|
SHAPE
News Summary & Analysis
13
October 2003
GENERAL
JONES
- More
on Gen. Jones’ remarks on NATO’s presence
in Bosnia
NRF
- Participation
in NRF could lead to changes in Berlin’s decision-making
process on troop deployment abroad
ESDP
- Britain,
France, Germany working on plans for closer defense
cooperation
OTHER NEWS
- Petition
for EU-wide ban on devices used to detect submarines
to be delivered to NATO headquarters
|
GENERAL JONES
- Gen.
Jones’ suggestion, at a Pentagon news conference Friday,
that Bosnia could be stable enough for NATO forces to withdraw
sometime next year is noted by the Washington Post. Under
the title, “Troops may leave Bosnia in ’04,
Commander says,” the daily quotes Gen. Jones
saying that if trends continue in the northern Balkans
nation, “during ’04, we could have a different
footprint there than we currently have.” As
the northern Balkans become more orderly, Gen. Jones reportedly
added, “we’re seeing in Bosnia a real
potential for ending the military mission there and transitioning
to … a presence that will be more based on establishing
police forces as a fundamental enforcer of the rule of law.”
Noting, however, that Gen. Jones said it was too early to
plan to end the parallel peacekeeping mission in Kosovo, the
article further quotes him saying: “I would
characterize Kosovo as somewhat different, because it’s
at a different stage in terms of its maturity.” The
newspaper comments that ending the U.S. mission in Bosnia
would ease strains on the military caused by the large occupation
of Iraq. It also would lessen Pentagon worries that post-Cold
War missions are open-ended efforts that have a “roach
motel” effect on troops, pulling them in but not allowing
them to leave. “Gen. Jones said Friday that
U.S. troops could be pulled out of Bosnia sometime next year,”
wrote the Boston Globe, Oct. 12, adding: “Officials
and analysts say Bosnia has moved past the thorniest worst
war issues, and the country’s politicians are now focusing
on more mundane issues like taxes and pensions. This has allowed
politicians to look toward goals that not long ago seemed
unattainable: eventual membership of NATO and the EU.”
NRF
- In
the wake of last week’s study seminar in Colorado Spring,
which explored the use of the NRF, German weekly Der Spiegel
speculates that the condition imposed by the Federal Constitutional
Court in 1994 that foreign missions outside the NATO area
require the “constitutive consent” of the Bundestag
could soon be razed. At
the seminar, Defense Minister Struck immediately realized
that the complicated rules under which Germany’s Bundeswehr
is sent to the scene of the action are unsuited, says the
article, adding: “A working group of the government
coalition has already been working for months on the draft
of ‘a parliamentary participation law.’
In Colorado Spring, Struck experienced how much that is needed.
He became painfully aware there that almost all of his colleagues
can decide on their own whether they will provide troops for
the NRF. Only he must still put up with a cabinet meeting,
three readings in the Bundestag and two sessions of the Defense
and Foreign Affairs committees. It is now possible for the
first time that the parliamentary proviso may disappear sooner
or later. In the early 1990s, the German parties wanted to
make foreign deployments of the Bundeswehr as difficult as
possible, so war would be the last resort. But today, Germany
is participating in eight international missions, the burden
of proof has reversed.” Sueddeutsche Zeitung, Oct. 11,
wrote: “It has long been clear what NATO intends. The
allies have been working since September of last year to create
a highly-equipped fighting unit that in principle can strike
at any time anywhere in the world within five days. This NRF
is designed to free hostages, chase terrorists or intervene
in rogue states that possess NBC weapons. No one makes a secret
of any of this. On the contrary, the ‘new NATO’
triumphantly displays its NRF on the Internet…. Things
get started Wednesday, when the first 6,000 troops of this
allied expeditionary corps will be ceremoniously presented….
To be sure, it can be, and indeed must be debated whether
the obligation to issue lighting-quick marching orders in
the NATO framework should now fall victim … of Parliament’s
say over war and peace.” Budapest’s Kossuth Radio,
quoted Hungarian Defense Minister Juhasz
saying meanwhile that Hungary is going to eliminate
itself from NATO cooperation unless it changes the decision-making
mechanism regarding joint missions. Hungary has achieved
serious progress in developing military capabilities and Hungary
is performing above the average of member states in various
military missions, Juhasz reportedly said. But, he warned,
“it must not be forgotten that because of the
cumbersome decision-making mechanism by Parliament, Hungary
is a hesitating … member of the Alliance.”
ESDP
- Britain,
France and Germany are working on plans for closer defense
cooperation with the EU. The three major European players
are at the moment working on developing plans for a unit which
can lead medium to long-term military operations,
reports Brussels’ EUobserver.com. If the work succeeds,
the EU will have taken a further step toward the development
of a common defense policy, says the report, claiming that
the issue was discussed Sunday when President Chirac met Chancellor
Schroeder in Paris. The report quotes unidentified diplomatic
sources saying that if London, Paris and Berlin agree
on an initiative, the Italian EU presidency is ready to table
the proposal at the Autumn Summit in Brussels Thursday. The
report adds: “The leaders of France and Germany reached
an agreement with Prime Minister Blair during a recent meeting
in Berlin on the principle of closer ties in the area of defense
and security among EU member states. They are said to have
agreed on the need to be able to plan and execute EU operations
independently of NATO, something Britain was earlier opposed
to. However, a previous proposal to establish a common headquarters
in Tervuren outside Brussels has been scrapped. Instead it
is likely that only a strategic headquarters will be in Belgium
or perhaps in the headquarters of the EU Military Committee
in Rue Cortenberg in Brussels. The operational center would
then be located nationally and could differ from operation
to operation.” Even though plans for the establishment
of an EU headquarters in Tervuren have been scrapped says
German weekly Der Spiegel, Britain, France and Germany are
working on a plan to create autonomous European military structures.
OTHER NEWS
- According
to the BBC World Service, Euro parliamentarians are
to deliver a 100,000-signature petition to NATO headquarters
in Brussels later Monday calling for an EU-wide ban on the
devices used to detect submarines. NATO officials have reportedly
agreed to meet the delegation to accept the petition signed
by nearly 100,000 citizens. Parliamentarians argue the use
of low frequency active sonar by NATO without proper studies
into its environmental impact is in breach of the UN convention
on the law of the sea, said the program. It noted
that the action comes days after scientists argued that sonar
signals may cause marine mammals internal injuries at close
range.
|