idea,
since one battalion split into battery fire bases could cover
a considerable area of the rear zone. The use of air assault artillery
in this role would facilitate coverage of the rear and speed response
times.
Generally, the farther away
from the FLOT the incursion occurs, the less likelihood there
is that the threat may be met by FA sources. In the rear areas
of the theater army, it is possibile that FA units either transiting
or reconstituting may be used to provide fire support. However,
the likelihood that they will be in range, complete with basic
load and fuel, and in communication with the operations cell fo the rear CP is remote.
Priority for MLRS is at present to deep operations.
Although its
range enables it to cover a large area of the rear, its ammunition type is unsuitable for close support and
is apt to create extensive collateral damage.
If a target is within range,
if an observer can engage the target, and if he has the communications
to contact the firing unit then FA remains the single most responsive
all-weather, day-and-night fire support system for rear operations.
Normally, mortars have insufficient
range to engage rear areas, unless they happen to be in the vicinity
of an attack. If reserve infantry battalions are in the vicinity,
they may be deployed as a tactical combat force to defeat the
threat; then their organic mortars would be of value. In the light
role, mortars could be inserted by helicopter to provide an immediate
asset until other systems can be deployed. They would require
a secure base from which to operate and a logistical backup if
they were to sustain fire support for a lengthy period of time.
Ammunition considerations
for both artillery and mortars should, if time is available, include
a request for ammunition for immediate consumption. The required
supply rate (RSR) also must be increased to handle rear area (unforecast)
consumption. The use of FASCAM should be severely limited. Under
most conditions, it even should be ruled out.
CAS provides a swift response
to a threat in any area. Immediate CAS can be requested through
TACPs at maneuver command posts and through the rear CP operations
cell. Aircraft can be directed to any part of the battlefield
within minutes and can deliver an extensive range of munitions
with precision accuracy. Terminal control presents, perhaps the
single largest problem for CAS. Most CAS aircraft must be guided
onto a target by voice and/or procedure control or by laser designation
Most CAS depends on weather and daylight Fratricide is a real
possibility and must be minimized in rear operations.
Gunships provide a suitable
rear area fire support system. The reduced threat from air-to-air
and ground-to-air antiaircraft weapon systems, together with its
day-and-night capability and high volume of firepower, makes this
aircraft ideally suited for rear area fire support. It does have
a VHF ground-link-to-observer capability but it can also loiter
over the target area, acquire its own gun targets, and control
its own engagement. Its weapon array of two 20-mm Vulcan cannons,
one 40mm cannon, and one 105-mm howitzer makes the system suitable
for engagement of all types of threat.
NGF may be suitable for rear
area fire support when deployed in general support of a division
or when given a nonstandard mission for rear area support. The
suitability of NGF depends on the antishipping threat, the hydrography
of the area and the ability of the ship to range suitable targets.
One important factor is the large range dispersion pattern, particularly
for the 16-inch gun, which must be considered in conjunction with
assessment of collateral damage.
Aviation brigades are units
of which some elements may be used to provide fire support. The
advantages of these units are their firepower, reaction time,
mobility, and ability to engage a target with precision and without
the use of ground observers, They are also responsive on Army
communications nets. Attack helicopters provide one of the most
readily available assets to engage rear area incursions. They
have the command and control structure, the mobility, and the
firepower to engage large Threat forces autonomously, rapidly,
and decisively. For attacks in the rear area, Army aviation in
conjunction with CAS is probably the most effective form of attack.
For EAC, it is probably the only means of attack that can neutralize
the enemy swiftly and completely.
If available, AFSOs in OH-58D
helicopters are a possible choice to support the rear area tactical
combat force. They can help find the enemy force and quickly bring
artillery fires on that force. AFSOs could be employed when the
aviation brigade is the rear area tactical combat force.
In certain areas, host nation
support (HNS) provides CAS, artillery, and mortars. For example,
there is a well-defined infrastructure in the German Territorial
Army. The Territorial Army is subdivided into three commands throughout
Germany; each command is subdivided into division-size units called
Wehrbereichskommando (WBK). Each WBK has a number of Home
Defense Brigades, organized along regular army brigade lines.
Each brigade has a battalion of field howitzers in close support.
Two of the four maneuver battalions are equipped with 120-mm mortars.
US Army units in the rear areas can expect to receive fire support
from heavy mortars, 105-mm and 155-mm howitzers, and German Air
Force CAS. The normal practice of exchanging liaison personnel
among allies working in combined operations greatly facilitates
such requests for support.
