SHAPE News Morning Update
26
January 2004
MIDDLE
EAST
- Can
the U.S. and the EU unite to push Middle East democracy?
- U.S.
presses case for NATO in Middle East, France is wary
IRAQ
- U.S.
considers Iraqi elections
- France
denies report it is sending troops to Iraq
AFGHANISTAN
- Afghanistan
resolves to fight drugs
|
MIDDLE EAST
- Can
the U.S. and Europe heal their bitter rift over Iraq by joining
forces to push for democracy and security in the greater Middle
East? That issue was one of the signature themes
of this year’s gathering at the World Economic Forum
in Davos. U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney challenged the Europeans,
in a conciliatory speech that stressed Washington’s
commitment to multilateral cooperation and respect for the
European Union, to join in pressing for democratic reform
from Iran to Mauritania. The Bush administration believes
a deficit in political and economic freedom in the Muslim
world is a key factor fuelling terrorism that poses the greatest
security threat to the West. Officials say it plans
to make President Bush’s “greater Middle East
initiative” a centrepiece of transatlantic diplomacy
this year. NATO Secretary-General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer
said the Western military alliance planned to build up cooperation
with Israel and Arab Mediterranean partners to help fight
terrorism. Arab and Muslim leaders in Davos voiced
deep suspicion of attempts to impose democracy from outside.
(Reuters 251159 GMT Jan 04)
- The
United States pressed its case on Friday for NATO to play
a greater role in bringing security and stability to the greater
Middle East, but France warned against using the alliance
as a nation-builder. “The future of NATO...is
no longer to focus our military efforts here on Europe because
we won that battle,” U.S. ambassador to the security
alliance Nicholas Burns said. “If our major
mutual security concern is this nexus between terrorism and
weapons of mass destruction we need to go where the source
of that problem is, to places like Afghanistan and Iraq,”
he told a conference in Brussels. He was echoed by Senator
Hagel, a member of the Senate foreign relations and intelligence
committees, who urged NATO to bolster Turkey as a
“bridge” to the Arab and Islamic world and to
plan for the day when its peacekeepers might “monitor
the birth of a Palestinian state.” He backed
plans to beef up the alliance’s decade-old security
partnership with Israel and Arab states around the Mediterranean
to include joint military training and exercises. (Reuters
231740 GMT Jan 04)
IRAQ
- The
Bush administration is considering whether to abandon or change
its plan to set up an independent Iraqi government through
regional caucuses, The Washington Post reported in
its Sunday edition. Citing anonymous sources, it said that
the U.S. government could set up partial elections or leave
an expanded version of the appointed Iraqi Governing Council
in place when it hands over power by June 30. U.S. officials
told United Nations representatives last week that everything
is on the table except the June 30 deadline, the newspaper
reported. The UN is reviving the idea of a national meeting
equivalent to Afghanistan’s loya jirga assembly. (Reuters
250541 GMT Jan 04)
- The
German weekly Der Spiegel reported on Saturday that France
was preparing to send troops to Iraq, prompting
a swift denial by Paris. The magazine quoted NATO
sources as saying France was considering sending a brigade,
or up to 3,000 troops. A French Foreign Ministry spokesman
dismissed the report, saying: “We deny this completely.”
The magazine also reported that NATO was considering moving
its rapid reaction force headquarters from Moenchengladbach
in Germany to Iraq as part of a deployment there, which could
force Germany to commit troops to Iraq. It said NATO
defence ministers would discuss the plans during a security
conference in Munich on February 6 to 8. (Reuters 241303 GMT
Jan 04)
AFGHANISTAN
- Under
U.S. pressure, Afghan officials are promising a crackdown
on the country’s booming drug trade, including high-profile
arrests, raids on drug laboratories and destruction of thousands
of acres of illicit crops. “The coalition came
into Afghanistan with a fairly narrow anti-terrorism mandate,”
said Adam Bouloukos, of the UN Office on Drugs and Crime in
Kabul. “I think there is now a better understanding
from all sides that it is very hard to separate terrorist
activities from the narcotics business here.”
U.S. commanders say American troops won’t be directly
involved in drug eradication. But a military spokesman said
Saturday that U.S. officials were “in consultation”
with the Afghan government. (AP 260056 Jan 04)
|