Appendix I
Techniques in Dislocated Civilian Operations
DC operations are a special category of PRC and the most basic collective task performed by CA personnel. The goals of DC operations are to minimize civilian interference with military operations and to protect civilians from combat operations. This appendix addresses techniques for meeting those goals.
INTRODUCTION |
|
I-1. People may become dislocated from their homes or villages for a variety of reasons in both war and MOOTW. The following are some examples:
I-2. Based on national policy directives and other political efforts, the theater commander provides directives on the care, control, and disposition of DCs. The operational force commander integrates the theater commander's guidance with the ground tactical plan. At division, COSCOM, and other subordinate command levels, the DC plan must-
I-3. DC plans support the OPLAN and require extensive coordination among operational, legal, logistics, interagency, HN, and IC planners. As a minimum, DC plans must address-
|
|
DC TEMPLATING |
|
I-4. There is no doctrinal template or rule of thumb for determining how many people of a certain area will leave their homes in response to actual or perceived threats and disasters. As illustrated above, every situation is different. Some people may be able to survive the situation in relative comfort and safety, while others may choose or be forced to leave their homes for relative comfort and safety elsewhere. I-5. In the absence of a doctrinal template, DC planners conduct comprehensive civil IPB, using all the factors of METT-TC and CASCOPE, to analyze the DC situation. They consider the civil centers of gravity, civil decisive points, and civil lines of operation in their analysis. I-6. DC planners use this analysis to create a series of civil SITTEMPs. The first of the civil SITTEMPs describes civil dispositions under normal conditions and circumstances. The remaining civil SITTEMPs describe the possible COAs a populace, or portions of a populace, may take given certain criteria or stimuli. Ideally, the SITTEMPS will indicate the anticipated speed, direction, and flow pattern of DC movement, which are described later in this appendix. I-7. DC templating is more of an art than a science. Planners will often need to call on knowledgeable representatives of various CA specialties to fully understand the civil environment. Appendix H contains some of the strategic, operational, and tactical considerations in planning DC operations. Examples of additional information requirements that may result from brainstorming are-
I-8. DC planning cannot occur in a vacuum. DC planners must make the DC templates available to other operational planners during problem-solving and decision-making processes. They must also coordinate with interagency, HN, and IC planners and participants as the situation and OPSEC requirements permit. |
|
DC MOVEMENT PLANNING FACTORS |
|
I-9. DC planners must consider several variables, or factors, when creating SITTEMPs for DC movements. These factors assume a controlled movement and apply to all DC movements regardless of type or size. Planners assume values for the variables, based on common sense, until verified by observation. For DCs moving through denied areas, planners should consider requesting unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) support to determine actual values. DC movement planning factors include the following:
EXAMPLE: Determine TDIS of a DC column moving on foot traveling 20 kilometers at a rate of 4 km/h. TDIS = 20 km/4km/h = 5 hours. NOTE: An EXTAL of 3 hours is added based on assessment of demographic (women, children, elderly) composition of the DC column and weather conditions. It is anticipated that the head of the DC column will arrive at completion point in approximately 8 hours.
NOTE: DC movement rate 4 km/h during day slows to 3.2 km/h at night. Cross-country DC movement rate 2.4 km/h during day slows to 1.6 km/h at night.
