|
SHAPE
News Summary & Analysis
4
December 2003
SACEUR
- Armenian
defense minister, Gen. Jones discuss results of cooperation
NRF
- U.S.
senator: France wants to head NRF and other NATO command
ISAF
- NATO
fills gaps for Afghan force
- Warlords
hand over tanks to Afghan army
NATO
- NATO
urged to increase Iraq role
- Lord
Robertson bemoans lack of NATO funding
UNITED STATES-TROOP
BASING
- Daily
views benefit of possible U.S. troop deployment in Bulgaria
ESDP
- Bush,
Blair to talk today on EU defense
|
SACEUR
- Defense
Minister Sarkisyan met Gen. Jones Wednesday in the first visit
ever by an Armenian defense minister to the headquarters of
Allied Command Operation,
wrote Yerevan’s Mediamax, Dec. 3. The dispatch reported
that the minister and Gen. Jones looked into the results
of cooperation between NATO and Armenia within the framework
of the PFP program in 2003. They also discussed all issues
related to the participation of an Armenian unit in the Kosovo
peacekeeping mission. During his visit, added the
report, Sarkisyan was briefed on the current operations carried
out by NATO in the Balkans and Afghanistan. He also visited
the coordination center of the PFP program.
NRF
- Reuters
reports Sen. Biden, ranking Democrat on the Senate
Foreign Relations Committee, told reporters in Brussels Wednesday
that France has asked to take over two NATO commands in a
signal of willingness to work more closely with Washington
on international security. According to the dispatch,
he said President Chirac had raised the issue during
a lengthy meeting with him on Wednesday and he would pass
on his thoughts to President Bush. Biden reportedly said France
wanted to head the NRF. He did not say what the other command
was. “I for one hope there is no trouble about
the two brigadiers-general the French are requesting. This
is a time to be grown-up, show a little sophistication,”
he stressed.
ISAF
- According
to AFP, at the start of a NATO foreign ministers’
meeting in Brussels Thursday, NATO Secretary General Robertson
announced that NATO had succeeded in filling key gaps in equipment
needed for ISAF. “I am delighted to announce
this morning that we have now filled the critical parts of
what ISAF needs in Kabul. I am extremely grateful to those
many countries round this table who helped us to do so,”
he reportedly said. Earlier Reuters quoted a diplomat saying
Turkey had offered three helicopters for ISAF, filling
a gap that had begun to undermine the credibility of plans
to expand the mission beyond Kabul. “We have
solved the helicopter problem. Turkey is providing
three Black Hawks,” the diplomat said. He reportedly
added that the Black Hawks would be added to the CH53s—which
Berlin had agreed to leave in Kabul beyond their scheduled
departure date—and four choppers that the Netherlands
offered provisionally earlier this week. “It’s
not the 11 we were looking for but the numbers were always
predicated on capacity and with the German helicopters we
have the lift capacity we need,” the diplomat was quoted
saying.
- The
Guardian reports Afghanistan’s most powerful
warlord has handed over tanks and weapons to the new Afghan
army under a deal brokered with the help of British peacekeepers.
Under the deal, the warlords agreed that a battalion from
the new army would guard the surrendered weapons until the
Ministry of Defense decided what to do with them. Eventually,
the Ministry hopes to disarm 100,000 members of Afghan militias
as it creates the new army and police force, thee newspaper
says.
NATO
- Electronic
media report that at a meeting with his European counterparts
at NATO Thursday, Secretary of State Powell called on NATO
members to take on a greater role in post-war Iraq, saying
stability in the country was critical. “We
urge the Alliance to examine how it might do more to support
peace and stability in Iraq,” BBC News quoted Powell
saying. The network carried a correspondent observing that
Powell’s appeal was the first time that the
United States had pressed the Alliance for help in Iraq.
Warsaw’s Gazeta Wyborca, Dec. 3, asserted that the
idea floated by U.S. officials to eventually put the Polish-led
international division in Iraq under NATO command “appeals
to Poland very much.” The daily said: “The
United States is not putting pressure on the allies It wants
to give them until the NATO summit in Istanbul in June 2004
to think the matter over. What the Americans are talking about
is a natural evolution of the situation…. Such an evolution
would undoubtedly be in Poland’s interests because the
country always wanted to stay in Iraq for as short a period
as possible.”
- NATO
Secretary General Robertson is scathing about the refusal
of some NATO member states, particularly Britain, “to
put their money where their mouth is” and increase funding
to the organization. He accuses some NATO members of being
“pathetically mean,” writes the Financial
Times. The article quotes Lord Robertson saying: “It
is not the U.S. who does not want to pay more…. The
U.S. is now fully behind NATO. NATO is probably one of the
few international organizations of which the U.S. is a member
that the U.S. wants to pay more money to.” He reportedly
added that Washington had been prevented from raising
the Alliance’s budget by “some governments.”
The article notes that NATO’s civilian budget is 171
million Euros a year—the price of three Eurofighter
aircraft—for the running costs of an organization with
1,100 civilian staff, of whom 300 are core civil servants.
In addition, the organization has a military staff of 3,000--seconded
to NATO and paid by the member states—and 4,000 members
of the 19 delegations, rising to 26 after next year’s
enlargement. “This is a very big campus. But the NATO
countries are pathetically mean. In fact, there has
been no effective increase in the budget for 20 years,”
Lord Robertson is further quoted saying.
UNITED STATES-TROOP
BASING
- Sofia’s
Dnevnik, Dec. 3, viewed reports that the U.S. administration
was to start serious consultations with its traditional allies
and new partners on the global redeployment of U.S. military
forces around the world. The article said: “It
has often been heard that Poland, Romania and Bulgaria are
the most likely hosts of some of these units…. According
to Gen. Jones, the new plans for the forces in Eastern Europe
will envisage a network of small bases that are deployed for
a short period if the need arises…. This is good news
for Bulgaria in the context of the struggle against terrorism,
rather than because of some expectations about economic profits….
In the vernacular of military strategists, Gen. Jones’
message means that adequate forces will be deployed in our
country, which is viewed as a border with the region that
breeds and propagates terrorism. These forces will not be
large, but will be extremely flexible and equipped with modern
arms. They will not be ‘anchored’ in one country,
but will be trained for a broad range of missions. The communication
between the Bulgarian officers and soldiers of these forces,
and their training with the help of up-to-date technologies
will give an impetus not only to our army reform, but will
also enhance our national security.”
ESDP
- Reuters
quotes a NATO diplomat saying President Bush and Prime
Minister Blair are due to talk by phone Thursday on the EU’s
defense arrangements.
|