SHAPE
News Summary & Analysis
31
March 2004
AFGHANISTAN
- Donor
nations meet in Berlin to seek to help on stabilizing
Afghanistan
NATO-ACCESSION
- Bulgarian
CHOD on country’s participation in NATO Air Defense
System
- Russian
admiral: Baltic states’ NATO accession “militarily
insignificant”
NATO-MIDDLE
EAST
- Washington
seeks NATO-Mideast cooperation
OTHER NEWS
- Defense
Minister Struck outlines ambitious military procurement
plans
|
AFGHANISTAN
- AP reports
a donors’ conference aimed at smoothing Afghanistan’s
transition to post-Taliban democracy opened Wednesday with
appeals for the world to make boosting security in the nation
a priority. According to the dispatch, UN
Secretary General Annan told the gathering that “security
remains one of the most important contributions—if not
the most important—that the international community
can make.” Earlier AFP reported that Mark
Malloch Brown, the administrator of the UN Development Program
(UNDP), urged NATO Tuesday to fulfill as soon as possible
a pledge to expand peacekeeping forces into Afghanistan’s
provinces so elections can be held there later this year.
“Security has been so much a part of the difficulty
of pulling off these elections. Sufficient deployment to ensure
law and order across the country is critical,” he reportedly
said in an interview.
“NATO
hailed (its takeover of ISAF) as a historic moment. It was the
Alliance’s first test in operating ‘out of area’
from its traditional European base. It undertook to help President
Karzai’s government extend its power outside Kabul and
assist with preparing the elections planned for this summer.
But despite public pledges to provide ISAF with urgently needed
capabilities such as helicopters and communications, member
states have failed to deliver,” writes the Financial Times.
The newspaper, which quotes one unnamed senior NATO military
officer noting that “rhetoric has been loud but delivery
has been poor,” claims that since December, promises made
by Belgium, the Netherlands and Turkey to provide helicopters
were either delayed or not met amid concern over costs. The
newspaper quotes Gen. Jones saying, however: “We keep
asking the Alliance countries to deliver what they have promised.
We are not setting unrealistic expectations. Everything we ask
for is needed.” Diplomats now admit it will be difficult
for NATO to create and command five new PRTs, the article adds.
But it notes, “Gen. Jones says he still hopes NATO will
be running five by June in the north and north-east of the country.”
NATO-ACCESSION
- Sofia’s
BTA, March 30 quoted Chief of the Bulgarian General
Staff Gen. Kolev announcing that as of 1400
hrs. GMT on March 29, the Bulgarian armed forces are assuming
their allied obligations through the Air Defense System.
According to the dispatch, Gen. Kolev said he had
signed a document delegating powers to SACEUR for direction
and assignment of missions to a portion of Bulgaria’s
Air Defense personnel.
- Baltic
Fleet Commander Adm. Valuyev said Tuesday the Baltic states’
accession to NATO was more of a political and demonstrative
nature and did not have any serious military significance,”
reported Moscow’s Itar-TASS, March 30. According to
the admiral, the dispatch added, “four Belgian
F-16 aircraft, which are part of the NATO stand-by forces
and which will patrol the Baltic skies, do not pose any threat
to the military grouping in Russia’s most westernmost
region.” However, the fact that “airborne,
naval and land subunits may be deployed on a permanent basis,
as the next step, evokes anxiety.” In a related report,
Interfax, March 30, quoted Adm. Valuyev saying: “Such
rapid location in Lithuania of an air force patrol unit, which
is absolutely unfounded from the military viewpoint, has not
come as a surprise to (Russia). However, the patrolling of
the Baltic states’ borders by air, first by Belgian
and next by Norwegian and British pilots, forces the Russian
Federation to reinforce various combat duty forces.”
The report suggested that the fleet’s air service and
air defenses, which have been monitoring NATO reconnaissance
flights off the coast of the Kaliningrad region, would be
the first to be reinforced.
NATO-MIDDLE EAST
- According
to AFP, a senior U.S. official said in Washington
Tuesday the United States is looking to extend to Middle Eastern
countries the same kind of cooperation established between
NATO and the former Soviet bloc nations under the PFP program.
The idea is one of several U.S. projects for democratic and
social reform in the Arab-Moslem world, Robert Bradke, the
State Department’s deputy assistant secretary of state
for Europe, reportedly said. Tools used in PFP could be used
to show “what we can do on areas like counterterrorism
and enhancing interoperability,” he suggested. According
to the dispatch, he said such a move would help Middle Eastern
countries reinforce their ties with NATO with a view to peacekeeping
operations or joint military exercises, or to obtain NATO
support for defense reform and planning. Washington also wanted
to boost the Mediterranean Dialogue “and try to invigorate
that,” he stressed.
A
commentary in French daily Le Monde, March 28, urged Europe
to take the “Greater Middle East Initiative” seriously.
The Greater Middle East Initiative is not a ruse devised to
divert attention away from the difficulties being encountered
in the democratic reconstruction of Iraq, which remains one
of the cornerstones of the projects, the article said, adding:
“Its inspiration is older, and it is not exclusive to
the neoconservatives of the Bush administration. Even Bill Clinton
made speeches about the need to democratize the Middle East,
tough he was more moderate and less commanding than his successor
at the White House. Democrats and Republicans readily agree
that the greatest mistake in U.S. foreign policy following the
first Gulf war was to accept the restoration of the status quo
in the region, in the name of stability and the Alliances with
the autocratic Arab regimes. They regard this as one of the
main causes of terrorism, together with … the inability
to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. But are these two
things not connected? Both parties, with differences regarding
means of implementation, regard the transformation of the Middle
East as a major objective for the coming years…. The next
U.S. president will have the Iraqi problem to deal with, and
will indeed be obliged to pay attention to the future of the
region. The most enthusiastic, including Democrats, believe
that the “Greater Middle East Initiative” is an
ambition that can strengthen transatlantic ties again. So it
would be wrong for Europe to regard it as a pie in the sky.”
OTHER NEWS
- Deutsche
Welle reported that in Berlin Tuesday, Defense Minister
Struck stressed Germany would honor its commitment to purchase
180 Eurofighter aircraft, ending speculation it might renege
on its order due to budgetary constraints. The program
said that under the catchphrase “Bundeswehr
in Transformation,” Struck is currently engineering
the biggest overhaul of the German armed forces in their 55
years history. “Struck aims to radically change
the face of the monolithic Cold War standing army in an effort
to get in shape for Germany’s new security challenges
such as anti-terror operations, conflict prevention and nation
building,” the program added, further quoting Struck
saying: “The Bundeswehr is on the right path to reach
three essential goals: First of all, we will create modern
structures in the military. Secondly, we will make contributions
to the overall transformation of NATO and the European defense
effort, and thirdly, we will provide planning security for
Germany’s arms industry and for all of our Bundeswehr
staff.”
|