NOTE: Distance between DCs during day is 2 to 5 meters, 50 meters between columns. Distance between DCs during night is 1 to 3 meters, 25 meters between columns. |
|
DC MOVEMENT GRAPH | |
I-10. A DC movement graph (Figure I-1) is a time-space diagram that visually depicts a DC movement from start point to completion point. It is used during the DC movement planning phase to integrate, coordinate, prevent congestion along the route of march, and deconflict route usage with the military highway regulation and traffic circulation plan. It is also used to prepare or check the DC road movement table. It shows the relative time and location of the head and tail of each DC march column at any point along the route, arrival and clearance times of DC columns at critical points, and restrictions and congestion in the network. I-11. DC planners transfer information derived from march formulas or obtained from DC march tables directly to the graph. To complete the DC movement graph, planners must determine time-distance, arrival time, and pass time for each identified DC column based on data collected on organized DC columns. |
Figure I-1. DC Movement Graph
DC MOVEMENT TABLE | |
I-12. A DC movement table is a convenient way of transmitting time schedules and other essential details of a DC move. The accompanying example (Figure I-2) of a DC movement table is a general use blank form. The following notes assist in the use of this form:
|
Figure I-2. DC Movement Table Format
MITIGATING THE DC PROBLEM - DC CONTROL TECHNIQUES |
|
I-13. Once DC planners have identified the parameters of the expected DC situation, they must determine how to deal with the DC problem. Potential COAs include-
|
|
PREVENT OR MINIMIZE DISLOCATIONS |
|
I-14. This COA involves executing populace control measures, such as a stayput policy, curfew, and controlled evacuations. Each measure requires detailed assessment and planning, as well as coordination with and support of HN civil authorities and, at times, the IC. Public information and PSYOP assets will increase the chance of success. |
|
STAYPUT POLICY | |
I-15. A stayput policy is, essentially, an order to citizens to stay within the confines of their homes, communities, or other defined boundaries. Successful execution of a stayput policy requires that the citizens be provided with sufficient necessities of life (food, water, shelter, security, and health care) (according to accepted international standards; for example, the Sphere Project), during and after the period the policy is in effect. Mitigation measures conducted during predisaster emergency services programs (building individual and community survival shelters, stockpiling food and medicines, and conducting preparedness exercises) will enhance the willingness of citizens to abide by stayput policies. Emergency response activities, such as the airlift of disaster relief into the populated area, may also be required. I-16. The policy is designed to minimize civilian interference with military operations and, just as importantly, to minimize civil collateral damage. HN authorities should enforce a stayput policy whenever possible. When enforced by military forces, the policy requires an agreement among participating nations and the appropriate military command. This section provides guidance on what such agreements should or could contain. |
|
General | |
I-17. This agreement should state that in matters concerning population movement, military commanders will always deal through and with the appropriate national commanders or authority. I-18. "Stay put" means that civil authorities will do everything in their power to stop DCs (also known as internally displaced persons, or IDPs) in their own country-especially preventing them from passing from one country to another. Neighboring countries should cooperate closely to help in the implementation of this policy within common frontiers. If, for whatever reason, some movement does take place, the receiving country should do all in its power to hold DCs in appropriate areas and return them to the country from which they were displaced, as soon as circumstances permit. Any such movement might gravely prejudice national, multinational, or coalition operations and the possibility of civilian survival. I-19. In crisis and wartime, indigenous national authorities retain full responsibility for their populations, institutions, and resources unless otherwise arranged for by special agreement. I-20. Evacuations of populations in times of crisis short of war may become a necessity to ensure the population's survivability and no less to ensure freedom of military operations. I-21. During crisis or wartime, civilian populations may start to move of their own volition and thus become DCs. Unless such movements are fully controlled by proper authorities and agencies, they may lead to chaos. National authorities shall take all possible steps-
I-22. Should refugee movements occur, commanders must cooperate with and assist national authorities in preventing such movements from interfering with military operations. National law normally dictates whether and under what conditions commands can take control of DC movements, if that is necessary for the achievement of their operational mission and for the protection and safety of the population. If such control has been granted to commanders, it will be handed back to the proper national authorities as soon as possible. I-23. All actions taken with respect to DCs must be in consonance with the applicable provisions of the Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, and other rules of the International Law of War, especially The Hague Land Warfare Conventions. |
|
Details of the Agreement | |
