SHAPE
News Summary & Analysis
18
February 2004
AFGHANISTAN
-
EU urges tougher action on drugs, more security for
Afghan elections
- U.S.
general maps new tactic to pursue Taliban and Al Qaeda
NATO
- Baltic
states insist on air defenses from NATO
|
AFGHANISTAN
- AP reports
EU External Relations Commissioner Chris Patten urged
NATO Wednesday to provide more security in Afghanistan’s
provinces before June elections and called for tough action
against the country’s booming drug trade. “Fewer
than a million (voters) have been registered and we need to
register 10 to 11 million, so of course security matters,”
Patten reportedly told a news conference in Kabul, adding:
“I very much hope that will be taken into account
by NATO planners and the rest of the international community.”
According to the dispatch, Patten also expressed
concern about Afghanistan’s booming drug trade and said
NATO forces should support Afghan security forces
and army in cracking down on traffickers. He added
that the wisdom of massive EU financial support for rebuilding
Afghanistan—including alternative crops for opium poppy
farmers and in law enforcement—would be called into
question if it failed to address the drug issue. A related
Reuters dispatch quotes Patten saying: “I think
ISAF are doing a terrific job. It would obviously help if
they were able to establish more (PRTs), but that is a question
for NATO.”
- According
to the New York Times, at a news conference Tuesday,
Lt. Gen. Barno, commander of U.S.-led forces in Afghanistan,
said the military had adopted new tactics to combat Taliban
and Al Qaeda militants in Afghanistan. In the past
three months, he said, U.S. units down to the level
of 40-soldier platoons had been dispatched to live in villages
where they can forge ties with tribal elders and glean better
information about the location and activities of guerrillas.
He reportedly stressed that the new strategy also
seeks to complement a renewed effort by the United States,
NATO and other allies to expand the number of PRTs which will
fan out beyond Kabul and assist local authorities with security
and rebuilding. He added that by the end of this week, 12
of those PRTs would be operating. The daily recalls that Britain,
Italy, Turkey and Norway agreed earlier this month to lead
four additional NATO teams by this summer. It quotes
Gen. Barno saying the allies, in concert with the
Karzai government, are forming regional development zones,
essentially areas that encompass more than one of the provincial
teams.
NATO
- The
Baltic states are insisting NATO provide them with air cover
that is considered an automatic part of the collective defense
umbrella for all members, reports the Financial Times.
The request has become a matter of principle for Latvia, Estonia
and Lithuania, the article notes, quoting a senior NATO official
saying: “This is about timing, resources and doctrines.”
The newspaper notes the Baltic states have no air defenses
to deal with threats such as hijackings. It adds that to make
up this shortfall, several months ago they asked NATO
to provide them with cover as part of its collective defense
system. “They are simply asking for the same
rights other member states have. They have not yet received
an answer,” the newspaper quotes an East European diplomat
saying. The newspaper asserts that the request has
opened up a sensitive issue for the Alliance, which is being
stretched by its mission in Afghanistan. An official
from a NATO member state is quoted saying: “We have
to ask if collective defense in the traditional sense is really
necessary now. The old threats of the Cold War are over so
these countries are not really threatened in the conventional
sense. With the new threats of terrorism, such as hijacking
of civilian aircraft, maybe we have to look at other options
such as they jointly developing their own defenses.”
The newspaper quotes another diplomat noting, however, that
other countries, particularly Turkey, say that if NATO fails
to provide the Baltics with a security umbrella, it would
“signal the slow crumbling of NATO’s ability to
provide collective defense.” Diplomats are also quoted
saying the issue has wider implications for NATO and
its relations with Russia. The article stresses that
NATO officials insisted Monday that if the Alliance
agreed to send aircraft to the Baltic states, “it would
not be an offensive” action.
|