SHAPE
News Summary & Analysis
09
July 2004
AFGHANISTAN
- Parliamentary
elections likely to be delayed again
- Britain
funding campaign to combat drug trade
|
AFGHANISTAN
- According
to the New York Times, Afghan and foreign officials
said in Kabul Thursday parliamentary elections, a central
part of the American-led effort to establish a stable democracy
in Afghanistan, are nearly certain to be delayed once again,
probably until next spring. President Karzai was expected
to make a decision on a further delay this weekend. The
newspaper reports that the Afghan commission charged with
scheduling the elections voted for the postponement Thursday,
after two days of consultations with the cabinet. It adds
that the presidential elections, far easier to organize
than the balloting to elect a Parliament, are still expected
to go ahead on or around Oct. 12. The officials in
Kabul reportedly pointed to three basic reasons for the latest
postponement, the first being the fear that regional warlords
would dominate the process and, by winning key posts, distort
the democratic process for years to come. The second was the
deteriorating security situation. The third concern was the
overwhelming logistical and technical hurdles facing the election
organizers. UN and Afghan election officials recommended to
the cabinet Tuesday that parliamentary balloting should be
delayed by two to six months, taking into mind the Moslem
month of fasting, which starts in October, and the onset of
the Afghan winter, which makes many parts of the country inaccessible,
the daily adds. It quotes one official saying the election
commission had recommended a six-month delay.
- Britain
is funding a £100 million campaign to combat the explosion
in the drugs trade in Afghanistan, which is fueling
violence and anarchy, reports The Independent. Pressure
from the British government has also led to changes in the
rules of engagement for international peacekeeping forces,
allowing them greater scope to seize heroin consignments and
destroy poppy fields, the newspaper claims, adding:
“It is believed that British troops earmarked
for Iraq will be deployed in Afghanistan for elections scheduled
for September. NATO allies are also being pressed
to send additional troops.”
A
commentary in Duesseldorf’s Handelsblatt, July 8, urged
Europe’s “big four” to send more forces to
Afghanistan.
Madrid has decided to send about 900 additional soldiers to
Afghanistan. In an almost exemplary manner, the Spanish government
is heeding NATO’s call to considerably strengthen the
efforts to stabilize the Central Asian nation. But unfortunately,
Spain is largely alone: in all, the Alliance has only achieved
a 1,500-man reinforcement for Afghanistan, the article said.
Claiming that, in particular, the four major EU nations are
not fulfilling their responsibility, it added: The British Army
appears to be overtaxed with its missions in Afghanistan and
in Iraq. France is sending a joint brigade together with the
Germans. But the engagement in Afghanistan by no means corresponds
with the French capabilities. Italy, too, is not playing a major
role. As far as Germany is concerned, the government is proudly
pointing out that with 1,900 soldiers, Germany has the largest
national contingent in ISAF. But the Bundeswehr could do significantly
more. “In order to save the coalition a new test of strength,
the government absolutely does not want to provoke another Bundestag
decision. Therefore …, the largest EU nation will not
be able to send more than those 2,250 soldiers, who are stipulated
as the upper limit in the current mandate,” the newspaper
stressed.
Kabul
Times, July 4, praised the consensus on ISAF’s expansion
expressed by NATO heads of state and government at the Istanbul
summit.
The newspaper commented: “The NATO leaders’ preparedness
to increase ISAF is a welcome move and a big step toward realization
of the Alliance’s commitment for peace and stability in
Afghanistan. NATO’s preparedness to form more PRTs in
some provinces is another bold step toward boosting peace and
security in those regions. The support given by NATO to the
Karzai administration and the trust shown in his leadership
is a … matter of pride for the Afghan nation in general.
NATO’s physical presence in the provinces will prevent
the further subversive activities by terrorist elements and
will prepare the ground for carrying out our reconstruction
activities throughout the country. It will also develop the
trust and confidence of some international NGOs who have ceased
their operations in the remote parts of the country largely
due to security concerns.”
|