I-24. Commanders and national authorities must consider the overall problem of population movements against the background of the circumstances likely to prevail at the time. Panic and fear among the civilian population caused by weapon effects-including WMD-may induce large numbers of civilians to flee their homes and take to the roads. Should this happen, DCs would use all means of transport available. Unless controlled, they may-
I-25. All commanders must be aware of-
I-26. In the event the military assumes direct control of the population, which is the last resort to ensure the safety of the population and the conduct of operations, the military commanders will inform higher HQ of the following:
|
|
CURFEWS | |
I-27. Curfews and other movement restrictions discourage unauthorized civilians from moving during certain time periods or into certain areas. These restrictions should be codified in a policy that is legal, practical, enforceable, and well publicized. Exceptions to the policy may be granted using a strict identification or pass system. In addition, restrictions should be enforced by a system of measures, including patrols, checkpoints, and roadblocks, or any combination thereof. |
|
CONTROLLED EVACUATIONS | |
I-28. Controlled evacuations are a way of minimizing the chaos that exists when civilians will not or should not stay where they are. Forced dislocations may be appropriate to protect civilians from combat operations, as well as impending natural disasters, such as hurricanes or volcanic eruption. They also may be appropriate to protect military operations, as in the removal of civilians from port areas or areas adjacent to main supply routes to promote the efficiency of logistics operations and minimize the possibility of sabotage. |
|
DC AVOIDANCE |
|
I-29. Some military operations may dictate that DCs can or must be ignored or bypassed to ensure military success. An example is rapid offensive operations in which maintaining momentum is required. Commanders should consider the use of PSYOP leaflets or loudspeakers to instruct or bolster the morale of bypassed DCs. I-30. The decision to bypass or ignore DCs depends on the factors of METT-TC and may require the approval of the chain of command. Bypassed or ignored DCs must eventually be controlled by some military or civilian organization in the AO. Since bypassed groups of DCs may include enemy infiltrators attempting to pass through friendly lines, the military or civilian organization must be prepared to take security and force protection measures when assuming this control. |
|
DC MOVEMENT CONTROL |
|
I-31. DC movement must often be controlled to minimize interference with planned or ongoing military operations. Planners may use several techniques to control the movement of DCs. These techniques require detailed assessment and planning, as well as coordination with and support of HN civil authorities and, at times, the IC. These techniques include blocking, clearing, and collecting (Table I-1). |
|
Table I-1. Measures to Control Civilians
Control Measure |
Effectiveness of Measure |
Special Requirements |
Personnel Resource Intensity |
Blocking |
Medium-High |
Conducive Terrain |
Low-Medium |
Clearing |
Low-Medium |
Dedicated Vehicle(s) |
Low-Medium |
Collecting |
Low-High |
Special Training |
High-Very High |
BLOCKING | |
I-32. Blocking uses roadblocks, which may be supported by checkpoints, to prevent DCs from flowing onto roads or into areas essential for the conduct of military operations. Blocking involves preventing DCs from entering those areas and redirecting them to some other area, such as back to their homes or along a designated DC route. Depending on the security situation and other factors, civilians and their means of transport may or may not be searched at the blocking position. I-33. The following questions must be considered when planning DC blocking operations:
|
|
CLEARING | |
I-34. Clearing directs DCs from main supply routes, alternate supply routes (ASRs), and other areas of military significance to keep them from interfering with operations. Clearing is conducted at the small unit level by ordinary soldiers or by small, specialized teams whose sole purpose is to confront DCs, remove them from their current location, and orient them toward the location to which the commander wants them to go. In some cases, this may simply be the shoulder of the road. I-35. Clearing is intended for fast-paced, unit-level operations. It is not an effective method for large-scale DC operations. It must be deliberately planned and integrated with other control techniques. Clearing is merely intended to push or direct DCs in specified directions, away from military operations, installations, or encampments, until they can be picked up by more organized DC operations, such as collecting. I-36. Some of the challenges of clearing operations include the following:
|
|
COLLECTING | |
I-37. Collecting provides positive control of concentrations of DCs at various holding areas to prevent them from interfering with operations and to foster care and processing. The collection plan is resource-intensive and must be coordinated and synchronized with operations, logistics, and security plans. Whenever possible, existing facilities, such as barns and warehouses, should be considered. I-38. Collecting must also be planned and executed in collaboration with HN authorities and NGOs that specialize in public health, public safety, public communications, transportation, public works and utilities, and mass care and feeding. Its main features are collection points, DC routes, assembly areas, and DC camps. |
|
Collection Points | |
I-39. These are temporary holding areas for gathering small numbers of DCs before moving onward along DC routes to assembly areas or DC camps. Units establishing DC collection points (commonly known as CIV on operational graphics) provide minimal emergency relief supplies that address only short-term (less than 1 day to 3 or 4 days) immediate needs (for example, water and trauma first aid). |