The primary fire support coordinating mea- sures (Appendix F) are restrictive measures-- restrictive fire areas and lines. They should be established by the operations cell of the rear CP. The procedures for establishing fire support coordinating measures in the rear area must become part of the overall planning process. Forces employed to deal with a level III force in the rear normally are given an area of operation. The establishment of a boundary within the rear and the possible addition of a force fire support officer require close coordination with the rear FSO. These measures should be reviewed routinely by higher headquarters; posted on rear CP operations maps; entered into TACFIRE; and given to the Air Force, reaction forces, and any TCF. Fire support coordinating measures that apply to rear area operations are discussed below.
Restrictive Fire Area.
A restrictive fire
area (RFA) could be established around a base or base cluster
or along a main supply route (MSR). No fires or effects of fires
are allowed inside the RFA unless requested by the base or base
cluster commander. This permits fires in support of the base without
the additional step of clearing those fires with the establishing
authority. Fires along MSRs also are permitted without closing
the MSR to our own resupply and troop movement. The restriction
on the RFA can be on certain types of munitions (for example,
no scatterable mines or no Air Force 500-pound or larger bombs
with delay fuzes). The establishing authority can allow the use
of these munitions if they are deemed necessary.
No-Fire Area. A
no-fire area (NFA) could be established around population centers
and critical facilities. This prevents any fire into these areas
unless authorized by the establishing authority or in cases of
immediate self-defense.
Restrictive Fire Line.
An RFL should be established
by the commander of combined forces. This should be done when
using a tactical combat force. If the tactical force is non-US,
the RFL must be established at the combined force headquarters
that controls both the US and the non-US forces.
At EAC, fire support coordinating
measures must be coordinated extensively with the host nation.
They may, in fact, be established by the host nation. This coordination
must ensure a common understanding of graphics and the exact meaning
of the measures used.
Overall fire planning responsibility
belongs to the rear operations commander. He is assisted by his
fire support staff members in the rear operations cell. It is
anticipated that most fires will be on targets of opportunity.
The supporting artillery must
be positioned to support rear operations. Positioning coordination
with the rear CP operations cell is necessary to avoid fratricide
of CS and CSS units and destruction of critical supplies when
field artillery and other fire support means receive Threat counterfire.
This action also facilitates the ability of the rear CP to coordinate
terrain management, movement control, and sustainment.
The FA battalion personnel
at all levels are possible target sources in the brigade area
because of the high density of troops in the zone. These personnel
include FS cells of maneuver units in reserve; gun battery reconnaissance,
survey, and occupation of position (RSOP) and survey parties;
and trains personnel. Distances at brigade level may be short
enough for redeployment in a timely manner. From division back
to theater army area command (TAACOM), the likelihood of observers
already in position with communications is remote. Some repositioning
would be necessary
Aerial fire support observers
and aeroscouts from the aviation brigade form a readily responsive,
mobile asset. AFSOs can adjust artillery fire, and the aeroscouts
have the necessary communications to provide emergency final CAS
control.
Normally, military police
are designated as the echelon reaction force. They are in place
in the rear areas and have intimate knowledge of local terrain.
They are trained in the adjustment of FA but not in the control
of CAS.
Army target acquisition assets
available for rear operations are limited. Most facilities are
oriented to the close and deep operations. However, depending
on the threat the commander may reallocate some resources to the
rear on an on-call basis. Some readily available assets can be
oriented quickly to assist acquisition in the rear. These include
the Mohawk-borne side-looking airborne radar (SLAR), side-looking
infrared (SLIR), Quick Look (noncommunication emitter detection),
and aerial photographic equipment. Also, the Guard Rail communications
detection system is available through Army channels. The Air Force
has a number of assets available. These include airborne warning
and control system (AWACS), SLAR, AC-130 Spectre (with forward-looking
infrared [FLIR] and low-light-level TV), photo imagery, and, ultimately,
J-STARS. Some of these may be tasked to provide accurate locations
for predicted fire support.
The principles of fire support
planning and coordination in the rear areas do not differ significantly
from those in the forward areas. There is, however, a difference
in the facilities available. MBA maneuver units are well-seined
by FSOs at all levels from company up to corps, are equipped with
quick fire channels to the gum, and are adequately staffed. Rear
CPs have only limited manpower and limited communications facilities.
Main operations will be fought and won in the forward areas; and
this operation should, naturally, receive the preponderance of
assets. The rear area is primarily a reinforcement and logistic
zone, whose main function is to facilitate the rapid and efficient
resupply of forward fighting units. It is not conceived as a combat
zone. Nevertheless, if a level III attack occurs, or if a level
II attack against high
priority units cannot be neutralized by
base, base cluster, or reaction forces, the rear area may temporarily
assume an importance greater than that of the close operations.
