Arab Gulf States Urged to Increase Pipelines After Iran's Oil Threats
Phillip Walter Wellman | Dubai January 27, 2012
As Iranian threats to close the Strait of Hormuz intensify, some energy experts are calling on Arab Gulf states to find alternative ways to export their petroleum. Experts differ, however, on whether proposed pipelines are economically feasible or whether Iran will follow through with its threats.
Nearly 40 percent of seaborne traded oil passes through the Strait of Hormuz, which connects the Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean and is bordered by Iran and Oman. Iran is threatening to block the route. Any closure of the strategic waterway would likely send oil prices soaring and have a significant impact on the global economy.
Already one Gulf oil producer is opening an alternative route.
Earlier this month, the United Arab Emirates announced that a new pipeline able to pump 1.5 million barrels of oil per day from fields in Abu Dhabi to its Indian Ocean coast should be operating by June. The Emirates currently produces about 2.5 million barrels per day.
"The pipeline that the UAE is doing is something related to the UAE only," said Kuwaiti oil expert Mousa Marafi. "But this is needed for Kuwaiti exports, for Saudi exports and for Qatari exports."
Marafi added that other Gulf producers should embark on similar projects.
UAE's Habshan-Fujairah pipeline
Iran is vowing to “definitely” close the Strait if further sanctions on its controversial nuclear program prevent it from selling its crude abroad.
Western nations have been imposing tighter sanctions against Iran, hoping the moves will force the country to abandon its nuclear work. The West believes Iran’s nuclear program is aimed at building weapons, but Tehran insists it is solely for peaceful purposes.
The European Union agreed to an oil embargo against Iran starting from July. It followed similar sanctions agreed to by the United States.
According to Marafi, the continued threats by Tehran highlight the vulnerability of the Gulf oil producers.
"It’s a warning that you need this pipeline. And we should really do this very soon. This is important for the world altogether," he said.
Other analysts, however, warn Iran would likely suffer most if the Strait is disrupted.
Iranians are heavily dependent on the shipping channel for trade. Reeling from the current sanctions, Iran is experiencing rapid inflation and currency devaluation.
"The reality is that this neighborhood has lived with a variety of unstable and uncertain circumstances over the history of the last 50 years of the oil industry and never for one moment was the Strait of Hormuz closed," said Sean Evers, managing partner at Gulf Intelligence, who believes Iran is likely to renege on its promise to close the Strait.
Oil analyst Simon Wardell says not enough pipelines could be feasibly built to compensate for the shutdown of the Strait.
"With something in the region of 16 to 17 million barrels a day going through, that’s an awful lot of pipeline capacity you would have to move. So I think whatever happens you’re always going to have substantial volumes of oil flowing through that particular area," he said.
Wardell says the U.S. and other nations would not allow the Strait to be blocked for long. Western allies have announced they would take swift action against any move by Iran to halt oil flow.
"It is going to be in most counties’ interest - China, America, Europe - everyone’s interest really, to make sure the Strait is open so chances are the Strait will remain open," Wardell said.
For the time being, some 17 million barrels of oil flow daily through the Strait as U.S. warships patrol the area to make sure of safe passage.
|Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list|