|
DC Routes | |
I-40. DC routes are routes that offer protection to DCs by moving them away from the main effort of military combat and logistics operations. |
|
Assembly Areas | |
I-41. Assembly areas are larger and more elaborate than collection points. They provide DCs with emergency relief, such as food, intermediate medical care, and temporary shelter. Designated personnel (military or civilians of the United States, HN, or IC) begin screening and registering DCs to identify family groups, determine points of origin and intended destinations, and other pertinent information. They also begin to segregate enemy prisoners of war (EPWs), hostile civilians, and deserters. Assembly areas are typically located in division rear areas and may host DCs for a week or longer. Authorities may decide to send DCs from assembly areas to camps, allow them to continue to their intended destination, or to return home. Assembly areas may evolve into DC camps, if required. |
|
DC Camps | |
I-42. DC camps are semipermanent, carefully planned facilities where administrators prepare DCs for the return to their homes, resettlement, repatriation, or other disposition. Host country authorities, NGOs, or international organizations normally administer DC camps. U.S. forces may temporarily administer them or assist when necessary. Designated personnel continue to detect hostile civilians who should be interned. Camp administrators also begin examining and monitoring the DC population for disease. DCs should receive identification cards, records, food, clothing, and medical care in the camp. Camps are generally located in the division or corps communications zone or theater rear area. Figure I-3, shows a typical DC collection plan. |
Figure I-3. Typical DC Collection Plan
I-43. Ideally, HN authorities handle mass DC operations by implementing planned and rehearsed evacuation plans. When a military force assumes responsibility for planning DC operations, DC planners should consider incorporating HN assets in the planning and implementation of DC plans. |
|
DC Route Planning | |
I-44. Considerations with respect to the movement of civilians are as follows:
I-45. When routing DC movements, CMO planners should consider three fundamentals and four principles that govern routing. The three fundamentals that govern routing are-
The four principles that govern routing are-
I-46. Effective routing of DCs requires a detailed understanding of the military highway regulation and traffic circulation plan. Route classification and traffic control measures currently in use by military movement control agencies are applicable during the planning and execution of DC operations. These measures include-
I-47. OPSEC considerations are important. Planned DC routes may be an indicator for the location of the main effort in the attack or defense. By attempting to minimize interference by DCs with military operations, planners may inadvertently disclose the location of the main effort. Because opposing forces seek to discover seams and boundaries to exploit them, DC planners should not consistently move DCs along seams or unit boundaries. The following example discusses DC road space usage calculations. |
|
EXAMPLE OF DC ROAD SPACE USAGE CALCULATIONS
|
COMBINED DC CONTROL METHODS |
|
I-48. An analysis of METT-TC may indicate that several of the DC control methods may be required simultaneously or sequentially. In a port city, for example, the people in a predominantly neutral area may be ordered to stay in their neighborhoods and conform to such restrictions as curfews. Meanwhile, civilians in a hostile section of the city may be quarantined (no one may enter or leave without permission and escort), and those in the areas closest to critical port facilities and adjoining the main inland supply routes may be selectively evacuated. |
|
TASK FORCE CONTROL |
|
I-49. One technique for controlling DCs in a tactical AO is to organize organic forces into a task force specifically tailored for this mission. Known generically as TF DC Control, this task force has four imperatives:
Table I-2, depicts a generic organization for TF DC control. |
|
Table I-2. Generic Organization for TF DC Control
Equipment |
GP Block/Collect Team |
GP Clear Team |
Vehicles | MP vehicle and infantry or combat engineer vehicle, supplemented by vehicles obtained through foreign nation support. | MP vehicle. |
Control Materials | Pepper spray (oleoresin capsicum - OC) with ultraviolet identification dye for marking individuals and heavy-duty foggers for mass dispersion. CS riot control agent (RCA) with means of mass dispersion, such as M203. Flash bangs, riot batons (and riot gear), and other crowd control equipment. Flex cuffs/cable ties. |
Pepper spray (oleoresin capsicum - OC) with ultraviolet identification dye for marking individuals and heavy-duty foggers for mass dispersion. CS riot control agent (RCA) with means of mass dispersion, such as M203. Flash bangs, riot batons (and riot gear), and other crowd control equipment. |
Care Materials | Water/cups for thirst and RCA flushing. ORT mixes/ingredients. Emergency medical kits. Humanitarian rations (emergency only). |
Water/cups for thirst and RCA flushing. ORT mixes/ingredients. |
Local Security | Lethal weapons (organic). Magic wand metal detector. Undercarriage inspection device. |
Lethal weapons (organic) |
Barrier Materials | Concertina/gloves. | |
Information | Loudspeaker with approved tape-recorded messages. | Loudspeaker with approved tape-recorded messages. |
I-50. Generic TF DC Control is a combined arms force revolving around general purpose (GP) teams of infantry with MP, PSYOP specialists, and CA specialists or CA-trained personnel. GP teams control civilians by the basic techniques of blocking, clearing, and collecting described earlier.
