|
|||||
SHAPE News Summary & Analysis 30 April 2003
ESDP Several media reported on the results of the defense summit held yesterday in Brussels by the leaders of Belgium, France, Germany and Luxembourg. The summit, nicknamed by many as a “mini summit” for its limited participation, can nevertheless have significant implications in the future of transatlantic relations and also within Europe. The four countries that attended the summit, writes AFP, called on Tuesday for a new European headquarters to command military operations independent of NATO, although President Chirac and his partners from Germany, Belgium and Luxembourg, stressed they did not want to undermine the U.S.-European alliance or the 19-nation military bloc. But, the news agency argues, the proposals made at the summit have indeed the potential to provoke disquiet in Washington and London. In particular, the dispatch adds, talk of a new “European Security and Defense Union” (ESDU) could be viewed with suspicion in other EU capitals. A joint statement issued by the four leaders says that the ESDU would “gather those members states that are ready to go faster and further in strengthening their defense cooperation.” Such development, the report notes, raises the prospect of a TWO-SPEED Europe as the EU struggles to forge a common foreign and security policy. Furthermore, the four leaders reportedly instructed their defense ministers to “take the necessary steps to establish, not later than 2004, a multinational deployable force headquarters for joint operations.” The EU, the dispatch points out, is already setting up a 60,000-strong “Rapid Reaction Force” in partnership with NATO. Belgian Prime Minister Verhofstadt joined Chancellor Schröder in insisting the four countries’ initiative was open to the rest of the EU, after criticism of the summit by Britain, Italy, Spain and the Netherlands. The Independent speculates that the agreement to form a planning and command center for European military operations separate from NATO - although watered down from the original Belgian plan for a fully fledged EU military headquarters – will inevitably be presented in America, and by some in Britain, as part of a long-term strategy to undermine the western Alliance. President Chirac reportedly replied to Prime Minister Blair’s criticism in an interview to the Financial Times on Monday, which accused France of wanting a “multi-polar” world, that the world is inevitably multi-polar and what he wanted, like Prime Minister Blair, was a partnership with America based on equality and respect. A related article carried by the Financial Times, reports that Secretary of State Powell was critical of what he called “some kind of plan” to create a new EU military headquarters in Brussels. He reportedly said that what was needed was more military capabilities, not more headquarters. Of the four nations involved only France, the newspaper finally argued, has significantly increased its defense budget. Le Soir writes that the Belgian Prime Minister explains that this headquarters should be operational in the 2004 summer and based in a barracks at Tervueren. It will be able to plan and conduct military operations when NATO or the European structure of the Alliance do not want to intervene or when – and this could be very sensitive, adds the newspaper, the EU wants to intervene without NATO. The Brussels declaration, concludes the daily, do not contain what Belgium hoped: the names of officers and the contribution from the four countries. Moreover, The Daily Telegraph reports that a new Rapid Reaction Force will be built around the existing Franco-German brigade, taking in Belgian commandos and units from Luxembourg. It would answer to the headquarters to be established at Tervueren. IRAQ
U.S. TROOP REDEPLOYMENT
NATO
|
NEWSLETTER
|
Join the GlobalSecurity.org mailing list |
|
|