In this case, the maneuver C2 must be agile enough
to cope with the problem for time will preclude the shift of C2
from the main CP to the rear. Similarly, the fire support
planning and coordination channels should be able to complement
the operational flexibility and provide rapid application of fire
in the rear. This requires fire support personnel to advise the
rear operations commander; and it requires communications to plan
coordinate, and call for fire support.
The nature of command and
control in rear operations varies with the echelon of command.
The theater army rear presents problems which do not occur at
the brigade. In general, the closer to the FLOT, the easier the
problem of command and control.
The FSO, in conjunction with
the operations officer at the rear CP, is responsible for fire
support planning. They establish and disseminate the communications
procedures (net, call signs, and so forth) to be used by rear
area elements for planning and requesting fire support. Bases,
base clusters, and response forces normally request fire support
on the operations net or MCS (MSE, when available) to the rear
CP. Calls for fire normally are not initiated by base or base
clusters. They report situational information to the response
force commander and the rear CP, who determine indirect-fire requirements
and initiate the request. The response force, whose objective
is to eliminate the Threat without commitment of the TCF, integrates
all available fire support into its plans and operations. If no
fire support agency has been dedicated to rear operations, response
force requests for fire are sent to the FSO at the rear CP, The
request is coordinated at the operations cell and forwarded to
the main FS cell.
The most responsive approach
to continue the mission depends entirely on the agency providing
the fire support and the requesting unit. All indirect fires in
the rear area must be observed fires. The rear FSO should talk
directly to the agency providing fire support and the requesting
unit on the same net. An AFSO, if available, can be used for this
function. The FSO and/or AFSO provides the link between the fire
support agency and any untrained observer. Some assets, such as
attack helicopters and AC-130s, increase interaction because
of their ability to actually observe the target and thus avoid
nearby friendly elements. In fact, attack helicopters employed
in conjunction with an AFSO may be the most responsive and efficient
means of providing fire support to the rear area operations.
When the TCF is committed,
one net from the supporting artillery unit can be used as the
rear fire support net. The rear CP FSO and the DS artillery unit
commander plan fires and position firing units where they can
best support TCF operations. The rear CP FSO must carefully coordinate
fires with rear area elements to avoid fratricide.
The FSO located with the corps
operations cell of the rear CP conducts fire support planning
and coordination. He effects fire support planning and coordination
among the operations cell of the rear CP, the host nation, the
corps MP brigade, the nuclear weapons logistics element (NWLE),
the ASOC, the corps FS cell, the subordinate rear operations cells,
and any fire support asset identified to provide fire support
for the rear area. There is no digital interface from the corps
operations cell of the rear CP to the corps main FS cell. An option
to provide a digital interface is to position a corps artillery
liaison section at the rear FSE, if the situation permits.
Fire support planning and
coordination for corps rear operations are similar to those at
division. The FSO collates base, base cluster, RAOC, and response
force fire plans and coordinates the composite rear operations
fire support plan with the main FS cell and the TCF. Fire plans
and requests for fire are passed to the rear CP FSE over the rear
operations net or MSC (MSE, if available), except in cases when
one net from a dedicated fire support agency is available for
use as the rear fire support net.
Should the TCF with its supporting
artillery be committed to a level III threat operation, the rear
CP FSO will coordinate with the main FS cell for additional fire
support assets as needed to assist base, base cluster, RAOC, or
response forces in countering other level II or III threat incursions.
The TCF will retain priority of fires. The FSO will provide specific
guidance concerning control measures and who can call for fires
(normally limited to response forces).
Echelons above corps may include
TAACOMs as the next higher headquarters. Requests for fire support
to the TAACOM and/or TAACOM area support group (ASG) operations
cell are coordinated by the FS cell and planned by the plans officer.
The tasking of fire support assets is passed from ASG operations
cell to TAACOM reserves or corps assets. This tasking should include
information about the signal operating instructions (SOI) for
fire support assets to contact the ASG operations FS cells for
coordination. At corps and TAACOM there is a requirement for a
rear operations fire support net whose frequency is known to all
transmitting units. This net could be monitored by all units in
the area, and both requests for fire and fire orders could be
transmitted via the FS cell.
Exploitation is an offensive
operation that follows a successful attack to take advantage of
weakened or collapsed enemy defenses. Indicators for exploitation
are as follows:
-
The enemy is having difficulty
maintaining his position.