I-51. The basic action element for blocking and collecting is the same-a GP block/collect team of one infantry squad with organic armored vehicle (if mechanized), one MP team with organic vehicle, one tactical PSYOP team (TPT), and one tactical CA team or several CA-trained personnel. The basic action element for clearing is the GP clearing team, consisting of one MP team with organic vehicle and one TPT. TF DC Control may modify one or more GP teams based on the civil-military situation and/or its tasks, the terrain, and the assets available (for example, using an MP squad instead of an MP team as a basic building block of all GP teams and/or augmenting the teams with combat engineers). I-52. Generic TF DC Control also has five special purpose teams, each designed to accomplish particular missions requiring special training and/or equipment:
Table I-3, depicts the basic equipment the various teams should have to perform their tasks. |
|
Table I-3. Basic Equipment of GP Teams
Equipment |
GP Block/Collect Team |
GP Clear Team |
Vehicles | MP vehicle and infantry or combat engineer vehicle, supplemented by vehicles obtained through foreign nation support. | MP vehicle. |
Control Materials | Pepper spray (OC) with ultraviolet identification dye for marking individuals and heavy-duty foggers for mass dispersion. CS RCA with means of mass dispersion, such as M203. Flash bangs, riot batons (and riot gear), and other crowd control equipment. Flex cuffs/cable ties. |
Pepper spray (OC) with ultraviolet identification dye for marking individuals and heavy-duty foggers for mass dispersion. CS RCA with means of mass dispersion, such as M203. Flash bangs, riot batons (and riot gear), and other crowd control equipment. |
Care Materials | Water/cups for thirst and RCA flushing. ORT mixes/ingredients. Emergency medical kits. Humanitarian rations (emergency only). |
Water/cups for thirst and RCA flushing. ORT mixes/ingredients. |
Local Security | Lethal weapons (organic). Magic wand metal detector. Undercarriage inspection device. |
Lethal weapons (organic). |
Barrier Materials | Concertina/gloves. | |
Information | Loudspeaker with approved tape- recorded messages. | Loudspeaker with approved tape- recorded messages. |
PLANNING DC CONTROL MEASURES |
|
I-53. The senior commander in the AO provides guidance pertaining to the designation of DC control measures. Typically, this guidance provides for bottom-up or top-down planning. |
|
BOTTOM-UP PLANNING | |
I-54. In bottom-up planning, each subordinate unit commander selects routes for movement of DCs and tentative DC collection points within his designated unit boundaries. His staff sends this information up to the next level commander for consolidation into his DC plan. The senior commander's staff deconflicts duplication and sends the approved plan back to subordinate commanders for implementation. |
|
TOP-DOWN PLANNING | |
I-55. The senior commander may designate and assign specific routes and collection points to subordinate units for implementation based on METT-TC. This action does not preclude the subordinate commander from adding to the plan as he sees fit. The subordinate commander's staff forwards additional control measures to the senior commander to allow the senior commander's staff to refine his plan. I-56. Whatever the planning method, commanders responsible for implementing DC control measures ensure the measures are known to all participants and, as applicable, are fully resourced for their intended purpose. Commanders also ensure those soldiers and civilians who man DC collection points, areas, and camps are trained and rehearsed to perform their duties. Figure I-4, provides a sample DC plan format. |
Figure I-4. Sample DC Plan Format
Figure I-4. Sample DC Plan Format (Continued)
Figure I-4. Sample DC Plan Format (Continued)
DC COMMUNICATION |
|
I-57. Persuading people to comply with the terms of a DC plan is often a difficult endeavor. HN public information programs and PSYOP assets may assist by providing mass media broadcasts, loudspeakers with prerecorded messages, signs (with culturally correct graphics), and leaflets. I-58. The following messages, prerecorded in the dominant language of the AO, are useful for controlling civilians in tactical situations:
I-59. These words should also be printed in English and the predominant language of the AO on 3x5 cards which can be used to "point and talk" by number. A well-prepared DC control site will have the same words in the same order on a large sign. I-60. There are 10 words or phrases that every soldier should be able to say in the dominant language of the AO. "Put down your weapon" and other phrases are also important, but "hands up" is a simpler way to express surrender, control, and related concepts. The ten words or phrases are-
|
|
TECHNIQUES FOR DC COLLECTION POINTS |
|
I-61. A technique for designating hasty sites to control noncombatants and other groups is the quadrant method. By this method, each quadrant of a crossroads may be designated for a likely group or purpose, as depicted in Figure I-5. In this example, West is designated as a hasty collection point (CIV); Northeast is designated as a hasty EPW or detainee (DET) site; Southeast is designated as a hasty casualty collection point (CCP); and Southwest as a multipurpose quadrant for maintenance, supplies, and other purposes. |
Figure I-5. Designation of Hasty Control Sites by Quadrant
