SHAPE
News Summary & Analysis
18
March 2004
BALKANS
- NATO
sending reinforcements to Kosovo after ethnic bloodshed
AFGHANISTAN
- Karzai:
Afghan elections face delay
TERRORISM
- EU
rushes to bring in security measures
- FBI
mulls NATO-style intelligence alliance with Europe
|
BALKANS
Media
center on the outbreak of ethnic violence in Kosovo, describing
the clashes as the worst since the 1999 war. Focus is on the
announcement that NATO is sending reinforcements to the province.
Media echo the message of NATO officials that the Alliance can
cope with the situation.
- Quoting
officials in Brussels, AP reports NATO decided to
send reinforcements to Kosovo Thursday following the outbreak
that has killed 22 people. The dispatch quotes a
spokesman at NATO headquarters stressing that “NATO
believes that KFOR has sufficient troops and capabilities
in theater to help restore stability” and that the extra
troops were being sent in “as a demonstration of our
commitment and our capability.” The spokesman
is further quoted saying: “KFOR is active and has been
active from the beginning in helping to try to restore order.
It is absolutely essential that we avoid a situation where
this becomes a bigger problem.” A related AFP dispatch
quotes a NATO spokeswoman stressing that “we
can cope with the situation” and saying the
decision on reinforcement was taken by the commander on the
ground. AFP further reports that the NAC, meeting
in special session, expressed confidence that the extra troops
added to 17,000-strong KFOR peacekeeping force could cope
with the crisis. In a statement, adds the dispatch,
NATO noted that “the allies expressed their
full confidence in KFOR’s ability to help restore order
in Kosovo.” AFP quotes COMKFOR, Lt. Gen. Kammerhoff,
saying in a statement he had given his troops the green light
to use force to quash the inter-ethnic violence. “I
have given to the commanders the authority to use proportional
force necessary to ensure the safety of our soldiers, to protect
the innocent people of Kosovo and re-establish freedom of
movement of all of Kosovo,” Gen. Kammerhoff reportedly
said. The dispatch adds that in Brussels, officials played
down the sense of crisis. “It’s perfectly normal.
It’s a routine thing. We don’t go anywhere without
having the plans in our pockets,” the dispatch quotes
a NATO spokeswoman saying. “NATO officials insist that
the Alliance and the UN are committed to quelling tensions
in Kosovo,” reported BBC News. The dispatch carried
NATO spokesman Jamie Shea saying: “I don’t believe
there is a possibility of a war. We will do what is necessary
to restore and uphold law and order.” The network’s
defense correspondent suggested however, that the
latest violence shows it will not be possible to reduce the
number of peacekeepers in Kosovo in the immediate future.
Among
other developments:
- AFP
reports KFOR Thursday closed the international airport
in Pristina to outbound flights.
- AFP
quotes a Defense Ministry spokesman saying Britain
is rushing 750 extra troops to Kosovo and adding
that the infantry troops should, in principle, be
on the ground in Kosovo within four days.
- According
to AFP, Russia Thursday called for the UN Security
Council to discuss in an emergency session the latest wave
of violence in Kosovo. “Russia supports the
initiative by Serbia and Montenegro to convene an emergency
session of the UN Security Council to discuss Kosovo,”
a Foreign Ministry spokesman reportedly said. He stressed
that Russia, one of five permanent members of the Security
Council, was “ready to actively participate in the search
for a solution to the Kosovo problem.”
AFGHANISTAN
- According
to the Washington Post, President Karzai said in Kabul
Wednesday long-sought direct elections in Afghanistan could
be delayed until August. The newspaper adds that
in a joint conference with visiting Secretary of State Powell,
Karzai said difficulties in registering millions of eligible
voters in rural areas had made a delay increasingly likely.
TERRORISM
- Brussels
is to rush forward a number of anti-terrorist measures this
week, including a “solidarity clause” obliging
EU member states to pool their military and policy resources
in the face of attacks, reports the Daily Telegraph.
EU ambassadors will thrash out the action plan at an emergency
meeting today, discussing ideas of a security “tsar”
and new powers for the EU’s intelligence arm, the newspaper
adds.
- AFP
reports FBI Director Robert Mueller told members of
a House of Representatives’ committee Wednesday the
FBI is considering creating an international unit, patterned
after NATO, to enhance the sharing of terrorism intelligence
between the United States and its European partners.
“We have had, upon occasion, agents from other countries
full-time in the FBI building, but there are issues related
to security and clearances … that a NATO-like joint
intelligence center might solve,” Mueller reportedly
said and added: “The NATO concept, where there is a
classification procedure and a background procedure, where
you already have established that level of security …
may be the mechanism for sharing intelligence information
that is meaningful.”
“On
terror, we are all on the same side,” says a commentary
in the Financial Times, calling on the U.S. and Europe to agree
on their common enemy.
Noting that the fight against the growing threat symbolized
by Osama bin Laden and the globalized network of his followers
is perceived very differently on both sides of the Atlantic,
the article says: To most Europeans, Iraq and the toppling of
Saddam Hussein were irrelevant to and likely to prejudice the
struggle against Al Qaeda. Very few buy the Bush administration’s
insistence on grouping all manner of unresolved problems in
the Arab and Islamic world under the heading of the “war
against terrorism.” The recent events in Spain should
provide the opportunity for these differences to be properly
examined. The strength and will to combat Al Qaeda is there.
It just needs to be regrouped. “Bin Laden and his ilk
must be crushed. It will be a difficult struggle, and no country
can assume it will be spared. It must, however, be prosecuted
with a much greater consensus on who the enemy is, and how he
can be denied political sustenance.
|