-
Attacking divisions are making
decisive gains.
-
Enemy resistance, particularly
supporting fire, is lessening.
-
Deep surveillance operations
detect a general enemy withdrawal.
Exploiting divisions should
have as much TACAIR as possible. These aircraft can--
-
Operate effectively when enemy
defenses are crumbling.
-
Quickly deliver massive amounts
of ordnance.
-
Operate across wide and deep
sectors.
-
Seek out, follow, and destroy
withdrawing enemy forces.
-
Present no rearming or refueling
burdens to the land force.
-
Block avenues of approach
for counter-attacking enemy forces.
Control of assets must be
decentralized because of the decreased requirement for massed
fires and the need for extremely responsive fire support. In organizing
corps artillery for combat, attachment to divisions and, in turn,
division artillery should be considered. This would ease command
and control problems.
In fire planning for the exploitation,
the following types of fires should be considered:
-
Fires not only in front of
the force but also to the flanks and rear.
-
Massed fires on enemy choke
points and key terrain to canalize, slow, and block the enemy
movement.
-
Suppressive fires to fix bypassed
enemy pockets of resistance until friendly maneuver elements are
safely past and follow-on forces can deal with them.
-
Fires that do not create obstacles
and barriers to our own forces and limit forward progress. Chemical
and nuclear fires, in particular, can hinder forward movement
if improperly placed.
Some available CAS should
be on ground alert.
Fire support coordination
should be completed early on. Use on-order measures to facilitate
rapid emplacement and movement of assets. Consider placing RFLs
between the direct-pressure force and the follow-and-support force.
Sustainment of the force is
primarily an exercise in the movement of assets. The ability of
the CSS structure to move forward with fuel, ammunition, and maintenance
support determines the limits of advance for the force and force
artillery.
Aerial resupply for units
in exploitation is a planning option for consideration to sustain
the operation.
When enemy resistance has
broken down entirely, an attack or exploitation may give way to
a pursuit. The objective of the pursuit is to maintain relentless
pressure on the enemy and completely destroy him. The pursuit
is characterized by broad decentralization of control and rapid
movement. Because a pursuit is rarely anticipated, forces normally
are not prepared for it. Also, lines of communication become increasingly
difficult to sustain. In conventional warfare, pursuits are rare,
mainly because a force is not able to sustain such an operation
to its completion.
A pursuit operation is basically
conducted by two attacking elements. One element provides continuous
direct pressure against the enemy across a broad front, while
another highly mobile enveloping element intercepts the enemy's
retreat and destroys him.
Field artillery organization
for combat must be extremely decentralized to increase responsiveness
of fires. Division and corps commanders should strongly consider
attaching FA units to the force conducting a pursuit.
Also, air support must be
extremely responsive to effectively slow the retreat of the enemy.
Ground or air alert may be necessary to provide the degree of
responsiveness required.
In planting fires for the
pursuit, the following should be considered:
-
Provide responsive fire support
to both the direct-pressure force and the encircling force.
-
Provide fires to slow the
enemy's retreat and to allow the enveloping force to catch up.
If FASCAM is used to slow the retreat, ensure safety zones for
the mine-field are disseminated.
-
Provide fires to stop reinforcements.
-
Use smoke to slow and disrupt
the retreat.
-
Use CAS and attack helicopters
against hard targets and dual-purpose improved conventional munitions
(DPICM) on soft-skinned targets.)
-
Use quick fire planning techniques
for hasty attacks.
-
Plan for continual displacement
of mortars and FA. Subsequent positions must be coordinated through
FS cells as early as possible.
-
Plan for greater use of retransmission
station (retrans) communications equipment.
NOTE: The AFSO can be equipped to provide voice or digital retrans for short periods. |
-
Provide fires to fix bypassed
forces until follow-on elements can engage. Consider free-fire
areas around bypassed pockets of resistance.
-
Ensure that fire support coordinating
measures are well forward to allow for the speed of the operation.
-
Plan RFL when necessary between
the converging, enveloping, and direct-pressure forces.
-
Plan for increased petroleum,
oil and lubricants (POL) and ammunition usage. Air transportation
of supplies may be required. Use captured enemy materiel and stocks
of supplies when possible.
-
Plan the use of AFSOs, UAVs,
tactical air reconnaissance, and surveillance aircraft. They are
necessary for timely and accurate information about enemy locations
and activities.
-
Engage command and control
elements with lethal and nonlethal means to disrupt the enemy's
attempts to consolidate and reorganize.
NEWSLETTER
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|