I-62. Each control point is located 50 to 100 meters from the roads to keep the groups sufficiently separated. This distance improves the safety and security of each group, minimizes manpower requirements, and reduces potential for terrorism by keeping people a reasonable distance from passing troops. Prior training and rudimentary supplies, including water cans or water bottles and large quantities of chemical lights, facilitate the day and night operation of a hasty DC collection point. I-63. Upon activation of a hasty DC collection point, designated personnel transform the site into a deliberate DC collection point. There are five key tasks that must be accomplished at a deliberate DC collection point. These tasks are illustrated in Figure I-6, and explained in detail in the following paragraphs. |
Figure I-6. DC Collection Point Layout Model
LOCAL SECURITY | |
I-64. The collection point should be located so that DCs will not suffer any greater exposure to the effects of combat than would exist for them away from the collection point. Local security should be established to protect the occupants, persons operating the collection point, and friendly troops adjacent to or passing by the collection point. Guards should be posted at the entrance and exit of the collection point and given special orders, as required. |
|
PHYSICAL SECURITY WITHIN THE COLLECTION POINT, TO INCLUDE VEHICLE SEARCH AND DC SEARCH | |
I-65. This task requires setting up special purpose areas within the collection point and following certain procedures. CA personnel-
I-66. Many vehicles will contain household goods, suitcases, and other items. These vehicles should be searched for bombs and other dangerous items if the vehicle holding area is within 50 meters of the people holding area. Searching for contraband is not standard procedure, but it may be mandatory under the OPORD or if given special orders. Searchers inform the driver that once the vehicle is searched, it will be secured and placed off limits so that no DC will be allowed to retrieve any of the items in the vehicle. Searchers communicate as described above. Searchers treat livestock as vehicles, and treat pets as livestock if this does not create more problems than it avoids. A searcher then escorts the driver to the DC search area. Designated personnel-
|
|
DC PROCESSING AND PROPERTY CONTROL | |
I-67. This part of operating a deliberate DC collection point may be deferred for a while, but full waiver is not advisable as a general practice. DC processing consists of two stages. All persons go through stage one. Stage two may be deferred or delayed, reserved for certain people, or not take place at all. |
|
Stage One Processing | |
I-68. This is the quick screen to identify EPWs and others (civilian internees and detainees) that must be segregated immediately from everyone else. This processing may be done without a translator. Searchers should beware of irregulars and infiltrators trying to pass as civilians. Upon discovery, all EPWs, civilian internees, and detainees are placed in the short-term detainee holding area. Normally, anyone who is causing a problem at the collection point is detained. Although civilian internees and detainees should be further segregated from EPWs, rarely is the time or resources available to do this. I-69. Consistent with orders, searchers take control of all items that may cause harm to the team, friendly forces passing the collection point, or the DCs. In addition, searchers confiscate and tag all items that noncombatants are not permitted to have according to U.S. or HN policy. I-70. If available, a Field Property Control Card is affixed to the vehicle or animal. The Field Property Control Card contains, at a minimum, the following information: the DC collection point number, the date, the seized item quantity, the seized item description, and a signature block for the collection point officer in charge (OIC) or NCOIC. A copy is given to the driver. |
|
Stage Two Processing | |
I-71. This stage is intended to help more finely categorize DCs (for example, determining if anyone is a U.S. citizen), to reunite families within the collection point, to identify persons of influence, and to obtain information (from equipment, weapons, papers, and discussions) that may have intelligence value. This processing is done when the time and resources are available-it is not a high priority. A translator is almost always required. |
|
LIMITED SERVICES (FOOD, WATER, SHELTER, AND SANITATION) | |
I-72. Services at a DC collection point may range from immediate care (attention to life-threatening conditions) to ancillary care (including food), depending on need and resources. However, only water and immediate medical care, to the extent they are emergency services provided consistent with the legal and moral obligations of the commander, are mandatory. Services are not provided to a DC until after he has undergone the quick-screen stage of processing, except for emergency care needed to prevent loss of life (death imminent). CA personnel should-
I-73. The following historical example discusses sanitation and is taken from notes of a CA soldier who served in Operation DESERT STORM. |
|
Lesson Learned During Operation DESERT STORM
|
RESOLUTION OR DISPOSITION OF EACH DC | |
I-74. Once a DC collection point is operational, there are four possible outcomes for the collection point operators:
|
|
DC COLLECTION POINT HANDOFF | |
I-75. As a unit moves out of an area, it must be prepared to hand off (transition) any active DC collection point to follow-on forces. Ideally, these forces will include trained CA operators; however, they may not. In either case, the outgoing unit must be prepared to fully brief the follow-on forces on the operation of the collection point. |
|
Briefing | |
I-76. The DC collection point OIC/NCOIC should personally brief the OIC/NCOIC of follow-on forces. He should note the date-time group of the handoff; the name, rank, and position of the person to whom the handoff was made; and a summary of the information provided. The transition briefing should cover-
