|
SHAPE News Morning Update
15
October 2003
IRAQ
- Turkish
PM stands firm on troops after blast
- U.S.
rejects timetable proposal for Iraq
- Most
in Baghdad want U.S. to stay
ESDP
- Subtle
shift by Britain on defense in the EU
BALKANS
- Symbolic
talks on Kosovo come to an angry close
|
IRAQ
- Turkey’s
prime minister on Tuesday shrugged off suggestions that a
suicide car bomb attack on its embassy in Baghdad was linked
to its proposed despatch of peacekeeping troops to Iraq. In
an interview with the Financial Times, Recep Tayyip Erdogan
also rejected criticism of Turkey’s troop deployment,
which has been opposed by members of Iraq’s Governing
Council and by Muslim countries in the region. “We don’t
think this is a terrorist action against the authorisation
granted by parliament,” he told reporters after an unscheduled
meeting with General Hilmi Ozkok, chief of general staff of
the armed forces. “This shows once again that
we need to establish a common fight against international
terrorism,” he added. (The Financial Times
October 14 2003 22:14)
- The
United States rejected a proposal by France, Russia and Germany
Tuesday to add a timetable for the transfer of power to Iraqis
to its new resolution and give Secretary-General Kofi Annan
a role in its preparation. The absence of a timetable
diminished the likelihood that the resolution will be adopted
with broad support from the 15-member Security Council. A
vote could come early as Wednesday afternoon. (The Guardian
October 15 2003 04:16)
- More
than two-thirds of Baghdad residents would like to see U.S.
troops stay in Iraq for an extended period, according to a
poll conducted by the Gallup Organization. Seventy-one
percent of Baghdad residents believe U.S. troops should not
leave within the next few months, according to the Gallup
Poll released yesterday in Washington. Twenty-six percent
feel the troops should leave that soon. Almost six in 10 —
58 percent — say U.S. troops in Baghdad have behaved
fairly well or very well, with one in 10 saying very well.
Twenty percent say the troops have behaved fairly badly and
9 percent say very badly. The biggest surprise may have been
public reaction to the questioners, who visited Iraqis in
their homes. Richard Burkholder, director of international
polling for Gallup, said the response rate was close to 97
percent, with some people following questioners around the
streets begging for a chance to give their opinions. A
sizable minority feel there are circumstances in which attacks
against U.S. troops could be justified. Almost one in five
— 19 percent — say attacks could be justified,
and an additional 17 percent say they could be in some situations.
The poll of 1,178 adults was taken between Aug. 28 and Sept.
4 and had a margin of error of plus or minus three percentage
points. (The Washington Times October 15 2003)
ESDP
- A
potential trans-Atlantic breach has opened in the aftermath
of the Iraq war that seems to leave Britain wavering between
its exclusive, pro-American commitment to NATO and involvement
in a European Union defense initiative pushed by France and
Germany. British officials hold that there is nothing
ominous about this for the trans-Atlantic relationship since
Britain regards NATO as having clear primacy except where
it is specifically transferred to wholly European auspices.
A recent African operation run out of French national headquarters
is an example. For Bernard Jenkin, the shadow secretary of
state for defense of the Conservative Party, the government’s
action breaches “the fundamental undertaking Blair gave
to Bush” on Europe’s relation to America. “If
the government were really asserting NATO’s primacy,”
he said, “it would be asserting the primacy of the ‘Berlin
Plus’ accord we’ve agreed to, which provides for
‘separable but not separate’ EU forces,”
he added. (IHT October 15 2003)
BALKANS
- Serbs
and Kosovo Albanians met face-to-face on Tuesday in Vienna
for the first time since their war in 1999, but the talks
ended on a sour note with rival leaders clashing over the
future of the Balkan province. Kosovo’s
ethnic Albanian leaders insisted on outright independence,
and Serbs rejected such plans. The rivals refused even a ceremonial
handshake before the start of the talks, which were intended
merely to pave the way for future negotiations on everyday
issues burdening Kosovo, such as energy supplies, transportation,
missing persons and the return of refugees. “My
country, Kosovo, wants to become a part of the European Union
and NATO,” the Kosovo president, Ibrahim Rugova,
told the gathering. “This means a democratic,
peaceful and independent Kosovo.” “Independence
of Kosovo is an irreversible process,” said
Nexhat Daci, the president of the Kosovo Parliament. “Kosovo
is prepared to achieve that at any price,” he added.
But the Serbian deputy prime minister, Nebojsa Covic, made
it clear that the republic did not recognize Kosovo as anything
more than “one of its parts.” “There
can be no dialogue if it is not clear to everyone that we
are not talking as representatives of two states,” he
said. “Instead of using this Vienna meeting for a dialogue
on burning problems, Pristina officials keep on describing
Kosovo as an independent state,” he said. (IHT
October 15 2003)
|