|
|
Controlled Property | |
I-77. Units have several disposition options for controlled property. Depending on the property category, units may retain control of it, return it to the persons from which it was taken, do a combination of all three, or hand it over to other forces or agencies (such as local law enforcement or follow-on forces taking control of the DC collection point). Unit commanders act according to their moral and legal obligations, weighing the advantages and disadvantages of each option. I-78. Transferring Control. To transfer control of this property, units must fill out a property control register listing all the items controlled and have an official of the follow-on forces sign for the items and a copy of the register itself by using DA Form 3161, Request for Issue or Turn-In. I-79. Retaining Control. If units take the property with them (it must be taken if no one will sign for it and return is not an option), they should give the owner an official receipt (such as DA Form 3161), explain the unit's intention for the property, and explain the owner's rights and procedure requirements for compensation. This reiteration of rights is intended to reassure the owners and may be needed to ensure a smooth handoff. |
|
EVACUATION PLANNING | |
I-80. Evacuation creates serious problems and should only be considered as a last resort. U.S. doctrine states that only a division or higher commander can order an evacuation. When the decision is made to evacuate a community, CA planners must make detailed plans to prevent uncontrolled groups from disrupting the movement of military units and supplies. Considerations in mass evacuation planning include-
|
|
DC CAMP CONSIDERATIONS |
|
I-81. Successful camp operations depend upon many considerations that CA personnel must take into account. These considerations are discussed in the following paragraphs. |
|
FACILITIES | |
I-82. When large groups of civilians must be quartered for a temporary period (less than 6 months) or on a semipermanent basis (more than 6 months), CA units establish camps. HN personnel usually direct the administration and operation of a camp. CA units provide technical advice, support, and assistance, depending on the requirements. They may also furnish additional detachments and functional teams or specialists to resolve public health, public welfare, or public safety problems at any particular camp. Minimum considerations include-
|
|
CAMP CONTROL | |
I-83. Control of the people is the key to successful camp operations. To meet U.S. obligations under international law, CA personnel ensure the efficient and effective administration of camps. Camp control also includes measures to reduce waste and to avoid duplication of effort. CA personnel must quickly and fairly establish and maintain discipline when administering DC camps. They must publish and enforce rules of conduct for the camp as necessary. Camp administrators serve as the single point of contact, coordinating all camp matters within the camp and with outside organizations or agencies. Camp rules should be brief and kept to a minimum. |
|
DC CAMP LOCATION AND CONSTRUCTION | |
I-84. The most manageable number of people in a camp is 5,000. This number helps enforce control measures. It also lets CA personnel efficiently administer the camp and its population. The location of the camp is extremely important. Engineer support and military construction materials are necessary when camps are in areas where local facilities are unavailable-for example, hotels, schools, halls, theaters, vacant warehouses, unused factories, or workers' camps. CA personnel must avoid those sites near vital communication centers, large military installations, or other potential military targets. The location of the camp also depends on the availability of food, water, power, and waste disposal. Additional considerations include the susceptibility of the area to natural or man-made disasters (for example, flooding, pollution, and fire) and the use of camp personnel as a source of local labor support. I-85. The physical layout of the camp is important. The main principle is to subdivide the camp into sections or separate compounds to ease administration and camp tension. Each section can serve as an administrative subunit for transacting camp business. The major sections normally include camp HQ, hospital, mess, and sleeping areas. The sleeping areas must be further subdivided into separate areas for unaccompanied children, unattached females, families, and unattached males. CA personnel must also consider cultural and religious practices and make every effort to keep families together. I-86. CA personnel must also consider the type of construction. Specific types of construction necessary to satisfy the needs of the particular DC operation vary according to the-
I-87. Whenever possible, the DCs themselves or local agencies or government employees should construct the camp. Local sources provide materials whenever possible IAW legal limitations. The supporting command's logistics and transportation assets are used to acquire and transport required resources to build or modify existing facilities for DC operations. The supporting command also furnishes medical, dining, and other supporting assets to establish DC camps. |
|
ADMINISTRATION OF DC CAMPS | |
I-88. Because of the large numbers of DCs for whom control and care must be provided, using HN civilians as cadre for the camp administration is preferred. DCs should become involved in the administration of the camp. Past military experience in DC operations shows that about 6 percent of the total number of DCs should be employed on a full-time basis. If possible, CA personnel organize and train the cadre before the camp opens. Whenever possible, civilians should come from public and private welfare organizations and be under military supervision. Other concerns are problems that might stem from the state of mind of the DCs. The difficulties they have experienced may affect their acceptance of authority. They may have little initiative or may be uncooperative because of an uncertain future. They may be angry because of their losses, or they may resort to looting and general lawlessness because of their destitution. The camp administrator can minimize difficulties through careful administration and by-
|
|
SCREENING | |
I-89. Screening is necessary to prevent infiltration of camps by insurgents, enemy agents, or escaping members of the hostile armed forces. Although intelligence or other types of units may screen DCs at first, friendly and reliable local civilians under the supervision of CA personnel can perform this function. They must carefully apply administrative controls to prevent infiltration and preclude alienation of people who are sympathetic to U.S. objectives. The insertion or the development of reliable informants is important in all but the most temporary camps. Intelligence collection by CA personnel is under the staff supervision of the G-2. The screening process also identifies skilled technicians and professional specialists to help in camp administration-for example, policemen, schoolteachers, doctors, dentists, nurses, lawyers, mechanics, carpenters, and cooks. |
|
MEDICAL CARE AND SANITATION | |
I-90. The need for medical care and sanitation intensifies in camp environments because of the temporary nature of the facilities and the lack of sanitation by the people. Enforcement and education measures are necessary to ensure that the camp population complies with basic sanitation measures. |
|
SUPPLY | |
I-91. The camp supply officer or CA civilian supply specialist must coordinate in advance for food, water, clothing, fuel, portable shelter, and medical supplies. CA supply personnel must make sure U.S. medical personnel inspect all food and water, particularly civilian and captured stocks. USAID and security assistance officers (SAOs) can be helpful in U.S. efforts to provide aid to the country. International organizations and NGOs may also be useful. Support from U.S. military stocks should only be considered as a last resort, however, and CA supply personnel should not rely upon that support. |
|
SECURITY | |
I-92. The camp security officer, supervised by the public safety team, provides camp security and enforces law, order, and discipline. Sources for security officers include local police forces, HN paramilitary or military forces, and U.S. military forces. Another potential source may be the camp population itself. Police personnel within the population could supplement security teams or constitute a special camp police force, if necessary. Internal and external patrols are necessary; however, security for a DC facility should not give the impression that the facility is a prison. |
|
TRANSPORTATION | |
I-93. The efficient administration of a DC camp requires adequate transportation assets. The camp movement officer or CA transportation specialist determines the types and numbers of vehicles required and makes provisions to have them on hand. He uses civilian or captured enemy vehicles whenever possible. |
|
INFORMATION DISSEMINATION | |
I-94. In the administration of any type of camp, dissemination of instructions and information to the camp population is vital. Communications may be in the form of notices on bulletin boards, posters, public address systems, loudspeakers, camp meetings and assemblies, or a camp radio station. An example of barracks rules is shown in Figure I-7. CA civil information teams and area PSYOP units may be able to help. |
Figure I-7. Example of Barracks Rules
LIAISON | |
I-95. Liaison involves coordination with all interested agencies. USG and military authorities, allied liaison officers, and representatives of local governments and international agencies may help in relief and assistance operations. |
|
DISPOSITION | |
I-96. The final step in DC operations involves the ultimate disposition of the DCs, although this consideration must occur early in the planning phase. The most desired disposition is to return them to their homes. Allowing DCs to return to their homes as quickly as tactical considerations permit lessens the burden for support on the military and the civilian economy. It also lessens the danger of diseases common among people in confined areas. When DCs return to their homes, they can help restore their towns and can better contribute to their own support. If DCs cannot return to their homes, they may resettle elsewhere in their country or in a country that accepts them. Guidance on the disposition of DCs must come from higher authority, under coordination with U.S. forces, national authorities, and international agencies. |
|
ORAL REHYDRATION THERAPY | |
I-97. Death from dehydration (extreme loss of fluids), especially of infants, the elderly, and the sick or injured, is a constant threat in war and MOOTW. People tend to experience extreme loss of fluids from diarrhea, bleeding, and hot weather. CA soldiers must be aware of this threat and be prepared to respond to it effectively, especially when operating a DC collection point. I-98. Soldiers operating a DC collection point must be especially aware of-
I-99. People suffering from dehydration require more than just water. Soldiers should consider the following information when providing oral rehydration:
|
NEWSLETTER
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|